|
The plane would have 2.7 giga joules of energy The train would have 42.67 mega joules This assumes the train is carrying 150 tons and the plane is carrying 220 tons 64,240,000,000 times more energy than the piece of poo poo train Trains are for tards Or I'm a tard and can't do math Edit congrats it's the last one Here's a super Swedish train 911 111 111 m kg / s Vs Fully loaded 747 79 197 227.8 m kg / s But the Swedish train is full of coal and gonna loving light up the town ziasquinn fucked around with this message at 06:24 on Aug 21, 2014 |
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 18:47 |
|
|
There was no plane you sheep.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:03
|
|
|
Your average train car weighs like 30 tons empty OP
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:03
|
|
|
dont need your nerd math to tell u how fuckinw rogn you are a train is lieka hammer and planes are built like aluminium cans
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:03
|
|
|
i'm pretty sure an airplane at speed would destroy more than 1/10th of the train, op
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:03
|
|
|
what if the train is a hoe train and the plane is a soul plane
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:05
|
|
|
funny that you said that op because this thread is travelling 350mph straight to the gas chamber
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:05
|
|
|
My dick would destroy both.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:06
|
|
|
did you account for the fact that the train is on a treadmill?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:06
|
|
|
also what angle is the plain hitting the train at? head-on, sideswipe, t-bone? this is an important factor that i think you neglected to consider.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:07
|
|
|
has there ever been, historically, an actual gravy train
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:08
|
|
|
Head on, train is 30 tons empty, I put 170 tons in it. Plane has 250 tons in it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:10
|
|
|
THE RAPETRAIN HAS NO BRAKES
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
you didn't account for the amount of gently caress I don't give for this poo poo jfc 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
you dont need all that to gently caress up a train though you just gotta give it enough of a push to derai and it does all the rest for you
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
lol, your numbers are the most heavy plane on earth fully loaded versus a train that's like 2 cars. 150 tons for a train is some pussy poo poo, nobody ever takes a train out that light.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:12
|
|
|
an entire train could be 8000tons a plane maybe 340 but the speed difference between 80mph and 600mph means the plane has more energy!
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:12
|
|
|
Nigga, I poo poo trains. Now what?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:12
|
|
|
Man I just googled train weight for freight and plane weight for 747
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:13
|
|
|
Wiki says trains in the us can carry 315,000 pounds or 157 tons
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:15
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:Wiki says trains in the us can carry 315,000 pounds or 157 tons per car
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:16
|
|
|
like an eagle taking a snake it is the circle of life
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:16
|
|
|
What if the plane is nuclear powered and has a payload of cinder block
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:17
|
|
|
Corey Plumper posted:Your average train car weighs like 30 tons empty OP one passenger car shell is 30 tons before anything is in there - seats, floors, bathrooms, luggage racks, a/c, electrical and brake systems, and the actual trucks. they're loving heavy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
Ok so I guess some rear end in a top hat train carried 19000 tons vs a fully loaded 747 (970,000 pounds) and that train would win But it'd also get derailed and jet fuel would explode all over its coal Plane 79 197 227.8 m kg / s Train 448 149 262 m kg / s
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:19
|
|
|
are you doing a college math placement test or something.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:20
|
|
|
mookface posted:What if the plane is nuclear powered and has a payload of cinder block Snowpiercer
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:20
|
|
|
Another train in some poo poo rear end Europe country hauls 41000 tonnes
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:Ok so I guess some rear end in a top hat train carried 19000 tons vs a fully loaded 747 (970,000 pounds) and that train would win the coal would begin to burn at an accelerated rate and cook the plane wreckage with coal / kerosene
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
i flushed a train toilet in station before.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
indigi posted:are you doing a college math placement test or something. No I'm just retarded and gay
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
911 111 111 m kg / s
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
indigi posted:one passenger car shell is 30 tons before anything is in there - seats, floors, bathrooms, luggage racks, a/c, electrical and brake systems, and the actual trucks. they're loving heavy. dont forget people!
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:911 111 111 m kg / s Reminds me of that tragedy
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
Your Dead Gay Son posted:911 111 111 m kg / s My god look what it spells when I type that out in windings
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
I flushed a train down the toilet, by which I mean 30 tons of poo.
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:24
|
|
|
I hope you guys know that Al Qaeda reads this forum and is taking notes. Way to help the jihadists 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:26
|
|
|
Rand alPaul posted:I hope you guys know that Al Qaeda reads this forum and is taking notes. Way to help the jihadists stuff a plane full of goons--most dangerous heaviest weapon known to man
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:40
|
|
|
dog the collision disperses the energy equally onto both participants, the plane would disintegrate into aluminum dust
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 18:47 |
|
|
EITHER ONE WOULD GET CRUSHED LIKE A POP CAN IF THEY HIT CHURUCK NORRIS
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:47
|
|
