Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost

Brown Moses posted:

The centres of Zliten and Zawiyah have both been secured by the rebels in the past few hours.
Here's a report from Zawiyah
and one from Zliten

This is good news, I was getting concerned with the reports of high casualties. Hopefully they've broken through and things will be smoother now.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

KashiMane posted:

Western involvement is pretty much the reason. We said no more after Iraq and yet, not only are we in Libya, but they fooled you into thinking that it's some humanitarian mission. Rebels picked the other side and are out to get paid. I don't care for either side, I care about the people of Libya. They are in the middle of a struggle for power and resources, and all we can do for them is call them "collateral damage" when they are murdered.

The West became involved when it was clear that Gaddafi was going to hold onto power by instituting a full-fledged bloodbath in Benghazi and after the Arab League and the UN both gave the mission their respective blessing. Whatever you might feel about western meddling in North Africa, the fact of the matter is that there is a universe of difference between giving the Libyan national liberation movement a fighting chance and Mussolini's mad dreams of a New Roman Empire.

AtomikKrab
Jul 17, 2010

Keep on GOP rolling rolling rolling rolling.

KashiMane posted:

Woah, you guys never met someone opposed to western imperialism? Or is western imperialism a mystical tale to you folks?

You know, when the people of a country whose leader is an enemy of the west rise up to overthrow him, then ask the west to provide some help, THE WEST IS GOING TO HELP OUT. The western nations do not like ghaddfi and this is a legitimate reason to drop bombs on him.


You know what, gently caress people like you, get your heads out of your asses and smell some real world good being done for once. This is an opportunity for the western nations to get rid of an enemy, improve their image in the middle east and maybe end up with a friend out of all of this.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Today a Guardian journalists asked me for my Twitter list of Libya related accounts, and all of a sudden they are posting much better and timely updates.

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Brown Moses posted:

Today a Guardian journalists asked me for my Twitter list of Libya related accounts, and all of a sudden they are posting much better and timely updates.

Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader

KashiMane
Feb 22, 2011

by angerbeet

Pureauthor posted:

The people of Libya were the ones who initiated the revolt, you know.

Yes they did, and the bloodsuckers rushed to Libya.

Amused to Death posted:

If you cared about the people of Libya you'd support a movement that is helping to bring down a 4 decade dictator who among other things if you remember why this all started used snipers to fire on random civilians returning from funerals, and threatened to annihilate the city of Benghazi if it required going room to room hunting people down like rats.

Also the people of Libya asked us to intervene.

First of all, western-backed rebels do not represent the Libyan people. Second of all, if you knew anything about imperialism, you'd know that western involvement will come at a cost. It's not a loving humanitarian mission, wake up and smell the coffee. If the rebels win, Libya will just be another puppet state. And in time when the puppets go rogue or have a change of heart, the west will have to revisit Libya for another "humanitarian mission." If you are in denial of western imperialism, then I'm wasting my time.

AtomikKrab posted:

You know, when the people of a country whose leader is an enemy of the west rise up to overthrow him, then ask the west to provide some help, THE WEST IS GOING TO HELP OUT. The western nations do not like ghaddfi and this is a legitimate reason to drop bombs on him.


You know what, gently caress people like you, get your heads out of your asses and smell some real world good being done for once. This is an opportunity for the western nations to get rid of an enemy, improve their image in the middle east and maybe end up with a friend out of all of this.

Yes because it worked fantastically for the Iraqi people.

KashiMane fucked around with this message at 18:31 on Aug 19, 2011

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

The Guardian also follows me on twitter now.

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




How are u posted:

Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader

More Americans Get Their News From The Something Awful Forums Than Probably Should.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

Brown Moses posted:

The centres of Zliten and Zawiyah have both been secured by the rebels in the past few hours.
Here's a report from Zawiyah
and one from Zliten

So the rebels are pretty much in control of the coastal highway from Tunisia all the way out to the outskirts of Tripoli. If that's the case, then NATO can simply ship whatever supplies they need to to Tunis and just truck it over to the border, skipping the logistical problems of supply by air. That'll take some pressure off of NATO's transport fleet, at least in the western half of the country.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Zeroisanumber posted:

So the rebels are pretty much in control of the coastal highway from Tunisia all the way out to the outskirts of Tripoli. If that's the case, then NATO can simply ship whatever supplies they need to to Tunis and just truck it over to the border, skipping the logistical problems of supply by air. That'll take some pressure off of NATO's transport fleet, at least in the western half of the country.

