|
Blistex posted:Was it that Pioneers sound too European, or that they've got a bit of overlap in duties and merged them into something else? I haven't the foggiest idea, sorry.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 22:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 21:36 |
|
Pioneer sounds vaguely communist (eg Young Pioneers) I thought a Sapper was the term applied to an assault element that used explosive charges exclusively to breach enemy lines whereas pioneers used engineering techniques to breach obstacles and then assault as normal infantry.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 23:14 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:Pioneer sounds vaguely communist (eg Young Pioneers) I don't know why Pioneer was dropped, but that sounds a bit far fetched regarding communism. Even if you GIS Pioneer, the the top hits aside from pioneer-brand electronics are covered wagons going west to settle the USA.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 23:17 |
Probably more to do with a changing mission than a fear of vaguely European words considering how many military terms are French in origin(Corporal, Sergeant, Lieutenant, enfilade, oblique, etc) and a historic love of artillery.
|
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 23:17 |
|
Sappers generally are assault engineers who blow poo poo up, in the 19th century a sapper was a diehard who placed gunpowder caskets underneath enemy fortifications to breach them. The name still has connotations of recklessness and vague insanity today in many countries. As for pioneers it varies considerably. A Norwegian pioneer is a guy who takes out a usable transportation axis for other units - setting up minor temporary bridges, clearing mine fields, cutting down trees and so on. It' can be a pretty big undertaking in a mountaneous, forest-studded sub-polar country. Naturally, they pride themselves on being First In (which they're not, recon was there first).
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 23:24 |
|
Sjurygg posted:Sappers generally are assault engineers who blow poo poo up, in the 19th century a sapper was a diehard who placed gunpowder caskets underneath enemy fortifications to breach them. The name still has connotations of recklessness and vague insanity today in many countries. The term (with the same connotation) was used at least as late as Vietnam for US forces. Although we were the ones getting our poo poo blown up by them. "Sappers in the wire!" etc etc.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 23:40 |
|
Uhhh....you guys are ALL wrong about sappers. Sappers are what spies use to destroy the teleporters, dispensers, and sentry guns of the enemy team.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 02:38 |
|
Sjurygg posted:Sappers generally are assault engineers who blow poo poo up, in the 19th century a sapper was a diehard who placed gunpowder caskets underneath enemy fortifications to breach them. The name still has connotations of recklessness and vague insanity today in many countries. This was my father's experience in the Bundeswehr. He was the company commander's radioman, riding around in a low-top M113. Their job was to get the regiment up to their staging areas and them support them from there using AVLBs, pontoon bridges, mine clearing devices, and explosives (lots and lots of explosives). During the inevitable retreat they were to blow up the roads behind them by placing C4 into predrilled holes or blocking them with huge concrete obstacles. Life expectancy was pretty short, something to the tune of 90% casualties in 24 hours.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 16:14 |
|
Blistex posted:They do almost no live-fire training because commanders want to save money to show their bosses how awesome they are. If your troops expended the amount of ammo in a year that the same number of US troops expended in a week, you'd probably find yourself canned or demoted pretty fast. Jesus, this sounds like thinking from the royal navy circa 1800. This is all information I've gotten from the Master and Commander books, but apparently the RN used to only provide enough gunpowder to do live fire drills once or twice a year. Enterprising commanders with the money to do so (like Jack Aubery) would buy gunpowder themselves so live-fire drills could happen more often.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 16:51 |
|
madeintaipei posted:This was my father's experience in the Bundeswehr. He was the company commander's radioman, riding around in a low-top M113. Their job was to get the regiment up to their staging areas and them support them from there using AVLBs, pontoon bridges, mine clearing devices, and explosives (lots and lots of explosives). During the inevitable retreat they were to blow up the roads behind them by placing C4 into predrilled holes or blocking them with huge concrete obstacles. Life expectancy was pretty short, something to the tune of 90% casualties in 24 hours. So he was part of regular army Pioniere? Do you know whether or not he was part of a company attached to other BW units or one of the Korps-level battalions or something? Engineers are such an overlooked part of Cold War military history. Soviet bridging dudes could cross almost anything, you had scatterable mine systems making GBS threads out stuff at entire grid squares, backpack nukes to take out important points, and dudes in vans blowing up every primary and secondary street. poo poo was cray.