|
Brown Moses posted:The centres of Zliten and Zawiyah have both been secured by the rebels in the past few hours. This is good news, I was getting concerned with the reports of high casualties. Hopefully they've broken through and things will be smoother now.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:22 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 02:52 |
|
KashiMane posted:Western involvement is pretty much the reason. We said no more after Iraq and yet, not only are we in Libya, but they fooled you into thinking that it's some humanitarian mission. Rebels picked the other side and are out to get paid. I don't care for either side, I care about the people of Libya. They are in the middle of a struggle for power and resources, and all we can do for them is call them "collateral damage" when they are murdered. The West became involved when it was clear that Gaddafi was going to hold onto power by instituting a full-fledged bloodbath in Benghazi and after the Arab League and the UN both gave the mission their respective blessing. Whatever you might feel about western meddling in North Africa, the fact of the matter is that there is a universe of difference between giving the Libyan national liberation movement a fighting chance and Mussolini's mad dreams of a New Roman Empire.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:22 |
|
KashiMane posted:Woah, you guys never met someone opposed to western imperialism? Or is western imperialism a mystical tale to you folks? You know, when the people of a country whose leader is an enemy of the west rise up to overthrow him, then ask the west to provide some help, THE WEST IS GOING TO HELP OUT. The western nations do not like ghaddfi and this is a legitimate reason to drop bombs on him. You know what, gently caress people like you, get your heads out of your asses and smell some real world good being done for once. This is an opportunity for the western nations to get rid of an enemy, improve their image in the middle east and maybe end up with a friend out of all of this.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:24 |
|
Today a Guardian journalists asked me for my Twitter list of Libya related accounts, and all of a sudden they are posting much better and timely updates.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:25 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Today a Guardian journalists asked me for my Twitter list of Libya related accounts, and all of a sudden they are posting much better and timely updates. Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:26 |
|
Pureauthor posted:The people of Libya were the ones who initiated the revolt, you know. Yes they did, and the bloodsuckers rushed to Libya. Amused to Death posted:If you cared about the people of Libya you'd support a movement that is helping to bring down a 4 decade dictator who among other things if you remember why this all started used snipers to fire on random civilians returning from funerals, and threatened to annihilate the city of Benghazi if it required going room to room hunting people down like rats. First of all, western-backed rebels do not represent the Libyan people. Second of all, if you knew anything about imperialism, you'd know that western involvement will come at a cost. It's not a loving humanitarian mission, wake up and smell the coffee. If the rebels win, Libya will just be another puppet state. And in time when the puppets go rogue or have a change of heart, the west will have to revisit Libya for another "humanitarian mission." If you are in denial of western imperialism, then I'm wasting my time. AtomikKrab posted:You know, when the people of a country whose leader is an enemy of the west rise up to overthrow him, then ask the west to provide some help, THE WEST IS GOING TO HELP OUT. The western nations do not like ghaddfi and this is a legitimate reason to drop bombs on him. Yes because it worked fantastically for the Iraqi people. KashiMane fucked around with this message at 18:31 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:29 |
|
The Guardian also follows me on twitter now.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:29 |
|
How are u posted:Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader More Americans Get Their News From The Something Awful Forums Than Probably Should.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:29 |
|
Brown Moses posted:The centres of Zliten and Zawiyah have both been secured by the rebels in the past few hours. So the rebels are pretty much in control of the coastal highway from Tunisia all the way out to the outskirts of Tripoli. If that's the case, then NATO can simply ship whatever supplies they need to to Tunis and just truck it over to the border, skipping the logistical problems of supply by air. That'll take some pressure off of NATO's transport fleet, at least in the western half of the country.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:30 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:So the rebels are pretty much in control of the coastal highway from Tunisia all the way out to the outskirts of Tripoli. If that's the case, then NATO can simply ship whatever supplies they need to to Tunis and just truck it over to the border, skipping the logistical problems of supply by air. That'll take some pressure off of NATO's transport fleet, at least in the western half of the country. I don't think they control the area around Zuwarah closer to the border, but it doesn't matter too much, Tripoli is cut off, and the whole area north of Nafusa and West of Zawiyah is encircled. Any Gaddafi troops there are cut off from resupply and reinforcement. Here's the video report from Martyr Square in Zawiyah if you can't see if on the Sky site: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gDfBs8HAr8
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:32 |
|
How are u posted:Something Awful Forums: Your Global News Leader I just felt an icy chill crawl up my spine. Seriously though, congrats to you Brown Moses. You've been doing some really fantastic work on this and it's nice to see you get recognition from the big media outlets.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:32 |
|
Sivias posted:\/\/\/ I heard Obama is not only on the ground, but is leading the push. He killed three CQ soldiers yesterday with a grenade. Pure propagandist drivel. The west can only kill civilians, not soldiers. In any case, I will go back to my line about not actually caring about the people of Libya, or the Libyan people, however they wish to style it. All you're doing is treating a populace as your passion play for partisan political dogma. Its not even a matter for some snide comment about understanding when they grow up, it's an endemic political construct built out of popular sovereignty that an undifferentiated "people" have some sort of notional existence which is valuated according to your political ideology.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:44 |
|
KashiMane posted:Imperialism. It's good to be suspicious of the proverbial Greeks bearing gifts, but you're so paranoid of the shadowy hand of "Western Imperialism" that you're being myopic and refusing to see that this is a GOOD THING for the people of Libya. They're getting western help, but they're fighting for their own freedom against a brutal dictator and his gang of thugs. If you honestly want to make a difference for the people of Libya, then work to ensure that that western support doesn't dry up and blow away after Gaddafi is ousted. They're going to need help rebuilding their country, creating democratic institutions, and dealing with the hangover that results from 40-years of dictatorship followed by a revolt. Or you could, ya'know, just bitch on SA about what shits we are here in the West and post about weed over on TCC. Up to you.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:47 |
|
I wouldn't put too much effort in to responding to Kashi. He came to this thread posting a poo poo one liner, a clear baiting attempt, so he could trigger a discussion where he could spout his opinions about the west. Edit - I don't want to come off as being such a dick, but his stuff about caring for the people of Libya while suggesting that he'd prefer them to be crushed by gaddafi's regime rather than getting our help is infuriating. hemale in pain fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:51 |
|
KashiMane posted:All that I can think of when I read your posts is this. How old and tattered is your Che shirt that you're wearing while you spout this stuff?
