|
It seems like this would amount to some combination of formal theorem proving, not the most dynamic of formats, and perfect mutual rational, Bayesian inference. At that point any disagreements are either irrational, illogical, or result from disagreements about the starting premises. This doesn't seem like the most viable of debating formats, but it would be interesting to see it work.
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2008 00:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 08:42 |
|