|
I'm happy to see revolutions and political change lead by the people, but is anyone else creeped out about people shouting god is great around every single dead leader the middle east has produced lately? The Saddam execution was haunting because of the chanting. And not a leader, but the Nick Berg beheading video... wtf.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:19 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 06:22 |
|
ease posted:I'm happy to see revolutions and political change lead by the people, but is anyone else creeped out about people shouting god is great around every single dead leader the middle east has produced lately? Increasingly seems to me that "Allahu Akbar" is almost used to mean "gently caress YEAH" than anything else but to hell if I know.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:21 |
EdTheHead posted:I believe definition 2 applies here. Please stop. Nobody cares.
|
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:22 |
Nombres posted:Increasingly seems to me that "Allahu Akbar" is almost used to mean "gently caress YEAH" than anything else but to hell if I know. The Libyan revolutionaries (and population as a whole) are strongly religious and their rhetoric is (for better or worse) centered around Islam. This is one of those things that is also disturbing about the Syrian revolution. Religious rhetoric wasn't so present during the Tunisian or Egyptian revolutions due to the general nature of the protesters as well as strategic decisions by religious groups. Eg the strongest slogans in Tunisia were of course "degage", "al-sha'ab yureed isqat al-nidham" (the people want the downfall of the regime) or "khubz wa ma' wa Ben Ali la" (Bread and water, Ben Ali no) az jan jananam fucked around with this message at 21:58 on Oct 20, 2011 |
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:23 |
|
Rrail posted:Not really, it's on his upper cheekbone. People get shot in the face and head all the time, accidentally and purposely. In the video previously linked it seems to appear he's bleeding from this area while standing, but it is unclear. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVIkck02qao&skipcontrinter=1
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/statuses/127110228612366337quote:Sky sources: Gaddafi's son Saif al-Islam is alive and is still at large quote:Saif al-Islam is alive and is still at large quote:still at large no i don't know either Nuclear Spoon fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Oct 20, 2011 |
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:26 |
|
Brown Moses posted:This is apparently the corpse of Moatassim Gaddafi: He looks like Nick Cave's condescending younger brother.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:29 |
|
This is apparently a new video of Gaddafi being all Weekend at Bernies http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpnwBXHuxOc
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:29 |
|
I guess no-one gives a poo poo about me posting news articles at this point in time?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:30 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I guess no-one gives a poo poo about me posting news articles at this point in time? We always do.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:31 |
|
^^^^ Yeah, this! Don't stop now Brown Moses posted:This is apparently a new video of Gaddafi being all Weekend at Bernies Dead as a doornail, his eyes look hemorrhaged. Think the UK will say this is revenge for Lockerbie?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:31 |
|
Chicken Doodle posted:Dead as a doornail, his eyes look hemorrhaged. They already interviewed a lady this afternoon here in Massachusetts that had a daughter die in that crash.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:32 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I guess no-one gives a poo poo about me posting news articles at this point in time? Please don't stop. There's a lot of interesting things that are going to be going on and you're literally my best up-to-the minute source. Also, it might rescue the thread.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:32 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I guess no-one gives a poo poo about me posting news articles at this point in time? Yeah, don't stop! We love you Brown Mosessss. Although if you want to take time off your vigil in order to spend time with your newborn, I'm sure none of us will fault you. Congrats!
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:34 |
|
He's another of Gaddafi's corpse, note the amount of mobile phones. Sorry if I post any repeats, I'm just catching up at the moment.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:34 |
|
Pueidist posted:to celebrate gaddafis death demands you remove the event from its entire context. i.e., bin laden was a bad dude, but his death was at best a bittersweet moment because it came as a result of a needlessly bloody and destructive war campaign that obliterated millions of lives. the nato campaign for north africa is a force for evil and that it accidentally results in some level of justice doesnt deserve celebration I half agree with this. A lot of people are supporting Gaddafi out of sheer contrarianism and basically using his "victimisation" as a stick to beat the western powers with. It is quite possible to both be happy that Gaddafi's regime has fallen and angry that NATO stepped in to ensure that it happened. The powers behind NATO are horrible precisely because they were willing at one point to be friends with Gaddafi in order to ensure that their goals in the Middle East were better met, and it was those same goals that kept dictators like Mubarak and Musharaff in Pakistan in power as well. Those strategic goals have not changed, even if the rules have been hastily re-written to no longer support the dictators and instead try to cosy up to their successor regimes. We can celebrate the fall of Gaddafi despite this. He was the personification of evil. When regarding NATO's role in all of this, don't forget that these actions were a panicked and hasty response to a situation that had they had lost all control over (see for example the confused response of our leaders to the Egyptian Revolution). This is a dent in the policy of supporting dictatorships in order to ahcieve regional goals, and that's a positive outcome. Whether that is permanent or not of course remains to be seen.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:37 |
