|
A Real Referee posted:1) Reverse your decision. Disallow the goal and take play back to the original throw. It won't be a popular call, but you have to be clear on this. Lots of competitions use a multi-ball system now, but those balls will all have been checked by you before being distributed to the ball boys. This ball came out of the kit man's own bag, so was not checked. Inform the kit man that he will be reported to the league.
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 11:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
3 may be correct in terms of the rules, but I doubt a ref would give a goal in that situation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 11:13
|
|
|
Mickolution posted:3 may be correct in terms of the rules, but I doubt a ref would give a goal in that situation. I think most would tbh.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 11:20
|
|
|
I still think you could/should caution that thrower for USB if he knew about it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 13:47
|
|
|
Dollas posted:I still think you could/should caution that thrower for USB if he knew about it. Footballers are incredibly thick at the best of times. Their coach or manager could hand some of them a Danger Mouse hissing bomb painted like a football and they'd still throw it in.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 18:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 10:10
|
|
|
Hes just recycling old ones with new wording. The third was is also incredibly simple.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 10:11
|
|
|
Barbershop posted:I'm pretty sure that it's: 1) Counts as a miss. The ball was moved by the taker, and thus the kick was taken. Look at the henry and pires fuckup a few years ago. The penalty was taken as soon as pires brushed it forward, buthe then panicked and had a second touch before Henry could run in. 2) The ball has to leave the area. It was mistaken the same as if it was moving, so the keeper has to re-take it. 3) Penalty, as the line counts as the area. Potentially DOGSO depending on circumstances we can't see, but a yellow card otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 10:33
|
|
|
1. I would say it's not taken because of the injury. Allow them to go on to the next taker and allow the opposing team to select an outfield player who won't take a penalty in the shootout should it get to his turn. 2. As Masonity said, ball has to leave the area to be in play. Retake. 3. Penalty, although I've seen freekicks given from the line before.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 13:07
|
|
|
1. A penalty is not in play until it has been kicked and moved forward. You can't kick with your knee. Replace him and retake. 2. Retake, ball must leave penalty area. 3. Penalty, any part of the line is the penalty area.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 14:57
|
|
|
Oh noes!
Bio-Hazard fucked around with this message at 06:54 on Jul 23, 2011 |
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 17:05
|
|
|
2) Yellow card for time-wasting.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2011 22:41
|
|
|
1) Goal, book the swan for diving 2) Goal, book the ball for diving 3) Goal, book a flight to the Bermudas
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 01:44
|
|
|
1: Didn't kick it. Replace him and retake. 2: Huh. Depends if the ball was going to make it out of the box. Either a red card for the keeper (deliberate handball + obstruction of goalscoring opportunity), or if the ball wasn't going to leave the box then retake the goal-kick. 3: Red for deliberate handball + obstruction of goalscoring opportunity, award a penalty as well.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 06:53
|
|
|
Thel posted:1: Didn't kick it. Replace him and retake. You might want to check what a goal scoring opportunity is defined as.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 07:37
|
|
|
Bhyo posted:You might want to check what a goal scoring opportunity is defined as. Given that the striker took a shot, one might think that this counts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 09:16
|
|
|
Sonic H posted:Given that the striker took a shot, one might think that this counts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 10:41
|
|
|
s0meb0dy0 posted:Really depends on who was behind the ball. If the keeper is in position, without more facts, you can't assume it's an "obvious" goal scoring opportunity. Perhaps, but I'd like to think that strikers don't usually just shoot without any form of "opportunity".. Although that's never stopped some of them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 10:58
|
|
|
Also there could be more defenders behind him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 18:07
|
|
|
I was referring more to him deciding the 2nd example is an obvious goal scoring opportunity tbh.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2011 21:06
|
|
|
