|
Boat posted:More importantly, why the gently caress is it white, and on the pussiest piece of poo poo "tripod" ever made? That poo poo looks like it's cobbled together out of a 2x4 and some erector set. No, they're pretty solid from what I hear. I agree with that being a lovely paint job though. http://gatlingguns.com/akfortysevenkit.asp Extremely over priced for what it is, but I don't exactly have a machineshop in my closet. It is really cool, though. You're saying you don't want this? Seriously? Edit: Oh wait I see what you're talking about. That tripod is an abomination. King Carnivore fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2008 around 03:20 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 03:14 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 14:33 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:It is really cool, though. I disagree.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 03:16 |
|
|
Tamerlane posted:I disagree. Do you also hate puppies, sunshine and rainbows?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 03:21 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:Do you also hate puppies, sunshine and rainbows? Rainbows are gay. Puppies are pretty good. Sunshine has Vitamin D.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 03:28 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:[citation needed] When, where? quote:Haanstad claimed the law does not exempt a malfunction. He claims that it states "any weapon that shoots more than once without manual reloading, per function of the trigger is a machinegun". When Len, acting as a defense expert, took the stand, he asked, "Are you saying if I take my great-granddaddy's double barrel shotgun out and pull one trigger, and both barrels go off, it's a machinegun?". Haanstad cited the law (U.S. Code, Section 5845[b]), restating that "any weapon that shoots ... " Craptacular posted:Man I'm surprised that it took six pages before someone mentioned that.  I guess it alternates between the two with every trigger pull?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 04:46 |
|
|
Yeah if you pull the trigger the round in the bottom gun will go off and the gas will cycle the action in the top gun. The selector on the top gun is always left on full-auto, so it fires once the gas from the lower gun cycles it. Then the gas from the upper gun cycles the action in the lower gun, ejecting the brass from the initial shot and then either firing it again if it's also in full-auto, or stopping if it's in semi.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 05:04 |
|
|
Tamerlane posted:
i'd like to see this mated to a glock, for full auto fun!
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 05:19 |
|
|
Pitch posted:US v Olofson Holy poo poo. HOLY poo poo! Reading up on this case, I take it that my 40 year old, tube-fed, .22 is then a dangerous, infant-slaughtering machine gun when it gets hot... How does this kind of ruling happen? A man may be going to surprise sex-me-in-the-rear end prison for almost three years because of a weapon's MALFUNCTION. All the while the NRA just sits idly by and lets it happen... Hell I don't even remember reading it about it here. Oh sure, the dude was just an idiot ARFCOMer who did do some some down right stupid poo poo before the trial; like CCW without a permit, use a lovely lawyer and a whole bunch of other stuff, but BATFE acted in a manner that could only be described as criminal. 87 pages of ARFCOM thread Edit: Okay I'm derailing pretty heavily here and this really deserves it's own thread, but I'm too lazy to condense it down to a cliff notes version... On the original subject of the super shotgun, the solution is simple: use two triggers set right next to each other. Technically that would be two trigger pulls and thus, legally safe. King Carnivore fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2008 around 05:50 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 05:40 |
|
|
Flanker posted:You should lowball that retard on gunbroker and get yourself a sweet optic/parts rifle! I just went AK crazy. I think I am set for the time. see here: http://forums.somethingawful.com/sh...hreadid=2876547 I am considering a WASR-22 rifle though.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 06:03 |
|
|
B4Ctom1 posted:I just went AK crazy. I think I am set for the time. Try to get your hands on that scope, they're rare as hell, and if you don't speak Russian you'll never get your hands on one probably, the only one I could find for sale online right now was from a post in a Saiga forum from 2004, going for about 230 dollars used, I imagine worth around 300 new without shipping. More info on commie scope - quote:The day 7X PKS-07 collimator sight has enhanced magnification, lesser weight and dimensions than the widely employed 4X PSO-1 sight. The red luminous collimator point, serving as an aiming mark, reduces the time for reaiming when firing with aiming point shift 1.5 times on the average compared to the cross hairs reticle sight, and improves fire consistency. The problem of dependence of sights with luminous aiming marks on a power source has resolved in the PKS-07 sight. In the event of battery exhaustion or failure, the red point does not disappear but turns black, and the sight remains serviceable. Because range determination is very important for weapons with low muzzle velocities, the PKS-07 sight has a simple and convenient elliptical range finder within its field of view. Edit: I can't even find a Russian website dealing in them, it must be a drat rare optic. Pretty Little Rainbow fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2008 around 06:48 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 06:37 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:How does this kind of ruling happen?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 09:23 |
|
|
FullMetalJacket posted:i'd like to see this mated to a glock, for full auto fun! Actually, there's probably more transferable full-auto S&W pistols than there are transferable Glocks. They're still pretty rare though.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 11:26 |
|
|
ktrange is almost cheating, because the guns are so inexpensive to begin with.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 12:10 |
|
|
Psycho Donut Killer posted:ktrange is almost cheating, because the guns are so inexpensive to begin with. ...And we're back on track. Ew. 
