|
iRFNA posted:Tell us more about how you aren't a worthless human being. And who lead you to believe I was a "worthless human being" and what did they confirm it with?
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 16:10 |
|
|
goonobyl posted:And who lead you to believe I was a "worthless human being" and what did they confirm it with? You did. Your posts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:39
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Hmmm.. TigerMoJo is getting all butthurt over the © now. Geeze, where were you when I was bitching about stolen images from my site? There's a big difference that I know your tiny little brain cannot comprehend, we never ever claimed any of the images we put in this thread or text was our own or SomethingAwful.com's work or copyright. We always said they were yours, why would we ever state otherwise  ?You are blatantly stealing someone else's work and claiming it as your own. Now unless you want to delete your misleading nonsense on there and put: Copyright © 2001 by Timothy Campbell Then I will find a way to contact this man and let him know about your "e-magazine article."
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:40
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:And who lead you to believe I was a "worthless human being" and what did they confirm it with? You. You brought it upon yourself. You confirmed it in this thread with your pitifully hilarious attempts at defending your dollfucking habits and 'pwning' us. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:43
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:And who lead you to believe I was a "worthless human being" and what did they confirm it with? goonobyl posted:Naw. My turning point with the EX (and bitches in general) was when she got arrested for taking child porno pics of her own kids and mailing them to her pedo lover in North Carolina. The state police let me know. Nice. I divorced her rear end quick and gained custody. But anyways.... who loving cares about this poo poo, we're talking about dollfucking here. 1a) Losing your wife to a pedo or 1b) Making up the fact that you lost your wife to a pedo -- take your pick. 2) Offering pictures of your junk to complete and utterly disinterested strangers on the internet. If that ain't worthless, it's pretty drat close. Like cash-value-of-coupons worthless.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:43
|
|
|
I think our friend here is at this point, resorting to such "i am rubber, you are glue" tactics here in order to prove a point... i don't think he's making actual attempts at sensical retorts of any caliber because, like the article he posted- he's trolling us. it might be worth it at this point to simply stop responding to him, i mean, is anyone getting any real satisfaction by calling him a piece of poo poo and saying how his wife left him for a pedophile? surely those must weigh on him without us throwing them over and over again- at this point, they've lost impact. (if he ever even had a wife, hell. for all we know, it's his real doll and his some male mannequins as his children). just saying... "During the time I was "trolling" them, I found that they're becoming increasingly hostile, and saw first hand at the great lengths they go to become the "center of attention"" he's just trying to somehow prove his point that we're fools by using ridiculously stupid, senseless insults to show that we'll just keep responding as long as he trolls.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 08:55
|
|
|
Honestly at this point I'd almost prefer if he got banned. Lord knows he's done enough to deserve it, and maybe just removing him entirely would convince him that we literally don't give a poo poo about him or his sad existence.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 09:52
|
|
|
Hahaha, oh Dave_vips, you crazy crazy guy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 13:12
|
|
|
Good Lord, this thread is epic. I love how, every time someone patiently explains to goonobyl the many reasons why he is worthless (hideous, apparently less desirable to his wife than a pedophile, unarmed in a duel of wits, fucks dolls), he just replies with a longer, but not marginally more clever, version of "No you are, lol WOO BURN". I really hope Kevin takes up the offer of free Bawls to register here, because I have a feeling that even the Spergin' Avenger would put Pit Viper's painfully weak burns to shame, Linux tangents notwithstanding.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 13:22
|
|
|
Sorry to fall behind, I'm reading this about 15 pages back at any given time, but there was something back on page 53 that no one said something about that I'd like to bring to light.Welcome to Spurg-berger, home of the Spurg-berger posted:I got some Go One Day bus passes for the city bus (unlimited rides for one day from first use to 2 AM), so I'm going to put them to good use and whenever Kat gives me permission to go out and have some time to myself (she stopped letting me do it a while back, but now she's starting to let me get out more again), and I just picked them up from the post office last Friday (I was home the two times the postman attempted to deliver it, but he was stupid enough NOT to knock on the door to deliver the package, so the second attempt he stuck a note in my mailbox and took it to the post office with a "final notice" warning), so I'm going to put them to good use and when it's okay, I'm going shopping. The mailman doesn't knock to deliver something... does he know what lies beyond?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 14:36
|
|
|
