|
What if the robot came in as your wife was blowing you...
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 13:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 21:27 |
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:What if the robot came in as your wife was blowing you... Bit unrealistic this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Bit unrealistic this. Yeah, robots are incapable of ejaculation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 13:43
|
|
|
Strom Cuzewon posted:Yeah, robots are incapable of ejaculation. Actually I believe this was addressed in Humans. Can any other fans of the show confirm?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 13:46
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:The show Humans for me asks a lot of questions : not limited to do robots have feelings, do we rely too much on computers in our every day life and also at some point in the future will humankind prefer sex with a robot that has been attuned to their wants and desires while reproduction becomes something just done in laboratories - maybe controlled by robots?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 13:49
|
|
|
Westworld asks and answers those questions in a much better way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 14:43
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Are you talking about receiving oral sex off a lifelike human simulacrum? What about some sort of clockwork and steam operated vagina? Yeah, my parents got my TV Go Home for christmas and I finished it the other week. Also giving Taboo a chance because the Frontier was loving shite Netflix.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:Westworld asks and answers those questions in a much better way. This is the UK TV thread, please respect the rules and keep the chat focused on UK TV matters
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:This is the UK TV thread, please respect the rules and keep the chat focused on UK TV matters Thanks ossifer, sorry ossifer. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
I want to have sex with a robot after watching this week's episode of Taboo with Tom Hardy I'm talking full penetration here please don't tell my wife.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:I want to have sex with a robot after watching this week's episode of Taboo with Tom Hardy I'm talking full penetration here please don't tell my wife. Have I not been paying attention and Taboo has been about sexy robots all along? Because I'm up for that
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
I am sure The Turk could provide a decent hand job at least.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
thehustler posted:What if the robot is an exact replica of your wife, physically and mentally? Richard Herring asks that in his podcast.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
SeanBeansShako posted:Also, the fictional Toast autobiography book is short but okay. I'd get it on Kindle though. Or wait for Matt Berry to do an audio book version. This is already a thing my friend!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
DrNewton posted:Richard Herring asks that in his podcast. That is why I said it
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 09:18
|
|
|
thehustler posted:That is why I said it YEAH! A fan of the podcast! \o/ I live in Canada and have yet to meet someone knows my references.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 14:53
|
|
Rondette posted:This is already a thing my friend!! I suspected as much, I imagine in a rare case they did the audio stuff first then wrote the book. Would explain the size and writing style a bit.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
I live in London and still haven't gone to a Herring podcast recording. Really gotta rectify that poo poo asap
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:Westworld asks and answers those questions in a much better way. By better do you mean "with needless J.J. Abrams fuckery so that people talk about how "complex" its very straightforward plot is"?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
Strom Cuzewon posted:By better do you mean "with needless J.J. Abrams fuckery so that people talk about how "complex" its very straightforward plot is"? Yes yes *strokes beard* very good, very good analysis. gently caress that popular piece of entertainment.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
The Westworld backlash is definitely cool and good and not irritating especially mixed with pretentious Taboo people
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
I eagerly await the new Futureworld series so we can add exact clones of peoples wifes to the robot loving mix. Also go see Herring record his podcast if you have the opportunity, if nothing else £15 is excellent value to see two telly comedians in one night.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Akuma posted:Because a TV show is only as good as the shortest summary you can write about it's plot? Oh don't get me wrong, I think it's absolutely loving incredible. But the entire timeline fuckery could be completely removed and it would be just as good, as if not better. That reveal felt like some 2006-era Lost knock off.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
Anyone else here a watcher of the Pottery Throwdown? I'm not normally one for that type of programme but there's something satisfying about watching them make what they do.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
Strom Cuzewon posted:Oh don't get me wrong, I think it's absolutely loving incredible. But the entire timeline fuckery could be completely removed and it would be just as good, as if not better. That reveal felt like some 2006-era Lost knock off. That's all down to Jonathan Nolan and his wife. Abrams just has his name on it to sell it. The idea was fine, the problem was the show dragging it along way past the point of reason since most people seemed to have figured it out. And then the show literally stops for 10 minutes to lay it all out for you.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
Attention Taboo fans: it's on the telly tonight.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
I hope it doesn't have any voodoo gently caress scenes because that first one was ridiculous as hell
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Maybe you should stick to Dr Who if Taboo is too spicy for you. Get a clue.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
Don't do that. Taboo ain't high art. High camp, at best.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Its great telly. You suck.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Maybe you should stick to Dr Who if Taboo is too spicy for you. Get a clue. Escobarbarian posted:Don't do that. Taboo ain't high art. High camp, at best. Making fun of peoples TV tastes is bad. Don't do it. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Its great telly. You suck. I like the show fine. I hate the attitude of so many people who watch it that it's the smartest TV show there ever has been and anyone who doesn't find it totally exciting and arresting at all times is a worthless idiot peon. And it makes it even worse that it's not actually especially smart compared to most US cable stuff. I've never encountered it with any other show yet I'm seeing it EVERYWHERE with this one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
Escobarbarian posted:I like the show fine. I hate the attitude of so many people who watch it that it's the smartest TV show there ever has been and anyone who doesn't find it totally exciting and arresting at all times is a worthless idiot peon. And it makes it even worse that it's not actually especially smart compared to most US cable stuff. I've never encountered it with any other show yet I'm seeing it EVERYWHERE with this one. Sounds like you don't get it. Try watching it again?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Sounds like you don't get it. Try watching it again? Or it's simply just overrated.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
My wife and I both enjoy watching it. That's all the rating I need. There's also no robots in it so no uncomfortable issues are raised.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
Taboo is good. Pissflaps probably drunken defence of Taboo is less good, but Tom Hardy voodoo wrong-cocking his sister is still cool
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Escobarbarian posted:I like the show fine. I hate the attitude of so many people who watch it that it's the smartest TV show there ever has been and anyone who doesn't find it totally exciting and arresting at all times is a worthless idiot peon. And it makes it even worse that it's not actually especially smart compared to most US cable stuff. I've never encountered it with any other show yet I'm seeing it EVERYWHERE with this one. It's the first genuinely good British drama period piece on BBC in gently caress knows how long. People are reacting to the experience of seeing something actually good as opposed to the standard slop of Broadchurch, Judge Puncher QC, Midsummer, Line of Duty, and Generic Oh God Let's Hope For Sense & Sensibility Ratings 4: The Wrath of Bonnets.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
I watched Pottery Throw Down and it was alright but not as charming as GBBO.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 06:46
|
|
|
DrVenkman posted:That's all down to Jonathan Nolan and his wife. Abrams just has his name on it to sell it. The idea was fine, the problem was the show dragging it along way past the point of reason since most people seemed to have figured it out. And then the show literally stops for 10 minutes to lay it all out for you. I thought the point was that the hosts experience memories perfectly, so the time line confusion was experienced by the hosts in question, not just about pulling the wool over the viewers eyes for a clever reveal. To me, it showed that despite the use of memories to make the hosts appear more human the way they experienced those memories made them distinctly inhuman. Although that might just be me entering some Lost level wankerey.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 10:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 21:27 |
|
|
Lovely Joe Stalin posted:It's the first genuinely good British drama period piece on BBC in gently caress knows how long. People are reacting to the experience of seeing something actually good as opposed to the standard slop of Broadchurch, Judge Puncher QC, Midsummer, Line of Duty, and Generic Oh God Let's Hope For Sense & Sensibility Ratings 4: The Wrath of Bonnets. Not a Peaky Blinders guy?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 12:26
|
|