|
in general this show has been okay but wow that was boring
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 03:17 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:50 |
|
poop=nopoop
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 03:56 |
|
dadwdfgf33dfgf vv
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 03:57 |
|
i read a book recently that said sherlock holmes comes off as gay because he was based on oscar wilde, basically tumblr was right
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 04:23 |
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:i read a book recently that said sherlock holmes comes off as gay because he was based on oscar wilde, basically tumblr was right I thought he was just a dupin ripoff
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 05:20 |
|
i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 14:07 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting lmbo
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 14:38 |
|
did they ever do P=np on NUMB4RS?
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 14:42 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:I thought he was just a dupin ripoff yeah but dupin was gay too
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 14:54 |
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:yeah but dupin was gay too just because his name was "m. auguste" doesn't mean he's gay
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 15:01 |
|
prefect posted:just because his name was "m. auguste" doesn't mean he's gay if you know how 19th century people described gays its actually p. obvious in both cases
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 15:08 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 20, 2014 15:25 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:09 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:56 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:in general this show has been okay but wow that was boring zerocool is a better sherlock than khan but the cbs show suffers from the mandatory american procedural structure
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 06:11 |
|
someone break p=np in a explain like I'm a retard idiot poster
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 07:55 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 07:57 |
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i wish your posting would equal not posting
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 08:32 |
|
echinopsis posted:someone break p=np in a explain like I'm a retard idiot poster a p problem is a problem easily solved* by an algorithm an np problem is a problem that evidently cannot be easily solved by an algorithm as an example, brute forcing a cipher takes a long time and is an np problem. after generating a likely key you need to use the key to decode the document. without any other clues, one key is as good a guess as any other, but each bit n of key length represents 2^n bits of keys that need to be checked. actually decoding a document is a p problem. you apply the correct key and the encrypted document becomes cleartext. if p=np, there exists some currently unknown aglorithm that lets you solve np problems quickly. since this would destroy the global economy it's probably a good thing p!=np e: * by easily solved or quickly solved i mean solved in polynomial time angry_keebler fucked around with this message at 09:37 on Aug 21, 2014 |
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:18 |
|
echinopsis posted:someone break p=np in a explain like I'm a retard idiot poster P stands for polynomial time and NP stands for nondeterministic polynomial time (that doesn't help you understand what's it about, I just want to feel like I'm better than simon singh here) (also I'm breaking all the posting = not posting jokes itt) problems in P are relatively easy to solve (I'll call easy = polynomial just to sound a little less abstract) nobody was able to show an easy way to solve a sudoku, it's the kind of problem that can easily blow up but it's a special problem because if I[1] give you all the answers[2] (I mean, I tell you all the red numbers) it's easy to verify if those answers solve the sudoku or not. this is basically what it means for a problem to be in NP: if I give you all the answers it's easy to prove that my answers are correct I guess it's intuitive to see that if it's easy to find a solution yourself then it'll be at least equally as easy to verify if a solution I give you is correct the other way around is a loving mystery and nobody knows [1] here I'm the benevolent NONDETERMINISTIC ORACLE mechanism. yeah, that's a technical term and it's cool as heck, mods namechange [2] the answers is what people usually call a certificate
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:19 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:NONDETERMINISTIC ORACLE still at delphi right??? or are u a sibylline book??
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:28 |
|
angry_keebler posted:a p problem is a problem easily solved* by an algorithm so some people are aall like "mother fuckin p == np!"
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:41 |
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:i read a book recently that said sherlock holmes comes off as gay because he was based on oscar wilde, basically tumblr was right anyone who knows anything understands that holmes comes off as gay because he's english hth also I've never watched sherlock because it's probably bad but sometimes i watch elementary because lucy liu is hot but then the walking autism comes on screen and i change the channel
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:48 |
|
also back in the day everyone was hell of gay
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 09:49 |
|
I just gave a vagrant money bc he said Steve Jobs is not dead
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:03 |
|
echinopsis posted:so some people are aall like "mother fuckin p == np!" well, probably the idea that p=np would destroy public key cryptography is a little bit of a simplification because it's likely that a polynomial time solution could still be practically too expensive, if not principally so although the idea of p=np forcing amazon to deliver by secure armed drone a one time pad to each customer so they can continue to order knicknacks appeals to my inner cyberpunk angry_keebler fucked around with this message at 10:08 on Aug 21, 2014 |
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:05 |
|
kraftwerk singles posted:I just gave a vagrant money bc he said Steve Jobs is not dead this is v good
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:10 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:anyone who knows anything understands that holmes comes off as gay because he's english hth hmmm.... the english are gay
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:12 |
|
theadder posted:this is v good
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:15 |
|
and yet he lives
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:16 |
|
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:18 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:50 |
|
angry_keebler posted:well, probably in 2002 some indian guys found a polynomial algorithm to verify if a number is prime. theoretically speaking it was a huge surprising discovery to the whole P = NP debacle for practical purposes it was worthless because the already known probabilistic algorithms were much more efficient something similar will probably happen if P happens to be NP
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 10:21 |