Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug

Neddy Seagoon posted:

There's also actually a flub. Daleks have said "Mercy" before, to River Song in The Big Bang. But time travel, Doctor Who, etc, etc.

It's the first time the Doctor heard it. It's not a flub per se, as Sing's Dalek has always had that mercy dna just we didn't know about it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

happyhippy posted:

It's the first time the Doctor heard it. It's not a flub per se, as Sing's Dalek has always had that mercy dna just we didn't know about it.

Hence "Doctor Who, time travel, etc, etc" :v:.

jng2058
Jul 17, 2010

We have the tools, we have the talent!





Burkion posted:

No you're not. Those that do are just louder at the moment.

FTFY.

For pretty much every episode, maybe "Day of the Doctor" aside, the people who like a given episode each pop in with one post along the lines of "hey, that was a good episode." Meanwhile those who didn't like it post over and over again about why it was the worst thing ever, this episode sucks, this is the doom of Who, etc. etc, etc.

It's always easier to inspire dislike than appreciation, I suppose. :shrug:

Attitude Indicator
Apr 3, 2009

people are talking about different elements of the most recent episodes they liked or disliked. it's sort of the point of the thread. you can participate or ignore it. :shrug:

Burkion
May 10, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

jng2058 posted:

FTFY.

For pretty much every episode, maybe "Day of the Doctor" aside, the people who like a given episode each pop in with one post along the lines of "hey, that was a good episode." Meanwhile those who didn't like it post over and over again about why it was the worst thing ever, this episode sucks, this is the doom of Who, etc. etc, etc.

It's always easier to inspire dislike than appreciation, I suppose. :shrug:

This is pedantic as gently caress, but you didn't fix anything.

You just said what I said with more words. And as a wordy motherfucker, that's not a good thing.

ConanThe3rd
Mar 27, 2009
I liked the Chair gag, "OK. THAT - IS - A - BIT - WIERD" and Missy being a prick to Clara.

As an actual who episode, though, it's a solid meh.

ConanThe3rd fucked around with this message at 19:41 on Sep 27, 2015

Rat Flavoured Rats
Oct 24, 2005
<img src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-rat_flavoured_rats.gif"><br><font size=+2 color=#2266bc>I'm a little fairy girl<font size=+0> <b>^_^</b></font>
I thought this was one of the most gripping episodes since Flatline. All the Doctor/Davros scenes were gold.

jng2058
Jul 17, 2010

We have the tools, we have the talent!





Burkion posted:

This is pedantic as gently caress, but you didn't fix anything.

You just said what I said with more words. And as a wordy motherfucker, that's not a good thing.


And I appreciate your confirming my point vis a vis complaining. Good job!

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
I've been thinking lately whether it's possible Moffat is staying on at least partly because the BBC don't have confidence in anyone else and will try to finish the show if he leaves? I'm pretty sure somebody mentions several threads ago that this was mooted when RTD and Tennant both announced they were going to step down, and Davies had to persuade them to let it continue with Moffat as showrunner. Was that true?

Yannick_B
Oct 11, 2007
I love a lot of the ideas and scenes in this episode. The Doctor feeling he has to live up to the title, Davros being happy for him, Clara stuck inside the Dalek...
But the biggest problem for me is Steven Moffat's approach to MOMENTS writing. It's all bigger moments that do not follow up on each other, his writing has to allow
for the next big, gleeful thing to happen (the writing for gifs idea works for me here) and by not following on his big moments, they don't matter anymore.
There's no big moment that he won't flip around or undo.
I understand his idea: thanks to the Doctor's amazingness and time-travel, every single fault can be undone, every wrong can be righted but he creates a world where
consequence is meaningless.

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

Wheat Loaf posted:

I've been thinking lately whether it's possible Moffat is staying on at least partly because the BBC don't have confidence in anyone else and will try to finish the show if he leaves? I'm pretty sure somebody mentions several threads ago that this was mooted when RTD and Tennant both announced they were going to step down, and Davies had to persuade them to let it continue with Moffat as showrunner. Was that true?

I haven't read The Writer's Tale in quite a while, but Doctor Who was printing money for the BBC in 2009-10. Moffat wasn't sure if he wanted to take over producing the show, but the BBC was going to find someone to do it.

Edit: I think Joe Lidster, who was running The Sarah Jane Adventures at the time, was next in line in the event that Moffat declined.

