|
Invert the whole thing! It'll be like you're watching the end of the movie.
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 07:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:49 |
|
|
Android Bicyclist posted:Put the sun rising from behind & have the monolith in eclipse? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 08:32
|
|
|
Now it's just 200. I think if you were gonna do that you'd have to make the sun really strong, strong enough to let you do the whole 2001 in black, even if you can barely see the 2.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 10:23
|
|
|
The number font stinks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 13:58
|
|
|
MikeJF posted:Invert the whole thing! It'll be like you're watching the end of the movie.  I like it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 18:47
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:
That is really cool, it looks like there's some pitch black dimensional window inexplicably shining light onto the surface of Venus or some poo poo. This doesn't happen in the movie but I like it. edit: more accurately, like it's a closed door with light escaping from underneath. Carly Gay Dead Son fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Jan 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 18:53
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:
Aside from the lovely font selection that's perfect.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2013 21:23
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:
I agree. This is aces.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2013 05:46
|
|
|
 It runs the risk of beating 4/6 jokes in the movie to death, but I think this works really well at conveying the movie before you see it. Dark, introspective, childish and homophobic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:13
|
|
|
Physical posted:
Wait, you think the film itself is homophobic? Admittedly, I've not seen it in years.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:29
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:Wait, you think the film itself is homophobic? Admittedly, I've not seen it in years. The film depicts a world where 'fag' is just an insult like any other. There doesn't seem to be any explicit homophobia, and even if there were it would probably be part of the satire. I want one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:38
|
|
|
Physical posted:
I think works better without the writing, just leave the image and the film title.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:47
|
|
|
This is a sort of a devil's advocate argument but consider the following: A large number of the characters are, so it is in a meta and then actual way when you consider that joke requires the audience to laugh at it in order to work. But the writer came up with it, and he thought it would be funny to do it, both are aware of the joke being laughing at ignorant idiots, but also at the delivery and content of the ignorant characters. It's like the writer pointing the homophobic finger at the audience, exposing them as homophobic because they laugh, and then the audience pointing the homophobic finger back at the writer for penning it. Does that mean Mike Judge is actually homophobic, or anyone who watches it and laughs is homophobic, no. Beyond sane knolls posted:That is really cool, it looks like there's some pitch black dimensional window inexplicably shining light onto the surface of Venus or some poo poo. This doesn't happen in the movie but I like it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:49
|
|
|
Physical posted:This is a sort of a devil's advocate argument but consider the following: A large number of the characters are, so it is in a meta and then actual way when you consider that joke requires the audience to laugh at it in order to work. But the writer came up with it, and he thought it would be funny to do it, both are aware of the joke being laughing at ignorant idiots, but also at the delivery and content of the ignorant characters. It's like the writer pointing the homophobic finger at the audience, exposing them as homophobic because they laugh, and then the audience pointing the homophobic finger back at the writer for penning it. This is like the "Ow, My Balls" clip writ large. The whole purpose of that is "try not to laugh at this, because, if you do, you've proven the point of this movie".
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:52
|
|
|
I don't get the whole "future" thing, as "Ow, My Balls!" has been on since the early 90's, first hosted by Bob Saget and now Tom Bergeron. Also, Youtube is basically "Ow, My Balls!". It's already here. Were living it now. We just need TV's with 30 feeds and child-taking fast food chains.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 04:04
|
|
|
Hbomberguy posted:The film depicts a world where 'fag' is just an insult like any other. There doesn't seem to be any explicit homophobia, and even if there were it would probably be part of the satire. So, Something Awful Forums ten years ago then.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 04:09
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:I don't get the whole "future" thing, as "Ow, My Balls!" has been on since the early 90's, first hosted by Bob Saget and now Tom Bergeron. rear end hasn't been made and it hasn't swept the Oscars. We're not there yet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:17
|
|
|
The UN also has to UN-Nazi the world, too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:19
|
|
|
Gonz posted:The UN also has to UN-Nazi the world, too. And a over-athletic President whose only skill seems to be his image and the way he communicates. We are a long way off from the world of Idiocracy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 07:18
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:rear end hasn't been made and it hasn't swept the Oscars. We're not there yet. Well, Crash did win Best Picture.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 07:58
|
|
|
Wank posted:And a over-athletic President whose only skill seems to be his image and the way he communicates. We are a long way off from the world of Idiocracy. He's also like Obama because he's black
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 08:16
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:rear end hasn't been made and it hasn't swept the Oscars. We're not there yet. Didn't Yoko Ono have a movie called "rear end"?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 15:46
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:Didn't Yoko Ono have a movie called "rear end"? It was called No. 4 but yes it was nothing but famous people's asses.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 15:51
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:rear end hasn't been made and it hasn't swept the Oscars. We're not there yet. Just wait until Johnny Knoxville gets a Lifetime Achievement Award to coincide with the release of "Jackass X". And he accepts the award by going on stage and taking a huge dump. Soon...
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:03
|
|
|
 Why  Must  All  Fanmade  Posters  Suck  ?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:51
|
|
|
I swear it feels like I'm the only nerd alive who doesn't masturbate to a copy of World War Z, and I loving love good zombie stories.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:50
|
|
|
These ones? Not awful. The rest? Awful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:53
|
|
|
Why is someone shooting that zombie in the hands in the DotD '4 ripoff one?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:55
|
|
|
Oh come on, aren't you excited for uuorld uuar Z?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:59
|
|
|
bowser posted:Suck
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 20:22
|
|
|
This wouldn't actually be that bad if it weren't for the really bad and incongruous font in the upper left. It looks more like a pulp paperback cover though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
I've avoided all trailers for World War Z even though I have read the book. Trailers always ruin a third act twist which ruins the first time viewing. See: Dark Knight Rises
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 20:47
|
|
|
I don't have a problem with this one at all. The title is legible, and the graphical elements support it well. Using flags instead of a globe to symbolize the world is a nice way to show that humanity is not a unified force, whereas we can see from the poster that the zombies are. Then there's the tilt, which adds a bit of tension to the poster and reinforces the idea that the world has gone awry.* *It also reminds me of a sinking ship, which is fitting given the tsunami-like character the zombie horde seems to possess. Tewratomeh posted:This wouldn't actually be that bad if it weren't for the really bad and incongruous font in the upper left. It looks more like a pulp paperback cover though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 20:56
|
|
|
New round of Mondo LOTR posters. I kind of like these ones.  
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 21:14
|
|
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:The perspective on the title text is all kinds of hosed-up though, and the whole thing looks too apocalyptic. Why is Yonkers in the middle of a desert? Punishment for Hello, Dolly.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 21:17
|
|
|
General Ironicus posted:Punishment for Hello, Dolly. Fallout from the Buffalo wings factory going up when Buffalo fell.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 21:33
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:New round of Mondo LOTR posters. I kind of like these ones.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2013 00:00
|
|
|
I think it is purposefully avoiding the iconic eye.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2013 00:19
|
|
|
tliil posted:This one would be SO much better if the background was just Mount Doom / Sauron's Eye Tower thingy. As it is it misses the whole point of the LOTR trilogy and Frodo's mission.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2013 00:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:49 |
|
|
Not a fan of any of those WWZ posters, especially the flag one. Nevermind World Wars 3, 4, 5 or 6 - WORLD WAR 7 is gonna' be BIG!
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2013 01:12
|
|
