|
SadWhaleFamily posted:Now I wish I weren't a pussy liberal trying to score with the easy hippy/theatre chicks who hated guns when I went there. No, that is the correct way to spend one's early 20's.
|
| # ? Jul 19, 2010 21:08 |
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2013 14:16 |
|
SadWhaleFamily posted:Now I wish I weren't a pussy liberal trying to score with the easy hippy/theatre chicks who hated guns when I went there. I'm not sure, I only went a few times with my fiance. It was a really fancy looking single-shot .22 with aperture sights. I'll see if he remembers.
|
| # ? Jul 19, 2010 21:12 |
|
eine dose socken posted:I am firmly convinced that all European armies should do this too- stop wasting tax money on new equipment and adjust older weapons and gear to suit their new requirements, instead of selling them off to some Third World regimes. Kinda like the french did with the FR F1 sniper rifles. Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs.
|
| # ? Jul 19, 2010 21:19 |
|
FirstPersonShitter posted:Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs. I was under the impression they had actually started doing this, rounding up FALs from the old armories and the like, kind of in the same way that the U.S. Army did with M-14s. Fake edit: On second thought, I believe my "source" for this was a random column in a random gun mag, so take that for what it's worth...
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 03:00 |
|
FirstPersonShitter posted:Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs. Of course, the best thing would be if they did adopt them again, then thought gently caress we need something smaller too and flipped NATO off and brought back the EM-2 but that's just a dream and it'll never happen gently caress life
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 04:57 |
|
Secret Ooze posted:...so I told them that I wasnt moving to another bench. Ive been to four benches during this visit and Im not going to move to another one. I had a nice view from my last bench, I could see the squirrels, and they were married... FTFY
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 19:47 |
|
iyaayas01 posted:I was under the impression they had actually started doing this, rounding up FALs from the old armories and the like, kind of in the same way that the U.S. Army did with M-14s. If that's the case, then it suggests that ballistics at range are a larger factor than accuracy, as FALs apparently aren't anything to write home about in that regard.
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 20:17 |
|
The Brits just bought a bunch of LMT AR-10 type rifles for use as squad designated marksman weapons (they're issuing them with 6x ACOGs as the L129A1)
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 20:35 |
|
Fang posted:If that's the case, then it suggests that ballistics at range are a larger factor than accuracy, as FALs apparently aren't anything to write home about in that regard. I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths.
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 21:18 |
|
FirstPersonShitter posted:I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths. The Brits, of course, can't go out in armored vehicles to flank or otherwise engage targets because the only APCs they have are armored with empty cans of Carling. Full cans are reactive armor. Tennents if it's the Scots.
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 21:32 |
|
FirstPersonShitter posted:I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths. Based off this helmetcam video of the Brits being ambushed, this sounds pretty accurate. The soldiers are aiming at the smoke of the Taliban insurgents hiding in the treeline. I doubt either could really see the other, although a guy does take a deflection to the face and you can see some of the Talibans' fire hitting pretty close. Direct link for those who don't want to deal with the Sun.
|
| # ? Jul 20, 2010 22:42 |
|
Young Freud posted:That's bizarre, those looked more like archery stances than rifle ones. Dredging this a bit, but this reminds me a lot of how I was originally taught to shoot airgun on the HS 'Rifle' team. Only the straps were on the jacket you wore. It was pretty silly. Still, I'd like to try that stance with a Garand. Stable, but dosn't seem to be optimal for mobility and such. I think the CMP still has competitions, do people actualy use this stance?
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 03:27 |
|
BOrangeFury posted:Still, I'd like to try that stance with a Garand. Stable, but dosn't seem to be optimal for mobility and such. I think the CMP still has competitions, do people actualy use this stance? Not necessarily that stance straight up, but yes, that type of awkward non-mobile but fairly stable stance is what you'd see at a bullseye rifle competition like Camp Perry.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 03:35 |
|
iyaayas01 posted:Not necessarily that stance straight up, but yes, that type of awkward non-mobile but fairly stable stance is what you'd see at a bullseye rifle competition like Camp Perry. I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles?? That bullet holder is so boss, thought. Almost cute.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 04:26 |
|
We do that silly stance for the rifle range as well. Resting your non firing elbow on your ribs gives you a more stable firing stance, but for the combat shooting range we do that linebacker thing.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 04:29 |
|
Yeah, you're really crippling yourself if you dont know the basics to shooting bladed.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 04:46 |
|
Anywhere where you can see pics of what the various stances are? Would probably be good to see where i'm going right / wrong
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 10:35 |
|
Sorry for the low res, it's all the site had, here are two monstrositys I saw while looking trough a Australian gun trading post:![]()
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 11:08 |
|
Zefiel posted:I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles?? Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol. ![]() Also: ![]()
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 12:13 |
|
Bogon posted:one_man_army.jpg
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 14:35 |
|
Also, why is the guy in the background shopped in?