Timby fucked around with this message at 19:55 on Sep 27, 2015

Yannick_B
Oct 11, 2007

Wheat Loaf posted:

I've been thinking lately whether it's possible Moffat is staying on at least partly because the BBC don't have confidence in anyone else and will try to finish the show if he leaves? I'm pretty sure somebody mentions several threads ago that this was mooted when RTD and Tennant both announced they were going to step down, and Davies had to persuade them to let it continue with Moffat as showrunner. Was that true?

It's not. The BBC wanted RTD to continue and were ready to throw more money at him but he felt it was time to go. For an instant, Tennant wobbled and almost stayed on for Moffat's 1st season (Smith's 1st meeting with Amelia Pond in 11th Hour would've been Tennant from the season finale, on the verge of regenerating) but decided against it after all.

curse of flubber
Mar 12, 2007
I CAN'T HELP BUT DERAIL THREADS WITH MY VERY PRESENCE

I ALSO HAVE A CLOUD OF DEDICATED IDIOTS FOLLOWING ME SHITTING UP EVERY THREAD I POST IN

IGNORE ME AND ANY DINOSAUR THAT FIGHTS WITH ME BECAUSE WE JUST CAN'T SHUT UP

Burkion posted:

No you're not. Those that do are just louder at the moment.

Burkion posted:

This is pedantic as gently caress, but you didn't fix anything.

You just said what I said with more words. And as a wordy motherfucker, that's not a good thing.

Lol piss off. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, some people like it and some don't, don't dismiss people as being loud mouthy bastards just because you disagree with them.


Maxwell Lord posted:

But he did in fact write the scene where the Doctor admits that he's just an old man in a box, and the entire story's about the Doctor pushing himself to be compassionate and merciful in a situation where it's hard to be so.

This is literally the arc of the story.

He spared Davros arbitrarily while killing a bunch of "less important" Daleks without a second thought in the most gruesome way imaginable, unleashing zombie daleks to eat them alive.

curse of flubber fucked around with this message at 20:00 on Sep 27, 2015

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Megaspel posted:

He spared Davros arbitrarily while killing a bunch of "less important" Daleks without a second thought in the most gruesome way imaginable, unleashing zombie daleks to eat them alive.

It was their decision to try and siphon off all his energy. Young Davros, however, had no such malice when he ended up in the middle of a handmine field.

It's consistent with his ethical pattern. He gives people chances.

curse of flubber
Mar 12, 2007
I CAN'T HELP BUT DERAIL THREADS WITH MY VERY PRESENCE

I ALSO HAVE A CLOUD OF DEDICATED IDIOTS FOLLOWING ME SHITTING UP EVERY THREAD I POST IN

IGNORE ME AND ANY DINOSAUR THAT FIGHTS WITH ME BECAUSE WE JUST CAN'T SHUT UP

Maxwell Lord posted:

It was their decision to try and siphon off all his energy. Young Davros, however, had no such malice when he ended up in the middle of a handmine field.

It's consistent with his ethical pattern. He gives people chances.

He made the choice to give them the energy, knowing it would unleash a zombie horde. Is the Doctor the Judge and Executioner suddenly?

cargohills
Apr 18, 2014

He wanted to help Davros. Also, has the Doctor ever had an issue with killing Daleks?

Burkion
May 10, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Megaspel posted:

Lol piss off. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, some people like it and some don't, don't dismiss people as being loud mouthy bastards just because you disagree with them.

You do realize that's not what I was doing or conveying right?

The first thing I said was meant to be more neutral. Lots of people said they liked the episode, then a few others came in and started critiquing the episode as is their wont. The people who said they liked it generally just did only that, while the people who complained posted a lot more.

Which is why I said the people complaining were simply louder at the moment- as I am one of those people complaining, I don't think I was being at all dismissive about them.

At least I'd like to think so!

And *I* am the mouthy bastard in the context of what you're quoting. Specifically I was referring to myself as the wordy motherfucker, because normally my posts look like...This. I was just pointing out that he pretty much said the same thing I did, but with more words.

I think you read way more malice in what I said then I could ever care to intend. People can like or dislike the episode all they want, that's fine.

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!

Megaspel posted:

He made the choice to give them the energy, knowing it would unleash a zombie horde. Is the Doctor the Judge and Executioner suddenly?

He didn't know for sure they were going to steal the energy until they did it.

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Megaspel posted:

He made the choice to give them the energy, knowing it would unleash a zombie horde. Is the Doctor the Judge and Executioner suddenly?

He was going to give them a little flare. They chose to take a whole lot more.

