|
Does anyone have the male version of this?
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
Weener Beater posted:Does anyone have the male version of this? why? so you can jack it?
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
ninjatang posted:why? so you can jack it? i jack to everything. But I really want to map all of male and female conquests to these charts and generate my average score level
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
It's below average
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
Weener Beater posted:i jack to everything. But I really want to map all of male and female conquests to these charts and generate my average score level you're being too ambitious.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:23
|
|
|
Lol @ at a former mod getting upset a reg from 2006 knows the exact same things everyone on SA knows about him if they joined within the last 12 months
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:Lol @ at a former mod getting upset a reg from 2006 knows the exact same things everyone on SA knows about him if they joined within the last 12 months who are you talking about?
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:46
|
|
|
Weener Beater posted:Does anyone have the male version of this? 
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
whack. they could've found better pictures.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
Weener Beater posted:Does anyone have the male version of this? 
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:08
|
|
|
wait, all the 10 guys wear makeup and spend hours on their appearance everyday? im in
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
I like humpeng
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
naem posted:I like humpeng my couch fixed
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
Thank you!! Calculating now....... Weener Beater fucked around with this message at 21:04 on Jul 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
Lol at some of the celebrity placement on this one Wat? No Lowtax as a 3?
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
ah yes, excellent! more helpful tips from the reddit website
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
This is a great chart for gay men. No srsly female attraction doesn't work like this, modern advertising is made primarily for gay men because women tend to go along with it more or less. Random: http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/ Women rate something like 80% of guys below average, so the 6-8 on that chart should be a 3, and the 4+ range is a question mark. e: Examples of maximally attractive men according to OKC women:   ...yeah I don't loving know either. revdrkevind fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Jul 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 21:36
|
|
ME
|
im at least a 7.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
my 10 guy does not wear make up unless he needs it for his job. (actor/burgler/marine etc)
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
revdrkevind posted:This is a great chart for gay men. yea but look at the chicks on okcupid.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
i got rated 9.6 on the original hot or not website back when it started pm me babes
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
no living girl is below my standards although i have been fooled before
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
revdrkevind posted:This is a great chart for gay men. so you're saying women are vapid cunts?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
david... posted:i got rated 9.6 on the original hot or not website back when it started pm me babes Is that website still around?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
revdrkevind posted:This is a great chart for gay men. Bottom pic looks lik me except with white skin.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
porkchop_express posted:no living girl is below my standards By a shemale.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
i refuse to date any woman who answers the okcupid question about the earth orbiting the sun incorrectly. my life revolves around heliocentrism.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 04:01
|
|
|
The 7s are hotter than the 9s on this one.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
LOVE LOVE SKELETON posted:i refuse to date any woman who answers the okcupid question about the earth orbiting the sun incorrectly. my life revolves around heliocentrism. You buffoon. Those are the ones you DO date.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
i was fully expecting to see barnacle jim photoshopped into this pic, disappointed
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
TeamIce posted:i was fully expecting to see barnacle jim photoshopped into this pic, disappointed Who?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
10. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 05:40
|
|
|
TeamIce posted:i was fully expecting to see barnacle jim photoshopped into this pic, disappointed I think the numbers are based on face attractiveness not length.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
Shithouse Dave posted:That was very flippant of me and you are right. It's just surprising to me that so many goons take issue with my tastes. Prob because the ones that don't really aren't bothering with posting. FWIW, your list doesn't seem all that unreasonable to me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
circ dick soleil posted:I think the numbers are based on face attractiveness not length. Face attractiveness = small length.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
ninjatang posted:Face attractiveness = small length. Its science
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 15:56
|
|
|
revdrkevind posted:Random:
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 16:37
|
|
|
ArbitraryC posted:I think that has more to do with the gender divide on online dating than women necessarily having unreasonable standards. Of course when the guys vastly outnumber the girls they're going to be more picky, they can afford to be. Guys would do the exact same thing if it were the other way around. exactly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
Counterpoint:
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 18:06
|
|
