|
It's just come up on the BBC Twitter feed that the pro-Gaddafi forces have moved into Misarata port, and its been previously reported there's a hospital ship their from Germany providing medical aid. There's also reports that military installations were hit last night in Sabha, in the south of the country. That's where it's believed a lot of mercenaries are arriving by plane. It's also believed that reinforcements had been heading from there to Misrata and Zintan. I've also read that coalition aircraft can fly lower now most of the AA defenses are destroyed, so they can target and hit tanks and other vehicles more accurately. In addition to the reports of airstrikes during daylight hours in Ajdabiya, I'm also seeing some Tweets about coalition aircraft flying around Zintan. This would suggest coalition aircraft feel safer flying during the day, and would support the other reports of AA defenses being destroyed or disabled across Libya. Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 11:52 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 11:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 15:15 |
|
Here's a curated list of Twitter personalities I'm working on. Some of them from Brown Moses suggestions throughout the thread. http://twitter.com/revolister/libya If any of you have suggestions, let me know and I'll update it. My timeline has too much noise in it. I decided to compartmentalize it into regions/nations to make it easier to glance at information. I just can't keep up during the day with all the stuff that's going down.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 11:56 |
|
French minister of defense hinting at ground forces. So the situation now is that NATO is in charge in the naval blockade, while the US is in charge of the no-fly-zone and ground strikes? Sri.Theo posted:Er, a point by point refutation? She makes a perfectly valid argument - that if we weren't selling weapons to Libya, Egypt, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia then it would be a lot harder for them to oppress their citizens in the first place. Depends what you mean by "we". When people were saying "we" armed Iraq, his weapons actually were mostly from Russia/Soviet Union and France. Libya's weapons are mostly Eastern Bloc in origin, with some French and Belgian. Some of the weapons have also been not bought on the open market, but illegally smuggled. There is half a valid point to be made that selling arms to these autocracies has given them weapons to use against "us", but ANY sort of trade would do it too, because they could a) Buy weapons from other countries b) Smuggle the weapons in illegally c) Make the weapons themselves Also this only applies to advanced stuff like anti-air missiles. It doesn't really apply to simple things like canons, assault rifles and handguns. It's incredibly easy to make some lovely AK knock-off with access to machine tools and some days of skilled work. It's not high tech. A child laborer can make one or two pistols in a day. Also, on the flip side of that argument stands the Egyptian and Turkish armies. After Camp David, the Egyptian army has had a close relationship with the United States military, through training, and stuff like how Egypt makes US-designed tanks for themselves. The Egyptian military ultimately chose to side with the people rather than massacring them. Who knows what would have happened if the Egyptian military had not had a relationship to the US?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:02 |
|
Zawiyahquote:BBC Maya in Manchester, UK, writes: "My husband is from Zawiya and we have received reports that all able-bodied men are being arrested as Gaddafi's troops go door-to-door. We do not know if his family have food but considering that the city has been closed off for weeks I can't imagine what they would have left to eat. There are also reports of women being raped and mobile communication is non-existent. The hospital has also been taken over by the army. We want to raise awareness of just how bad it is inside Libya. Imagine what the terminally ill, the women in labour and those who need life-saving treatement are doing! Personally, if the UN agreement allows for ground troops to enter without the risk of occupancy then I ask the UN to please put this into effect immediately."