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer
These two episodes were better than any of last season. First time I've been entertained since Smith left. What the gently caress got into the writing team last season. It was so awful I felt like I was back in the RTD era!.

ImpulseDrive
Jul 25, 2008

cargohills posted:

He wanted to help Davros. Also, has the Doctor ever had an issue with killing Daleks?

Yes, with the fourth doctor.

Pesky Splinter
Feb 16, 2011

A worried pug.

Regarde Aduck posted:

These two episodes were better than any of last season. First time I've been entertained since Smith left. What the gently caress got into the writing team last season. It was so awful I felt like I was back in the RTD era!.

Last series was uneven...but I don't think these episodes were as good as say, Flatline or Mummy. And certainly nowhere as bad as the Forest episode; I guess I'm just not that overwhelmed with these two. :geno:

cargohills
Apr 18, 2014

ImpulseDrive posted:

Yes, with the fourth doctor.

Since then he's been pretty liberal with killing them.

docbeard
Jul 19, 2011

So am I the only one who watched this and immediately started thinking of it as Doctor Who: The Killing Joke?

Anyway, I liked most aspects of this episode, but you can kind of see where it was straining at the seams. The plot was paper-thin and seemed only to exist to give the characters excuses to be in the same room with each other. Which is how stories should work, so good.

jng2058
Jul 17, 2010

We have the tools, we have the talent!





Burkion posted:

You do realize that's not what I was doing or conveying right?

The first thing I said was meant to be more neutral. Lots of people said they liked the episode, then a few others came in and started critiquing the episode as is their wont. The people who said they liked it generally just did only that, while the people who complained posted a lot more.

Which is why I said the people complaining were simply louder at the moment- as I am one of those people complaining, I don't think I was being at all dismissive about them.

At least I'd like to think so!

And *I* am the mouthy bastard in the context of what you're quoting. Specifically I was referring to myself as the wordy motherfucker, because normally my posts look like...This. I was just pointing out that he pretty much said the same thing I did, but with more words.

I think you read way more malice in what I said then I could ever care to intend. People can like or dislike the episode all they want, that's fine.


Technically, what you said was:

Burkion posted:

No you're not. Those that do are just louder at the moment.

Emphasis mine.

I was expanding on this point to note that it's not just a momentary thing related to this episode. That, in fact, people complaining happens more often on virtually every episode, regardless of quality.

To which you replied by being a dick. :golfclap:

But hey, that's your right. Just as it's mine to comment about you being a dick. It all works out.

Facebook Aunt
Oct 4, 2008

wiggle wiggle




I liked it. I bet Toxx gives it an A.

Mr Beens
Dec 2, 2006

Maxwell Lord posted:

I mean, sure, it'd be fine for the showrunners not to think "we can do no wrong, the audience will follow us anywhere." But I'm thinking more of the kind of clumsy top-down interference that gave us Galactica 1980, Buck Rogers Season 2, and Community Season 4.

And plus, really, despite all the craziness in Part 1, this ended up being downright traditional. The Doctor gets put in a trap by an old enemy, manages to clever his way out by the skin of his teeth, the Master- er, Missy gets caught in a collapsing city but probably will be around for the next time they need her, etc.

On top of which, they actually managed to handle the self referential stuff in an interesting way- they touched on the idea that there's this icon of "The Doctor" that is wonderful and good and heroic, and there's the real old man in a box, and he wants to live up to that ideal but it takes work. He does have those values of mercy and compassion but he has to push himself sometimes. This is good writing. This is character development. For all that the concrete plot stuff gets handwaved, this season and the last have actually delved into The Doctor as person in a way the show rarely has in the past.

Except the Doctor didn't get put into a trap and clever his way out by the skin of his teeth, the Doctor put him self there and smugged his way out with a series of Deus Ex Machinas. Literally nothing that happened over the past 2 episodes meant anything.
And the Doctor left Clara on Skaro.

jivjov
Sep 13, 2007

But how does it taste? Yummy!
Dinosaur Gum

Mr Beens posted:

And the Doctor left Clara on Skaro.

Nah, he just went for coffee.

Chucat
Apr 14, 2006

Megaspel posted:

He made the choice to give them the energy, knowing it would unleash a zombie horde. Is the Doctor the Judge and Executioner suddenly?

Why did he touch the cables instead of just poking Davros with his magical healing hand or whatever?

