|
sure if the plane was a super saiyan
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 12:49 |
|
|
i think that if a plane hit a train or vice versa it would be bad for both of them op
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:51
|
|
|
Still jet fuel and derailment
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:51
|
|
|
I just wanna know who's paying thousands of dollars for train simulators!? It's literally on rails!! At least airplanes are nonlinear transport and cockpits are cool as he*k
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:51
|
|
|
same except that it would be your bung and my dilz. that poo poo would be DEVESTATED. RAVISHED. pm me :bigtran:
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:52
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:I just wanna know who's paying thousands of dollars for train simulators!? It's literally on rails!! They should at least throw in the random suicide or livestock every once in a while.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:54
|
|
|
Meters per kilo per second? What the gently caress kind of retarded math is this? Joules please, this ain't retarded amerimath with foot pounds and other bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:58
|
|
|
A train is made of sturdier materials than a plane because a plane needs to sacrifice collision tolerance for less weight so it can fly more cheaply, so the plane will break first. Replace the train with an egg with a thick shell and the plane with an egg with a thin shell and you can see what happens. Also imagine that you are moving alongside the plane, so the plane is moving at 0 MPH, yet the outcome of the collision stays the same. Makes you think.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:00
|
|
|
NihilismNow posted:Meters per kilo per second? What the gently caress kind of retarded math is this? Joules please, this ain't retarded amerimath with foot pounds and other bullshit. I had joules initially and it was like 42.7 mega joules vs 2.76 gigajoules but 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:03
|
|
|
WilltheMagicAsian posted:They should at least throw in the random suicide or livestock every once in a while. there's nothing to train for, there's literally nothing the engineer can do
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:12
|
|
|
Here is what one train car blowing up looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf3WKTwHpIU
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:15
|
|
|
Just checking in to ask if anyone's owned you for your improper use of 'decimated' yet or do I have to be the pedant
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:25
|
|
|
Flagrant Abuse posted:i'm pretty sure an airplane at speed would destroy more than 1/10th of the train, op really, most of the back parts of the train would be destroyed by running into the front parerts of the train which have stopped.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:28
|
|
|
Medicinal Penguin posted:lol, your numbers are the most heavy plane on earth fully loaded versus a train that's like 2 cars. 150 tons for a train is some pussy poo poo, nobody ever takes a train out that light. but thomas only took those 2 coach cars
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:31
|
|
|
Video taping the radio. They might check your tapes but they'll never think to check videos for your hit tunes E; Wrong thread but I think it sill stands
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
TOILETLORD posted:i flushed a train toilet in station before. are you implying that it would just vent the poo poo directly onto the ground that is kinda absurd??? or is this like some old rear end train in a country with poo poo infrastructure quote:This assumes the train is carrying 150 tons and the plane is carrying 220 tons 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 12:29
|
|
|
concerned mom posted:Just checking in to ask if anyone's owned you for your improper use of 'decimated' yet or do I have to be the pedant Sorry I'm not from the fifteenth century 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 15:23
|
|
|
I'm sorry, the plane would get owned. What kind of retarded question is this. There's a good chance the train won't even stop or get derailed assuming this is a head-on-somehow-the-plane-is-on-the-rails-coming-the-other-way retard question
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 15:33
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:The plane would have 2.7 giga joules of energy why do they have to fight?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 15:52
|
|
|
OP You're looking at this the wrong way. It doesn't really matter what their relative kinetic energy is but the strength and mass of the materials they're built by. Think of it this way, there's just this building sized hunk of diamond that's not moving anywhere, it would have 0 kinetic energy. But if a plane flew into it, the diamond would be relatively unharmed compared to the new state of the plane. Trains tend to be made of heavier sturdier materials that would almost undoubtedly fair better in a crash than the light stuff they need to make planes from, whether or not the train was even moving.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 16:14
|
|
|
What if the plane was on a treadmill and the train refused to tip if it didn't get enough soda refills?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 23:18
|
|
|
Like whales and giant squid, planes and trains are natural enemies
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 23:34
|
|
|
oh yeah??? what if it's a 10,000ton freight train??? did you ever thing of that op? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 23:36
|
|
|
What about a container ship?
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:14
|
|
|
this is a useless discussion unless people are going to specify the make and model of the train or container ship of their choosing
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
After we're done can we stomp around and kick the trains like godzilla? And do we get imitation crab meat?
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:29
|
|
|
null posted:Like whales and giant squid, planes and trains are natural enemies so much tragedy and senseless violence
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:32
|
|
|
And what about the Tectonic plates in all off this shaming and decimating? A plate colliding would remove all trace of a plane /or a mere train from the earth's crust. i.imgur.com/ltXdUakl.jpg
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:36
|
|
|
Robbie Fowler posted:After we're done can we stomp around and kick the trains like godzilla? And do we get imitation crab meat? Dont break they are my sons
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
The OP is a great example of an utter lack of critical thinking. It's quite impressive actually. And I do realize the poster acknowledged using poorly chosen number, later, but still... Grabbed some numbers from WIKI, plugged in some algebra, spit out some garbage and made a declaration. That was completely devoid of any critical thinking. Quick, simple, and stupid. Truly pure. Not even a vague hint that any actual thinking had been applied. It not like you could look at a picture of a train and a plane, travel on either, see them in real life, and at least consider the slight possibility that "hey, these numbers seem a bit out of whack. I wonder if my premise was accurate?" Nope. Not necessary. Just going to vomit some garbage out. Setting new bars, lower than ever before.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:50
|
|
|
Internetjack posted:The OP is a great example of an utter lack of critical thinking. It's quite impressive actually. And I do realize the poster acknowledged using poorly chosen number, later, but still... this is a great example of a bad post
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 01:58
|
|
|
Hey op, a cat that weighs 600 pounds (imagine Totoro) crashes into that girl you met on Tinder last week. I looked up the speed of light on Wikipedia and multiplied that by the current time (UTC). Add the 1 carry the 8, and by my calculations you're a fat lonely goon
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 02:03
|
|
|
yeah maybe if both the train and the plane were both just solid cubes of matter u dumb idiot planes are built to be light and hollow, trains are thick and have bigass engines.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
OP is right Planes vs Trains https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqN_Pd58MFw
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU1_L5ww3og F3AR THE F40PH
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 02:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 12:49 |
|
|
So if we could find a way to make trains that don't need tracks we could weaponize them and create the most terrifying armored vehicles in human history? Like armored basilisks killdozing the land
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 03:35
|
|
