|
I am really very glad that McMillan is in instead of the faster, more intelligent, more skilled Kennins because
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:17 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 03:06 |
|
JawKnee posted:I am really very glad that McMillan is in instead of the faster, more intelligent, more skilled Kennins because What kind of a name is Ronalds anyways?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:18 |
|
JawKnee posted:I am really very glad that McMillan is in instead of the faster, more intelligent, more skilled Kennins because Desjardins is just Torts with wins at this point. His personnel decisions have been beyond baffling at times.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:19 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Desjardins is just Torts with wins at this point. His personnel decisions have been beyond baffling at times. How does he react to the opponent's personnel decisions?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:20 |
|
Zodijackylite posted:How does he react to the opponent's personnel decisions? With team building exercises. Actually he's nothing like Torts. God dammit why are we getting Allstar quick tonight?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:22 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Desjardins is just Torts with wins at this point. His personnel decisions have been beyond baffling at times. Every time I see Kennins take a run at someone I'm like 'man, that is the kind of poo poo that a 4th liner would do if he couldn't do anything else' but the kid also has hands, and moves, and eyes. It's so cool to watch him play and apparently no one on the management sees it.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:23 |
|
JawKnee posted:Every time I see Kennins take a run at someone I'm like 'man, that is the kind of poo poo that a 4th liner would do if he couldn't do anything else' but the kid also has hands, and moves, and eyes. It's so cool to watch him play and apparently no one on the management sees it. Yeah he and Horvat have Sedin level chemistry and they've even admitted it themselves. You have to figure that Kenins doesn't work in practice or something because from an on ice performance perspective he's been a world class fourth liner this year.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:25 |
|
GAME KILLING PP COMING UP
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:26 |
|
This has been a very effective powerplay. Keep it up boys. I'm sorry for mocking you!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:28 |
|
EDLER
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:29 |
|
I like how Willie doesn't even bother with a second unit anymore. All Sedins all the time.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:31 |
|
Wippersnapper posted:What kind of a name is Ronalds anyways? the best name.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:32 |
|
Please don't gently caress this up Vancouver.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:33 |
|
hank!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:34 |
|
Hank!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:34 |
|
Mmm, yes,
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:35 |
|
phew. you are going to have to see my rear end in a top hat with a microscope if smith is going to post a .940 for the rest of the season
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:36 |
|
I guess I can see the logic in bringing McMillan in tonight. It's his birthday and a game against his old team so certainty one he'd want to play in. He's too lovely to replace anyone but a 4th liner though so if the coach wants to get him in for the sake of being a nice guy who the players all like then kenins is the only choice to sit.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:36 |
|
woop woop 2 more points!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:37 |
|
Hey so Markstrom is perfectly adequate, who'd have thunk it.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:37 |
|
Franks Happy Place posted:Hey so Markstrom is perfectly adequate, who'd have thunk it. shots were 44 to 25 that was all Nucks offense tonight (strange to watch, after the rest of the season) Markstrom managed, which doesn't say much against the Yotes.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:39 |
|
Yeah good for Markstrom he played well, but the Yotes were basically Mike Smith and a bunch of people trying to lose. It's hard to put a great deal of stock in the winning goaltender's play after such an anemic offensive display against him.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:41 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Yeah good for Markstrom he played well, but the Yotes were basically Mike Smith and a bunch of people trying to lose. It's hard to put a great deal of stock in the winning goaltender's play after such an anemic offensive display against him.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 03:50 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 03:06 |
|
Markstrom honestly kinda looked like crap, but whatever. Win is a win.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2015 04:33 |