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:26 |
|
evilweasel posted:Posting about politics on facebook is about the least classy thing you can do ever, regardless of what politics you post about. Heh, I've been my Facebook networks go-to guy for information about current events since Fukushima. Once I realised I was hours if not days ahead of local media, largely thanks to this fine forum, I felt the need to share. The response has been overwhelmingly positive so far. I'm almost a bit sad that I will be out of the loop until Sunday since I'm heading to Norway on a ski trip. StrohBC news will experience some downtime. But then again, I've been sticking to reporting in an objective fashion. And I've got intelligent friends. Stroh M.D. fucked around with this message at 12:50 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:42 |
|
Well, there's an announcement on the US Embassy website about the large demonstration happening Friday here in Bahrain. It'll be at 4PM, despite the ban on demonstrations right now. Apparently it'll take place in a few different spots, already in the red zones on the map. Also, they updated that map of places we are supposed to avoid! http://bahrain.usembassy.gov/demonstration/demonstration-notice-march-26-to-april-2.pdf So maybe we'll get some more news about what's going on in Bahrain after the demonstrations tomorrow. Hopefully it won't involve large-scale shooting of protestors or anything. I hear that the Crown Prince is supposed to get more involved in the goings-on in Bahrain, maybe there will be serious discussions somewhere?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:45 |
|
I'm certain Friday prayers tomorrow will be pretty big for Yemen, Syria, and Bahrain, even today AFP is reporting a funeral attending by 20,000 people for the people killed yesterday, and fighting in Yemen between different army units.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:50 |
|
I was halfway through a post asking why France was so determined in their push for military intervention (to a considerable degree, this is France's war), but came across this article which seems to sum it up. Long story short, Sarkozy needs a boost in the polls. Sounds pretty skeevy to use military conflict for political advantages, but his main opponent is described as the sort of vehemently anti-immigration demagogue so popular in Europe these days; to be able to prevent a civilian massacre, oust a dictator, and prevent the election of another anti-Muslim European politician is a hat trick of Good Things. edit; VVV Definitely possible, although Ergodan also seems to have been on some sort of defender-of-Islam kick recently. Who knows? Suntory BOSS fucked around with this message at 13:11 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:55 |
|
I get the feeling that some of the opposition from Turkey might be related to France's opposition to Turkey joining the EU as well.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 12:58 |
|
J33uk posted:Western speaking? I'm torn between imaginging a posse of dudes with Stetsons on or a Roman legion. But seriously, I doubt anyone is sending snatch teams into his palace right now, as fun a rumor as it is. Spaghetti Western, I'd wager. New Man with No Name movie being filmed? Pissboy Geoff posted:The different reactions probably have a whole lot to do with who was president. There were mega atrocities going on in Iraq before we invaded there too. They executed like 300,000 people a year in the years running up to the war if I remember reading correctly, not to mention using chemical weapons on their own populace. Bush does military action = bad for Democrats, Obama does military action = bad for Republicans. It is pretty much a no-brainer. Here's the difference for me: The only clear thing that Obama has said about this "action" is what the limits are. IE: no boots on ground, and only going to be there for a short while and going to pass over the reins to someone else. Say what you will about Bush's wars, he at least had more concrete/clear objectives. edit: and congressional approval (whether you believe there were WMDs or not) Cartouche fucked around with this message at 13:36 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 13:27 |
|
quote:AJE The US Naval Institute has released his handy map showing the location and nationality of the international forces brought to bear against Gaddafi:
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 13:36 |
|
Zintanquote:Guardian The people of Zintan, 90 miles southwest of Tripoli, have begun returning from the caves where they sought refuge from government shelling in the last few days, Reuters reports.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 13:37 |
|
cioxx posted:Here's a curated list of Twitter personalities I'm working on. Some of them from Brown Moses suggestions throughout the thread. Thanks for this, it's very useful, saves me having to open lots of windows at once.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 13:50 |
|
Very interesting news if truequote:alihashem Some Army commanders in Benghazi were arrested for collaboration with Gaddafi's regime. #feb17 #libya IF they were in cahoots with Gaddafi or not it could be a sign of the Transitional council trying to get their trained forces organized under more aggressive leadership. Also, possible great news for France when it heads off to sell the Rafale based off it's performance in Libya. quote:1259: ABC News are reporting that a French fighter has shot down a Libyan air force jet which was violating the no-fly zone. Woohoo lets watch those arms sale dollars roll in; suck it Sweden. farraday fucked around with this message at 14:03 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 13:58 |
|
He said the full story should come up on AJA soon, I'm really interested in exactly what happened. It does sound like Benghazi has been trying to root out any Gaddafi supporters after the attack on Benghazi, as they had so much trouble with them during the battle.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:04 |
|
Brown Moses posted:He said the full story should come up on AJA soon, I'm really interested in exactly what happened. It does sound like Benghazi has been trying to root out any Gaddafi supporters after the attack on Benghazi, as they had so much trouble with them during the battle. They are, but a wide scale internal suppression campaign would be ugly, and likely in full view of the International media. I hope it doesn't head that way.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:12 |
|
Someone asked if it endangered Benghazi:quote:no not in danger get relaxed, they are behind bars now, except for one senior one who will be with them very soon It does get worrying when the rebels start rounding people up, sometimes it can suggest a violent and paranoid attitude.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:23 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Someone asked if it endangered Benghazi: Goign back to my earlier point I hope this is more about reorganizing the armed forces than trying to crush pro Ghaddaffi sentiment, although I suppose it could be both. The ongoing unwillingness of the defected commanders to move their troops forward has become untenable for the Transitional government. I hope they realize that.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:33 |
