|
Edit: Never mind, stupidly easy question
Misogynist fucked around with this message at Jun 24, 2007 around 16:19 |
| # ¿ Jun 24, 2007 16:17 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 19, 2013 04:57 |
|
FrontLine posted:I'm looking for the command to assign a directory a certain amount of size. I'd like assign a file called 'Jimmy' a maximum size of 9GB and it will show up as such when I run 'df -k'.
|
| # ¿ Jul 1, 2007 23:42 |
|
FrontLine posted:Can you explain what this is going to do? FrontLine posted:It's like creating a partition just for that directory.
|
| # ¿ Jul 2, 2007 00:01 |
|
nbv4 posted:Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
|
| # ¿ Jul 6, 2007 04:48 |
|
coconono posted:I'm having a bad sysadmin day Edit: Just realized I answered a question totally different from the one you asked
|
| # ¿ Dec 19, 2007 00:44 |
|
hooah posted:I want to format over my Ubuntu drive. Do I have to do anything with Grub first (on the Ubuntu drive), or will booting go back to the way it was if I go right ahead and format?
|
| # ¿ Jan 29, 2008 05:28 |
|
nbv4 posted:I forgot to mention that lftp for some strange reason is not compatible with my ftp server. When I try to get a directory listing, it gets stuck on
|
| # ¿ Feb 3, 2008 05:12 |
|
Kaluza-Klein posted:I don't have any sort of dns cache Do your primary and secondary nameservers return the same result as one another?
|
| # ¿ Feb 3, 2009 04:46 |
|
Lots of people use SUSE, but you're going to find it a lot easier to get help with a RHEL-alike distro. Also: "reigning."
|
| # ¿ Aug 14, 2009 16:25 |
|
Jerk McJerkface posted:Nope, not working.
|
| # ¿ Sep 2, 2009 15:54 |
|
Jerk McJerkface posted:Hey, just a quick question, I'm having a miserable time setting up proftpd on my Ubunutu 8.10 file server. I've set FTP before on Centos a few times with no problem, but for some reason I just can't get it to work. Can someone give me a sample .conf file or give me some guidance on user names?
|
| # ¿ Sep 14, 2009 14:33 |
|
Zom Aur posted:Oh, and I guess you should edit their lines in /etc/passwd to something like '[user]:x:[uid]:[gid]::[/user/home]:/bin/false'
|
| # ¿ Sep 14, 2009 18:01 |
|
JHVH-1 posted:Setting up vsftp isn't that hard. On Ubuntu server anonymous is enabled, so you want to change that to NO and then change local users to YES and value to chroot local users to YES, unless you only want to chroot certain users. In that case you set the chroot file to some place in /etc/, create the file with an editor and put the users you want to chroot on it. I think thats about it.
|
| # ¿ Sep 14, 2009 18:59 |
|
baalzamonbarnes posted:I'm running some UNIX/Linux servers at home right now as web/email/file/etc servers to provide basic network services to my roommate and friends. Most of these people either don't know what Linux is, or can't be bothered to learn anything about it, but I would like to be able to provide them with user-friendly access to their accounts on the servers. I know enough PHP to set up a basic user account management application, but I'm interested in using it to control the actual Linux user accounts, since these are the accounts used to access most of the network services (email, samba/nfs file sharing, etc).
|
| # ¿ Sep 15, 2009 18:23 |
|
Trick question, XP will trash your MBR without asking
|
| # ¿ Sep 15, 2009 20:09 |
|
teamdest posted:Does anyone have a recommendation for a music server with a web interface that can run on a headless server? I've got a Debian box running as a file server, with SABnzbd+ on it as well, but I'd like to also make it so that rather than just sharing my music and playing it locally in winamp I can connect to it remotely from any computer and play music as if it were a music repository. I don't know if this request makes any sense, I'm basically asking if there's software that creates a dedicated "music" server separate from Samba.
|
| # ¿ Sep 16, 2009 18:34 |
|
If you have ACL support the easiest way is to do a setfacl -m default:group:owner:2777 /path. This will only apply to new files and will not apply to files copied from elsewhere. Those files will retain their permissions.
|
| # ¿ Sep 16, 2009 20:49 |
|
bitprophet posted:Misogynist is right that ACLs may help here, but assuming you're copying files into that folder by hand somehow, you'd probably need something awful like a cronjob that runs every minute and performs the chmod.
|
| # ¿ Sep 17, 2009 03:52 |
|
Severed posted:My stupid question (for now) is if I have Fedora 11 installed and Red Hat releases Fedora 12, how do I update this? Is it just a kernel update or am I installing a patch for the OS itself? Sorry, I know jack poo poo here.
|
| # ¿ Sep 17, 2009 04:54 |
|
Severed posted:Alright then. I am going to dedicate an entire hard drive to Linux, and I want to configure it so that the kernel will go on it's own partition (/boot?) and maybe even make a few other partitions just to help segregate the data incase I gently caress something up... which would make using the backup utilities a little easier.
|
| # ¿ Sep 17, 2009 13:25 |
|
Severed posted:You could also just experiment with other x-windows too.
|
| # ¿ Sep 25, 2009 18:47 |
|
mcsuede posted:Wondering if there are any filesystem compression utilities that work on Ubuntu similar to NTFS on-the-fly compression.