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 16:53 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Jesus, this sounds like thinking from the royal navy circa 1800. This is all information I've gotten from the Master and Commander books, but apparently the RN used to only provide enough gunpowder to do live fire drills once or twice a year. Enterprising commanders with the money to do so (like Jack Aubery) would buy gunpowder themselves so live-fire drills could happen more often. That's what you might call technically true - It was part of the obligations of the captain to drill the crew as much as was necessary to achieve combat effectiveness. Don't think of the captain buying extra powder as being outside his duty, think of it as being the same as mess bills - a convenient (although rather cold blooded) way for the navy to save money, and part of the traditional duty owed by the captain to the navy in gratitude for his promotion.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 19:45 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:Maybe that's why they subbed everyone in chinese characters? Some bizarro hillbilly dialect from wherever it is that they have wasps nests the size of family sedans? Who the heck knows. The idea of a modern Chinese identity is pretty tenuous. Also who the hell thought a flamethrower was a good idea?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 20:05 |
|
You're a communist if you think a flamethrower is a bad idea ......wait
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 20:09 |
|
Koesj posted:Engineers are such an overlooked part of Cold War military history. Soviet bridging dudes could cross almost anything, you had scatterable mine systems making GBS threads out stuff at entire grid squares, backpack nukes to take out important points, and dudes in vans blowing up every primary and secondary street. poo poo was cray. Quite a few bridges in the north of Norway are longer than they have to be just so that the distance betwwen the bridgeheads would exeed the length of a soviet mobile bridgelayer like the MT-55 when the bridge had been blown.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 20:52 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Jesus, this sounds like thinking from the royal navy circa 1800. This is all information I've gotten from the Master and Commander books, but apparently the RN used to only provide enough gunpowder to do live fire drills once or twice a year. Enterprising commanders with the money to do so (like Jack Aubery) would buy gunpowder themselves so live-fire drills could happen more often. Decent gunpowder was a serious strategic resource and a single ship of the line could expend an entire land-battle's worth in a few volleys (Literally. Wellington had 150 guns at Waterloo. A 74-gun third rate obviously has half that just in one hull). And Britain was probably best supplied in the world. British line infantry got a yearly practice allowance of 30 rounds. Everyone else on the continent was lucky to get 5.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 21:32 |
|
Caconym posted:Quite a few bridges in the north of Norway are longer than they have to be just so that the distance betwwen the bridgeheads would exeed the length of a soviet mobile bridgelayer like the MT-55 when the bridge had been blown. Awesome, never heard that before! It'd only have taken a bit longer for them to have to bust out the PMPs but still, that's some good defensive engineering.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 21:43 |
|
Insane Totoro posted:Who the heck knows. The idea of a modern Chinese identity is pretty tenuous. It might be Sichuanese. In other words, to a native Mandarin speaker it's about the same as Dutch is to you. Insane Totoro posted:Also who the hell thought a flamethrower was a good idea? A genius.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 22:58 |
|
Koesj posted:So he was part of regular army Pioniere? Do you know whether or not he was part of a company attached to other BW units or one of the Korps-level battalions or something? Panzer Pioneer Company 300. I think he said it was ostensibly a madeintaipei fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Oct 22, 2013 |
# ? Oct 21, 2013 23:58 |
|
Well it's a XX0-series unit which means it was part of a numbered brigade, in this case Panzerbrigade 30 out of... Elwangen e: I don't think they would have been part of PionierKdo 2, not even administratively, but hey all my knowledge comes off of ~paper~ (or in this case a long-rear end PDF) Koesj fucked around with this message at 00:22 on Oct 22, 2013 |
