|
dude who cares if your baby is bawling while someone is trying to talk he's right it's annoying af and yeah 'but he's supposed to kiss it on the head' who cares meng righteous 
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 06:24 |
|
|
rezatahs posted:babies are horrible yet they get this sacred pass because supposedly they don't know any better spare the rod spoil the child
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
It really is remarkable how much worse everyone in this picture looks today Except Melania (if that is her in the picture, who can keep track of trumpwives), she still looks good
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
loquacius posted:It really is remarkable how much worse everyone in this picture looks today almost like twenty years have passed and they were already old, weird
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:youre seriously loving stupid and this doesn't happen in america You are not aware of Minimalist Program's posting style. Hint: It is the same weak attempt at trolling.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
Did he just throw a loving baby?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
OMG JC a Bomb! posted:Did he just throw a loving baby? Was it a baby muslim?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
OMG JC a Bomb! posted:Did he just throw a loving baby? Did the baby he threw go too far?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Told Two Times posted:Let's put a child rapist back in the white house. Hillary Clinton 2016 I'm with her! But you vote Clinton to stop the child rapist.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:youre seriously loving stupid and this doesn't happen in america UH yeah it does so happen. People in the US carry firearms with them all the time, in public. They walk around with guns and even rifles and point them at the cashiers at their local supermarket when they get mad.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
khan stump the trump
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
Minimalist Program posted:UH yeah it does so happen. People in the US carry firearms with them all the time, in public. They walk around with guns and even rifles and point them at the cashiers at their local supermarket when they get mad. It's considered a sign of respect to point your gun at someone, because it means you recognize the threat of their power. At board meetings everyone watches the slides and such while keeping the red dot of their short-barreled rifle trained on the speaker out of deference.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:22
|
|
|
Ork of Fiction posted:It's considered a sign of respect to point your gun at someone, because it means you recognize the threat of their power. At board meetings everyone watches the slides and such while keeping the red dot of their short-barreled rifle trained on the speaker out of deference.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:youre seriously loving stupid and this doesn't happen in america you're talking about a nation so filled with pussies that youtube is packed with videos of people that feel the need to carry an assault rifle to places like walmart and ruby tuesday's...it does happen
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:you're talking about a nation so filled with pussies that youtube is packed with videos of people that feel the need to carry an assault rifle to places like walmart and ruby tuesday's...it does happen Yeah it does. This is exactly what I am talking about. Ork of Fiction posted:It's considered a sign of respect to point your gun at someone, because it means you recognize the threat of their power. At board meetings everyone watches the slides and such while keeping the red dot of their short-barreled rifle trained on the speaker out of deference. I did not know this but, if you think about it, it makes a lot of sense. I guess the US really is a country of many interesting facets.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:28
|
|
|
I'm getting really tired of the fact that every election I'm stuck with having to choose the lesser of two child rapists
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
Trump is going to drown a puppy live on periscope at 8pm est tonight.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
jiharlequinade posted:I'm getting really tired of the fact that every election I'm stuck with having to choose the lesser of two child rapists
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
Yes, Trump has gone too far. From Talking Points Memo discussion about a series of tweets from a former nuclear weapons officer saying "Trump is so drat dangerous", in response to reports that Trump repeatedly asked an unnamed advisor why the United States can't use nuclear weapons since we have them: ncsteve says: "We are now into the second generation of voters who have no meaningful memories of the days when the Emergency Broadcast System wasn't a thing that warned you about severe weather but, rather, was a government service that would provide everyone ten to fifteen minutes to decide whether you were really, truly an atheist before you died. Nuclear war wasn't an abstraction or an exercise in hyperbole before 1992. It was a constant background worry for all informed people. It was like a low grade infection sapping your sense of wellbeing. And that's when there wasn't actually a crisis going in the world. We and the Soviets each had fifty to sixty thousand nuclear weapons and they were all armed, aimed and on a hair trigger alert. We had seventeen, that's right, seventeen warheads pointed at Moscow alone, which, in keeping with the underlying madness of the entire idea, were targeted at individual buildings, and scheduled to roll in over the course of the Last Day to ensure they didn't disrupt each other. They had even more warheads, similarly targeted at us. (Unspoken by either nation was that neither us or the Soviets were likely to leave China around to claim the title of King of the Ashes if the nukes flew.) It would take hours for either side to get the End of the World Party started today. Then, it could happen literally in two or three minutes. So, back in those days, at least, this story wouldn't have been just a thing people shrugged their shoulders at and criticized the sourcing before moving on. In those days, the MSM, whose denizens lived with the same fear the rest of us did and, in any case, wasn't the degenerate, coopted sham it is today, would have been on this story like a pack of Rotweillers on a trespasser wearing a suit made of steak. I don't want to shake my cane or criticize the useless youth of today or go on and on about the days when I hung an onion from my belt. I just want people to understand that the mere fact that a person who thought he could be president asked these questions--the mere level of ignorance that caused him to ask them, not the underlying madness--would have been considered disqualifying and a matter of absolute, paramount importance. You would have heard of nothing else for days. I'm glad that, along with all the other shitshows--the income inequality, the global warming, the democratic institutions strained to their breaking point because one of our two major parities has degenerated from a normal American political party into a nihilistic authoritarian hypernationalistic movement--we could at least pass on a world where the constant fear of global thermonuclear armageddon has receded. But for god's sake, please don't take it for granted. It would be a criminal irony if the result of our having been able to accomplish the small good of delivering ourselves and our posterity from a world where Mutual Assured Destruction was the only way we could think of to render the use of nuclear weapons "unthinkable" was was to render the use of two or three or ten nuclear weapons all-too-thinkable by a presidential candidate." http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/john-noonan-trump-nuclear-weapons-twitter
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Is it wrong that I prefer the nuclear deterrent option over the endless drone-automated proxy wars path that we are currently traveling down?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 06:24 |
|
|
Fury Road was better than the Robocop remake, therefore it only makes sense to vote for Trump.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 22:37
|
|
