Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

Ayato posted:

Burns
Burns

That's Bones, you doofus. :laugh:

Anyway, this movie is a gigantic train wreck. As the OP noted, the movie had theoretical potential, but it is completely wasted. Shatner was a) Shatner, b) a directorial newbie, and c) shafted in various ways during the production, resulting in d) a monstrous disaster of a movie. Laurence Luckinbill may be the most dull actor to play a Star Trek villain. Most of the original cast gave their worst performances ever. The effects are lame; they didn't spring for ILM like they usually did, and the result was a cold turd. The comic relief was simply not funny. And so on.

1/5, because I have a vague memory of some small components of the movie being OK.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Post
  • Reply