Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«540 »
  • Post
  • Reply
bunnielab
May 19, 2005

Ask me about Herbs

SadWhaleFamily posted:

Now I wish I weren't a pussy liberal trying to score with the easy hippy/theatre chicks who hated guns when I went there.

No, that is the correct way to spend one's early 20's.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Faerunner
Dec 31, 2007


SadWhaleFamily posted:

Now I wish I weren't a pussy liberal trying to score with the easy hippy/theatre chicks who hated guns when I went there.

Rifle team, you say? What rifles do they run with?

I'm not sure, I only went a few times with my fiance. It was a really fancy looking single-shot .22 with aperture sights. I'll see if he remembers.

FirstPersonShitter
Dec 2, 2007

How would the dog wear goggles and even more than that, who makes the goggles?


eine dose socken posted:

I am firmly convinced that all European armies should do this too- stop wasting tax money on new equipment and adjust older weapons and gear to suit their new requirements, instead of selling them off to some Third World regimes. Kinda like the french did with the FR F1 sniper rifles.

It would also lead to some totally awesome old/new hybrid weapons- imagine the Bundeswehr riding around in modified BMPs, sporting pimped out AK 74s and G3s.

Or the British army using FALs with folding stocks, ACOGs and lots of rails.

Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs.

iyaayas01
Feb 19, 2010

Perry'd


FirstPersonShitter posted:

Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs.

I was under the impression they had actually started doing this, rounding up FALs from the old armories and the like, kind of in the same way that the U.S. Army did with M-14s.

Fake edit: On second thought, I believe my "source" for this was a random column in a random gun mag, so take that for what it's worth...

rossmum
Dec 2, 2008

Cummander ross, reporting for duty!



FirstPersonShitter posted:

Recently the british army has been talking about switching back to a 7.62x51 because of the huge ranges they're having to engage people at on average in afghanistan, so maybe we would've been better off keeping the FALs.
While that sounds cool as hell I'd take it with more than a few grains of salt. As soon as they're back from Ghan and needing to engage at shorter ranges, they'll run into the exact problems that caused the (eventual) development and adoption of the L85. Surely they'd realise this, so I'd imagine any re-issue of SLRs would be temporary or perhaps limited in number.

Of course, the best thing would be if they did adopt them again, then thought gently caress we need something smaller too and flipped NATO off and brought back the EM-2 but that's just a dream and it'll never happen gently caress life

tomstuart
Aug 1, 2006

I see what you did there.

Secret Ooze posted:

...so I told them that I wasnt moving to another bench. Ive been to four benches during this visit and Im not going to move to another one. I had a nice view from my last bench, I could see the squirrels, and they were married...

FTFY

Fang
Jul 9, 2001

Why couldn't Fluttershy finish her carrot?

She was a little horse

iyaayas01 posted:

I was under the impression they had actually started doing this, rounding up FALs from the old armories and the like, kind of in the same way that the U.S. Army did with M-14s.

Fake edit: On second thought, I believe my "source" for this was a random column in a random gun mag, so take that for what it's worth...

If that's the case, then it suggests that ballistics at range are a larger factor than accuracy, as FALs apparently aren't anything to write home about in that regard.

Otto Skorzeny
Nov 7, 2008

He's a PSoC, loose and runnin'
came the whisper from each lip
And he's here to do some business with
the bad ADC on his chip
bad ADC on his chiiiiip


The Brits just bought a bunch of LMT AR-10 type rifles for use as squad designated marksman weapons (they're issuing them with 6x ACOGs as the L129A1)

FirstPersonShitter
Dec 2, 2007

How would the dog wear goggles and even more than that, who makes the goggles?


Fang posted:

If that's the case, then it suggests that ballistics at range are a larger factor than accuracy, as FALs apparently aren't anything to write home about in that regard.

I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths.

Rodrigo Diaz
Apr 16, 2007

Knights who are at the wars eat their bread in sorrow;
their ease is weariness and sweat;
they have one good day after many bad

FirstPersonShitter posted:

I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths.

The Brits, of course, can't go out in armored vehicles to flank or otherwise engage targets because the only APCs they have are armored with empty cans of Carling. Full cans are reactive armor. Tennents if it's the Scots.

Young Freud
Nov 25, 2006

My old avatar sucked anyway.

FirstPersonShitter posted:

I heard the average engagement distance has gone up to something crazy like 900 yards in afghanistan for british troops because the guys just stand at the edge of forests and fire into the army bases, so 5.56 drifts too much to really be effective, and they don't have enough sniper rifle equipped guys to handle all the insurgents/al quada/taliban. I might have the units wrong on that distance because 900 yards is an awfully long way, but it's what I heard from some pretty knowledgable people. I hope it's not one of those dumb myths.

Based off this helmetcam video of the Brits being ambushed, this sounds pretty accurate. The soldiers are aiming at the smoke of the Taliban insurgents hiding in the treeline. I doubt either could really see the other, although a guy does take a deflection to the face and you can see some of the Talibans' fire hitting pretty close.

