|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Google "Sam Sparks" and "fetus" to restore your faith in the federal justice system I didn't even look at the judge's name. I should've known, just from the court's location.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 01:23 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 07:37 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:On another note, from the "Awesome Judgment" department: This is about as rad as: http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Civil/072006/m2304854.pdf Restore your faith in the federal justice system, probably not. But it'll probably make you laugh, which is good enough, even if you've seen it tens of times.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 06:51 |
|
I once met a partner at a firm that boasted that he had never taken more than a half day off in 40 years with the firm. In a discussion with someone that knew said partner, it was mentioned that he had lost his wife 25 years previously to cancer. I asked how he had handled her death considering his representations that he had never taken more than a half day off. The response? "The funeral was at 9:00, he was at his desk by noon." He had 4 kids, 3 of whom were under the age of 18 at the time. Yeah...
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 09:17 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:On another note, from the "Awesome Judgment" department: awesome judgment, same judge e:f;b
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 16:00 |
|
cerebral posted:I once met a partner at a firm that boasted that he had never taken more than a half day off in 40 years with the firm. In all fairness to the partner, you really don't need to be at your spouse's funeral - there's nothing to be done at that point anyway. At least at your kid's birth you can catch the baby or whatever. The best you can do at a funeral is draft some client emails on your blackberry.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 16:05 |
|
cerebral posted:I once met a partner at a firm that boasted that he had never taken more than a half day off in 40 years with the firm. If I do end up practicing for 40 years, I hope "never taking time off" never becomes a boasting point. Honestly, I'm worried about looking back 20 years later and going "You know all those cool things you used to do? You're an empty shell of a human being now. Congratulations on the money, I guess."
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 16:34 |
|
Zenostein posted:This is about as rad as: Goodnight, sweet prince.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 16:35 |
|
F E Smith posted:Very interesting arrangement - never heard of it before! (London lawgoon here.) Is it a small litigation boutique? Pretty much, yeah. Specialist work involving migrant businessmen, and some sharia-compatible finance and conveyancing. I snapped it up precisely because it was unusual, and I've spent quite enough time as a junior up to my ears in Biglaw repossession work. Where are you based in London? Phil Moscowitz posted:You typically need to be able to manage the case yourself though, and more common in high-volume plaintiff lit places. That sums it up. Good to hear it isn't a warning sign for anything, which is what I was concerned about. So 10% is a solid starting percentage?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 18:30 |
|
If you work for a firm and meet but don't exceed the minimum billing requirements, and you take the vacation days you're allotted... ok, so maybe you don't make partner, but sometimes I wonder if that's really such a bad thing.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 19:19 |
|
The Wise Teen posted:If you work for a firm and meet but don't exceed the minimum billing requirements, and you take the vacation days you're allotted... ok, so maybe you don't make partner, but sometimes I wonder if that's really such a bad thing.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 19:43 |
|
Plus, don't most firms have an 'up or out' policy, where you are automatically fired if you don't get promoted within a certain amount of time?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 21:19 |
|
cerebral posted:I once met a partner at a firm that boasted that he had never taken more than a half day off in 40 years with the firm. I've taken a single one week vacation during my entire 10+ year tenure with my firm. Frankly, that's not me being a martyr. When you bill by the hour, any time that you're not in the office is time you have to make up somehow. I'd rather go home an hour earlier 50 or 60 days out of the year than take it all in a single one week burst. Welcome to billing your time, have a nice loving day.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 21:20 |
|
SlyFrog posted:I've taken a single one week vacation during my entire 10+ year tenure with my firm. Welcome to government, have a nice day.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 21:40 |
|
Spoke with my boss, he encouraged me to take off two weeks since he'll be on vacation himself during that time, and there won't be a lot for me to do anyway. So, having gotten explicit approval to take off two weeks, I'll be taking one week and then working half in the office and half at home for the second week.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 21:45 |
|
entris posted:So, having gotten explicit approval to take off two weeks, I'll be taking one week and then working half in the office and half at home for the second week.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 21:56 |
|
Coloring Book for Lawyers
|
# ? Aug 31, 2011 22:55 |
|
Green Crayons posted:Having just come off of a two week vacation, it is boring as poo poo by week two. You are doing the right thing. Spoken like a true workaholic lawyer.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 00:45 |
|
I'd agree that 2 week vacations get boring, you certainly don't appreciate that second week anywhere near as much as the first.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 00:47 |
|
SlyFrog posted:I've taken a single one week vacation during my entire 10+ year tenure with my firm. I know that in the legal profession I'm the maladjusted one, but I just can't fathom signing up for that. I'm not much into religion, but I now feel the need to sacrifice a small animal/child to give thanks that I don't need to do that to make a living.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 01:31 |
|
diospadre posted:I'd agree that 2 week vacations get boring, you certainly don't appreciate that second week anywhere near as much as the first. My job only offers 1 week vacation per year so I solved that problem!
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 01:39 |
|
Penguins Like Pies posted:Coloring Book for Lawyers poo poo is so old I still laugh at the one about the staff having lunch in the kitchen. "Hello, my smile says. I am one of you. I never eat there."
