Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Prorat
Aug 3, 2004

by FactsAreUseless

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GastonEatTheEggs
Nov 7, 2012

Supreme Commander is real strategy and Starcraft is just a game of who can click stuff faster.

Dicere
Oct 31, 2005
Non plaudite modo pecuniam jacite.

P-Mack posted:

It should be like "The Wizard" where everyone's like "Super Mario THREE???! We haven't trained for this!"

eSports would be way way better like this. I'd sit through a half hour Starcraft match (or however long that poo poo takes) if, at the end of it, they switched over to GoldenEye, then over to Age of Empires, then some beta version of a game in development, then to Fallout 1 (if neither of you bring back the water chip in 30 days, you BOTH lose), then DOTA or some stupid poo poo, over to Soul Caliber. Final Round: Independence Day - the pinball game.

Having a competition and earning actual money for being good at one video game you're really good at would have sounded self-centered when I was 13, let alone as an adult.

P-Mack
Nov 10, 2007

Planarch posted:

Supreme Commander is real strategy and Starcraft is just a game of who can click stuff faster.

In all seriousness, Supreme Commander would have been absolutely incredible if it got patched and improved for years after release like StarCraft.

FedEx Mercury
Jan 7, 2004

Me bad posting? That's unpossible!
Lipstick Apathy

toggle posted:

do these electronic sports team have training sessions? what do they train? map layouts? do the tournaments have special unseen maps just for the tournament? because that would actually show legitimate skills and tactics instead of hiding behind a door on a map they've been playing since 1998

I think they should do both. One established map, and one wildcard to see which team is better at organizing and thinking on the fly.

a bay
Oct 14, 2014

by Lowtax
I think Badeball would be watchable if they randomly had spikes or lava pits on the field, and then after every game the players had to do Double Dare style challenges.

Helpimscared
Jun 16, 2014

I think esports are pretty cool OP, they give me the option to get a scholarship and make money without really having to move.

E: As a side note athletes are over payed.

Helpimscared fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Apr 6, 2015

a shiny rock
Nov 13, 2009

Dicere posted:

eSports would be way way better like this. I'd sit through a half hour Starcraft match (or however long that poo poo takes) if, at the end of it, they switched over to GoldenEye, then over to Age of Empires, then some beta version of a game in development, then to Fallout 1 (if neither of you bring back the water chip in 30 days, you BOTH lose), then DOTA or some stupid poo poo, over to Soul Caliber. Final Round: Independence Day - the pinball game.

Having a competition and earning actual money for being good at one video game you're really good at would have sounded self-centered when I was 13, let alone as an adult.

yeah being good at several video games makes you cool

Extra Large Marge
Jan 21, 2004

Fun Shoe
The playing video games for money thing makes sense, I mean people will bet on anything.

I just can't believe they get so many fans to show up to these events to watch people play DOTA live.

Prorat
Aug 3, 2004

by FactsAreUseless
"athletes are overpaid"

apparently there is a natural or divine amount that people should be paid.

socialist scum.

ArbitraryC
Jan 28, 2009
Pick a number, any number
Pillbug

Fergus Mac Roich posted:

i would say the most damning thing about esports is that their fans get desperate for some sense of legitimacy. i do get into esports sometimes(not watching any currently) but i don't see why i should care if the public at large is interested, it's not like there's a lack of content or players.
Eh I dunno if that's fair. Pretty much the only time I ever hear anyone mention esports is to poo poo on them, like in the OP. Esports people pretty much only argue about the validity of their hobby when someone else starts the fight.

ColoradoCleric posted:

Competitive smash no items because I'm a baby that can't adapt fluidly to random situations
I played smash pretty seriously back in high school with some friends and the reason for this is because items are really strong and the spawns are random. It's not about not being able to adapt to surprise situations (as that was one of the main focuses of the game), it was about trying to eliminate large advantages you get solely due to chance.

People also tend to exaggerate smash tourny rules way too much. Only a couple stages were banned, it wasn't fox on fd only or whatever weird misconceptions people had. The few banned stages were again ones where it gave specific characters way too strong of an advantage or simply added too much chance to the game.

The rules were largely added because the game wasn't designed to balance in mind, it was supposed to be a party game not a serious fighter. That's why they added tripping to brawl; it was an intentional barrier to competitive play. The unique stocking system made for a super cool and strategic fighting game though, so people did their best to come up with rules that let people play on equal ground where skill determines the outcome of the match. If you want to play it like a party game that's totally fine, but its simply not a balanced competitive game with items on.

BigBoss
Jan 26, 2012

by Lowtax
*fap fap fap fap* My God...simply gorgeous!

Fergus Mac Roich
Nov 5, 2008

Soiled Meat

ArbitraryC posted:

Eh I dunno if that's fair. Pretty much the only time I ever hear anyone mention esports is to poo poo on them, like in the OP. Esports people pretty much only argue about the validity of their hobby when someone else starts the fight.