I don't think they control the area around Zuwarah closer to the border, but it doesn't matter too much, Tripoli is cut off, and the whole area north of Nafusa and West of Zawiyah is encircled. Any Gaddafi troops there are cut off from resupply and reinforcement.
Here's the video report from Martyr Square in Zawiyah if you can't see if on the Sky site:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gDfBs8HAr8

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

How are u posted:

Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader

I just felt an icy chill crawl up my spine.

Seriously though, congrats to you Brown Moses. You've been doing some really fantastic work on this and it's nice to see you get recognition from the big media outlets.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Sivias posted:

\/\/\/ I heard Obama is not only on the ground, but is leading the push. He killed three CQ soldiers yesterday with a grenade.

Pure propagandist drivel. The west can only kill civilians, not soldiers.


In any case, I will go back to my line about not actually caring about the people of Libya, or the Libyan people, however they wish to style it. All you're doing is treating a populace as your passion play for partisan political dogma.
Its not even a matter for some snide comment about understanding when they grow up, it's an endemic political construct built out of popular sovereignty that an undifferentiated "people" have some sort of notional existence which is valuated according to your political ideology.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

KashiMane posted:

Imperialism.

It's good to be suspicious of the proverbial Greeks bearing gifts, but you're so paranoid of the shadowy hand of "Western Imperialism" that you're being myopic and refusing to see that this is a GOOD THING for the people of Libya. They're getting western help, but they're fighting for their own freedom against a brutal dictator and his gang of thugs.

If you honestly want to make a difference for the people of Libya, then work to ensure that that western support doesn't dry up and blow away after Gaddafi is ousted. They're going to need help rebuilding their country, creating democratic institutions, and dealing with the hangover that results from 40-years of dictatorship followed by a revolt.

Or you could, ya'know, just bitch on SA about what shits we are here in the West and post about weed over on TCC. Up to you.

hemale in pain
Jun 5, 2010




I wouldn't put too much effort in to responding to Kashi. He came to this thread posting a poo poo one liner, a clear baiting attempt, so he could trigger a discussion where he could spout his opinions about the west.

Edit - I don't want to come off as being such a dick, but his stuff about caring for the people of Libya while suggesting that he'd prefer them to be crushed by gaddafi's regime rather than getting our help is infuriating.

hemale in pain fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Aug 19, 2011

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

KashiMane posted:

:words:


All that I can think of when I read your posts is this. How old and tattered is your Che shirt that you're wearing while you spout this stuff?

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.

farraday posted:

Pure propagandist drivel. The west can only kill civilians, not soldiers.

In any case, I will go back to my line about not actually caring about the people of Libya, or the Libyan people, however they wish to style it. All you're doing is treating a populace as your passion play for partisan political dogma.
Its not even a matter for some snide comment about understanding when they grow up, it's an endemic political construct built out of popular sovereignty that an undifferentiated "people" have some sort of notional existence which is valuated according to your political ideology.

Can't make everyone happy all the time. If Libya was left to it's own devices, Benghazi would have been a massacre similar to the Balkans. Egypt and surrounding developing democratic nations would have a humanitarian crisis that would have required the intervention of western influence anyway. They already did when the Libyan military was knocking on the doors of Benghazi.

Of course it's not purely humanitarian. I don't think anyone could honestly argue that. You could ask questions like; "why aren't we intervening more in Syria, or in the Ivory Coast, or in Bahrain, or Yemen, etc."
The problem comes from cost for return. Libya would have been a huge disaster, and the cost to fix the problem gave much greater return then say intervening in Bahrain. It's lovely but it's life. However, assuming it's all implemented for purely maniacal political ideology is simply short sighted.