|
Brown Moses posted:He's another of Gaddafi's corpse, note the amount of mobile phones. Well, it's pretty clear he was hit in the stomach, then. Unless that's his bellybutton.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:37 |
|
Nombres posted:Yeah, don't stop! We love you Brown Mosessss. Thanks everyone for the congrats, mum and baby are recovering in hospital over night, so I've got a few hours free now.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:37 |
|
Nombres posted:Yeah, don't stop! We love you Brown Mosessss. Yeah, exactly this. Though it'd be nice to have this thread saved from an inane discussion about whether Ghaddafi death was just and imperialists.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:38 |
|
It's worth posting this article that summarises the events leading up to his death:quote:Libya's Gaddafi caught hiding like a "rat"
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:41 |
|
Brown Moses posted:It's worth posting this article that summarises the events leading up to his death: Late to the party but congratulations on your daughter's birth! I don't know how your wife would feel but Spring would be a lovely name
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:43 |
|
Rasler posted:
Yup he pretty much had great success in shedding his black sheep status and helping EU countries overlook his true nature. Especially getting energy deals with countries such as Italy and also quitting his WMD program. But the Arab spring introduced a bad surprise and uncontrollable element into the picture especially since it caught the west flatfooted.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:43 |
|
quote:Body of Gaddafi son put on display in Misrata house
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:48 |
|
Brown Moses posted:This is apparently a new video of Gaddafi being all Weekend at Bernies Wow, now that is just undignified.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:50 |
|
Brown Moses posted:This is apparently a new video of Gaddafi being all Weekend at Bernies It did not. I'm probably some kind of monster.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:50 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Some of this is ghastly. I understand the need to prove beyond doubt to people that these people are dead but some of this stuff is really grisly.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:50 |
|
Rasler posted:It is quite possible to both be happy that Gaddafi's regime has fallen and angry that NATO stepped in to ensure that it happened. Is it, though? Because the first would absolutely not have occurred without the latter.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:51 |
|
Nilbop posted:Some of this is ghastly. I understand the need to prove beyond doubt to people that these people are dead but some of this stuff is really grisly. I'm genuinely curious how the groups of rebels in these shots see this. Is it a feeling of, "Yeah we killed the fucker"? "Finally this is over we can rebuild"? How do they see their treatment of Gadaffi's corpse? They've presumably been exposed to death a great deal during this war, I wonder to what degree it affects them. Is being this close to a corpse a day to day thing, or at least something they've gotten used to? What do they plan to do with the body?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:53 |
|
etalian posted:Yup he pretty much had great success in shedding his black sheep status and helping EU countries overlook his true nature. To be fair, does is surprise anyone that NATO would support dictator stability vs democratic unpredictability? I mean, yeah that sucks that he was able to play the game so long, but that's what happens when a section of the planet gets labeled as a "powder keg."
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:54 |
|
Golbez posted:Is it, though? Because the first would absolutely not have occurred without the latter. Yeah, the only reason this civil war didn't drag on longer is because NATO pounded Gadhafi as hard as they did. I'm just glad it was kept as limited as it was.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:54 |
|
Reuters has compressed this thread into a 60 second video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0xoyIQFN58 Yes, that's Reuters who did that, not some random pro-rebel idiot, they actually picked that music and chose that editing.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:55 |
|
Nilbop posted:Some of this is ghastly. I understand the need to prove beyond doubt to people that these people are dead but some of this stuff is really grisly. It actually worth looking at this public corpse decoration through the Foucaultian lens on the need groups have for public punishment.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:56 |
|
Dr. Video Games 0055 posted:Yeah, the only reason this civil war didn't drag on longer is because NATO pounded Gadhafi as hard as they did. I'm just glad it was kept as limited as it was. While it's always impossible to be sure, I'd say it's more likely that NATO is the reason the rebellion wasn't swiftly crushed, given what the momentum was before airstrikes started.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:57 |
|
