|
Slanderer posted:Did I say they were justified? No, moron. Were they justified? Of course not, you dumb poo poo. Based on his last performance review, that cop couldn't even tell if he was justified to go to the bathroom on his own, let alone end a human life.
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 08:30 |
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Based on his last performance review, that cop couldn't even tell if he was justified to go to the bathroom on his own, let alone end a human life. So you're arguing he's not competent for trial because of how dumb he is? You are gonna let him get away with murder? Why are you so happy that Tamir is dead? Cop lovers like you just make me sick.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:So you're arguing he's not competent for trial because of how dumb he is? You are gonna let him get away with murder? Why are you so happy that Tamir is dead? Slanderer posted:are you an actual poster, or just a markov chain generator seeded by LF rejects? do we even have the technology to automatically generate shitposts such as yours? C'mon now, if you are going to throw personal insults around, don't live up to your own insults.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:C'mon now, if you are going to throw personal insults around, don't live up to your own insults. Don't break the 4th wall of your shitpost gimmick
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 04:33
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:Hmm yes you're right, I'm sure those lovely cops believed that they weren't legally justified when they pulled the trigger, you willfully dense piece of poo poo If they felt that they were legally justified in killing him, then why falsify the police report?
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:So you're arguing he's not competent for trial because of how dumb he is? You are gonna let him get away with murder? Why are you so happy that Tamir is dead? Are you having a breakdown?
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
C2C - 2.0 posted:If they felt that they were legally justified in killing him, then why falsify the police report? To cover their asses after they realized that they probably hosed up. "feeling that your actions are legally justified" is an entirely subjective thing, and will obviously change. But them realized they hosed up after the fact doesn't retroactively change their belief that they were justified at the moment of the shooting. Slanderer fucked around with this message at 05:30 on Jan 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:To cover their asses after they realized that they probably hosed up. "feeling that your actions are legally justified" is an entirely subjective thing, and will obviously change. But them realized they hosed up after the fact doesn't retroactively change their belief that they were justified at the moment of the shooting. Whether or not they felt justified does not counter a murder charge, especially when you purposefully falsify police reports AND don't even bother to follow department procedure prior to the encounter anyways, unless it's always been department procedure to conduct drive by shootings.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Whether or not they felt justified does not counter a murder charge, especially when you purposefully falsify police reports AND don't even bother to follow department procedure prior to the encounter anyways, unless it's always been department procedure to conduct drive by shootings.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
Maybe you should look up the Ohio murder statute instead of reading the common law definition on Wikipedia?
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Actually, if they reasonably believed that their conduct was lawful, it seems like that would invalidate the "malice aforethought" element you bolded in your quote, because the guy who pulled the trigger would not be intending to kill someone unlawfully. Whether or not they followed department procedure isn't directly material to the lawfulness of their actions. Yeah, I'm not buying this argument for one moment. Belief that they were at risk of immediate harm does not support their method of engagement, actions, or the fact that they lied and falsified everything they could. Unless you are sincerely arguing that rolling up on a suspect and shooting them through the rolled down window without warning is a valid method of engaging one, you can stop trying to dress it up from a point of legality. The instant they chose that method to engage Tamir, they lost all legality.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 08:30 |
|
|
These general law enforcement threads just aren't working out. As always, somebody can make a thread for the next incident that happens.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2016 08:07
|
|
