|
kiwid posted:you loving idiots, it's NOT a bug. worksforme wontfix
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 06:31 |
|
|
His twitter is amazingly double speakish today. Don't tell him though, as he'll block you from retweeting him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:ahahahah blockchain has a thing for warning people about double-spends when that's not even supposed to be possible with bitcoin bad news haters - freedom always wins
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
astr0man posted:worksforme wontfix please don't post my work login info
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:he made a tweet 1m ago lollllllllllllllllllll
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
His followers call themselves true believers unironically. Faith is a big value in secular libertarian circles.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-11/the-glitch-that-will-kill-bitcoin.htmlbloomberg posted:The only reason to be part of the bitcoin universe today is speculation. The volatile exchange rate makes Bitcoin an interesting, high-risk financial instrument. [..] There is now a community of people who are "all in" and therefore committed to propping up the market even though there is little substance to it. redditors making GBS threads themselves a little atm unpacked robinhood fucked around with this message at 20:03 on Feb 11, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:00
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:didn't he say he was leaving for a while because of all the trolls or something? i don't actually follow him all he loving does all day is post on twitter, he can't leave it kiwid posted:start poking bitcoin jesus on twitter again lol he's blocked two of my accounts so far
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:00
|
|
|
my main man N.Y. regulator Ben Lawsky about to speak on the panel http://futuretense.newamerica.net/events/2014/new_coin_of_the_realm
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:00
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:His followers call themselves true believers unironically. Faith is a big value in secular libertarian circles. nec fides in institutis
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR6wok7g7do
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
just keep chanting "not a bug" now in unison, we need more power
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
unpacked robinhood posted:http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-11/the-glitch-that-will-kill-bitcoin.html to be honest, 0.1% of mastercard's traffic has got to be pretty sizable
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
Robawesome posted:
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
prefect posted:to be honest, 0.1% of mastercard's traffic has got to be pretty sizable yes but for a system crowing about bringing the downfall of the dollar and CCs it illustrates the magnitude of the delusion. Bitcoin might have been an interesting way of offering an alternative payment system. There might even have been some validity to the 'borderless' aspect (though that would depend on how the regulations on it were implemented), but any chance of it ever becoming a broadly used system is smothered in the crib by the insane ideology coiners have married to their system.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:11
|
|
|
Linguica posted:right but only one of the two double spends actually gets accepted to the blockchain, which is the point? i know, it's just really funny that blockchain.info is calling it that also it allows me to set up this which ought to piss some people off to no end
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
it'd be pretty cool if we got permanent scammer tags for anyone that likes bitcoin
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:14
|
|
|
 Said two days ago as the price was already free falling to try to defy reality. Then Gox released their story. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:21
|
|
|
stupid question but what's the point of having a hash if it can't be relied on
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:23
|
|
|
is this too subtle?
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:stupid question but what's the point of having a hash if it can't be relied on gently caress you dad
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
surebet posted:what would happen if you tried to post a transaction with X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H* in it? we tried that already, it's gotta be the header for it to detect on that note though i wonder what the win32 dll header would do with regards to heuristic antiviruses, or maybe a gzip header Nice!
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:28
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:stupid question but what's the point of having a hash if it can't be relied on it's a design flaw. the transaction ids were obviously supposed to be able to uniquely identify a transaction, but the protocol spec wasn't quite tight enough, so it's possible to generate different hashes for the same transaction by swapping the inputs around in a real financial environment this would have been fixed very quickly. but this is bitcoin, so the developers just put a workaround for the problem in the reference implementation instead of actually fixing the protocol itself
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:28
|
|
|
Robawesome posted:my main man N.Y. regulator Ben Lawsky about to speak on the panel and of course the forbes lady pops up, asks a retarded question
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:29
|
|
|
let's see if i get a response also  i know what he's trying to say here, and it's true, but man that seems like a bad way to handle it
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:33
|
|
|
Let's be honest... does bitcoin have any true competitors we should be looking at or focusing on? (self.Bitcoin) submitted 7 minutes ago by IceTurtle4 [–]couttsphotog 1 point 1 minute ago I don't really see how competition would be beneficial. It's not like two firms competing with each other, it's in everybody's best interest to work together.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:33
|
|
|
keep poking him heresiarch, hopefully it becomes too much for him to handle and he blows his brains out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:33
|
|
|
Don't forget double spend is the recommended safe way to retry a payment that appears failed
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
not sure what's funnier, that this is a known flaw that they told everyone to work around, or that nobody did so
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:36
|
|
|
if that screenshot actually gets legs i'm going to laugh my rear end off. it's getting rewtweeted and i bet most of these people haven't seen the "correction"
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:if that screenshot actually gets legs i'm going to laugh my rear end off. it's getting rewtweeted and i bet most of these people haven't seen the "correction" i've lost the thread somewhere, what's the joke?
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:39
|
|
|
you all need to give blockchain.info/BTC a bit more credit. they did post a wiki page about this txID design flaw three years ago!!!!!! 
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:let's see if i get a response it's worth noting that unless the bitcoin-qt wallet has been updated at some point in the last few years, which i doubt, you need to hex edit your wallet.dat to even attempt that safe fix since pending transactions couldn't be resent by default for obvious reasons
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:43
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:i've lost the thread somewhere, what's the joke?
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
Robawesome posted:
and scene
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:i've lost the thread somewhere, what's the joke? the joke is that blockchain.info says "Warning! this transaction is a double spend of ####" and there's a big red "DOUBLE SPEND" label, but it's not a successful one because if you look at the other transaction it has zero confirmations. but if you don't follow the link to the other transaction it looks like a real problem so i can post an unaltered screenshot where it totally looks like there's been a double-spend and feign complete ignorance, even though anybody with any clue can tell that i'm loving with people and @aantonop has retweeted part of the conversation so i know he's seen it, but he didn't say anything in response, i wonder if he's going to get that fixed
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
I'm bringing this out of retirement for the next bitcoin shitstorm
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:49
|
|
|
andreas's twitter is "this is a good thing for bitcoin because!" personified "Just a brute test by someone who read about Gox and decided to shake any remaining bugs loose. Inconsequential in long run"
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 06:31 |
|
|
that man stole my kidney to make a point about the inherent oppression in regulating the organ trade industry
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 20:53
|
|