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 18:55 |
|
farraday posted:Pure propagandist drivel. The west can only kill civilians, not soldiers. Can't make everyone happy all the time. If Libya was left to it's own devices, Benghazi would have been a massacre similar to the Balkans. Egypt and surrounding developing democratic nations would have a humanitarian crisis that would have required the intervention of western influence anyway. They already did when the Libyan military was knocking on the doors of Benghazi. Of course it's not purely humanitarian. I don't think anyone could honestly argue that. You could ask questions like; "why aren't we intervening more in Syria, or in the Ivory Coast, or in Bahrain, or Yemen, etc." The problem comes from cost for return. Libya would have been a huge disaster, and the cost to fix the problem gave much greater return then say intervening in Bahrain. It's lovely but it's life. However, assuming it's all implemented for purely maniacal political ideology is simply short sighted. Sivias fucked around with this message at 19:12 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:05 |
|
There's also the assumption that Gaddafi would have crushed Benghazi and it would have been over, but Nafusa stll could have risen up, and Misrata still might have carried on fighting. That would have led to more bloodshed, and the possibility of more extremist factions arising without the NTC and NATO pressure to keep things in check. The Berbers in Nafusa might have decided to declare independence, and started getting rid of the other tribes Gaddafi moved into the area.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:09 |
|
I've just added more accounts of journalists based in Libya to my twitter list. Interesting times in Libya, so it's a good source of reliable first hand info. Felicity Barr just posted a interesting update from Zlitan quote:Our correspondent says Gadaffi forces fled #Zlitan, leaving behind ammunition and equipment. Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 19:27 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:20 |
|
KashiMane posted:Western involvement is pretty much the reason. We said no more after Iraq and yet, not only are we in Libya, but they fooled you into thinking that it's some humanitarian mission. Rebels picked the other side and are out to get paid. I don't care for either side, I care about the people of Libya. They are in the middle of a struggle for power and resources, and all we can do for them is call them "collateral damage" when they are murdered. You apparently do, since you have only gloated when rebels die.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:26 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I've just added more accounts of journalists based in Libya to my twitter list. Interesting times in Libya, so it's a good source of reliable first hand info. Oh I see how it is. First you get us all addicted to the daily updates and all of a sudden it's by the way, I've got a twitter feed you could upgrade to for the cost of your soul." drat you Brown Moses, not all of us have souls! Edit// Great news on Zlitan, general military collapse is one of those things that gets previously loyal underlings to consider their post-war prospects. Taking family vacations to Egypt is only the start.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:27 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:Or you could, ya'know, just bitch on SA about what shits we are here in the West and post about weed over on TCC. Up to you. Hey now, no need to insult fine upstanding potheads by associating them with the IMPERIALISM crowd.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:29 |
|
Lindsey Hilsum of Channel 4 news has been tweeting from Gharyanquote:Today #Gharyan a big march celebrating the rebel takeover, and a funeral for a young man shot by an alleged '#Ghaddafi spy' last night. Here's a video from the Gaddafi regime of the women of Gharyan training to fight off any rebel advances: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1js8j-YfKQY Guess that plan didn't work out too well.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:52 |
|
Now that Gharyan has fallen I demand update maps conform to this 1943 British Map of the North African coast ranging from Libya to Syria. Map Also, not to scale.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 19:59 |
|
"How not work safe could a map be?..." drat my curiosity.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 20:16 |
|
Great audio report about the capture of Zliten, sounds like a loving epic battle.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 20:34 |
|
Here's some expert analysis from AJE on today's event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM3F45P19FU Footage of fighting in Zliten today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdNwD9agVpw Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 20:58 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 20:54 |
|
Here's the Guardian's summing up of how hosed Gaddafi was today:quote:Tripoli facing three-sided advance by Libyan rebels It would be ironic if this is all over before Brega is retaken.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:03 |
|
France24 has been talking to @2011Feb17, in an interesting and long interview about life in Tripoli at the moment.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:10 |
|
Purely speculative, but I wonder if military costs have driven coalition western support for the more aggression revolutionary areas instead of the nominally in charge TNC. Or perhaps Brega was just held much more solidly. The post Ghaddafi shake out of power will be complicated if the aggressive areas view the TNC as not entirely legitimate based on their apparent comparative quiescence or incapability.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:13 |
