|
I thought the reason was that Morgan can't and Pieterson won't.
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 13:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 11:11 |
|
|
What the gently caress did I just watch? In the scorchers/strikers game Kane Richardson hit wicket but no one noticed until the run was completed. He was then given out after a review of the footage and a long discussion but he was still dawdling on his way to the boundary. Meanwhile Lone Bear was still talking to the umpires and decided to call him back.  Apparently it was because no one had appealed but that is like someone being clean bowled and then being given not out because no one went up for it. Mind boggling stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 13:39
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:Apparently it was because no one had appealed but that is like someone being clean bowled and then being given not out because no one went up for it. Rules is rules.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 15:51
|
|
|
You have to technically appeal for any out. Its just things like bowled and obvious catches not being appealed for is by tradition rather than rules. Plus the batsman will walk for it. More batsman need to stand their ground after being bowled. The reason why hit wicket is more like an lbw than a bowled is because there is some leeway. Not as much as there was where a lot of the hit wicket rules came down to umpire interpretation of if a batsmen was preparing to or playing a shot or not. So you could be given out if your initial shuffle clipped the stumps but not if you turned and walked away towards square leg after playing the ball (as Mark Waugh did against south Africa). Also things like a gusts of wind do blow off bails. Burn Down Canberra fucked around with this message at 19:04 on Jan 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 19:01
|
|
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:More batsman need to stand their ground after being bowled. Shut up you literal quilt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 19:41
|
|
|
I thought out bowled was the only dismissal where the fielding side don't have to appeal, the umpire just gives you out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 20:49
|
|
|
tarbrush posted:I thought out bowled was the only dismissal where the fielding side don't have to appeal, the umpire just gives you out. Batsmen walk for it. If you read the rules for appealing all outs need to be appealed. There just isn't a lot of recourse when the stumps are scattered about the field.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 22:19
|
|
|
NZ 2nd test team announced: Franklin & Martin have been omitted, Colin Munro & Neil Wagner to play. Harsh on Martin who took 3/63 in the first test, but exciting to see what Wagner can do. Franklin had to go, but I had no idea Munro was the spare batsman, he is far more of a limited overs batsman than a longer format player. Bruce Martin expected to be 12th man but I'm hoping he starts ahead of Patel.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 22:22
|
|
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Batsmen walk for it. If you read the rules for appealing all outs need to be appealed. There just isn't a lot of recourse when the stumps are scattered about the field. "The wind blew them over?"
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 22:34
|
|
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:You have to technically appeal for any out. Its just things like bowled and obvious catches not being appealed for is by tradition rather than rules. Plus the batsman will walk for it. More batsman need to stand their ground after being bowled. I bet you're a riot down the local boozer.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 22:42
|
|
|
serious gaylord posted:I bet you're a riot down the local boozer. It's Canberra, there's only lovely League's clubs where this sort of stuff would be a riot.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 22:45
|
|
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Batsmen walk for it. If you read the rules for appealing all outs need to be appealed. There just isn't a lot of recourse when the stumps are scattered about the field. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3Ms37yt3lg
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 23:22
|
|
|
Smorgasbord posted:I had no idea Munro was the spare batsman, he is far more of a limited overs batsman than a longer format player. New Zealand would have to make it through 50 overs first for that to be an issue.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 23:28
|
|
|
Thank you for giving me another reason to hate that rear end
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2013 23:30
|
|
|
Doc Holliday posted:New Zealand would have to make it through 50 overs first for that to be an issue. They can barely make 20 as it is, let alone 50.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 00:34
|
|
|
So there's an ODI v Sri Lanka today. Does anyone give a gently caress?
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 01:21
|
|
|
baked posted:So there's an ODI v Sri Lanka today. Does anyone give a gently caress? Usually I would give no fucks about an ODI between any countries, but I am a George Bailey fan so will watch a bit for that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 01:43
|
|
|
I'm curious to see how this Australian "B team" will go.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 01:48
|
|
|
iajanus posted:"The wind blew them over?" I once played a junior game years ago where this exact thing happened. The batsmans bail got knocked off, everybody appealed, but the umpire at that time was the coach of the other team and he was also really loving drunk, so he said the wind or the wicket keeper had knocked the bail off.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 02:27
|
|
|
I was going to record the ODI but then I remembered that the name was literal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 02:59
|
|
|
A refugee from Pakistan has been selected in the PM's XI. Presumably Today Tonight are already planning a "refugee invasion" story.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 03:27
|
|
|
Is he eligible to play for Australia? Somewhat a pity that he is so old...
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 03:44
|
|
|
He has residency which I think is enough to make him eligible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 03:45
|
|
|
baked posted:So there's an ODI v Sri Lanka today. Does anyone give a gently caress? ...is there?
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 03:46
|
|
|
He played for the renegades the other day too
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 03:49
|
|
|
I just saw the people dressed up for the "$1000 for the best costume" contest and all I can think is with the 37 degree heat and the full body costumes the winner will probably be the one still alive at the end of the Australian innings.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 04:52
|
|
|
Scylo posted:A refugee from Pakistan has been selected in the PM's XI. Presumably Today Tonight are already planning a "refugee invasion" story. Gurinder Sandhu, who was born in India, is also in the team. He's a young fast bowler. I really hope he ends up better than any of India's current crop of fast bowlers so we can troll them even more.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:24
|
|
|
The commentators trying to sell the lower order batsmen is pretty sad. On the plus, their disgust at the running is pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:47
|
|
|
If Phil 'Better than Bradman' Hughes runs out Bailey I'm going to get mad.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:48
|
|
|
And I'd have to congratulate him for making me emotional about short-form cricket.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:49
|
|
|
Get ready for a scintillating 20 overs of knocking singles around here
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:55
|
|
|
Phil Hughes cementing his place nicely here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:57
|
|
|
Ashes as good as won.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 05:58
|
|
|
There's this article on cricinfo about Healy being unhappy with Wade's glovework http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-sri-lanka-2012/content/current/story/600442.html I find it interesting because I don't think I've ever seen Healy have a strong opinion on anything. quote:Healy said he could not understand why the selectors had chosen Wade ahead of Brad Haddin at the start of this summer. However, he also said that he believed Queensland's Chris Hartley, 30, was the best pure gloveman in the country but that he was unlikely to earn an opportunity at international level with Wade, Haddin and Tim Paine all ahead of him in the queue. He believes Hartley is the best gloveman and Hartley has a better one day batting average than Haddin this season. Makes me wonder why, if they're looking to the 2015 world cup, the selectors didn't choose Hartley over Haddin for this series.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 06:22
|
|
|
Because all national selectors regardless or sport or nation are idiots.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 06:23
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:Because all national selectors regardless or sport or nation are idiots. But these selectors were supposed to be better than the previous lot.  Phil Hughes, first Australian to make a century while on debut in an ODI.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 06:59
|
|
|
Hartley is not the best wicketkeeper. Ian Healy is wrong.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 07:36
|
|
|
First 50 balls from India have them record 38 dots and give up seven boundaries.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 08:04
|
|
|
Tony A. Butt posted:Ian Healy is wrong. This is just as plausible as any other
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 08:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 11:11 |
|
|
Ian Bell wtf
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2013 08:26
|
|