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:18 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Jesus, this sounds like thinking from the royal navy circa 1800. This is all information I've gotten from the Master and Commander books, but apparently the RN used to only provide enough gunpowder to do live fire drills once or twice a year. Enterprising commanders with the money to do so (like Jack Aubery) would buy gunpowder themselves so live-fire drills could happen more often. The other thing you should know is that the fiction greatly overemphasizes frigates and gunnery because it makes the stories more interesting. (that blog doesn't cite many sources on that post, but most of the posts have reputable citations) Most gunnery was "get the ship close enough so you cannot miss, and fire broadsides as fast as humanly possible". Not really unlike the military doctrine for soldiers on land at the time which can be facetiously simplified as: form ranks, shoot volleys towards the enemy until they're all dead or running, maybe go stab them to death if your officer says to. So the old Jack Aubrey tradition of floating a cask on day 2 of every voyage and giving extra rum to the first gun crew that hits it doesn't appear to have been common practice. And the actual story of Thomas Cochrane capturing El Gamo with HMS Speedy is even more incredible in real life than the re-telling in fiction. That guy was a grade A, genuine badass. HMS Victory Rolling Broadside
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:07 |
|
canyoneer posted:And the actual story of Thomas Cochrane capturing El Gamo with HMS Speedy is even more incredible in real life than the re-telling in fiction. That guy was a grade A, genuine badass. I had to look this up, and the Action of 6th May 1801 was indeed, badass as all hell. quote:Finding that he had been beaten by such an inferior foe, the Spanish second-in-command asked Cochrane for a certificate assuring him that he had done all he could to defend his ship.[8] Cochrane obliged, with the equivocal wording that he had 'conducted himself like a true Spaniard'
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 09:03 |
|
Good god, Cochrane's balls must have been enormous! e: hahaha, Cochrane described his own ship as "little more than a burlesque of a vessel of war". What that wiki article didn't mention was that the Gamo had been sent out specifically to capture/kill the Speedy, which had captured about 9 spanish/french ships in the months leading up to the engagement. In the end, it took an entire french squadron, lead by a 74-gun ship named Tyrannicide, to finally take little Speedy down. The french refused to take his sword and traded him and his crew in a prisoner exchange right after the battle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Speedy_%281782%29 US's next supercarrier needs to be called Tyrannicide grover fucked around with this message at 12:19 on Oct 25, 2013 |
# ? Oct 25, 2013 12:05 |
|
I'm thinking about going to Cape Kennedy Space Center this december, but I'm getting confused by all the different tours. Has anyone been there recently and could tell me which are/aren't worthwhile?
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 19:33 |
|
wdarkk posted:I'm thinking about going to Cape Kennedy Space Center this december, but I'm getting confused by all the different tours. Has anyone been there recently and could tell me which are/aren't worthwhile? Everything is worthwhile But man they really did make their tours confusing as all hell, they weren't always like that. If you're spending just one day there you need to see the IMAX movie(s), the Atlantis exhibit, the VAB and the Saturn V/Apollo Center. The exhibits in the visitor complex itself are also pretty neat, the rocket garden especially. You can get some really nice pictures of the rocket garden at dusk when they turn the lights on.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 20:01 |
|
In addition to that stuff (Atlantis wasn't there when I went but I can highly recommend the Saturn V center), if you are in any way shape or form a history buff you need to do the Cape Canaveral Then and Now tour...it hits the historic Mercury and Gemini launch sites and unless they've changed something it goes to LC-34 (site of Apollo I).
|
# ? Oct 26, 2013 15:48 |
|
Cape Canaveral Then and Now is the poo poo. I went three-ish years ago and the last stop before the big museum was Apollo 1. They also take you to a small museum on base with a gift shop, but time is limited. Related to this thread, they have a garden exhibit with all sorts of Cold War toys.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2013 17:55 |
|
Fair amount of cross-pollenation here already, but y'all need to go read MrChips on the M-50 Bounder. Pro-as-gently caress writing on coldwar supersonic bombers. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3276654&pagenumber=381#post420942400
|
# ? Oct 26, 2013 22:00 |
|
Interesting cold war documentaries on Norwegian TV today. Factoids: - Norwegian intelligence built up clandestine stay-behind groups in Finland specifically to blow the major bridges that could be used by Soviet forces to invade Norway through Finland. This was without the Finnish governments knowledge. Norwegian intelligence had the Finnish military penetrated to such a degree that they were told when the Finns broke the Norwegian crypto used for negotiations with Soviet over Svalbard. - Norway also recruited Finnish nationals to conduct deep recon into Soviet, several of these agents had to run to Norway to avoid arrest by the Finns. - A Nowegian intercept station in Fauske was built to intercept signals from Soviet sattelites to Moscow. Two noteworthy episodes of intercepted signals include the Falklands and Iraq. In Iraq the beacons from downed American pilots was meant to be picked up by American sattelites, but this failed several times. The beacons were however picked up by Russian sattelites and beamed down to Moscow. These signals were intercepted at Fauske and relayed to the Americans who could then rescue the pilots. In the Falklands a russian radar intercept sattelite picked up the position of Argentine naval units, including the General Belgrano (by fingerprints of radar emissions intercepted by the sattelite). This information was also intercepted at Fauske and relayed to the UK. The Fauske intercept station is still operational and still classified. - And of course, someone in Norway knew about the use of Bodø Airbase as a U2 base, but we still don't and probably never will know just who knew what.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2013 14:41 |