|
What's interesting now is you have a situation where the rebels in Benghazi might not actually play much of a role in the end game, and instead the Nafusa rebels and Misrata rebels will finish this. Personally I'd prefer the rebels to trying and secure as many cities outside of Tripoli, and be joined by other rebels from those cities, which we've seen happen in Zliten and Zawiyah already. This would hopefully bring a greater sense of national unity once the dust settles, and hopefully reduce the chances of their being divisions.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:18 |
|
From what I remember Brega was incredibly hard fought. They almost took it a couple times at some pretty big losses. I'm betting it was just costing too much to try and take it and other areas provided a much greater success to dump resources into. As far as the post Gadaffi green regime, I'm sure NATO, UN, and the west will be regarded as highly influential in the success of the rebellion and will be welcomed to help construct some sort of working system. The rebels know how much NATO has helped. Not to mention the Libyan rebel fighters have a lot of ex pats (judging by a lot of the personalized stories from the rebels) that returned to fight. We can only hope the outcome is peaceful and democratic. Power and influence is a very dangerous thing though.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:24 |
|
I could see that fostering unity for a general rebel sentiment, but it might also increase tension between rebel factions. I don't know how tied in Misrata is with Benghazi, although presumably to some degree, but I don't think the Nafusa rebels are more than nominally separate. If the TNC presumes to establish a post regime transitional government that heavily favors the Benghazi based rebels* those groups which may feel they've both sacrificed and succeeded more would probably have a serious grievance with them. The successful groups taking more towns would only exacerbate that, not lessen it. * A mistake you can identify easily but which is harder to avoid on the ground. Think of the logic "I want to put people I know in charge of important areas, not unknowns."
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:26 |
|
It'll be important to the Nafusa rebels to have the Berber culture properly recognised in Libya after being oppressed for so long and fighting so hard against Gaddafi, so I think that'll be something to watch out for in post-Gaddafi Libya.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:34 |
|
Well Farraday, I would imagine it depends on how united they are against the idea of the Qadaffi regime. Nothing unites people like a common enemy. Although I'd be confident the values of the council in Benghazi sync well with those in the west. It'd be a pretty dick move to take advantage of the victories and ground fought by the Nafusa Mountains only to ignore their efforts once the battle has won.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:42 |
|
Brown Moses posted:What's interesting now is you have a situation where the rebels in Benghazi might not actually play much of a role in the end game, and instead the Nafusa rebels and Misrata rebels will finish this. In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:43 |
|
Sivias posted:Well Farraday, I would imagine it depends on how united they are against the idea of the Qadaffi regime. Nothing unites people like a common enemy. Although I'd be confident the values of the council in Benghazi sync well with those in the west. It'd be a pretty dick move to take advantage of the victories and ground fought by the Nafusa Mountains only to ignore their efforts once the battle has won. You'd think so, but it's amazing how badly success can go wrong in a revolution.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:46 |
|
farraday posted:You'd think so, but it's amazing how badly success can go wrong in a revolution. Exactly. The revolution of a society becoming that which they gave their lives to defeat is almost a proverb. As Jefferson (?) said, every generation needs it's revolution. We as a species become complacent and forget quickly the values we fight for.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:51 |
|
Golbez posted:In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy. To me there seems to be three possible scenarios: 1) Gaddafi hangs on, the rebels attack Tripoli, and it's a bloodbath. 2) Gaddafi hangs on while the rebels take over the rest of the country, and there's a humanitarion disaster in Tripoli. 3) Gaddafi quits.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:55 |
|
Golbez posted:In other words, let Tripoli rot while they consolidate the remainder of the country under one flag. That would seem to be a sound strategy. If the alternative is a bloody siege, then perhaps it would be. For a time, at least.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:55 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 02:52 |
|
Brown Moses posted:4) Gaddafi hangs It'll happen. Sounds like there is a pretty heavy exodus from Tripoli as it is. I just hope CQ doesn't go on some rampage inside the city itself. "If I can't have it, no one can" sort of approach. Yikes. Edit: The rebels aren't far from Tripoli now - Could they be assaulting it this weekend? (assuming a different, more strategic plan isn't implemented). Are we going to hear about fighting on the outskirts of the capitol? Edit 2: Also, has the government spokesman said anything since his brother died yesterday? Sivias fucked around with this message at 22:13 on Aug 19, 2011 |
# ? Aug 19, 2011 21:57 |