|
A perfect debate is an interesting idea, but don't you need perfect information about an issue to hold that debate? I can't think of an example where both parties agree on a common set of facts, but disagree about a conclusion. If we believe that the main problem in modern debate is poor logic then shouldn't we find some examples of common facts leading to separate conclusions?
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2008 00:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:08 |
|