I uses to read and sometimes post on Team Liquid Dot Net so I know there's more to it than that

ArbitraryC
Jan 28, 2009
Pick a number, any number
Pillbug

Fergus Mac Roich posted:

I uses to read and sometimes post on Team Liquid Dot Net so I know there's more to it than that

I mean yeah they talk about esports on esports forums but in gbs for example 100% of the threads on the topic were made to make fun of them. People aren't going out of their way to tell you to watch them.

Starving Autist
Oct 20, 2007

by Ralp
I played varsity DOTA back in high school... those were truly the best years of my life.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,
I was captain of the chess team. Nbd

e: btw if any non-sport got into the Olympics it would be chess. Already chess players have to take doping tests as an IOC measure. Also chess will never be in the Olympics

Ocean Book
Sep 27, 2010

:yum: - hi

ArbitraryC posted:


I played smash pretty seriously back in high school with some friends and the reason for this is because items are really strong and the spawns are random. It's not about not being able to adapt to surprise situations (as that was one of the main focuses of the game), it was about trying to eliminate large advantages you get solely due to chance.



You can still have a valid competitive environment with items enabled though, and items are cooler and better than no items, especially given item throwing. Over time the randomness evens out and the better players will have a higher win percentage.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Ocean Book posted:

You can still have a valid competitive environment with items enabled though, and items are cooler and better than no items, especially given item throwing. Over time the randomness evens out and the better players will have a higher win percentage.

also if you want a serious eSport don't play smash problem solved

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



I play smash with no items because we had a friend who would just run around and collect items and just talk massive poo poo when he got a hammer and thought he was some kinda golden god.

He kinda sucked so we started playing without items so he wouldn't play with us.

Starving Autist
Oct 20, 2007

by Ralp
Playing with items on is a different game, it adds variance but variance does not eliminate the advantage that skill provides, it does change which skills are relevant, though. Poker has variance and you see people consistently put up results and make a living off it; that isn't just luck. If you want a deterministic game play chess or something, just don't try poker and get mad that it isn't more like chess when you refuse to treat it like a different game.

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



Starving Autist posted:

Playing with items on is a different game, it adds variance but variance does not eliminate the advantage that skill provides, it does change which skills are relevant, though. Poker has variance and you see people consistently put up results and make a living off it; that isn't just luck. If you want a deterministic game play chess or something, just don't try poker and get mad that it isn't more like chess when you refuse to treat it like a different game.

i see you're doing a great job keeping up the "autist" portion of your name but i would appreciate it if you put more effort into the "starving" portion, preferably by starving yourself to death.

Starving Autist
Oct 20, 2007

by Ralp

Business Gorillas posted:

i see you're doing a great job keeping up the "autist" portion of your name but i would appreciate it if you put more effort into the "starving" portion, preferably by starving yourself to death.

I would argue that wishing death on internet strangers over smash bros is more indicative of autism than having a basic understanding of how games work, but :shrug:

ArbitraryC
Jan 28, 2009
Pick a number, any number
Pillbug

Ocean Book posted:

You can still have a valid competitive environment with items enabled though, and items are cooler and better than no items, especially given item throwing. Over time the randomness evens out and the better players will have a higher win percentage.

And yet people who are good at the game consistently find it a shittier game at a high level play when items are on. I mean I get what you're saying in that statistically over a broad enough number of games the chance element should be neutral to both players (ignoring that certain characters like fox are going to benefit from items significantly more than larger more sluggish ones), but when you have tournaments where only the top 8 or whatever play longer matches no one wants to leave to something that was largely beyond their control in that particular game.


eSports Chaebol posted:

also if you want a serious eSport don't play smash problem solved

This is more the valid point though, the smash community was just trying to make the game fit to a competitive esport because the stage/life system was amazingly cool but realistically the game just wasn't meant for that kind of scene.

Do it ironically
Jul 13, 2010

by Pragmatica

ArbitraryC posted:

Eh I dunno if that's fair. Pretty much the only time I ever hear anyone mention esports is to poo poo on them, like in the OP. Esports people pretty much only argue about the validity of their hobby when someone else starts the fight.

I played smash pretty seriously back in high school with some friends and the reason for this is because items are really strong and the spawns are random. It's not about not being able to adapt to surprise situations (as that was one of the main focuses of the game), it was about trying to eliminate large advantages you get solely due to chance.

People also tend to exaggerate smash tourny rules way too much. Only a couple stages were banned, it wasn't fox on fd only or whatever weird misconceptions people had. The few banned stages were again ones where it gave specific characters way too strong of an advantage or simply added too much chance to the game.

The rules were largely added because the game wasn't designed to balance in mind, it was supposed to be a party game not a serious fighter. That's why they added tripping to brawl; it was an intentional barrier to competitive play. The unique stocking system made for a super cool and strategic fighting game though, so people did their best to come up with rules that let people play on equal ground where skill determines the outcome of the match. If you want to play it like a party game that's totally fine, but its simply not a balanced competitive game with items on.

i read every word of this

Do it ironically
Jul 13, 2010

by Pragmatica
please tell me more about how you competitvely play a childs video game

ArbitraryC
Jan 28, 2009
Pick a number, any number
Pillbug

Do it ironically posted:

please tell me more about how you competitvely play a childs video game

As a literal child.

hemale in pain
Jun 5, 2010




ArbitraryC posted:

Eh I dunno if that's fair. Pretty much the only time I ever hear anyone mention esports is to poo poo on them, like in the OP. Esports people pretty much only argue about the validity of their hobby when someone else starts the fight.

