|
Unskilled Labour posted:I was trying to troubleshoot a client's monitor and had connected to the PC via Remote Desktop, just to see that it was turned on (yes, to see if the PC was turned on, some of our clients are that stupid) and to check Device Manager. My favorite was trying to work with somebody over the phone on troubleshooting a loving Dymo LabelWriter (why the gently caress do we keep selling them!). In the end, the poor woman was so confused she had pretty much just given up and requested that I come on site (billable time). When I got there, the USB connector was jammed into the serial (looked like RJ45) connector end of the the label printer, and the power cord was laying on the floor unplugged.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2009 14:54 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:55 |
|
sm8000 posted:I once asked somebody to unplug their network cable and sure enough, they unplugged the PC's power cable. Sometimes I luck out and somebody says yellow or blue, which is usually the cat5, but even then it could just be an oddly colored USB cable.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2009 16:40 |
|
sm8000 posted:Actually, that is how I described it to her. In one ear, out the other.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2009 21:48 |
|
ab0z posted:p.s. Never go to ITT, I only went for convenience and I regret it.
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2009 15:56 |
|
Hoppy posted:A user told me her new windows password, after I reset it. This meant I had to reset it again and give her a slap on the wrist, no big deal. But I'm trying to figure out if the password she selected is stupid, or genius:
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2009 15:18 |
|
Beary Mancrush posted:Ugh. Yup, you're in sales in a remote office in bumfuck, AZ. I'm not adding "emails to your apple iphone". Don't keep asking me when I'm going to "upgrade the server to IMAPs". You'll get OWA if you're lucky. With what they want to spend (nothing), there really aren't a lot of good, secure ways for them to get what they want. But they assume they should be able to anyway. I loving hate doctors.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2009 21:37 |
|
TheElectronicOne posted:I hate to be the contrarian here, but it's not like they're making an unreasonable request. I mean, putting medical records on an iPhone is a little bizarre but if we could just bring hardware/net security into the 21st century it would be quite simple to implement. It quickly snowballs into a ridiculous time and support sink. And any time we try to push for decent security, such as complex passwords that expire, or idle timeouts, it is always met with the wrath of the all important doctor.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2009 21:54 |
|
Richard Noggin posted:but I reminded her that she didn't consult with us (we're their IT provider) before dropping $700. I'm sorry, I can't make <random piece of equipment you just bought> work with our software. It's not compatible. You should have checked with us first. Interesting notes about hardware compatibility with some of our apps: One app requires PCL drivers to print properly, as long as it's not a Dell printer. For some unknown loving reason, any Dell printer will cause the app in question's memory useage to start climbing wildly until the PC either starts spewing memory errors or the app just starts timing out. I've witnessed this in multiple locations with multiple iterations of the software and driver versions. Another app, document imaging, will only use scanners with ISIS drivers. Sorry, I can't make your multifunction piece of poo poo work.
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2009 15:07 |
|
Midelne posted:To read email. What are ya, new?
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2009 17:53 |
|
ab0z posted:With an inkjet it is important to periodically print SOMETHING to keep the nozzles clear, but not a bunch of stupid anime.
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2009 18:48 |
|
ab0z posted:What's a centerbeam? I think it's what Tony Stark shoots out of his chest..
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2009 21:39 |
|
This was an interesting one... client was complaining that our app was taking 20-30 seconds to open documents that normally open instantly. I remotely control the computer, sure enough, something is unusual. The rest of the app is responsive. I see AVG running in the system tray, so I wonder if maybe it's trying to scan the network folder that holds all of the documents (massively huge folder/subfolders). I've seen McAfee do that before. Thankfully, AVG lets me set scanner exceptions, so I exclude that network path. No change? Hmm... I fire up filemon to see what's going on when I try to open the document. There's a clear 25 second gap between sections, and the first entry after the gap is referencing some HP INI file, even though she wasn't trying to print anything, just open it. On a whim, I take a look at her printers, and see the status next to the HP LaserJet-- "Unable to connect". "Which computer <computername>?" "That sounds like Elaine's." "Is her computer on?" "No, she's not here today." "Can you turn it on, please? You don't have to log in, just power it on." <waiting, refreshing the printer list> "Okay, this printer is now showing up as Ready. Let's see what happens when we open a document." Documents instantly open. If I hadn't seen something similar happen with a completely different app once several years back, I'd probably still be staring at filemon and scratching my head. I hate printers.
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2009 18:11 |
|
Caged posted:Was that the default printer?
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2009 18:51 |
|
Richard Noggin posted:Word documents by any chance? TIFF files, actually.