It's monday or something. 1) Your first priority is to get the medical staff on to look after the player. Then award a retake: the ball must be kicked for the effort to count, and clearly this wasn't a kick. The new penalty can be taken by another eligible nominated player. Only the goalkeeper can be substituted in a shoot-out, so the player's team is effectively down to 10 men for the rest of the process. 2) Your instinct might be that the keeper has denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity – but the ball would not have been in play until it left the penalty area. As this incident has happened inside the area, you should simply order the goal-kick to be retaken. 3) It's a penalty. Part of the ball is overlapping the penalty area line, so it's considered to be within the area. You also need to deal with defender's deliberate action. If he has denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity it's a red card, otherwise it's a yellow for unsporting behavior.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2011 20:59
|
|
|
I am deeply disappointed in all of you
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2011 22:25
|
|
|
1: I am a hundred percent certain this exact question has appeared in YATR before. In any case, It's a yellow card for unsporting behaviour. 2: Award the goal, mention the incident in your match report. 3: No? Why on earth would he be?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2011 22:58
|
|
|
Nyarlothotep posted:3: No? Why on earth would he be? No idea if there a rule or not, but would you really expect FIFA not have thought about anything that could potentially harm a source of income?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 02:00
|
|
|
Alan BStard posted:No idea if there a rule or not, but would you really expect FIFA not have thought about anything that could potentially harm a source of income? How could drawing attention to a sponsor harm income?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 02:01
|
|
|
pik_d posted:How could drawing attention to a sponsor harm income? I have no idea but who knows the inner workings of FIFA.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 02:16
|
|
|
The only action I could see FIFA taking is deciding it's a great idea and making it mandatory after scoring a goal in any match with TV cameras present.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 02:23
|
|
|
I think the point of the third question is to shut up some smart rear end talking about the display of slogans being illegal during celebrations. In my opinion, the spirit of that law is to stop the display of slogans that would incite. The advertising boards have in theory been approved already as non-inciting so what would be the issue. Perhaps if he instead insulted the competitors of his sponsors you'd have something, but still. Play the loving game.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 18:11
|
|
|
Nyarlothotep posted:1: I am a hundred percent certain this exact question has appeared in YATR before. In any case, It's a yellow card for unsporting behaviour. None of these seem remotely tricky.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 21:26
|
|
|
I think they've ran out of ideas. They seem to recycle at least 1 a week now.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2011 21:29
|
|
|
They're getting a bit boring but here's the new one:
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 10:19
|
|
|
1. Goal 2. Tackle's fine, let it go 3. It's a backpass, so yes you do intervene
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 10:23
|
|
|
1) You stop immediately a keeper is injured and restart with a drop ball. 2) I'd say it's not dangerous so I'll let it go. 3) And yes, it's still a fricking backpass he caught.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 13:33
|
|
|
1. Goal. This one is down to the attacking player to kick the ball out if he is wants to be sporting. 2. IDFK to whites. The player is not wearing proper equipment and this is why it is dangerous, as opposed to the challenge itself. He also needs to be sent to the sidelines to correct this and can only come back on when checked in a break in play. 3. IDFK to the attacking team. It was ultimately played directly to the goalkeeper.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 16:40
|
|
|
1) goal 2) red 3) penalty Cheers
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 17:25
|
|
|
thompson posted:1) goal It will never be a penalty ever, that's not the sanction for a backpass.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 18:39
|
|
|
Dudley posted:It will never be a penalty ever, that's not the sanction for a backpass. I'm a crazy American ref. Nuff said.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2011 20:34
|
|
|
Hey I have a question about the game of soccer and the Trin thread is gone I think so I'll ask here: what happens when a goalie gets sent off during a penalty shoot-out?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2011 13:46
|
|
|
jyrka posted:Hey I have a question about the game of soccer and the Trin thread is gone I think so I'll ask here: what happens when a goalie gets sent off during a penalty shoot-out? Pretty sure you're allowed to sub on another keeper for an outfield player if you have a sub left, but since it's a shootout you've probably used your 3 in the preceding game so an outfield player would have to go in goal.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2011 13:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
jyrka posted:Hey I have a question about the game of soccer and the Trin thread is gone I think so I'll ask here: what happens when a goalie gets sent off during a penalty shoot-out? An outfield player takes over, I guess. What would you have to do to get sent off during a shootout though? Act grossly unprofessionally in some way?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2011 13:59
|
|