ease posted:I'm happy to see revolutions and political change lead by the people, but is anyone else creeped out about people shouting god is great around every single dead leader the middle east has produced lately? They are united under a monarchist flag with Islamic symbolism on it, what do you expect? The rebels are largely composed of religious fundamentalists, and are Mujahideen in the literal sense of the word. Like the Mujahideen from the Afghan civil war they have also received arms and training from the US and its allies, and we will probably end up bombing them in the future. Almost every case of regime change in the past 100 years has been at the hands of the United States of America and its allies, this is indisputable. There is an extremely good chance, given the confirmation by extremely mainstream and otherwise supportive media sources that the CIA has had substantial involvement in the region predating the start of the uprising, that this was not an organic uprising at all but a regime change coordinated with the disperse dissenting elements within the country and Ghadafi administration itself to achieve economic and political goals. Shock Doctrine style. Rasler posted:We can celebrate the fall of Gaddafi despite this. He was the personification of evil How is this known to you? By information released from the channels of propaganda that are beholden to the same NATO you deem horrible? I'm not saying the man was a Saint, but the information cited by those who unilaterally condemn him despite having guided Libya to enormous prosperity compared to its universally despicable state as a god damned monarchy prior to the '53 revolution comes from sources that are undoubtedly compromised as far as integrity is concerned. No major media outlet can publish things completely unfiltered, to lend them unlimited credibility is incredibly naive considering the past collusion by omission or outright censorship concerning US and western foreign policy. The US and its client states that it maintains, some of which aided in the intervention, have far worse human rights records than post-monarchy Libya has had. The situations in Qatar and Saudi Arabia for example are abhorrent and go completely ignorned while those states continue to receive western support and aid without question. Do you trust the same people who ignore mass enslavement and human trafficking to give you the unfiltered truth about a known enemy of their host country? One recalls the debunked accusations of chemical warfare by the USSR during the Indochina conflict while the same was actively and actually carried out by the US in South Vietnam, as far as media complacency in propaganda goes. It takes people on the inside testifying about their willingness to distort and cover up the truth to expose poo poo like that, usually many years later as in that case. Bias exists, get used to it. Libya is going to poo poo and the next 10 years will have Libyans yearning for the days before their country was destabilized and ravaged by internal conflict. Also the whole pilfering of resources by multinational corporations etc but that's small potatoes compared to the immediate threat of Constant Violence From Now On.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:59 |
|
Killer robot posted:While it's always impossible to be sure, I'd say it's more likely that NATO is the reason the rebellion wasn't swiftly crushed, given what the momentum was before airstrikes started. I always think that analysis underplays the events occuring in Misrata and Nafusa at the same time as the events in Benghazi. Even if Benghazi had been crushed Gaddafi still needed to deal with those two locations, and I think Nafusa would have been a drawn out affair.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 21:59 |
|
Golbez posted:Is it, though? Because the first would absolutely not have occurred without the latter. The point is that it's pretty obvious that NATO didn't intervene for the sake of justice or democracy. Or they A) would never have allied with him or Mubarak in the first place and B) would've intervened in Yemen and Syria which are, as you know, currently having equal problems with justice and democracy and yet have not been liberated by NATO. The anger over NATO involvement is not anger that they intervened, but anger that there will be "terms" for the new libyan government as a result of that intervention. Obama said in his speech that Libya and the USA will now have a "relationship". Libya does not have anywhere near enough leverage or bargaining chips to ensure that the relationship will benefit Libya as much as it does the USA. So it goes like this: Thankyou NATO for getting rid of Gaddafi. gently caress you NATO for basically having ulterior motives for doing it in the first place. And of course in no way does any of that justify turning around and supporting Gaddafi of all people. It's like two really awful people trying to kill each other while you watch. You're glad that one of them finally got killed, but you've still got the other one standing in the room with you afterwards...and poo poo, those two guys were friends five minutes ago. Mr. Self Destruct, your enthusiasm is great, but I think you've fallen into the trap of basic contrarianism. For all of its sins, capitalist democracy doesn't have a monopoly on truth itself. Rasler fucked around with this message at 22:15 on Oct 20, 2011 |
# ? Oct 20, 2011 22:04 |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:retarded extremist left bullshit Jesus Christ, aren't you the idiot who was linking Russia Today and pro-Gaddafi blogs in the D&D thread? Learn how to use paragraphs by the way. And goddamn, all Misratans have gone plain loving crazy, haven't they? The people in Benghazi need to send someone to snatch that body off Misrata.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 22:05 |
|
Vladimir Putin posted:Wow, now that is just undignified. Nombres posted:What do they plan to do with the body?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 22:05 |
|
CBS News has a good article collecting various information about Gaddafi's final moments, worth a read if you need to catch up. [edit] As does AJE
|
# ? Oct 20, 2011 22:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 06:22 |
|
Winkle-Daddy posted:To be fair, does is surprise anyone that NATO would support dictator stability vs democratic unpredictability? I mean, yeah that sucks that he was able to play the game so long, but that's what happens when a section of the planet gets labeled as a "powder keg." Well the US policy especially has been pretty much "The devil we know" Killer robot posted:While it's always impossible to be sure, I'd say it's more likely that NATO is the reason the rebellion wasn't swiftly crushed, given what the momentum was before airstrikes started. NATO involvement was the turning point since it allowed the rebels to take away the opposing conventional forces really quick such as scaring off the navy, trashing supply depots plus being able to quickly trash threats such as heavy armor units. Not to mention all the additional benefits such as access to high quality intelligence info to help the rebels plan attacks better. etalian fucked around with this message at 22:13 on Oct 20, 2011 |
# ? Oct 20, 2011 22:09 |