|
Valeyard posted:why is 16:10 good, dont tell me its because 16:9 monitors are rebranded tv panels More pixles 4 ur workspace Like 1920 x 1200 has another 120px of height to work with for more efficient computering. For video editing you can basically run a 1080p video full size and still have room for toolbars
|
# ? May 14, 2015 18:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2024 03:10 |
|
That being said if ur computer is only games and internet like mine who gives a gently caress
|
# ? May 14, 2015 18:12 |
|
32MB OF ESRAM posted:i got 2 mac cinema displays your pixels are too big. 3840x2160+ or trash
|
# ? May 14, 2015 18:23 |
|
Panty Saluter posted:That being said if ur computer is only games and internet like mine who gives a gently caress ur dumb eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
# ? May 14, 2015 18:56 |
|
Qwijib0 posted:your pixels are too big. gross
|
# ? May 14, 2015 18:57 |
|
the one port wonder is an okay laptop then better question find a pc labtop that has 16:10
|
# ? May 14, 2015 20:36 |
|
Valeyard posted:why is 16:10 good, dont tell me its because 16:9 monitors are rebranded tv panels 120 more pixels of height for workspace. 16:9 feels too narrow after you've used one
|
# ? May 14, 2015 20:37 |
|
*uses a nexus 7 in landscape mode to browse the web* goddamn i love this poo poo
|
# ? May 14, 2015 21:06 |
|
Panty Saluter posted:More pixles 4 ur workspace WOW i guess next time i edit a vidu
|
# ? May 14, 2015 21:10 |
|
Panty Saluter posted:More pixles 4 ur workspace EMILY BLUNTS posted:120 more pixels of height for workspace. 16:9 feels too narrow after you've used one hmm ok that actually sounds reasonable
|
# ? May 14, 2015 22:02 |
|
i don't notice a different btw 1080 and 1200 im also not video fanatic so take what u will from that
|
# ? May 14, 2015 22:34 |
|
you have the right attitude. caring is spergin
|
# ? May 15, 2015 02:30 |
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2024 03:10 |
|
32MB OF ESRAM posted:i got 2 mac cinema displays glossy bad matte good I'm rocking 2x 20" ACDs
|
# ? May 15, 2015 10:45 |