Kikka
Feb 10, 2010

I POST STUPID STUFF ABOUT DOCTOR WHO
I like Daleks screeching "Have pity!" (like in "Dalek") over "Mercy!". The first one still has the air of command over it.

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!
Plus it's cool because "have pity" is what Davros said to the Doctor in that one episode where the Doctor blew up Skaro.

Kikka
Feb 10, 2010

I POST STUPID STUFF ABOUT DOCTOR WHO
Oh, and it's what Davros said to the Daleks in Genesis! Good point.

Burkion
May 10, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Kikka posted:

I like Daleks screeching "Have pity!" (like in "Dalek") over "Mercy!". The first one still has the air of command over it.

It plays into who they are as characters. The Dalek that said Have pity knew he was drat near dead anyways, and that the Doctor would very, VERY happily kill him. So he lied his rear end off, as he did again with Rose until he got what he needed.

The Dalek begging River for Mercy is just stupid and reeks of pet character status for River. But whatever.

I really miss Daleks being actual characters. For a little while there, I thought we were going to get back to that version of the Daleks, where they would make alliances with other races and team up and have characters and not just be generically roboticly evil all the time. And then they just kinda went into flux as Moffat tried to reinvent them left and right and I don't think they've been the same in any single appearance after Victory. They keep wildly changing how they operate and who they are, often not for the better.

Silhouette
Nov 16, 2002

SONIC BOOM!!!

I prefer the episode where the Daleks screamed "HAVE MERCY" and then they played that song they wrote with The Beach Boys at the juice bar

Forktoss
Feb 13, 2012

I'm OK, you're so-so

2house2fly posted:

Plus it's cool because "have pity" is what Davros said to the Doctor in that one episode where the Doctor blew up Skaro.

The Doctor's plan here is actually really similar to what he did in Remembrance with the Hand of Omega, just let Davros go through with his scheme until it blows up in his face.

HD DAD
Jan 13, 2010

Generic white guy.

Toilet Rascal
This was a good episode and it redeemed the previous one too, a bit. I believe Davros was being genuine with the Doctor, up until he pulled the "I want to see the sunrise" bit. A villain can still be a total dick while having genuine emotion, and this point was driven home with the last scene with kid-Davros. He isn't perfect, but he does have the capacity for mercy.

Is this Emmy-winning drama? No. Doctor Who never will be. But it's good at what it sets out to do. Also, gently caress you, I like the sonic shades.

AndyElusive
Jan 7, 2007

HD DAD posted:

Also, gently caress you, I like the sonic shades.

I like them too. gently caress you to any and all goons who don't. Less sonic screw driver waving around ala 10 and 11 and more sonic shades. :c00lbert:

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Attitude Indicator posted:

people are talking about different elements of the most recent episodes they liked or disliked. it's sort of the point of the thread. you can participate or ignore it. :shrug:

Yeah, very few people come in making blanket statements about the quality of the episode - most people say"I liked this part, didn't like this part, LOATHED this part, LOVED this part" etc, and as a whole some liked the episode more than they disliked it, and others disliked it more than they liked it. That's good, because it generally kicks off good discussion about the merits or otherwise of the episode, of particular scenes, of what they might mean etc. It's very difficult to have any kind of meaningful discussion if somebody just says,"I loved it, it was perfect!" or,"I hated it, it was literally poo poo smeared on paper".

I know I say it a lot, but I'm still amused whenever somebody complains about the thread having any kind of "hivemind/consensus", and I really dig that our Doctor Who threads generally include a lot of reasoned discussion of the show regardless of whether we overall liked or disliked any particular episode. I dug this episode, but it had a number of problems, and even some of the good stuff was problematic (The Master and Clara had great chemistry, but Clara took far too eagerly to the role of the Master's companion), and as the second part of a 2-parter it did have that unusual element of feeling mostly disconnected from the first part.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Timby posted:

Edit: I think Joe Lidster, who was running The Sarah Jane Adventures at the time, was next in line in the event that Moffat declined.

:stare:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Timby posted:

Edit: I think Joe Lidster, who was running The Sarah Jane Adventures at the time, was next in line in the event that Moffat declined.

Jesus Christ :gonk:

I guess I shouldn't be too surprised, RTD really dug Lidster's work, didn't he? I guess the big difference is that apparently RTD does think the world is kinda cruel and unfair but produced Who to show somebody rising up above that and setting things to rights, while Lidster seems to enjoy wallowing in,"AND THEN EVERYBODY GOT MURDERED AND NOBODY COULD DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT AHAHAHAHA!"

  • Locked thread