Cha posted:Honestly at this point I'd almost prefer if he got banned. Lord knows he's done enough to deserve it, and maybe just removing him entirely would convince him that we literally don't give a poo poo about him or his sad existence. I would nth that in a heartbeat. Plus you know it'd drive him loving batshit if the thread became members only. I doubt he would be able to hack it. It's the same reason you're not still on his ignore list. He can't bear to not read what you are saying about him. I vote for a ban on Goonobyl and make the thread viewable by members only. Most of the recent entertainment in this thread has not been from Goonobyl going "no you!" but from good old Mr.Havens so I doubt Goonobyl would be a loss to the thread. If what I proposed there was done you know he'll be itching to fork out $10 so he can come back in and have his say, he won't like not knowing and being unable to respond. In the event that he buys another account to troll again = Hilarity. I'd be happy to risk killing the thread for that. Just a thought anyway
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 14:36
|
|
|
It's probably a waste, but I'm going to point out a few salient facts again in hopes that Goonobyl is one of those fancy higher primates that can learn: 1. Nobody cares if he fucks dolls in the privacy of his own home; it's the personification and public display of dollfucking that people find disturbing. If there were no internet site touting the glories of dollfucking and even attempting to portray the practice as healthy and normal, this thread would not exist. 2. This thread would have died from lack of interest long ago if he'd been able to ignore it, but he can't; he needs the human attention and interaction. Dolls are incapable of being dramatic. If you yell at them or beat them, they just continue to stare at you with their dull, dead eyes. 3. His "burns" are terribly weak, and even the other dollfuckers disagree with him (i.e. Cha). 4. We've gone full circle through defend/I'm leaving FOREVAR/puppetmaster/no U, so there's really not much else he has to offer us.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 16:40
|
|
|
Apology posted:4. We've gone full circle through defend/I'm leaving FOREVAR/puppetmaster/no U, so there's really not much else he has to offer us. I would say theres the meltdown stage to go but he's been on that for weeks now
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 16:49
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Hmmm.. TigerMoJo is getting all butthurt over the © now. Geeze, where were you when I was bitching about stolen images from my site? No one here ever claimed those images was theirs. No one here ever slapped a © notice on those images. The only thing anyone here did was rehost those images on a distributed image host so that it was not be leached from someone else's server. You on the other hand have taken someone else's articles and slapped your name and copyright on them with out there permission, passing their work off as yours. See the difference? Awaiting lame rear end insult that doesn't address anything I just said
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 19:38
|
|
|
Lowen SoDium posted:No one here ever claimed those images was theirs. No one here ever slapped a © notice on those images. The only thing anyone here did was rehost those images on a distributed image host so that it was not be leached from someone else's server. yeah? well gently caress YOU hahaha owned goon
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 19:49
|
|
|
Nemesis Of Moles posted:yeah? well gently caress YOU hahaha owned goon owned
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 19:50
|
|
|
Cha posted:CHA IS A WHORE Carry on! -pv (c) (tm) pat. pending 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 19:54
|
|
|
You're all just jealous trolls because my dolls know how ugly you are. When my new novel "Mannequin" comes out you'll all go to jail. HaHaHaChaHaha dumb puppets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:15
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Like your typical troll? Well, I suppose it's good for you that you have your fuel as you're the only one here with something to prove. If this were a democratic forum, I would be tempted to vote to not ban the goonobyl. I would vote to make this thread non-viewable for that account or non-members though just to cause him frustration. However, I would like to hear more about the lies he tells himself about why his wife left him for another man.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:43
|
|
|
^^^^^ Ah man, I find it so loving funny that he resorts to bringing up points previously made by Hockey directed at us, but before him myself directed at the dollfuckers, then he goes and plagerizes after accusing me of being an unoriginal violator of copyrights. As for banning him, well, he is the only white knight here, and I would like to see him utterly loving BREAK... and I presume that his being unable to come back here without an effort on his part could very well push him over the edge. I propose BAN for goonobyl, mainly because he wouldn't dare show up for a good Helldumping. I propose against making it Members Only since that would confine the subjects of this thread to this site. However, if dollfucker threads pop up elsewhere as well, then I would agree with this becoming Members Only. There is one last stipulation before I officially request a ban, though. If you, goonobyl/Shit_Viper/James S. Williams, Sr., would rather take this to Helldump so that you may go out in a blaze of glory, you will earn that with me by quoting me from any of my previous posts on here within the next 24 hours. The ban will be requested regardless. You have a choice as to how you would like to go out; Whimper or Bang, Jim?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:48
|
|
|
Caligasti posted:If you, goonobyl/Shit_Viper/James S. Williams, Sr., would rather take this to Helldump so that you may go out in a blaze of glory, you will earn that with me by quoting me from any of my previous posts on here within the next 24 hours. The ban will be requested regardless. You have a choice as to how you would like to go out; Whimper or Bang, Jim? I challenged him to helldump months ago, and he declined 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:51
|
|
|
iRFNA posted:I challenged him to helldump months ago, and he declined Well then he can get banned and go away quietly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:53