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 02:03 |
|
cerebral posted:I know that in the legal profession I'm the maladjusted one, but I just can't fathom signing up for that. I've got to be fair, that's me. Most other people at my firm take a week or two a year (but not all - I've got a partner down the hall that makes me look like a slacker, as I do not recall him taking even the single week off that I did in the 10+ years I've been there). As much as I rant and rave, I do need to give some perspective (and not seem quite so dedicated as "one week in ten years" sounds). I have taken single days off here and there over the years from time to time, so it's not like I've worked 6-7 days a week without fail for the entire 10+ years. And I have no problem getting the hell out of the office at three in the afternoon occasionally if I feel like it. That's my point though - private practice for a large firm is miserable enough. Everyone has their preferences. For me, I'd rather go home at 6 p.m. instead of 7 p.m. 50-60 nights per year (or get out at 3 in the afternoon 15 times per year, whatever way you want to look at it) than take the 50-60 hours off that a week's vacation implies. It's not like billable hours break down that easily, but the general concept applies.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 02:06 |
So is law actually that fun or is it just Stockholm syndrome or self-deception or something? "I have never taken a day off in 40 years because this rules so hard" is a hell of a claim.
|
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 03:22 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:poo poo is so old I think about posting the "color my underpants important" one in the file room but never can quite sack up to do it.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 03:31 |
|
shovelbum posted:So is law actually that fun or is it just Stockholm syndrome or self-deception or something? "I have never taken a day off in 40 years because this rules so hard" is a hell of a claim. The partner that claimed to have never taken a full day off in 40 years definitely didn't do it because the practice of law was "fun" to him. He did it because his identity and ego were so wrapped up in the practice of law and the running of the firm that he was absolutely lost and miserable whenever he was engaged in anything other than his work. He is almost universally reviled by everyone that knows him (that doesn't directly benefit from his billable hours), and is an absolute loving chore to be around, even in social situations. Seriously, he is a special special kind of rear end in a top hat in a profession known for assholes, and his slavish dedication to his work is one of the least offensive things about him.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 03:36 |
|
I took two loving days off (well, four counting the weekend), and it felt like my world was collapsing around me when I got back today. My schedule is perfectly set to gently caress me the rest of the year. Big deadlines basically every two weeks like clockwork. But I'm not going to have the opportunity to make this kind of scratch forever. I have like two good earning years left before I'm up-or-outed, and then who knows what the gently caress.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 03:51 |
|
shovelbum posted:So is law actually that fun or is it just Stockholm syndrome or self-deception or something? "I have never taken a day off in 40 years because this rules so hard" is a hell of a claim. It can be both. Well not enough to not take a day off, but PD work is fun as hell. It is also emotionally draining (layoffs every few months don't help), so we take vacations. I can say that my dad who is with a large (but not biglaw ) firm and has been there for decades seems to genuinely love his job. He works a small number of very complex and interesting (even to me and I hate civil) cases that seem to make billables without issue. And even he takes vacation. He's off on a 3 week vacation he takes annually. The firm also has sabbaticals of 3 months every few years partners are expected to use (as in they'll have a talk if you don't) and you are not expected to bill then. Of course, this took a long slog through boring poo poo to get, but even private civil can be fun if you've set the groundwork early.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 03:58 |
|
SlyFrog posted:For me, I'd rather go home at 6 p.m. instead of 7 p.m. 50-60 nights per year (or get out at 3 in the afternoon 15 times per year, whatever way you want to look at it) than take the 50-60 hours off Future law students: look at this quote very carefully, imagine it came from your mouth a decade and a half from now and carefully examine yourself for any thoughts of suicide. Then realize this man is one of the elite because he has a very well paying job.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 09:16 |
|
and on that note http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/01/f...=general&src=me NYT posted:
quote:“What was the point of working so hard for 22 years if there was nothing out there?” said Ms. Morales, who...plans on attending law school. oh irony
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 23:26 |
|
Oh man I've just started to cram for the LSAT and anticipate taking it in september, I don't even want to think about anything else past that. This thread is simultaneously the scariest and most educational thing in my quest for law knowledge. Thankfully I scored a gig that is setting me up with a job after i'm done and paying me through school for my JD I just hope it all stays afloat.
Bob Log fucked around with this message at 23:50 on Sep 1, 2011 |
# ? Sep 1, 2011 23:46 |
|
Bob Log posted:Oh man I've just started to cram for the LSAT and anticipate taking it in september, I don't even want to think about anything else past that. This thread is simultaneously the scariest and most educational thing in my quest for law knowledge. Thankfully I scored a gig that is setting me up with a job after i'm done and paying me through school for my JD I just hope it all stays afloat. Got it on paper?
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 23:59 |
|
IrritationX posted:Got it on paper? That's confidential. Did I do this right?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 00:14 |
|
Bob Log posted:That's confidential. You work somewhere that is going to invest $80,000+ in you so they can bring on an entry-level attorney? Interesting.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 00:40 |
|
Bob Log posted:That's confidential. If they can leave you holding your dick and 80k in loan debt, they will.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 00:53 |
|
Bob Log posted:That's confidential. Nope! Not even close!
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 01:13 |
|
Don't be a lawyer join Titus Andronicus like that girl in that article.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 01:14 |
|
Longshot but any other NYU Law goons here? I just started and holy poo poo this is a lot of work.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 02:15 |
|
Bob Log posted:That's confidential. if you are auditioning for a reboot of JAG: yes
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 02:19 |
|
blar posted:You work somewhere that is going to invest $80,000+ in you so they can bring on an entry-level attorney? Interesting. Yeah, I don't buy it. It just makes no sense unless your dad is running the company.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 03:37 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 07:37 |
|
blar posted:You work somewhere that is going to invest $80,000+ in you so they can bring on an entry-level attorney? Interesting. patent attorney?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 04:16 |