|
D13F00L posted:Ok...can I set them up a remote desktop connection through citrix or give them an RSA SecureID fob?
|
| # ¿ Dec 1, 2008 19:00 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2013 06:52 |
|
People generally feel that way in small shops, or when their 1st/2nd line sucks.
|
| # ¿ Dec 3, 2008 13:01 |
|
sanchez posted:Even if they were great at their actual job? We only exist to allow them to work more effectively, if that includes loading paper, so be it. We regularly send users on basic computer usage courses. An informal/playful day with someone who tolerates technologically retarded people often does wonders.
|
| # ¿ Dec 5, 2008 08:05 |
|
ErIog posted:So we've been hosing all our backups for the last 2 or 3 months if I'm correct in my understanding of backup exec and tape strategy. All the while this guy has been reassuring me that we're getting 11:1 compression(actually 1.1:1). And..we have no offsite backup strategy. This guy never set anything up to even carry a set of tapes to their house every 2 weeks. The tapes sit in the server room in a pretty thick safe, but there's no documentation to say that it's fireproof at all.
|
| # ¿ Oct 24, 2009 14:51 |
|
Pyroclastic posted:I really hope we can run a technology levy soon. A measly 1-2 million dollars would let us replace every single computer in the district. I get all depressed any time I read about the education system in the US, especially IT. dergeist posted:Goddammit, autocomplete is not a way to save your important contacts. I tried to explain that to one of the first callers and he laughed and said, "I don't even know what you're talking about. My VCR is still blinking 12:00, that's how good I am with technology." evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at May 5, 2011 around 13:42 |
| # ¿ May 5, 2011 13:36 |
|
Joe Don Baker posted:It's definitely B. We get calls like this all the time. We've never had someone get this upset. Gee I wonder why users would complain about auto-trashing mail. The IT department at Girlfriend's work (research institute) is a loving disaster of epic proportions, and it's all the more aggravating to hear about when I work with people who actually give a poo poo. I really cannot understand how keeping just 6 months worth of mail online is in any way acceptable. Not that any of that poo poo's your fault, mind. Che Delilas posted:A single copy of 5 years' worth of research on a 6 square-inch piece of plastic, and no backups? No insurance against precisely this type of event? I felt a bit sorry for the guy, but drat, how badly do you REALLY want that doctorate if you're that cavalier about your work? evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at May 10, 2011 around 11:58 |
| # ¿ May 10, 2011 11:51 |
|
Moey posted:We just ordered a new SAN, 24 300gb 10k disks, was in the 16 grand range. That's a lot less than 40tb. Plus the behind the hardware costs that Alex mentioned. Re: 6 months mail retention, regulatory retention schedules are one thing, so is users expecting mail features on par with any modern free webmail solution. Exchange 2010 personal archive is loving amazing since you can put the the DAG on cheap storage. Yaos posted:I looked in the event log and found somebody had logged into the server the day after the last time McAfee was able to update. Thanks for turning it off you jerk! evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at May 18, 2011 around 08:15 |
| # ¿ May 18, 2011 08:01 |
|
I don't understand the rage, I really don't. People keep repeating the same mistakes, you just point it out along with the 3 times you memo'ed it before, then go home at 5.
|
| # ¿ Dec 2, 2011 22:16 |
|
couldcareless posted:
Telex posted:So yeah, that poo poo's great except when another person shows up and declares their boring rear end standard is The One True Way (tm) and since everything kinda depends on you not renaming servers left and right you end up with 3 non-corresponding standards combined with 3 more non-corresponding standards and you're basically as hosed as you would have been in the first place if you can't document your hostnames and you're using an extendable standard and you just evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at Dec 5, 2011 around 13:24 |
| # ¿ Dec 5, 2011 13:19 |
|
Telex posted:it tends to cause problems unless you: Poing posted:
evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at Dec 5, 2011 around 22:53 |
| # ¿ Dec 5, 2011 22:45 |
|
Scikar posted:To be fair, I feel kind of bad for people like that. There's a decent chance they're telling the truth and they did ask their manager and got told it was fine. It's not your fault so I wouldn't feel too guilty, but I do have sympathy for users who get hosed over by their incompetent management just the same as we do. HalloKitty posted:While this is true, it's also true that in 2011 they could have bought a USB stick -- that would have easily contained their personal documents -- for a vanishingly small price. Especially if it was that important! Prosthetic_Mind posted:That's nothing compared to the goddamn chair of our CS department. Not only is he the only professor I've seen who has flat out insulted people in class for asking valid questions and refuses to actually grade code (instead running scripts of input and grading how far the scripts make it), but the motherfucker can barely even code. If I'm explaining poo poo to you, you're paying me; not the other way around. Arguably, I've got a pretty short fuse. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at Dec 7, 2011 around 12:42 |
| # ¿ Dec 7, 2011 12:38 |
|
HalloKitty posted:Every environment I've been seen, USB storage has been enabled. Is it really common practice to disable it? HalloKitty posted:If he had personal documents, he should have been storing them on something he owned. The only thing I care about is deltas. I don't care what you put on our CIFS shares as long as it's not growing 1TB a day. HalloKitty posted:The most "secure" environment I worked in was a pharmaceutical company, and although I can't remember with 100% certainty, I don't think there were any steps taken to disable USB. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at Dec 7, 2011 around 12:50 |
| # ¿ Dec 7, 2011 12:44 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2013 06:52 |
|
HalloKitty posted:Anyone else got any input on this? http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/top35...nstrategies.htm
|
| # ¿ Dec 7, 2011 12:53 |





