Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Spoke Lee
Dec 31, 2004

chairizard lol

Flocons de Jambon posted:

Don't start wars if you don't like massacres :shrug:

Lay out your timeline of events leading up to this. I want to know what order you think events transpired to lead you to this view.

Spoke Lee fucked around with this message at 06:59 on Nov 1, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Flocons de Jambon
Apr 11, 2015
I'm not a specimen for your examination. You'll just have to live your life knowing someone doesn't share your world view.

I'm content to point out that if you think Assad has any plans for the "extermination" of Sunni Syria, you're bonkers.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Flocons de Jambon posted:

I'm content to point out that if you think Assad has any plans for the extermination of Sunni Syria, you're bonkers.

Wait, yet again, is this a post from 2010?

Flocons de Jambon
Apr 11, 2015
Like, if they surrender tomorrow, he'd probably only kill the leadership. He probably wouldn't exterminate the population.

Flocons de Jambon
Apr 11, 2015

Bip Roberts posted:

Wait, yet again, is this a post from 2010?

It's almost as if I don't see the Syrian War as something Assad up and chose to do like you or I would choose to visit Dairy Queen.

Spoke Lee
Dec 31, 2004

chairizard lol

Flocons de Jambon posted:

I'm not a specimen for your examination. You'll just have to live your life knowing someone doesn't share your world view.

I'm content to point out that if you think Assad has any plans for the "extermination" of Sunni Syria, you're bonkers.

Sorry I assumed you knew why you felt the way you do. Crazy of me to expect someone to debate and discuss in debate and discussion.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Flocons de Jambon posted:

It's almost as if I don't see the Syrian War as something Assad up and chose to do like you or I would choose to visit Dairy Queen.

In this case is the blizzard the murder of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the extra crushed Oreo the displacement of a third of the total population?

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Flocons de Jambon posted:

Don't start wars if you don't like massacres :shrug:

Boy I sure hope you apply this view evenly to everything.

Bates
Jun 15, 2006

Flocons de Jambon posted:

Like, if they surrender tomorrow, he'd probably only kill the leadership. He probably wouldn't exterminate the population.

Surely you'll excuse the Syrian population for not taking your word on it. Even so, Assad has that same option - surrender, get executed, assume your people won't be victimized and the war will be over.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

We're supposed to give the benefit of the doubt to the guy who's responsible for 85% of the civilian casualties, who has bombed & shelled his own cities to rubble, and dumped nerve gas on the suburbs of his own capitol city.

Yeah dude like I'm totally sure that Assad will be gateful for their surrender and he totally won't have every Sunni male between the age of 15 and 75 in every town that supported the rebels shot and kicked into a ditch.

Sergg fucked around with this message at 09:26 on Nov 1, 2015

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Flocons de Jambon posted:

Police and security personnel were attacked from the outset. They were never peaceful protests for government reform.

I still can't believe people as dumb as this exist. " what?! Security personnel of a fascist police state got hurt? Well, kill all the civilians!"

Unbelievable stupidity.

Confusion
Apr 3, 2009
It is posible to both say that arming insurgents leads to chaos, anarchy and destruction, and that Assad is a mass murderer and war criminal at the same time.

Putin is absolutely right in his assertion that the Western interventions in Iraq, Libya and Syria have been absolute failures. But unfortunately he doesn't offer an acceptable solution either (helping Assad destroy the Rebels clearly isn't one).

In Ukraine Putin is arming the 'rebels/insurgents' himself, but here he is not doing it to overthrow a regime and bring stability/prosperity (like the west in Iraq/Libya/Syria), but precisely to create anarchy and throw the country into chaos. So it does kinda seem that he at least understand the implications of such actions a bit better than some western powers.

Postorder Trollet89
Jan 12, 2008
Sweden doesn't do religion. But if they did, it would probably be the best religion in the world.
The FSA is not a "Democratic moderate group"

It has a few elements of that in it but by and large it is composed of the same kind of opposition as the Al-Nusra front or Army of Conquest. These groups are not after a democracy folks.

lynch_69
Jan 21, 2001

Lol if you people think the TOWs and armaments being gleefully shoveled into Syria by the Saudis (with implicit US backing) isn't going to end up with ISIS eventually. And as if ISIS\Al Nusra isn't operating with Gulf Arab, Saudi and Turkish support, which the US is conspicuously silent about. We've seen this dance before in Afghanistan, it always ends the same way, why even act surprised or indignant when someone points it out.

Putin made a great point in that interview about all the people the US spent hundreds of millions arming and training in the intervening years most likely switched sides and are fighting for Al Nusra or ISIS - which is why officially they can only account for a handful of moderate fighters trained.

Bashar al Assad is a brutal dictator, and will have to go sooner and later - it's a poo poo sandwich with no binary good guys bad guys divide. Even the plucky Kurds who everyone loves have been accused of ethnic cleansing areas under their control. Yes, I understand not all sides are equally bad and there different degrees of wrongdoing, but goddamn if you can't count on goons to pick a side in a horse race (FSA this time around) and stick with them no matter what.

Flocons de Jambon
Apr 11, 2015

Confusion posted:

Putin is absolutely right in his assertion that the Western interventions in Iraq, Libya and Syria have been absolute failures. But unfortunately he doesn't offer an acceptable solution either (helping Assad destroy the Rebels clearly isn't one).

I find that solution acceptable.

crabcakes66
May 24, 2012

by exmarx
Keep in mind you guys are arguing with someone who said this:


Flocons de Jambon posted:

Syria. A nation of bad asses taking on America, Isreal, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Hail the Lion Assad.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Postorder Trollet89 posted:

The FSA is not a "Democratic moderate group"

It has a few elements of that in it but by and large it is composed of the same kind of opposition as the Al-Nusra front or Army of Conquest. These groups are not after a democracy folks.

The two groups are openly hostile to each other and Islamist groups have been pretty focused on siphoning people off through whatever means available for years now. The only reason non-islamist groups still exist is that a lot of people in them have incompatible views they're willing to risk conflict over.

Flocons de Jambon posted:

I find that solution acceptable.

Problem: The "rebels" are most Syrians.

Warbadger fucked around with this message at 16:25 on Nov 1, 2015

Back Hack
Jan 17, 2010


Confusion posted:

In Ukraine Putin is arming the 'rebels/insurgents' himself, but here he is not doing it to overthrow a regime and bring stability/prosperity (like the west in Iraq/Libya/Syria), but precisely to create anarchy and throw the country into chaos. So it does kinda seem that he at least understand the implications of such actions a bit better than some western powers.

Putin isn't arming "separatists", he sending them over the border.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

crabcakes66 posted:

Keep in mind you guys are arguing with someone who said this:

Isn't the best situation for the average Syrian being that Assad, and his faction (no matter the extent frankly) are to be allowed to be destroyed, and ISIS should be actively destroyed?


I say stymie Russian efforts in any way possible.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Back Hack posted:

Putin isn't arming "separatists", he sending them over the border.

Sending Russian troops over the border, just to be absolutely clear. Along with the mercenaries/volunteers/hard right militia nutjobs/whatever you want to call the irregulars.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Warbadger posted:

Sending Russian troops over the border, just to be absolutely clear. Along with the mercenaries/volunteers/hard right militia nutjobs/whatever you want to call the irregulars.

He's also funding extremism in Europe so that more nazi type political parties, with a very clear Russian bent in their foreign policy, rise to power.

  • Locked thread