----------------
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 13:21 |
|
|
Psycho Donut Killer posted:ktrange is almost cheating, because the guns are so inexpensive to begin with. Oh gross. Is that a Glock?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 13:24 |
|
|
Psycho Donut Killer posted:What gun is that?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 13:33 |
|
|
I think its a SUB-2000
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 14:21 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:You're saying you don't want this? Seriously? I can think of quieter ways to aerate my lawn.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2008 15:11 |
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 02:48 |
|
|
WimpBastard posted:Is that a PPSh-41???
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 02:50 |
|
|
dans posted:Is that a PPSh-41??? ya but I dont think the poo poo is attached
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 02:57 |
|
|
dans posted:Is that a PPSh-41??? Yes. I'm just guessing here, but I'd bet it was taken off a dead Iraqi.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 02:57 |
|
|
John Stercus posted:Yes. Probably just found imo, I think most insurgents would prefer an AK.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 03:00 |
|
|
I still want one so I can shoot x25 faster  Akimbo with my TT33 and CZ52 isn't satisfying my waste-lust
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 03:01 |
|
|
Craptacular posted:Some retard/genius over at THR bolted two Remington 870's together to make a Remington "1740". I hope that the Mutant Chronicles movie is worth my high-school memories and that it has that over/under pump shotgun:  (click for big)
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 06:36 |
|
|
Sgt. Shaved Balls posted:ya but I dont think the poo poo is attached If you look closely you can see that at least the VFG is attached with zip ties or maybe paracord.
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 08:27 |
|
|
Scarecrow411 posted:I hope that the Mutant Chronicles movie is worth my high-school memories and that it has that over/under pump shotgun: 
Operating Rod fucked around with this message at Jun 18, 2008 around 16:34 |
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 16:31 |
|
|
This is from a movie, but it's the first thing I thought of after the double shotgun above. Reggie and his 4 barreled shotgun. 
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 16:59 |
|
|
Whatever dude... http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/hamck.htm
|
| # ? Jun 18, 2008 23:01 |
|
|
Wow, we're moving into early Richard Gatling territory.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 00:28 |
|
|
WimpBastard posted:looks like the original stock got the cut too, it's pretty short there.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 00:45 |
|
|
I prefer mine more Jerry riged. 
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 00:47 |
|
|
JEEVES420 posted:I prefer mine more Jerry riged. I prefer mine big bore. 
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 02:40 |
|
|
Sgt. Shaved Balls posted:
safety wire can hold the gently caress out of things when properly used 
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 15:47 |
|
|
B4Ctom1 posted:safety wire can hold the gently caress out of things when properly used Impressive.
|
| # ? Jun 19, 2008 19:11 |
|
|
Well here are some new ones! From M4Carbine.net I think that is an 870 under there.  Top is an M14 in a Sage stock bottom is a Norinco all tacti-crapped up.  Yeah this is the more money than sense picture. M1A tacti-lol'ed up with what looks like a cold steel tanto and a stipple gripped glock.  I guess this one is for shooting moon rabbits or something. 
|
| # ? Jun 23, 2008 20:11 |
|
|
Just saw this monster on rimfirecentral:
|
| # ? Jun 23, 2008 21:07 |
|
|
Oh my dear god. I'm pretty sure that wins the thread. Nothing could be uglier than that abomination.
|
| # ? Jun 23, 2008 21:09 |
|
|
Dagon posted:Just saw this monster on rimfirecentral: This is a .22, right? Would the bullet even reach as far as the scope can? I like how it has backup iron sights, though. Hell, I kind of like it. I could rob a convenience store with it and never fire a shot, the cashier would die from laughter and the police would be baffled.
|
| # ? Jun 23, 2008 21:17 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 14:33 |
|
|
It almost makes sense, if you think that since there's no cheekweld anyway, he just wants to be able to use the scope sitting up in a chair at the bench.
|
| # ? Jun 23, 2008 21:19 |
|
