|
Jesus Christ, 2 dips a year. Alright, change my original B vote to
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:14 |
|
My opinion has changed because I'd love to see a Paradox LP (that doesn't have 75% goon bickering) to feature a revolution that leads to a republic (or hell, why stop there? Go-go Proletariats!) In short, vote changed to
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:52 |
|
Wiz posted:We only get about 2 diplomats a year. Yeah A is clearly the stupidest choice. How the hell are you managing with so few diplomats wiz? How many magistrates are we getting a year?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:53 |
|
Changing my vote from B to .
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:53 |
|
I change my vote from c to to improve diplomat production by 50%!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:54 |
|
Well, that is just one heck of a turnaround. Also,
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 00:59 |
|
Since Sniper has to count the vote by hand (I think) if you're changing your vote could you please show what you changed FROM. It will make it a lot easier for him. Thanks.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:00 |
|
We get 0.8 diplomats from Aristocracy, 0.2 diplomats per point of DIP (so 1.6 for current monarch) and +0.5 for being a Major Power. That means our diplomat total is between 1.9 and 2.9 depending on monarch DIP (currently 2.9, was a bit more than I remembered). EDIT: Oh and .1 diplomats from our SOI, so 3 Wiz fucked around with this message at 01:04 on Oct 13, 2011 |
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:00 |
|
Wow, I had no idea we had so few diplomats, I'm changing my vote from b to because there is no way we'll be able to survive in the long run with only two diplomats a year. Domestic issues can be handled after we deal with foreign ones.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:01 |
|
Switching to from B. We could use the extra diplomats.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:02 |
|
tossing in a vote for
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:03 |
|
The Saurus posted:Since Sniper has to count the vote by hand (I think) if you're changing your vote could you please show what you changed FROM. It will make it a lot easier for him. Thanks. But WITHOUT using the original voting icon, just the icon you want to change your vote to. Backseat count-ruling ITT
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:05 |
|
Guys, 2-3 diplomats a year is not a crippling handicap. More diplomats is nice, but it's not the end of the earth to just have a few diplomats.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:06 |
|
Wiz posted:Guys, 2-3 diplomats a year is not a crippling handicap. More diplomats is nice, but it's not the end of the earth to just have a few diplomats. Stop influencing the vote! This is the wheels of democracy turning.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:09 |
|
Uh-huh, well then. Changing vote to
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:09 |
|
Well, that's why we're here Wiz, We'll work as hard as we can to give you dozens of diplomats a yer. Azerbaijan will be the diplomatest.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:10 |
|
I played as Switzerland in HTTT once, and only generated about 4 diplomats a year. It made me want to kill myself. Granted, this was a huge Europe-spanning Switzerland, but still.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:10 |
|
Remember, folks, diplomacy is the art of tolerating foreigners and their outlandish ways. And there's a lot more foreigners than Azerbaijani.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:13 |
|
Shifting my vote from C to
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:14 |
|
104 - 87 - 25
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:15 |
|
Wiz posted:Guys, 2-3 diplomats a year is not a crippling handicap. More diplomats is nice, but it's not the end of the earth to just have a few diplomats. And its not like you're surrounded by dozens of tiny principalities that you need to constantly negotiate with either.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:17 |
|
Wiz posted:Guys, 2-3 diplomats a year is not a crippling handicap. More diplomats is nice, but it's not the end of the earth to just have a few diplomats. We will not stop until you have at least 10 diplomats a year
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:18 |
|
sniper4625 posted:104 - 87 - 25 While I'm sad that A will win instead of B, I think I can tolerate it.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:19 |
|
Conskill posted:While I'm sad that A will win instead of B, I think I can tolerate it. Don't worry, we can vote for it next time. Assuming we survive.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:21 |
|
Mark my words, we will look back on this vote as the deciding factor in Azerbaijan's eventual slide into Totalitarian Ultrafascism!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:24 |
|
Necroskowitz posted:Mark my words, we will look back on this vote as the deciding factor in Azerbaijan's eventual slide into Totalitarian Ultrafascism! And that's for the best! gently caress all the heathens!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:25 |
|
Money, and Power will soon rule Azerbaijan.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:32 |
|
I think that both Cabinet and Bill of Rights are nice steps along the path to codified, representative, stable, and open government. I'm not saying that they represent Azerbaijan becoming Sweden in the 17th century or anything, just that they're steps in the right direction.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:49 |
|
Basically the idea is that we delegate the cost of the inevitable war on other powers. Which is extremely tolerant since it proves we value foreign soldiers as much as our own men. Or something along those lines, I guess. Also, being tolerant is not very useful when there is no one left to be tolerated. As Karl Popper used to say, the tolerant must not tolerate the intolerant. Which means we need to crush the Russians in the name of tolerance. steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 02:01 on Oct 13, 2011 |
# ? Oct 13, 2011 01:57 |
|
ZearothK posted:Changing my vote from C to . I am doing the same. . Death to the Republic.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:07 |
|
As long as National Bank isn't coming up again, I think we all win. Also, because revolt risk reduction is great. We're going to have serious war exhaustion after the fight with Russia, and this should counteract some of the craziness.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:11 |
|
I know is a wasted vote but what the hell
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:12 |
|
I actually want A to win, but I'm going to vote just to try and shove us back closer to a tie again. E.g., I'm strategically throwing away my vote so that everyone will know that every vote counts.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:16 |
C. We're not at risk of serious revolt, nor have we been hampered by lack of diplomats. But we're constantly out of money.
|
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:17 |
|
None of the options really impact the immediate future, and having cyclic boom-bust relations with our neighbors as we get good/crap diplomatic leaders makes for a better story.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:23 |
|
I vote B!!! Glad to see another Wizthread, sad I missed a bunch of it!! Edit: Someone told me i need to put a picture in, so here it is I hope I still get counted!!! gowb fucked around with this message at 03:36 on Oct 13, 2011 |
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:36 |
|
This is only Option. Option A is one of me having a steady job.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 02:48 |
|
It is the only way to stop the cabinetmakers.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 03:09 |
|
No matter what wins what's important is that Azerbaijan will place one foot firmly into the future.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 03:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:14 |
|
Vote closed!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 03:35 |