|
Pleads posted:2+ minutes, no replay. Show the loving replay Sportsnet I miss TSN
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:49 |
|
|
Hey sportsnet, where's the replay.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:11
|
|
|
Look Around You posted:nbcsn showed it and perry is pretty much laying on ramo's leg and shoving his stick over ramo's. bless him
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:11
|
|
|
Pleads posted:2+ minutes, no replay. Show the loving replay Sportsnet NBC showed it. Pretty questionable goal if you ask me. Series enders always count though. See: Hull, Brett.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:11
|
|
|
If I were a flames fan and not just bandwagoning I'd be absolutely livid holy gently caress
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:11
|
|
|
ty Sportsnet
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
This goal brought to you by not loving calling anything in the crease the last 4 games.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
good goal 
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
OK, thanks Sportsnet I guess we don't need to see that controversial goal.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
do people actually think that goal shoulda been called back?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:NBC showed it. Pretty questionable goal if you ask me. I mean this is a lot more egregious than brett hull's, who just had his foot somewhere that it technically shouldn't have been. Perry was literally on top of ramo's leg obviously impeding him from recovering
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Angry Asian posted:do people actually think that goal shoulda been called back? I'm angry that they've been running through the crease the entire series not getting poo poo called and the series winner involves Corey loving Perry bumping into the goalie.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
i really wanted the flames to win and that goal was questionable but dind't really seem like that big of a non call *weird kirby shrugging emoticon that a false always makes*
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
Angry Asian posted:do people actually think that goal shoulda been called back? Yeah, it is pretty dumb too.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
Look Around You posted:I mean this is a lot more egregious than brett hull's, who just had his foot somewhere that it technically shouldn't have been. Perry was literally on top of ramo's leg obviously impeding him from recovering Nah. Hull's was 100% against the rules at the time. This is borderline based on current rules. I'd like to see it reviewed but I'm not sure the call changes.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
Also they can't review goalie interference, it was called a good goal on the ice, it is a goal, series over.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
Get home to the handshake line. Congrats to the literally hundreds of Ducks fans worldwide
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
It doesn't because what goal was ever controversial when scored or called back based on goaltender interference!
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:Nah. Hull's was 100% against the rules at the time. This is borderline based on current rules. I'd like to see it reviewed but I'm not sure the call changes. I'm not arguing based on the legality (as you said, Hull's was definitely illegal then), but in terms of actual impact on the play, Perry's is like 50x worse.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
There was definitely contact, I guess the argument would be that it didn't prevent Ramo from making the save. Which I kinda see. gently caress corey perry all the same.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
Look Around You posted:I mean this is a lot more egregious than brett hull's, who just had his foot somewhere that it technically shouldn't have been. Perry was literally on top of ramo's leg obviously impeding him from recovering imo much less egregious than hull's b/c his was a violation of what was essentially a black-and-white rule. much like the current Worst Penalty, it's a dumb rule, but it's just about as objective a call as you can get in a sport. this was maybe interference, to be honest i've only seen whatever replay they've showed on nbcsn like twice so i dunno, but it didn't really seem THAT bad edit Look Around You posted:I'm not arguing based on the legality (as you said, Hull's was definitely illegal then), but in terms of actual impact on the play, Perry's is like 50x worse. well ok yeah
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
Flames were being butchered the whole (albeit short) OT. It was inevitable.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:17
|
|
|
Oh well. The better team won in the end. We started the season as cannon fodder and draft lottery contenders, overcame countless deficits and Giordano's injury, beat our biggest rivals in the playoffs, and gave a far more talented team a good run in the second round. Any team can throw #NeverQuit up on Twitter; the Flames lived it all season long. That's more than enough for me.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:49 |
|
|
Goddamn Caps better get their poo poo together so there's a team I actually like playing next round.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 06:25
|
|