Sivias fucked around with this message at 19:12 on Aug 19, 2011

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

There's also the assumption that Gaddafi would have crushed Benghazi and it would have been over, but Nafusa stll could have risen up, and Misrata still might have carried on fighting. That would have led to more bloodshed, and the possibility of more extremist factions arising without the NTC and NATO pressure to keep things in check. The Berbers in Nafusa might have decided to declare independence, and started getting rid of the other tribes Gaddafi moved into the area.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

I've just added more accounts of journalists based in Libya to my twitter list. Interesting times in Libya, so it's a good source of reliable first hand info.

Felicity Barr just posted a interesting update from Zlitan

quote:

Our correspondent says Gadaffi forces fled #Zlitan, leaving behind ammunition and equipment.

Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 19:27 on Aug 19, 2011

Golbez
Oct 9, 2002

1 2 3!
If you want to take a shot at me get in line, line
1 2 3!
Baby, I've had all my shots and I'm fine

KashiMane posted:

Western involvement is pretty much the reason. We said no more after Iraq and yet, not only are we in Libya, but they fooled you into thinking that it's some humanitarian mission. Rebels picked the other side and are out to get paid. I don't care for either side, I care about the people of Libya. They are in the middle of a struggle for power and resources, and all we can do for them is call them "collateral damage" when they are murdered.

You apparently do, since you have only gloated when rebels die.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Brown Moses posted:

I've just added more accounts of journalists based in Libya to my twitter list. Interesting times in Libya, so it's a good source of reliable first hand info.

Oh I see how it is. First you get us all addicted to the daily updates and all of a sudden it's by the way, I've got a twitter feed you could upgrade to for the cost of your soul."

drat you Brown Moses, not all of us have souls!

Edit// Great news on Zlitan, general military collapse is one of those things that gets previously loyal underlings to consider their post-war prospects. Taking family vacations to Egypt is only the start.

Toast Museum
Dec 3, 2005

30% Iron Chef

Zeroisanumber posted:

Or you could, ya'know, just bitch on SA about what shits we are here in the West and post about weed over on TCC. Up to you.

Hey now, no need to insult fine upstanding potheads by associating them with the :qq: IMPERIALISM :qq: crowd.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Lindsey Hilsum of Channel 4 news has been tweeting from Gharyan

quote:

Today #Gharyan a big march celebrating the rebel takeover, and a funeral for a young man shot by an alleged '#Ghaddafi spy' last night.
I asked an old man in #Gharyan if #Ghaddafi would come back. "Never never never," he said.
Rebel commander in #Gharyan said General Sabhan fought for only 4 hours before fleeing. Not much destruction in the town.

Here's a video from the Gaddafi regime of the women of Gharyan training to fight off any rebel advances:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1js8j-YfKQY
Guess that plan didn't work out too well.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Now that Gharyan has fallen I demand update maps conform to this 1943 British Map of the North African coast ranging from Libya to Syria.

:nws:
Map
:nws:

Also, not to scale.

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.
"How not work safe could a map be?..."

drat my curiosity.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Great audio report about the capture of Zliten, sounds like a loving epic battle.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Here's some expert analysis from AJE on today's event:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM3F45P19FU
Footage of fighting in Zliten today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdNwD9agVpw

Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 20:58 on Aug 19, 2011

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Here's the Guardian's summing up of how hosed Gaddafi was today:

quote:

Tripoli facing three-sided advance by Libyan rebels
Muammar Gaddafi's 41-year grip on power in Libya looked more precarious than ever on Friday night, as rebel forces advanced on the capital from three directions after breaking out of the once-besieged town of Misrata.

With opposition forces taking control of the coastal town of Zlitan in the east, those in the west made progress clearing out the last pro-Gaddafi troops from Zawiyah, 30 miles west of Tripoli. They now have the main coastal road under pressure on both sides of the capital and also under threat from the Nafusa mountains.