|
|
|
Is there a link/explanation about "challenging someone to helldump." I'm not very clued in on forum goings on it seems.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:53
|
|
|
I'd like to request that Goonobyl be probated for a ridiculously long amount of time or until a copy of Hockey's "movie" appears on these forums, whichever comes first
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:57
|
|
|
Zappatista posted:I'd like to request that Goonobyl be probated for a ridiculously long amount of time or until a copy of Hockey's "movie" appears on these forums, whichever comes first I'd say a month probation would be pretty good, honestly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 20:58
|
|
|
iRFNA posted:I'd say a month probation would be pretty good, honestly. He's been probated. It certainly hasn't changed anything.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:00
|
|
|
Cha posted:Well then he can get banned and go away quietly. Awww. There's no fun in that As a compromise, is it possible to have him scheduled for probation where he only has like a 12 hour window on, say, Saturday night to post? In a way this might be helpful to him as he seems to not be able to tell the differenece between a week and a day. I'm speaking about Jimmy, as I think Davey has washed his hands of any direct contact with us. Hmmm. I wonder what lies Davey has told himself to allow his ego to accept defeat?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:01
|
|
|
Or his account can be reclassified as FYAD-only.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:06
|
|
|
Deacon Blues posted:Awww. There's no fun in that What point is there in keeping him around? He's stopped even being humorous in his remarks- I think banning him would be for the best. I enjoy laughing at him as much as, if not more than anyone, but he's ceased to be funny. His replies are growing more nonsensical and desperate by the hour and at this point I'd say the best tactic would be to put him out of his misery- put him to sleep.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:09
|
|
|
TigerMoJo posted:There's a big difference that I know your tiny little brain cannot comprehend, we never ever claimed any of the images we put in this thread or text was our own or SomethingAwful.com's work or copyright. We always said they were yours, why would we ever state otherwise While there is much ballyhoo about "Copyright" here, I think the more salient point is plagiarism. Copyright is simply (one of many) means by which the human race (and dollfuckers,) try to protect their works from it. The difference here, goonobyl, is that we cite our sources when using someone else's work. Unlike your recent blog post about trolling. Oh, and it's been said earlier, but in case you missed it; Since this is our forum, you're the only troll here... Aw man, was I ever e;f;b; - but I'm leaving this anyway. Gavitron fucked around with this message at 21:15 on Nov 16, 2008 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:11
|
|
|
Cha posted:What point is there in keeping him around? He's stopped even being humorous in his remarks- I think banning him would be for the best. I enjoy laughing at him as much as, if not more than anyone, but he's ceased to be funny. His replies are growing more nonsensical and desperate by the hour and at this point I'd say the best tactic would be to put him out of his misery- put him to sleep. Yeah, I'm going with this. It was a good run, but he's just repeating himself now, and it's getting old. Personally I think the funniest parts of this thread have been the insights into Kevin's mind  and we don't need Shit_Viper for that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:18
|
|
|
Shit_Wiper is probably the lamest of the 3. Kevin has his nuttiness going for him, Hockey has his dorkumentary, but Williams doesn't really bring anything to the table. He's more like that Stickam guy who registered and made that "I am the Puppetmaster" thread, only without any interesting visuals.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:21
|
|
|
If this thread dies I'd rather it did with happy memories about it in my heart.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 21:27
|
|
|
Please don't ban goonobyl! He's the best thing to happen to GBS since... ever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:01
|
|
|
 ! how 'bout that...http://bankofamericasucks.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3220&p=15361#p15361 
Caligasti fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Nov 16, 2008 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:06
|
|
|
What an
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:07
|
|
|
Caligasti posted:
Wait, what? Pit Viper is a troll on other forums too? And yet he thinks we're the trolls? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:11
|
|
|
^^^^^ Yes indeed. I found that forum a while back ago and mentioned it on here. Back then the location for BigJimW was listed as Warwick, Rhode Island. After a link was posted on here showing he was trolling over there, the location suspiciously (but not too surprisingly) changed. Guy in Rhode Island, works at BoA, insults people like an awkward teenager, goes by BigJimW... it's quite plain, really. That goes back to before he even began lashing out at us, too. Caligasti fucked around with this message at 22:59 on Nov 16, 2008 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:16
|
|
|
In fact, here's his post history. Sure sounds like him, doesn't it? UPDATE: Looks like he's backpedaling and misspelling as he does so. From his CD article... 
Caligasti fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Nov 16, 2008 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 22:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 16:10 |
|
|
Caligasti posted:In fact, here's his post history. Phycology article written by professional phycologist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2008 23:01
|
|