Direct link for those who don't want to deal with the Sun.

BOrangeFury
Feb 18, 2005

by T. Fine


Young Freud posted:

That's bizarre, those looked more like archery stances than rifle ones.

Dredging this a bit, but this reminds me a lot of how I was originally taught to shoot airgun on the HS 'Rifle' team. Only the straps were on the jacket you wore. It was pretty silly.

Still, I'd like to try that stance with a Garand. Stable, but dosn't seem to be optimal for mobility and such. I think the CMP still has competitions, do people actualy use this stance?

iyaayas01
Feb 19, 2010

Perry'd


BOrangeFury posted:

Still, I'd like to try that stance with a Garand. Stable, but dosn't seem to be optimal for mobility and such. I think the CMP still has competitions, do people actualy use this stance?

Not necessarily that stance straight up, but yes, that type of awkward non-mobile but fairly stable stance is what you'd see at a bullseye rifle competition like Camp Perry.

Zefiel
Sep 14, 2007


You could have it so much better.


iyaayas01 posted:

Not necessarily that stance straight up, but yes, that type of awkward non-mobile but fairly stable stance is what you'd see at a bullseye rifle competition like Camp Perry.



I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles??

That bullet holder is so boss, thought. Almost cute.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

"Watch your six Devil Dog!"


We do that silly stance for the rifle range as well. Resting your non firing elbow on your ribs gives you a more stable firing stance, but for the combat shooting range we do that linebacker thing.

El Jorge
Feb 26, 2006

A spiritus dominatus,
Domine, libra nos,
From the lighting and the tempest,
Our Emperor, deliver us.


A morte perpetua,
Domine, libra nos.


Yeah, you're really crippling yourself if you dont know the basics to shooting bladed.

markoshark
Nov 6, 2005


Anywhere where you can see pics of what the various stances are?

Would probably be good to see where i'm going right / wrong

Quantum Koala
Apr 21, 2010

Revvin' up your engine
Listen to her howlin' roar
Metal under tension
Beggin' you to touch and go


Sorry for the low res, it's all the site had, here are two monstrositys I saw while looking trough a Australian gun trading post:

Bogon
Nov 7, 2006


Zefiel posted:

I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles??


Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol.



Also:

oddspelling
May 31, 2009

Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment


Bogon posted:



one_man_army.jpg

I like turtles
Aug 6, 2009

"Wouldn't want to see an angry turtle with a gun, would ya? "

Well...


Diet coke.

Also, why is the guy in the background shopped in?

Android Bicyclist
Apr 28, 2009

Leave no chalupa behind...
Yes, I shoot just like this.


I like turtles posted:

Diet coke.
How else are you going to carry your favorite carbonated beverage into battle? Using AK chest rigs they got at the local army surplus store, my friends would wear them under their jackets & sneak in PBR's into the local movie theaters.

niggerstink420
Aug 7, 2009

by T. Fine


Bogon posted:

Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol.


http://www.uticaod.com/homepage/x17...f-baby-stroller

Ygolonac
Nov 26, 2007

FURRED STREET,
BITCHES!




Zefiel posted:

I-is that red thing like a golf bag, but for rifles??

That bullet holder is so boss, thought. Almost cute.

You should see the fancy cart the cowboy-action shooters have - miniature stagecoaches and suchlike. :3 (Also .)

I should snag a baby-cart next time I find one at the thrift store - it'd make hauling my poo poo from the car to the firing position easier, out at the shootin' hole. (BLM land, fenced/no unauthourised vehicles.)

Black Stormy
Apr 1, 2003



Ygolonac posted:

You should see the fancy cart the cowboy-action shooters have - miniature stagecoaches and suchlike. :3 (Also .)

I should snag a baby-cart next time I find one at the thrift store - it'd make hauling my poo poo from the car to the firing position easier, out at the shootin' hole. (BLM land, fenced/no unauthourised vehicles.)

I see a lot of guys using these in 3-gun pictures:

I like turtles
Aug 6, 2009

"Wouldn't want to see an angry turtle with a gun, would ya? "

Well...


I'm too lazy to carry, so around the house, I just have a roomba programmed to follow me. There is a 1911 duct taped to the roomba. Safety and cleaning all at once.


Now I sort of want to get cheap RC cars, take off the shell fill it with tannerite and send them down range as moving targets.

I like turtles fucked around with this message at Jul 21, 2010 around 17:03

thermobollocks
Jul 5, 2009

GET A DILLON

I like turtles posted:

I'm too lazy to carry, so around the house, I just have a roomba programmed to follow me. There is a 1911 duct taped to the roomba. Safety and cleaning all at once.


Now I sort of want to get cheap RC cars, take off the shell fill it with tannerite and send them down range as moving targets.

Stick helium balloons on them. I've seen at least one trashy cop show on TV where they were using a red balloon and a green balloon on an R/C car as a hostage target.