|
Pissboy Geoff posted:The different reactions probably have a whole lot to do with who was president. There were mega atrocities going on in Iraq before we invaded there too. They executed like 300,000 people a year in the years running up to the war if I remember reading correctly, not to mention using chemical weapons on their own populace. Bush does military action = bad for Democrats, Obama does military action = bad for Republicans. It is pretty much a no-brainer. Well, the reactions from the opposing party did, anyway. Republicans reacted in the same manner when Clinton authorized airstrikes in Yugoslavia. That was after intense and protracted deliberations by the UN to address what was an obvious ongoing genocide. Bush decided to invade Iraq. There was no social upheaval, no genocide, no international calls for action, and no 'coalition' but in name; we levelled the infrastructure and continue to occupy the country eight years later. What's happening now is similar to what was going on in Yugoslavia, but with even more impetus - there is a true regime change going on, one that sprung from the grassroots, and a request for help from the UN. This type of thing is part of the UN's mission.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:43 |
|
Tripoliquote:BBC A Tripoli resident, unnamed for obvious reasons, tells BBC's Newshour: "I'm not exaggerating if I say tens of thousands of young people are arrested. Look, we cannot even now stay close to each other, three four people, for a couple of minutes talking or chatting, I mean it's very danger[ous]. quote:ChangeInLibya Tripoli: "No shortages in food but fuel is a problem. Some stations are closed, others only open for a few hours per day quote:ChangeInLibya Tripoli: "Families, grandparents & all are staying together nowadays. Either in the safest houses they could find or in farms" Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 14:51 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:49 |
|
Round-up from the Guardian blog:quote:Despite air strikes, Gaddafi's tanks rolled back into Misrata under the cover of darkness and began shelling the area near the main hospital, residents and rebels told Reuters. quote:The excellent Colum Lynch at Turtle Bay on the Foreign Policy website points out a little-noticed fact about the UN sanctions against Libya that could come back to haunt the international community. quote:Presidential guards loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh clashed in the town of Mukalla with army units backing opposition groups, AP reports. quote:#BREAKING ABC's Martha Raddatz: #Gadhafi sends up first warplane violating no fly zone -- plane is shot down by French fighter jets. #Libya And from Reuters: quote:"Government tanks are closing in on Misrata hospital and shelling the area," said the doctor, who was briefly reached by telephone before the line died. "The situation is very serious." ... Abdul Basset, another rebel spokesman, said the shelling at Misrata hospital was continuing. "We fear a massacre. There are about 1,000 people in the hospital and most of them are in critical conditions, they can not move or run -- many amputees among them," he said. "There are also ten Filipino nurses who we lost contact with on Friday."
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:59 |
|
quote:Latest on that ABC News report about a Libyan air force jet shot down for violating no-fly zone: it was a single-engine Galeb, apparently. Still no confirmation of that report. I assume it refers to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soko_G-4 There's no mention of them being used in Iran, but they are used in Serbia, where it has been claimed Iran has been hiring mercenary pilots from.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:59 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I assume it refers to this: It's more likely to be one of these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soko_G-2_Galeb Which are part of the Libyan air force.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:02 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I assume it refers to this: The Libyan Air Force had at least a hundred G-4s as trainers and light attack aircraft. If CQ is starting to bring those up instead of the Mirages (which I think he only has one left, last I checked) or the MiGs, he's pretty much running on fumes now. Edit: No, the Libyan Air Force page only lists Soko G-2s. It looks like the G-4s are from somewhere else.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:03 |
|
Based on other reports they are probably forcing the pilots into them at gun point. Misarata quote:Our colleague, Mona Mahmood, has been speaking to Muhammed, a rebel spokesman, in Misrata. This is what he told her.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:10 |
|
Young Freud posted:The Libyan Air Force had at least a hundred G-4s as trainers and light attack aircraft. If CQ is starting to bring those up instead of the Mirages (which I think he only has one left, last I checked) or the MiGs, he's pretty much running on fumes now. Didn't the US or UK say yesterday or the day before that Gaddafi's air force had lost its capability to wage war? I guess if they're relying on older aircraft, that kinda proves it. Also, in regards to trying to root out Gaddafi sympathizers, quote:11:28am
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:11 |
|
There's a bit more on that in the Telegraph as well.quote:"They were beaten on their feet and the woman was slapped around the face until she admitted planning an attack on the mosque," said Basim Mohamed, muezzin at Quiche mosque.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:14 |
|
You can start taking control of your city, god drat. You can not be in charge without having control, otherwise you're not actually in charge. You'd think some of these people would realize that they don't have a military base so they ned a popular one, and just letting people try and self organize while you claim to be in charge is not the same as creating a popular base.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:23 |
Cartouche posted:Say what you will about Bush's wars, he at least had more concrete/clear objectives. You just said Bush had clear goals in the Middle East without any sense of irony. Amazing.
|
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 15:25 |
|
Spiky Ooze posted:You just said Bush had clear goals in the Middle East without any sense of irony. Amazing. Bush did, but he misled the public about them (although he was pretty blunt in speeches he gave to West Point and other less public avenues).
