|
Does someone make a Lightroom plugin that repairs known lens distortions, so you could for example correct a whole bunch of pictures shot at different apertures and lengths?
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2009 00:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:54 |
|
Yeah I can't imagine using Lightroom without the keyboard now. Spend the 10 minutes learning them, it'll save you hours upon hours in the long run.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2009 02:57 |
|
Yeah setting your white balance under a bunch of colored spotlights isn't the brightest of ideas.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2009 01:57 |
|
He shoots Vivid +3 jpegs and calls the results fabulous. If that doesn't tell you anything...
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2009 11:56 |
|
Sometimes I wish I didn't need a CS4 PhD to feel comfortable around photoshop.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2009 20:41 |
|
There's little point to putting a digital painting on modelmayhem.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2009 22:46 |
|
evensevenone posted:I'm basically deciding between a e8400 (3.0 ghz, dual core, 64bit) windows machine and just getting a new mac mini (2 ghz intel, dual core, 64bit). FunkyJunk posted:The "apple tax" is worth it at twice the price IMO. If you get a machine with no hardware quirks Vista is quite decent, and 7 is just sweet. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 00:46 on Mar 4, 2009 |
# ¿ Mar 4, 2009 00:42 |
|
KennyG posted:I would take a stab at it but after friendship waffles war a month ago, I would rather leave it to someone who knows exactly what they are doing.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2009 18:55 |
|
And if you want to move stuff you just add the target directory and move it with LR.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2009 08:40 |
|
Eh, do you not have a less terrible picture of that kid?
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2009 22:35 |
|
Alright not even a higher res version? Edit: half-stop graduated filter to her left and a bit of vignette is all I can think of. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Apr 15, 2009 |
# ¿ Apr 15, 2009 22:49 |
|
The sky can look however you feel like In your last picture you can desaturate the blue channel a wee bit and it'll look more like what you expected.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2009 07:49 |
|
Lookie here germskr posted:Overall it's way too cool. I see too much cyan. Any chance you were shooting on AWB?
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2009 20:09 |
|
Exactly, the thing that no automation is ever going to grasp is intent. Aside from that, there's only 2 ways to get WB right: calibrate the camera (if you can) using a grey card, or reference a grey card in post.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2009 20:11 |
|
Is there any way to see the EV comp and Flash EV comp EXIF from Nikon RAWs in Lightroom2?
|
# ¿ May 9, 2009 15:49 |
|
There's no point converting to DNG, especially if it's not lossless.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2009 12:56 |
|
gib posted:I'm pretty sure DNG is lossless... but why bother? Canon's raw files will continue to be supported as long as DNG, and DNG files aren't much smaller than CR2s.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2009 21:28 |
|
Warm it up a tad.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2009 19:44 |
|
Just adjusted WB and toned down the topleft corner.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2009 20:24 |
|
multigl posted:Thanks for the feedback, I hadn't even considered the other corner. Martytoof posted:Does anyone else agree on the tree or am I just being weird?
|
# ¿ May 19, 2009 22:46 |
|
Yeah that'd work, but it's a pretty significant loss of resolution.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2009 23:07 |
|
Alctel posted:Why do people use Photoshop as well as Lightroom? Is it because it has a bunch more features than LR? What are the main advantages?
|
# ¿ May 20, 2009 20:54 |
|
I've started using the second lightroom window in Lightroom a while ago and it's ridiculously useful, especially in Live mode. Any change you make is reflected there in full screen, and if you mouse-over the film strip, it'll show whatever's under your cursor, which is about the fastest way I've found to choose picks/selects out of a Whole bunch of raws. So if you use LR2, try a second display if you don't have one yet. pwn posted:Since then I double backup to two external hard drives. Even if you choose the less-extreme methods of using one, you should consider buying an external hard drive for storing your photos. Write whatever you don't want to lose to DVD, and store it somewhere safe, not on top of your desk. The rule of thum is that you always, always want to digital copies of whatever you care about. Ideally you either do live replication to an offsite system (PLUS normal backups, because if you delete stuff that'll get deleted on the remote host too), or you bring DVD's/tapes semi-regularly to someone you trust. It's just ridiculous to shoot digital and still have a something like a house fire or a flood wipe out your archive. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 08:15 on Jun 12, 2009 |
# ¿ Jun 12, 2009 08:07 |
|
pwn posted:What?
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2009 09:01 |
|
It'd be really interesting to watch (PP is one of the many things I suck at), especially if people are going to lay out the process for their entries.
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2009 22:20 |
|
brad industry posted:What's the point of doing this if people aren't going to process it to their taste/style? Just post a file and let people do whatever they want with it and have everyone post their steps. Splinter posted:Does 64-bit Photoshop have any advantages over 32-bit for photography related work? I've read that 64-bit is significantly faster when working with very large files, but I don't think a typical photograph gets anywhere near that large, even with many layers. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 08:24 on Jul 7, 2009 |
# ¿ Jul 7, 2009 08:12 |
|
8th-samurai posted:Oh and when are we doing this and did we decide how to get the raw files on here? evensevenone volunteered to collect the RAWs and make a thread.
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2009 09:57 |
|
HPL posted:Theoretically, couldn't you use something like SmugMug or Flickr as your backup? Upload everything and then make it private.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2009 21:32 |
|
It's unlimited jpegs. RAWs you just put on amazon.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2009 23:48 |
|
baptism of fiber posted:open jpeg in firefox: looks washed out
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2009 10:42 |
|
I have this monitor as well, and let's just say it puts my old TN panel to shame. I really love it.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2009 21:59 |
|
It's not like his kind of client is going to complain or even notice.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2009 20:32 |
|
Nikonos
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2009 23:23 |
|
Alvination posted:Thanks. I think the history section will do me well.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2010 16:10 |
|
Back up the catalogs as well.
|
# ¿ Jan 12, 2010 22:51 |
|
In LR at least it'll show you the low res preview while it generates the high quality one.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2010 09:44 |
|
Don't ever buy first party extra ram for consumer machines, christ.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2010 23:45 |
|
spf3million posted:I've upgraded RAM before, the physical install is easy. But I've never replaced it all before. Can I just take out the old one and pop in the new ones and start her up?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2010 08:56 |
|
If the range is not too crazy, this works fine (CS3, so things might not be 100% the same in 5).
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2010 13:33 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:54 |
|
fronkpies posted:How does this look?
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2010 00:37 |