Mister Sinewave
Feb 9, 2008

Unload Safely!
1. Fire into ceiling.
2. Count each round in screamed German.
3. Repeat until empty.

thermobollocks posted:

Stick helium balloons on them. I've seen at least one trashy cop show on TV where they were using a red balloon and a green balloon on an R/C car as a hostage target.

I tried something like this once upon a time. You don't need helium balloons - actually just normal balloons tied to a "mast" (I used a 1/4" dowel zip strapped to the front grill on the RC truck) on the RC vehicle works great. The balloons bob and dance behind the car (but nice and high up) as they get dragged along. To reload, just tie new balloons onto the existing string lengths on the mast.

There were a couple gotchas though.

1 - Even pretty flat and smoothed outdoor ground is pretty serious off-roading terrain for a cheap RC vehicle. It's easy to get stuck if you're not careful where you drive.

2 - Being able to drive back up to the firing line to reload balloons, then drive back out onto the range with no need for a ceasefire is pretty boss.

3 - It really is pretty fun.

4 - Anything downrange eventually will catch a bullet. RIP cheap RC Truck.

incredibull
Sep 7, 2008

GENERIC

I like turtles posted:

Diet coke.

Also, why is the guy in the background shopped in?

I don't know but he's showing far more mobility than a man of his physique should be capable of, so that may have something to do with it.

Propagandalf
Dec 6, 2008

itchy itchy itchy itchy

I like turtles posted:

Diet coke.


I thought it was Coors Light at first. I like my version better.

Kung Fu Fist Fuck
Aug 9, 2009

They can't say no to my body, ufooo!


SO ANGRY posted:

We do that silly stance for the rifle range as well. Resting your non firing elbow on your ribs gives you a more stable firing stance, but for the combat shooting range we do that linebacker thing.

I always used that weird rest the handguard on your fist stance when I was in the 200 yard standing slowfire portion of the qual, I still don't know why

Unskilled Labour
Jul 23, 2009


Bogon posted:

Yea that is. But if you want to go all out you need to get the trike type baby strollers for complete Tacticlol.



FirstPersonShitter
Dec 2, 2007

How would the dog wear goggles and even more than that, who makes the goggles?


Polemides posted:

I always used that weird rest the handguard on your fist stance when I was in the 200 yard standing slowfire portion of the qual, I still don't know why

There's a guy I know who with his left hand makes kind of the gun hand gesture with the thumb straight up, then rests the gun across the thumb and fingers with his left elbow against his wrist. There's loads of weird target shooting stances and hand positions, I guess it's just whatever lets you personally hold the gun the stillest.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

"Watch your six Devil Dog!"


Well regardless of how you do it, you're still standing straight up, so it's still going to be wibbly wobbly. Outside of 100 yards you won't hit poo poo standing anyways, especially in a combat environment, so it's kind of a moot point.

Cyrano4747
Sep 25, 2006

American planes, full of holes and wounded men, took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France, a few German fighter planes flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground.

SO ANGRY posted:

Well regardless of how you do it, you're still standing straight up, so it's still going to be wibbly wobbly. Outside of 100 yards you won't hit poo poo standing anyways, especially in a combat environment, so it's kind of a moot point.

I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing.

Not with any "well if you're an olympic grade marksman" caveats - if you know the fundamentals of shooting and have any kind of upper body strength and aren't shooting some hilariously heavy rifle, hitting things at 200 or 300 yards with a half-decent sling support is pretty doable.

lifenomad
May 8, 2009




^ agreeing with Cyrano

I shot my last 2 deer at around 200-300 yards standing with no sling support with a Remington 700 ADL. It's very possible, and very doable.

DILLIGAF
Nov 16, 2003

I don't know, I find it hard to take hipster/non-hipster advice from someone with a Brony avatar!

Cyrano4747 posted:

I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing.


Then let me chime in on the combat environment bit, since I have personal experience with that.... he is STILL wrong.

You fight like you train.

Fang
Jul 9, 2001

Why couldn't Fluttershy finish her carrot?

She was a little horse

I like turtles posted:

Diet coke.

Some people prefer the taste of diet sodas to the sugary ones. Regular sodas are too sugary.


Cyrano4747 posted:

I'm not going to comment on the combat environment bit, since I have jack poo poo personal experience with that, but it's VERY possible to hit things beyond 100 yards while standing.

Not with any "well if you're an olympic grade marksman" caveats - if you know the fundamentals of shooting and have any kind of upper body strength and aren't shooting some hilariously heavy rifle, hitting things at 200 or 300 yards with a half-decent sling support is pretty doable.

You don't even need a sling. The standing slow-fire portion of High Powered Rifle matches doesn't permit use of a sling and is done at 200 yards.

Fang fucked around with this message at Jul 22, 2010 around 16:27

Cyrano4747
Sep 25, 2006

American planes, full of holes and wounded men, took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France, a few German fighter planes flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground.

Fang posted:

Some people prefer the taste of diet sodas to the sugary ones. Regular sodas are too sugary.

Amen to that, I haven't been able to drink a regular pop in about 6 years now.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

iioshius
Apr 22, 2005



  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
«540 »