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:16 |
|
THE HORSES rear end posted:Bush did, but he misled the public about them (although he was pretty blunt in speeches he gave to West Point and other less public avenues). I'd rather be ambiguous than be clearly wrong, to be honest.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:18 |
|
Spiky Ooze posted:You just said Bush had clear goals in the Middle East without any sense of irony. Amazing. I'm sure he did (initially). Don Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others who had been there during the Kuwait war, had been busy planning the toppling of Saddam while resting in R'lyeh for the Clinton years. Clarity of goal doesn't guarantee that it is sound, however.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:19 |
|
The US goal is pretty clear, it's just not being made explicit for international political reasons.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:24 |
|
Some pretty bold claims are being made about Misrata:quote:39 tanks invaded #misrata Waldensian morning, 22 were destroyed by revolutionaries using RPGs quote:#misrata #libya caller says alhamdulilah about 30 pro #gaddafi snipers have been killed today. Fighting is still going on Also Zintan quote:3 tanks, 2 GRAD vehicles, anti-air missle truck, BMB troop carrier and 4 cruiser carrying AA guns captured quote:yesterday was attack but attack was blocked, 120 mercenaries were killed, 15 were captured, and forces were pushed back 35K. All from @SerajElalem, so who knows how reliable he is. [edit]Apparently he's involved with Alive in Libya, which was set up in Benghazi with the help of Small World News Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 16:33 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:29 |
|
Lareous posted:I'd rather be ambiguous than be clearly wrong, to be honest. It's not really a matter of right or wrong, it's just the reality of foreign policy. With the exception of Jimmy Carter, just about every foreign intervention that the United States has taken part in since Truman left office has been publicly ambiguous for both domestic political reasons and the insanely complex politics of the international world. Even the most simplistic and straightforward (and thoroughly justified) military actions will undoubtedly go against the interests of some great power or against the narratives of many people. I think Jimmy Carter's honesty was almost a cautionary fable to other presidents about being unambiguous about foreign policy.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:33 |
|
Misarataquote:Our colleague Mona Mahmood has managed to contact another resident in Misrata, Ahmed, who describes himself as a political activist. This is what he told her. Benghazi quote:Detained government soldiers and suspected mercenaries are kept in a former military prison near Benghazi, now taken over by rebels. Some of the men admit to serving with Gaddafi's forces, but say they had no other choice, but to fire at rebels and civilians during battles for cities in the east of the country: That would certaintly be backed up by other reports of soldiers that had been killed and bunrt for refusing to follow orders.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:35 |
|
evilweasel posted:The US goal is pretty clear, it's just not being made explicit for international political reasons. I know the whole horrible precedent about assassination of foreign leaders, but I wish we could just go loving kill him already and get the gently caress out of this mess before it gets any worse.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:44 |
|
Nenonen posted:I'm sure he did (initially). Don Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others who had been there during the Kuwait war, had been busy planning the toppling of Saddam while resting in R'lyeh for the Clinton years. Pretty much this. I never said that his goals were sound, but they at least had substance. Lareous posted:I'd rather be ambiguous than be clearly wrong, to be honest. I find that pretty frightening. Your superhuman talent of hindsight amazes me. Cartouche fucked around with this message at 16:51 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:48 |
|
Details from Reuters about the plane the was destroyed earlier:quote:A French warplane fired an air-to-ground missile at a Libyan military plane and destroyed it just after it landed at Misrata air force base, a French armed forces spokesman said on Thursday. "The French patrol carried out an air-to-ground strike with an AASM weapon just after the plane had landed at the Misrata airbase," the spokesman said, adding that the plane, belonging to Muammar Gaddafi's military, had breached the UN-imposed no-fly zone.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 15:15 |
|
Cartouche posted:I find that pretty frightening. Your superhuman talent of hindsight amazes me. "And you see that CIA report? We should've had more than one disgruntled escapee that claimed Saddam had WMDs."
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 17:28 |