|
| # ¿ Sep 27, 2009 03:36 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Here's a question, more related to webhosting I guess.
|
| # ¿ Oct 2, 2009 16:21 |
|
angrytech posted:I work IT at a small university in Minnesota that uses Active Directory for everything. I'm jealous as hell and would like to replicate all the functionality on my personal domain.
|
| # ¿ Oct 20, 2009 04:35 |
|
Firefox uses its own DNS resolver rather than the OS's. Baseless speculation suggests to me that your primary nameserver is working fine, but your secondary isn't. Whatever assumptions you make about what's causing the problem, you should try to test them against the output of strace/ltrace, which will be far more useful than guessing.
|
| # ¿ Oct 22, 2009 05:07 |
|
Accipiter posted:GeForce 4 is PCIe and/or AGP.
|
| # ¿ Oct 22, 2009 13:38 |
|
Linux (with GUI, at least) and Virtual PC have never, ever played nice together in my experience.
|
| # ¿ Oct 24, 2009 16:00 |
|
fail2ban and other active response methodologies really aren't useful unless you're actually worried about insecure accounts with weak passwords on your system, in which case you're putting a band-aid on a broken leg and need to change either or both of your password and remote access policies. If someone is trying to bruteforce an otherwise-secure system it's because all the easier exploits didn't work. Log pollution is really the only thing you need to worry about, and for SSH it's simple enough to just change the port to something arbitrary. Dobermaniac posted:I couldn't really find a cross-platform thread so since I'm using both ubuntu and osx I guess I'll ask it here. I am using synergy on my main desktop(ubuntu9.04) with my mac as the slave computer. Is there any program similar to synergy that will transfer the sounds also to the master computer? I'd rather use my speakers for both computer and didn't want to always plug in tons of cables. I think it'd be easier just to transfer keyboard, mouse, and sound across to another computer. Misogynist fucked around with this message at Oct 26, 2009 around 02:30 |
| # ¿ Oct 26, 2009 02:25 |
|
I just wanted to bump this thread in appreciation of awesome. Other tiling window managers have always left me wanting, but I feel like someone has created this application for me to welcome me to the future.
|
| # ¿ Oct 27, 2009 03:44 |
|
Unix filesystems are case-sensitive. That's how it is. Assuming you're talking about your file manager with all this "actions" business, you just have to get it to associate .JPG with MIME type image/jpeg.
|
| # ¿ Oct 30, 2009 20:31 |
|
Dyna Soar posted:Ok, after looking into this I found out that Ubuntu is pretty much the way to go. So the question is, Gnome or KDE? I read KDE is better, more customizeable and more similar to windows, but thats coming from a sworn KDE user. What are the pros of Gnome? I used KDE for a very long time before switching to something leaner and more terminal-oriented.
|
| # ¿ Nov 3, 2009 22:23 |
|
This is pretty much the kind of thing that Exim was designed for, no?
|
| # ¿ Nov 6, 2009 18:21 |
|
Sounds like a bad disk to me. Check dmesg and your kernel logs.
|
| # ¿ Nov 12, 2009 16:29 |
|
roadhead posted:I think all the disks are fine, they're practically brand new Trying to start ftpd shouldn't crash a machine. Something else is at play here.
|
| # ¿ Nov 12, 2009 17:42 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Being that it's from 2001, is it possible that nobody tries exploiting something that old?
|
| # ¿ Nov 12, 2009 21:43 |
|
Bob Morales posted:What are some good Linux IRC channels/servers?
|
| # ¿ Nov 16, 2009 18:28 |
|
HatfulOfHollow posted:We have a naming scheme where any address ending in -vip is a virtual server that's going through a bigip to talk to some pool of servers. Well I stumbled over this one name in dns today and ended up going through every bigip we have looking for the virtual server configuration without any luck. Then by sheer accident I tried to ssh to the vip address and it opened a session. Then it hit me that the vip was actually a redhat cluster to provide HA for an NFS mount. So I did an ifconfig to confirm my suspicions and surprisingly the IP didn't show up. But if I look in /etc/cluster/cluster.conf I see that the name is defined. So I'm trying to figure out why it works this way. Why isn't the machine aware that it also has this other IP address once the cluster service is started yet the system has no idea that it's listening on that address. Does anyone know?
|
| # ¿ Nov 19, 2009 07:24 |
|
Hey, after performing too much performance work this week, I'm looking to start enabling process accounting on a lot of my servers. The problem is that on some servers, the pacct file can get up to around 380 MB in a day. How do you guys manage these? Is there some way to tune the accounting, or should I just try to logrotate the account files?
|
| # ¿ Nov 20, 2009 06:28 |
|
ext3/ext4 reserve 5% (configurable) of the total filesystem space for the root user. 93GB is, not coincidentally, about 5% of 2 TB.
|
| # ¿ Nov 20, 2009 22:12 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 19, 2013 04:57 |
|
A MIRACLE posted:Getting flash to work for a first time linux user is kind of a bitch. Especially because Ubuntu doesn't install a lot of flash dependency libraries, that can be hard to find.
|
| # ¿ Nov 23, 2009 07:54 |





I'll try it now.