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2009 19:32 |
|
Libal posted:Ok, I'll bite. Please tell me he gave an explanation of how that's supposed to speed-up browsing? I'm dying to hear it.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2009 19:39 |
|
Oddhair posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2834226&userid=28872
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2009 21:05 |
|
Spermy Smurf posted:I'd kill for that.
|
# ¿ Aug 13, 2009 19:38 |
|
Midelne posted:Or you can paste into Paint.Net, which crops easy as pie if you want to show more than just one active window.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2009 14:02 |
|
Crowley posted:Considering how tough that glass is on tablets that's quite a feat.. unless they dropped a coffee mug on it or something.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2009 14:50 |
|
I have about 12 open issues right now, most reportedly urgent, all waiting for other people to do something (order software, pay a bill, answer a question, etc). I wonder what's on TV.
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2009 19:25 |
|
xarph posted:If your company has a webex subscription, you can use webex support center to accomplish mostly the same thing cross-platform. Except that WebEx is godawful
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2009 19:54 |
|
Spermy Smurf posted:"Hey, support tech. Let me grab control so I can show you where it errors out since you obviously have no idea how to use your own product. I'll just double cli-... I'll just triple cl--... Well gently caress. I'm smashing the poo poo out of my mouse. How the gently caress do I take control of my own god drat desktop again?"
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2009 21:52 |
|
Midelne posted:This is what should properly be referred to as a failure by personnel to properly secure access to vital resources. If this were healthcare, that would be another HIPAA violation nobody cares about.
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2009 22:26 |
|
mllaneza posted:If Midelne is telling you to get a new job...
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2009 19:00 |
|
Midelne posted:From Rod. Rod isn't actually human. You are a part of an alien psychology test. You're being tested against various psychological stresses so they can monitor your reactions. Ask yourself the following: Do you ever see Rod outside of work? Would a normal human be able to maintain employment in a supervisory position with his skill set? Have you ever seen Rod and an alien scientist in the same room at the same time before? Proceed with caution. Don't make the same mistakes your former boss made.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2009 16:32 |
|
HatfulOfHollow posted:Sadly, yes. I don't know Rod but I've run into enough like him along the way. I've only ever worked under one of them before being recruited away to another department.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2009 16:45 |
|
Lum posted:Just be glad you two have the luxury of being able to walk to the affected PC. When your users are a minimum of a 2 hour drive away (and a maximum of 8) with security requirements meaning no remote access and definitely no webex shite, questions and talking them through it is the only way. It is possible eventually.
|
# ¿ Sep 1, 2009 16:09 |
|
Lum posted:Well if you ever needed proof that users do not look or do anything at all to help themselves before yelling for help, I think this is it:
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2009 02:41 |
|
TokenBrit posted:Or induction, there are already products out there which allow you to chuck your device onto a mat and have it charge. Electric toothbrushes use this method. As do transformers, I suppose.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2009 17:02 |
|
AutoArgus posted:You get free corporate email from us for two years through some amazing fluke of an account somehow never getting deactivated, and then when someone finally notices you throw an email to the -wrong goddamned person- (who then asked us to fix this persons email) asking what gives?
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2009 20:22 |
|
Naxr posted:Easy enought to make your own: http://www.afrotechmods.com/cheap/arnoldpad/arnoldpad.htm
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 14:35 |
|
Midelne posted:I keep recommending that we change over to Brother as our HP printers require more and more (outsourced) maintenance and have an ever-more-predictable cascade of hardware and other failures. No one listens, so I think I'm going to give up on making that recommendation and just watch money fly out the window because they think it's a better idea to take purchasing advice from the guy who makes money every time he comes out to repair something. WHQL certified PCL Driver (Recommended) Size: 0.98 MB I think the smallest HP "driver only" download I've seen weighed in at over 5 MB
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 16:51 |
|
Midelne posted:I'm meeting with the district manager on the 14th to discuss him. It'd be sooner, but the DM is out of town again this week. He didn't seem all that surprised that I wanted to discuss him, so we'll see whether that means he thinks Rod is useless or thinks I'm a malcontent.
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2009 17:17 |
|
Please send pog as our slammer is not working. I will contact playground once I can confirm status of pog. (anybody remember pogs?)
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2009 21:00 |
|
Spermy Smurf posted:It's not mine... It's gas stations No. "Printing receipt..." This happened to me at a gas station once. True story.
