|
Discount_Bees posted:Is that a selector? and an NFA violation
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 23:19 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 11:49 |
|
|
thermobollocks posted:Is that a selector?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 23:22 |
|
|
Seven year old holding a FiveSeven with a questionable attachment? Shocking.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 23:24 |
|
|
Is that really a FiveseveN or do they always look fake? Also grippods were made to make god cry.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 23:30 |
|
|
Discount_Bees posted:Jesus why does that look so big. Content:  
Afro fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2010 around 23:53 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 23:51 |
|
Tyson
|
Afro posted:Jesus why does that look so big. Because children have small hands.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 00:46 |
|
|
babby's first felony
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 01:42 |
|
|
thermobollocks posted:Is that a selector? Putting a bipod on a pistol is a felony?
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 03:38 |
|
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Putting a bipod on a pistol is a felony? VFG bro, makes it an AOW.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 03:40 |
|
|
Afro posted:Jesus why does that look so big. 
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 04:40 |
|
|
thermobollocks posted:Is that a selector? No, it's the safety.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 09:17 |
|
|
Afro posted:Jesus why does that look so big. lol - my first thought was "definitely lego"
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 09:27 |
|
|
Inspector_71 posted:VFG bro, makes it an AOW. Bipods at this point are a grey area, though not something I'd want to push with a grip pod though.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 13:57 |
|
|
homerlaw posted:Because children have small hands. Afro posted:Jesus why does that look so big. It's like someone got ahold of a Testor's paint set and went hog wild.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 15:47 |
|
|
Mad Dragon posted:It's like someone got ahold of a Testor's paint set and went hog wild. A paint set consisting of only 3 colors.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 15:47 |
|
|
There's a Mini-14 decked out like that at my local EBR store.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 19:11 |
|
|
cypha posted:lol - my first thought was "definitely lego" Mine too. Now, if it was an AR15....
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 19:28 |
|
|
QuarkMartial posted:Mine too. Now, if it was an AR15.... ...it would look right at home in some asinine configuration with a retarded paint job?
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 20:10 |
|
|
Too top it off it's California legal config so the magazine release isn't functional without shoving something inside. Ugh.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 20:25 |
|
|
Fang posted:...it would look right at home in some asinine configuration with a retarded paint job? It wouldn't need a ridiculous aftermarket stock to achieve such asinine feats like having adjustable length of pull and a pistol grip
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 20:52 |
|
|
Fat Ogre posted:Bipods at this point are a grey area, though not something I'd want to push with a grip pod though. Ruger was selling that 10/22 pistol with a bipod attached and I would guess they looked into it and found it was fine.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 20:54 |
|
|
Afro posted:Jesus why does that look so big. My god... he watches trueblood! Somebody stop this man!
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 20:58 |
|
|
Sgt. Shaved Balls posted:My god... Or he's managed to attract a mate. 
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 22:36 |
|
|
bunnielab posted:Ruger was selling that 10/22 pistol with a bipod attached and I would guess they looked into it and found it was fine. Well a bipod isn't a VFG, but I assume a Grippod would be a Inspector_71 fucked around with this message at Jun 18, 2010 around 23:57 |
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 22:48 |
|
|
Inspector_71 posted:Well a bipod isn't a VFG, but I assume a Grippod would be a bipod in the eyes of the law.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 22:57 |
|
|
Sgt. Shaved Balls posted:Is that really a FiveseveN or do they always look fake? I call "airsoft". Didn't know Tokyo Marui made them until my friend bought one at A-Kon.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 23:25 |
|
|
Pitch posted:You think the ATF would assume that a product explicitly marketed as being both a bipod and a grip would in this case take the charitable interpretation that it was only the one that isn't a felony? Whoops, I actually meant to say grip in that post instead of bipod.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2010 23:56 |
|
|
No pic because I was driving, but I witnessed tacticlol tonight. I was going to a baseball game, and pointed out how one of the officers directing traffic was probably a lefty because his gun was on his left side. Of course, the next officer had his gun on the right hand side... ...The next officer, the one in the lot itself, had two guns. Reflecting on it now, though, they were backwards. One was on his left side, facing the proper way to be drawn on the left. The other was on his right side, but with the magwell facing me as if it was meant to be a crossdraw. I thought he just had two guns and was ready to wield his Glocks akimbo, but now I'm not really sure what he was trying to accomplish. Note: He had two functioning arms, so it wasn't some sort of "I only have one arm so I carry a second gun instead of trying to reload my first gun" sort of thing, either.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 08:19 |
|
|
QuarkMartial posted:No pic because I was driving, but I witnessed tacticlol tonight. Are you sure they were two firearms? The weapon on his right side could be a Taser, which would make sense.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 08:29 |
|
|
Cross draw was a Taser, I would be $Texas on it.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 08:35 |
|
|
ArmyGroup303 posted:Are you sure they were two firearms? The weapon on his right side could be a Taser, which would make sense. Airbone Operation posted:Cross draw was a Taser, I would be $Texas on it. So, I did some quick googling and found one that looks really similar to a Glock from a distance. I still say that the magwell area of the device looked exactly the same as the pistol of the surrounding officers. QuarkMartial fucked around with this message at Jun 19, 2010 around 08:51 |
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 08:46 |
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 10:56 |
|
|
Why does the shotgun on the top not have a barrel?
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 17:17 |
|
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Why does the shotgun on the top not have a barrel? Maximum spread of shot.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 18:47 |
|
|
Secret Ooze posted:Maximum spread of shot. A Real Man's shotgun has a shot pattern that includes his support hand.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 19:00 |
|
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Why does the shotgun on the top not have a barrel? It's a stealth shotgun so you can't see the spread coming.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 19:42 |
|
|
With the one on the bottom, is the actual shotgun just sitting on that stock? Look at the back - does it just seem that way, or is it actually just laying there?
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 19:45 |
|
|
ballgameover.mp3 posted:With the one on the bottom, is the actual shotgun just sitting on that stock? Look at the back - does it just seem that way, or is it actually just laying there? I think that's just oil staining the aluminum block that fixes the pistol-grip and stock to the receiver - makes it look like a shadow on. If you look that the barrel clamp and them back, you do get an MC Eischer effect.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 20:11 |
|
|
I see that you are correct, since you can see the light source, the shadow would be at the top.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 20:28 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 11:49 |
|
|
TFR: Explaining the Unexplainable.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2010 21:11 |
|