I played smash pretty seriously back in high school with some friends and the reason for this is because items are really strong and the spawns are random. It's not about not being able to adapt to surprise situations (as that was one of the main focuses of the game), it was about trying to eliminate large advantages you get solely due to chance.

People also tend to exaggerate smash tourny rules way too much. Only a couple stages were banned, it wasn't fox on fd only or whatever weird misconceptions people had. The few banned stages were again ones where it gave specific characters way too strong of an advantage or simply added too much chance to the game.

The rules were largely added because the game wasn't designed to balance in mind, it was supposed to be a party game not a serious fighter. That's why they added tripping to brawl; it was an intentional barrier to competitive play. The unique stocking system made for a super cool and strategic fighting game though, so people did their best to come up with rules that let people play on equal ground where skill determines the outcome of the match. If you want to play it like a party game that's totally fine, but its simply not a balanced competitive game with items on.

mmm interesting

Dr. Carwash
Sep 16, 2006

Senpai...

Dicere posted:

Having a competition and earning actual money for being good at one video game you're really good at would have sounded self-centered when I was 13, let alone as an adult.

grats on saying the stupidest/most nonsensical thing itt

Prorat
Aug 3, 2004

by FactsAreUseless
You are an elitist douche if you don't play Smash the correct way, which is with items ON.

a shiny rock
Nov 13, 2009

i think video games are better when you take the fun parts out

White Noise Marine
Apr 14, 2010

THE PENETRATOR posted:

poker, like chess, is actually interesting to watch if you're not extremely invested in it


a game similar to dota/league/cs/etc in that you wouldn't watch ever if you weren't entirely about it: golf

Poker fun to watch? Your an idiot.

Level Slide
Jan 4, 2011

Prorat posted:

You are an elitist douche if you don't play Smash the correct way, which is with items ON.

I do, except only with the explosives and the drop rate is at max.

Nanomashoes
Aug 18, 2012

toggle posted:

do these electronic sports team have training sessions? what do they train? map layouts? do the tournaments have special unseen maps just for the tournament? because that would actually show legitimate skills and tactics instead of hiding behind a door on a map they've been playing since 1998

Tournaments don't debut new maps, no, because there'd be no way to guarantee that the maps would be balanced without people having played a million games on them to figure everything out. I don't know much about professional FPS play, but I do know that there are a number of different strategies that the teams practice because in the few CS GO games I've watched you see the players throwing out smoke grenades in very specific locations at very specific timings to produce some pretty cool results. Pro MOBA players have gone on record saying that they practice 10+ hours a day before big tournaments, usually by scrimming against other pro teams, with both teams in an agreement in regards to what heroes are going to be picked so that they can try out new strategies.

Dicere
Oct 31, 2005
Non plaudite modo pecuniam jacite.

Dr. Carwash posted:

grats on saying the stupidest/most nonsensical thing itt

I can't take all of the credit. Robitussin deserves at least some of the praise.

What I'm saying is, I'm not terribly impressed if some kid kicks rear end in Starcraft and only Starcraft. Now if a kid kicked rear end at drat near any game he/she touched, that might be more enticing to watch. It seems to me to be a little immature to play a game and think "I am SO AWESOME at this game. They should have a tournament with a stage and a cheering crowd and announcers and I can show the world I'm the very best at [insert game title here]." That's poo poo a 9 year old would dream up and now it's real. What the gently caress.

Let me know when there's a tournament for Syphon Filter on the PS1, because I'll take home the gold for USA.

Fergus Mac Roich
Nov 5, 2008

Soiled Meat

Nanomashoes posted:

Tournaments don't debut new maps, no, because there'd be no way to guarantee that the maps would be balanced without people having played a million games on them to figure everything out. I don't know much about professional FPS play, but I do know that there are a number of different strategies that the teams practice because in the few CS GO games I've watched you see the players throwing out smoke grenades in very specific locations at very specific timings to produce some pretty cool results. Pro MOBA players have gone on record saying that they practice 10+ hours a day before big tournaments, usually by scrimming against other pro teams, with both teams in an agreement in regards to what heroes are going to be picked so that they can try out new strategies.

in starcraft 1 the organization behind the tournaments also had professional map makers who would make and test maps and then send them to the pro teams who would develop strategies in anticipation of the upcoming "season"

and games are waaaay more interesting when the players get to prepare

butt implants
Oct 16, 2004

i'm gay
shut the gently caress up and stop real talking

big sexy
Apr 7, 2015

by XyloJW
:iamafag:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AZ Guy
Apr 7, 2015

by Ralp
:iamafag:

  • Locked thread