Gaddafi's army outside Tripoli is trapped in a series of besieged and shrinking enclaves, with rebels controlling more than two thirds of the country. And as the stranglehold on the capital tightens, plans are being made to evacuate the last remaining foreign workers by sea.

It was a day of heavy street fighting in Zlitan, where rebels from Misrata came up against tanks and troops from the 32nd brigade commanded by Gaddafi's son Khamis. Thirty-five rebel troops were killed and scores more injured.

By Friday night, however, opposition leaders said they had taken control of the city 100 miles east of Tripoli. They said their column had reached the outskirts of Al Khums another 30 miles along the coast.

Al Khums commands the last significant road junction before the capital. Rebel spokesmen in Misrata said their forces were now in a valley not far from the town. "Zlitan is now under thwar [revolutionary] control," said Ali Gliwan, spokesman for Misrata's military council. "Misrata thwar linked with the Zlitan thwar. They are now establishing control of the town."

At Misrata's Mujamma Aledad hospital, bloodied bodies of the wounded and dead rebel fighters filled the corridors. "It's a big rush, many martyrs," said Dr Jamal Mustafa, sitting exhausted on a gurney. "Some of the faces, three of them we cannot recognise."

He said wounded fighters had told him government troops had hidden rocket launchers inside buildings to ambush fighters as they pushed into the town. "The bloody bastards, they hid in the houses, they know we [rebels] will not shoot at the houses for fear of killing civilians."

A large crowd of relatives and blood donors gathered at the hospital. One elderly woman in black was guided through the crowd, wailing and shrieking that her son was wounded. "I wish for God to take Gaddafi," she shouted. "I wish for God to take him."

The latest rebel advance came amid reports that the Tripoli compound of Gaddafi's brother-in-law and intelligence chief, Abdullah Senussi, had been destroyed by a Nato airstrike according to neighbours at his house which was hit overnight.

There was no word on whether the intelligence chief was inside.

In the west of Libya, rebels were reported to have seized the centre of Zawiyah after a fierce onslaught by regime forces. They were poised to move towards the coastal town of Janzur on the outskirts of the Libyan capital.

Fighters also told the Guardian they would advance on Zuara, one of the few remaining western coastal towns still under government control, in the next "three or four days" .

After recent rebel advances on the capital from the south and west – and now the east – an international sea evacuation is being considered for thousands of Egyptians and other foreigners trapped in Tripoli. A spokeswoman for the International Organisation for Migration, Jemini Pandya, said the operation would begin within days. "We are looking at all options available, but it will probably have to be by sea," she told a Geneva news conference.

There were estimated to be 1.5 million to 2.5 million foreigners, mostly Asian and African migrant workers, in Libya but more than 600,000 have fled the country during the six months of fighting.

However, many thousands remained in Tripoli which, until this week, was far from the fighting and is a two-hour drive from the Tunisian border.

Earlier in the war the IOM evacuated thousands of foreigners trapped by fighting in Misrata, though it is unclear how many eligible evacuees are in Tripoli, or whether the authorities would cooperate with any evacuation by allowing ships to dock.

It would be ironic if this is all over before Brega is retaken.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

France24 has been talking to @2011Feb17, in an interesting and long interview about life in Tripoli at the moment.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Purely speculative, but I wonder if military costs have driven coalition western support for the more aggression revolutionary areas instead of the nominally in charge TNC. Or perhaps Brega was just held much more solidly. The post Ghaddafi shake out of power will be complicated if the aggressive areas view the TNC as not entirely legitimate based on their apparent comparative quiescence or incapability.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

What's interesting now is you have a situation where the rebels in Benghazi might not actually play much of a role in the end game, and instead the Nafusa rebels and Misrata rebels will finish this.
Personally I'd prefer the rebels to trying and secure as many cities outside of Tripoli, and be joined by other rebels from those cities, which we've seen happen in Zliten and Zawiyah already. This would hopefully bring a greater sense of national unity once the dust settles, and hopefully reduce the chances of their being divisions.

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.
From what I remember Brega was incredibly hard fought. They almost took it a couple times at some pretty big losses. I'm betting it was just costing too much to try and take it and other areas provided a much greater success to dump resources into.