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 15:14 |
|
I like turtles posted:
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 15:26 |
|
Bogon posted:Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol. http://www.uticaod.com/homepage/x17...f-baby-stroller
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 15:30 |
|
Zefiel posted:I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles?? You should see the fancy cart the cowboy-action shooters have - miniature stagecoaches and suchlike. :3 (Also I should snag a baby-cart next time I find one at the thrift store - it'd make hauling my poo poo from the car to the firing position easier, out at the shootin' hole. (BLM land, fenced/no unauthourised vehicles.)
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 16:52 |
|
Ygolonac posted:You should see the fancy cart the cowboy-action shooters have - miniature stagecoaches and suchlike. :3 (Also I see a lot of guys using these in 3-gun pictures:
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 16:57 |
|
I'm too lazy to carry, so around the house, I just have a roomba programmed to follow me. There is a 1911 duct taped to the roomba. Safety and cleaning all at once. Now I sort of want to get cheap RC cars, take off the shell fill it with tannerite and send them down range as moving targets. I like turtles fucked around with this message at Jul 21, 2010 around 17:03 |
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 17:00 |
|
I like turtles posted:I'm too lazy to carry, so around the house, I just have a roomba programmed to follow me. There is a 1911 duct taped to the roomba. Safety and cleaning all at once. Stick helium balloons on them. I've seen at least one trashy cop show on TV where they were using a red balloon and a green balloon on an R/C car as a hostage target.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 17:23 |
|
thermobollocks posted:Stick helium balloons on them. I've seen at least one trashy cop show on TV where they were using a red balloon and a green balloon on an R/C car as a hostage target. I tried something like this once upon a time. You don't need helium balloons - actually just normal balloons tied to a "mast" (I used a 1/4" dowel zip strapped to the front grill on the RC truck) on the RC vehicle works great. The balloons bob and dance behind the car (but nice and high up) as they get dragged along. To reload, just tie new balloons onto the existing string lengths on the mast. There were a couple gotchas though. 1 - Even pretty flat and smoothed outdoor ground is pretty serious off-roading terrain for a cheap RC vehicle. It's easy to get stuck if you're not careful where you drive. 2 - Being able to drive back up to the firing line to reload balloons, then drive back out onto the range with no need for a ceasefire is pretty boss. 3 - It really is pretty fun. 4 - Anything downrange eventually will catch a bullet.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 18:38 |
|
I like turtles posted:
I don't know but he's showing far more mobility than a man of his physique should be capable of, so that may have something to do with it.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 21:03 |
|
I like turtles posted:
I thought it was Coors Light at first. I like my version better.
|
| # ? Jul 21, 2010 22:57 |
|
SO ANGRY posted:We do that silly stance for the rifle range as well. Resting your non firing elbow on your ribs gives you a more stable firing stance, but for the combat shooting range we do that linebacker thing. I always used that weird rest the handguard on your fist stance when I was in the 200 yard standing slowfire portion of the qual, I still don't know why
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 09:34 |
|
Bogon posted:Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 11:59 |
|
Polemides posted:I always used that weird rest the handguard on your fist stance when I was in the 200 yard standing slowfire portion of the qual, I still don't know why There's a guy I know who with his left hand makes kind of the gun hand gesture with the thumb straight up, then rests the gun across the thumb and fingers with his left elbow against his wrist. There's loads of weird target shooting stances and hand positions, I guess it's just whatever lets you personally hold the gun the stillest.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 13:26 |
|
Well regardless of how you do it, you're still standing straight up, so it's still going to be wibbly wobbly. Outside of 100 yards you won't hit poo poo standing anyways, especially in a combat environment, so it's kind of a moot point.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 14:26 |
|
SO ANGRY posted:Well regardless of how you do it, you're still standing straight up, so it's still going to be wibbly wobbly. Outside of 100 yards you won't hit poo poo standing anyways, especially in a combat environment, so it's kind of a moot point. I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing. Not with any "well if you're an olympic grade marksman" caveats - if you know the fundamentals of shooting and have any kind of upper body strength and aren't shooting some hilariously heavy rifle, hitting things at 200 or 300 yards with a half-decent sling support is pretty doable.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 14:35 |
|
^ agreeing with Cyrano I shot my last 2 deer at around 200-300 yards standing with no sling support with a Remington 700 ADL. It's very possible, and very doable.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 14:55 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing. Then let me chime in on the combat environment bit, since I have personal experience with that.... he is STILL wrong. You fight like you train.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 15:39 |
|
I like turtles posted:
Some people prefer the taste of diet sodas to the sugary ones. Regular sodas are too sugary. Cyrano4747 posted:I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing. You don't even need a sling. The standing slow-fire portion of High Powered Rifle matches doesn't permit use of a sling and is done at 200 yards. Fang fucked around with this message at Jul 22, 2010 around 16:27 |
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 16:17 |
|
Fang posted:Some people prefer the taste of diet sodas to the sugary ones. Regular sodas are too sugary. Amen to that, I haven't been able to drink a regular pop in about 6 years now.
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 16:19 |
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2013 14:16 |
|
|
| # ? Jul 22, 2010 16:23 |









