|
[redacted]
Koesj fucked around with this message at 05:50 on Jan 8, 2015 |
# ? Oct 27, 2013 15:19 |
|
Everyone had their dirty fingers in the northern Finland pie, it seems. The Soviets are claimed to have constructed a number of gas stations along certain very low-traffic roads up there, via an apparently independent commercial petroleum company. The Swedish militia battalion commanders along the Swedish-Finnish borders had rather close contacts with their Finnish counterparts (it's the usual thing up there, what's said in the sauna stays in the sauna), to the point that there are stories about some visiting brass from Stockholm asking a militia commander what his intentions for the companies in his battalion are when the Russians come rolling over the border, and he goes: - Sir, 1st company at this place, 2nd company at that place, 3rd company at some other place, 4th company- - Hold on, hold on, your battalion only has three companies! - Well, if the Russians are at the border, the neighbors will be here before them... Probably a story to be taken with about a kilo of table salt, but still. Tangentially related, during WW2 and up until the 50's the Swedish military intelligence repeatedly attempted to land spies (mostly exiled Estonians that fled to Sweden during the war) in the Baltic countries via torpedo boat, but most (all?) of them got caught. Overall the Swedish military was extremely aggressive vs the Soviets in the 50's. "Provocations" doesn't even begin to cover it; in the late 40's and early 50's most of the east block's sea ports around the Baltic Sea were repeatedly photographed with recon Spitfires, which naturally violated Soviet air space. At one point the air force flew a recon Spitfire with the national roundels painted over all the way to Kandalaksha on the Kola peninsula and back (naturally violating Finnish airspace as well). All of this eventually led to the Russians finally losing their patience and shooting down a SIGINT DC-3 in what became known as the Catalina affair. TheFluff fucked around with this message at 15:00 on Oct 29, 2013 |
# ? Oct 29, 2013 11:22 |
|
TheFluff posted:Everyone had their dirty fingers in the northern Finland pie, it seems. Fight to the last Finn was the plan all along, right? Not like it would have made any difference. Nukes, everyone dies.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2013 13:11 |
|
Well that's the saying. If you can, let the Finns Win without us. But as far as Sweden goes; if WW3 rolled in over the border, the plans where fight to the last swede and take as many bastards with you. Everyone knew we where going to loose in every circumstance: so the logic went that if we could guarantee a stupidly costly victory for 'Landet Urban' hopefully they wouldn't bother coming. I think it was close to 70%?, of everything we had, that would be going to the Finnish border...
|
# ? Oct 29, 2013 18:37 |
|
While we're still here, story from Norwegian state television (NRK) today. http://www.nrk.no/fordypning/her-far-de-vite-pappas-hemmelighet-1.11318663 NRK, my translation, posted:Dads dark secret.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 01:02 |
|
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 03:26 |
|
At first I thought that was a video game.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 03:45 |
|
Koesj posted:It seems the Scando-Falklandian (Malvinian?) connection goes even deeper than I thought! In a very roundabout some people I know might have stumbled upon the alleged Argie attempt to buy intel of UK fleet movements from the Soviets in Stockholm back in '82 I know some people who would be very interested in this. I can give you some contact info if you'd like. They're British naval historians.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 06:15 |
|
Associated video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzjKauBI0T0 GoPro: We make cool cameras, but you will never be as badass as our advertisements, hth.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 11:54 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747_Large_Cargo_Freighter I didn't get photos (I was driving) but I saw one of these flying around recently. They are completely absurd. But they're not as awesome/absurd as the Super Guppy.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 19:03 |
|
Psion posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747_Large_Cargo_Freighter Aww yeah, Super Guppy. There's one at the air and space museum close to where I grew up. The pictures don't do the scale any justice. It is a cartoonishly enormous plane.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2013 19:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 21:36 |
|
Psion posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747_Large_Cargo_Freighter The Super Guppy clearly has hydroencephalitis.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2013 02:26 |