As far as the post Gadaffi green regime, I'm sure NATO, UN, and the west will be regarded as highly influential in the success of the rebellion and will be welcomed to help construct some sort of working system. The rebels know how much NATO has helped. Not to mention the Libyan rebel fighters have a lot of ex pats (judging by a lot of the personalized stories from the rebels) that returned to fight.
We can only hope the outcome is peaceful and democratic. Power and influence is a very dangerous thing though.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
I could see that fostering unity for a general rebel sentiment, but it might also increase tension between rebel factions. I don't know how tied in Misrata is with Benghazi, although presumably to some degree, but I don't think the Nafusa rebels are more than nominally separate.

If the TNC presumes to establish a post regime transitional government that heavily favors the Benghazi based rebels* those groups which may feel they've both sacrificed and succeeded more would probably have a serious grievance with them. The successful groups taking more towns would only exacerbate that, not lessen it.


* A mistake you can identify easily but which is harder to avoid on the ground. Think of the logic "I want to put people I know in charge of important areas, not unknowns."

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

It'll be important to the Nafusa rebels to have the Berber culture properly recognised in Libya after being oppressed for so long and fighting so hard against Gaddafi, so I think that'll be something to watch out for in post-Gaddafi Libya.

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.
Well Farraday, I would imagine it depends on how united they are against the idea of the Qadaffi regime. Nothing unites people like a common enemy. Although I'd be confident the values of the council in Benghazi sync well with those in the west. It'd be a pretty dick move to take advantage of the victories and ground fought by the Nafusa Mountains only to ignore their efforts once the battle has won.

Golbez
Oct 9, 2002

1 2 3!
If you want to take a shot at me get in line, line
1 2 3!
Baby, I've had all my shots and I'm fine

Brown Moses posted:

What's interesting now is you have a situation where the rebels in Benghazi might not actually play much of a role in the end game, and instead the Nafusa rebels and Misrata rebels will finish this.
Personally I'd prefer the rebels to trying and secure as many cities outside of Tripoli, and be joined by other rebels from those cities, which we've seen happen in Zliten and Zawiyah already. This would hopefully bring a greater sense of national unity once the dust settles, and hopefully reduce the chances of their being divisions.

In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Sivias posted:

Well Farraday, I would imagine it depends on how united they are against the idea of the Qadaffi regime. Nothing unites people like a common enemy. Although I'd be confident the values of the council in Benghazi sync well with those in the west. It'd be a pretty dick move to take advantage of the victories and ground fought by the Nafusa Mountains only to ignore their efforts once the battle has won.

You'd think so, but it's amazing how badly success can go wrong in a revolution.

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.

farraday posted:

You'd think so, but it's amazing how badly success can go wrong in a revolution.

Exactly. The revolution of a society becoming that which they gave their lives to defeat is almost a proverb. As Jefferson (?) said, every generation needs it's revolution. We as a species become complacent and forget quickly the values we fight for.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Golbez posted:

In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy.

To me there seems to be three possible scenarios:
1) Gaddafi hangs on, the rebels attack Tripoli, and it's a bloodbath.
2) Gaddafi hangs on while the rebels take over the rest of the country, and there's a humanitarion disaster in Tripoli.
3) Gaddafi quits.

Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost

Golbez posted:

In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy.

If the alternative is a bloody siege, then perhaps it would be. For a time, at least.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.

Brown Moses posted:

4) Gaddafi hangs

It'll happen.

Sounds like there is a pretty heavy exodus from Tripoli as it is. I just hope CQ doesn't go on some rampage inside the city itself. "If I can't have it, no one can" sort of approach. Yikes.

Edit: The rebels aren't far from Tripoli now - Could they be assaulting it this weekend? (assuming a different, more strategic plan isn't implemented). Are we going to hear about fighting on the outskirts of the capitol?

Edit 2: Also, has the government spokesman said anything since his brother died yesterday?

Sivias fucked around with this message at 22:13 on Aug 19, 2011

  • Locked thread