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2009 20:36 |
|
rolleyes posted:To be fair I think most people (myself included) who disliked the XP visual style did so because:
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2009 20:41 |
|
Super long post ahead... I don't know how many of you have dealt with HL7 interfaces before, but to quickly summarize, HL7 is a standard format typically used as a means to keep two different [medical] databases in sync. For example, if you create a patient in Application A, an HL7 message (usually either in the form of a text file or a direct TCP connection to a receiving interface) is generated that contains all of that patient's information in a standard format. Application B receives the message, processes it, and adds that patient to its database. It's pretty straightforward. Usually when dealing with these interfaces, there's a little bit of testing and tweaking that needs to be done upon installation, but after that, they rarely need to be touched. We have a client that has two applications, Application A and Application B, that were both set up many years ago. They had an interface between them, although it wasn't actually an HL7 interface... it was a custom interface that imported patient data via some special DLLs of Application B's. It worked great for years, but about 2 months ago it started to throw .NET framework exceptions. I had the developer look into it but he was unable to determine the problem, or just didn't care to look much into it because that particular interface had been discontinued in favor of a proper HL7 interface. So we installed the new one on Friday 8/14. I had to get the Application B people involved because HL7 interfaces have two parts... the sending part (ours) and the receiving part (theirs). We configured everything, did some tests, confirmed that patient updates worked properly and didn't create duplicate accounts. The only issue was with the patient appointments, since the formatting of the appointment ID's (a unique identifier assigned to each appointment) had changed between old interface and new. Not a big deal. I just deleted everything from the appointment table in SQL for Application B and then manually exported all future appointments from Application A. This ensured that everything was using the new appointment ID format and there should be no conflicts moving forward. Enjoy the weekend, we're done! So Tuesday rolls around and I get a message from the client saying that all of the doctors are listed in Application B twice, and some of the appointments are wrong and this and that. They did note that on Monday an EMR software was installed alongside Application A, but it runs off of a completely separate database and doesn't alter Application A in any way, so I couldn't see how that could be related. I opened a ticket with the interface developers to get some help identifying what was going on. The company we use for all of our custom interfaces generally makes really great software, but getting support out of them is next to impossible. It took a good 3 weeks of hassling them before I was able to get them to look into the problem. In an effort to give them as much data as I could, I extracted the results of a query on Application B's database pulling all of the appointments for a particular day. It was at this point that I noticed something weird... It was easy to identify that appointments that had the "duplicate" doctor name (basically in Application B there's a drop down box of providers, and for each one there would be something like "SMITH, JOHN Q" and "SMITH,JOHN Q", each with different appointments, sometimes both sharing one. Anyway, for all of the duplicate providers, there was way more information present in the database fields and the appointment ID's followed a completely different format. Here's my (HIPAA compliant!) example: code:
So I did a few more queries trying to find some commonality between these appointments and all the rest, and I finally realized something. All of the hosed up appointments had a "LastChange" date of 8/17/2009. A quick test shows that this is the timestamp of when Application B receives the appointment. I did a query to search for all appointments with that date, and sure enough, they're all like they're all like that. I searched for appointments processed on the 18th, and they're normal. In fact, it seems every appointment before and after the 17th are normal. What happened on 8/17? Wait a minute, wasn't that when they installed that EMR... My best theory at this point is that whoever installed the EMR also installed their own interface from Application A to the EMR, likely an HL7 interface because that's what medical software uses. The only thing that makes sense is that they, for reasons far beyond my comprehension, configured their interface to dump files to the one and only directory (that's 2 directories deep inside Program Files in a folder completely unrelated to Application A) that Application B monitors. HL7 files are a standard format (first name goes in this field, SSN goes in this field, etc, etc), but the formatting within those fields is completely up to the interface. The processing interface doesn't really care.. so if it saw messages from an interface that wasn't ours, it would process them anyway not knowing any better. Since this only occurred on the 17th, I'm assuming they discovered the problem and corrected it, explaining why we're not still getting two conflicting sets of IDs. Last night I once again purged Application B's schedule table and manually exported future appointments. So far everything still looks normal. This is probably the single most bizarre thing I've ever had to troubleshoot. tl;dr No poo poo. Basically, it looks like some jackass installed an interface and somehow had it sending updates to our software instead of theirs, causing some really loving weird results.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2009 16:56 |
|
Dragyn posted:I don't suppose you work for a large medical HCIS software company around Boston, do you?
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2009 18:33 |
|
Dragyn posted:I don't suppose you work for a large medical HCIS software company around Boston, do you? quote:For the restart thing you mentioned, we have a system wherein the interface toggles the socket every x amount of time it's inactive. Sadly, it only works when it wants to.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2009 18:35 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:55 |
|
Midelne posted:Call from one of our higher ups, notifying me that one of the sites has "a bad CPU" that needs to be replaced as soon as possible. Had no details, but he's a higher up, so I load up a replacement machine and head over. My money was on someone having accidentally flipped the manual power switch on the power supply on the back of the workstation in question and that "doesn't work" would end up having meant "does not power on when I push the button". I love using a bullshit excuse like "VIP type needs this right away" to get out of the office even when I know it's something I could probably solve over the phone. Doesn't work so much anymore, now that I live several hundred miles away from our nearest client.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2009 19:01 |