|
Someone says "I really liked [thing], and I usually hate [thing]!" - 1 shot, and I usually hate shots!
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 20:48 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2013 19:09 |
|
|
SyHopeful posted:don't think you can escape this game So I should just go to the hospital now then huh?
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 20:57 |
|
|
Secret Ooze posted:So I should just go to the hospital now then huh? All of us buddy, all of us.  
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 21:02 |
|
|
Naramyth posted:If that is per pun we are hosed. speaking of photos, if Miso posts a macro - 1 shot
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 21:41 |
|
|
Cyrano4747 posted:The best drinking games are the ones that have you doing shots non-stop. Watch The Protector. Take a shot every time something goes "crack".
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 21:59 |
|
|
Naramyth posted:tactihog or other tactipet photo - 2 shots Tac-rat  
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 22:06 |
|
"
|
 It was hard to post this because I was already 3/4 of the way to a coma.
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 22:21 |
|
|
If a Beeb made gif is posted - take a shot
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 22:26 |
|
|
If a vaguely or not so vaguely homoerotic remark is made, drink.
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 22:27 |
|
|
I was thinking of making another guns+pets thread. I enjoyed the last one greatly, but was unable to contribute. Yes/No? For content, have a sporterized Garand! 
|
| # ? Jun 15, 2010 23:53 |
|
|
How do you insert an enbloc with that scope in place?
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 01:12 |
|
|
Gewehr 43 posted:How do you insert an enbloc with that scope in place? You can't load it, that is why it is for sale.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 01:13 |
|
|
Gewehr 43 posted:How do you insert an enbloc with that scope in place? Unless it's the M1-D, the Garand Sniper, in which the scope is offset to the left to load the clip. In that case, that rifle is even more a travesty since M1-Ds are far less common. Edit: Upon closer inspection, I have no idea.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 01:35 |
|
|
It's a Huntin' Rahful, you load one clip before mounting the scope, shoot three rounds to zero, then you have a legal five rounds left to get your deer/elk/moose/yeti/whatever. Then you put it back in the case until next season.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 02:49 |
|
|
Yea I have no idea.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 02:51 |
|
|
Ygolonac posted:It's a Huntin' Rahful, you load one clip before mounting the scope, shoot three rounds to zero, then you have a legal five rounds left to get your deer/elk/moose/yeti/whatever. Then you put it back in the case until next season. I actually believe you. I mean, MAYBE you can wedge one in there, especially if it's a smaller five round clip, but I believe the only way would be to remove the scope. I'd also mention that is only the second or third sporterized Garand I've ever seen. It seems people were kinder to them than other guns. Or maybe I'm biased because it's to heartbreaking to go looking for them.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 04:18 |
|
|
Who the gently caress sporterizes a pre-war Garand?
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 05:13 |
|
|
El Jorge posted:Who the gently caress sporterizes a pre-war Garand? A dumb gently caress who's probably ugly and most likely impotent.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 06:50 |
|
|
Everyone gets butthurt over sporterized milsurp: 1 drink. Beeb spergs out on Fallout 3: 1 drink Any of us sperg out on Jagged Alliance 2: 1 drink, unless you have Larry Roachburn in your party, at which point you go on a bender and wake up sometime in the 2020s.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 06:54 |
|
|
El Jorge posted:Who the gently caress sporterizes a pre-war Garand? ...at least it isn't a gas port. But really...that guy deserves to be shot. Wait, that's not painful enough...drawn, quartered, and hung seems like it should do it.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 07:40 |
|
|
This one is kind of a goddamn shame to me: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vi...?Item=172377616 An FN GP35, with Waffenamts, re-parkerized and given hideous Pachmayr grips.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 16:58 |
|
|
SadWhaleFamily posted:This one is kind of a goddamn shame to me: Ugh, that's terrible. Goddamn. "re" parkerized isn't even the right term. That gun should be blued. Someone took grandpa's valuable bring back and took it down to used-high-power levels as a pure utility gun. Christ, whoever did that park job really had a heavy hand with the media blast, too. What's a new High Power cost these days? $500 is high for that thing in that condition, either as a range toy or as a slot-in for a German pistol collection until a nicer P35(b) can be found.
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2010 17:09 |
|
|
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vi...?Item=168761356 Is this a "Please arrest me, ATF" auction?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 13:55 |
|
|
It's not airsoft?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:14 |
|
|
So is that an airsoft receiver or not? Didn't know airsoft pellets come in 5.56mm. 
Robot Battalion fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2010 around 14:18 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:16 |
|
|
slidebite posted:It's not airsoft? Advertising an Airsoft lower as being a FA M16 no-FFL lower "most real components will fit" seems like a really bad idea after that ruling.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:21 |
|
|
I like how he comes right out and says that in his opinion it's illegal.quote:[Information added 5/14/2010 8:28:45 AM]
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:33 |
|
|
Agreed this is stupid on his part but if I may dream for a second, the ATF is moving in the wrong direction regarding the definition of a receiver. These most recent decisions regarding airsoft only add to the ambiguity. A receiver should be a component built for the purpose of being a working firearm, not a toy, or a box or tube with a slot in it. If someone rigs up a box or toy or tube into a working firearm illegally, punish them for that. Constructive possession crimes are absurd.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:44 |
|
|
That is an interesting precedent. My guess is he doesn't know? (I hope?) Also, why would anyone call something 4/32" and 2/32" instead of 1/8" and 1/16" ?
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:45 |
|
|
Sten Freak posted:A receiver should be a component built for the purpose of being a working firearm,
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 14:54 |
|
|
Pitch posted:It's meaningless to define a receiver at all if an object functionally identical to one isn't. While I agree I wonder if this airsoft receiver is truly functionally identical. If people are taking airsoft and making illegal guns out of them, then the ATF should pursue and prosecute that action.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 15:29 |
|
|
Especially since that one appears to be made in Az, I wonder if the ATF is going to pay the factory a little visit if they haven't already.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 15:33 |
|
|
slidebite posted:Especially since that one appears to be made in Az, I wonder if the ATF is going to pay the factory a little visit if they haven't already.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 15:36 |
|
|
slidebite posted:Also, why would anyone call something 4/32" and 2/32" instead of 1/8" and 1/16" ? Probably to avoid going insane.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 16:19 |
|
|
Groda posted:Probably to avoid going insane. Haha this. Also, I did notice that that "lower" is missing a few holes that are fairly important, namely the buffer detent and spring hole; it also looks like the safety detent hole does not exist. I would imagine that an airsoft FCG would be slightly different from these observations, also the bolt catch area is different. Compare: Airsoft Lower: http://pics.gunbroker.com/GB/168761...x2214746734.jpg with "HUR REAL STEEL" (My AR Lower) http://www.personal.psu.edu/ndb5059...d_lower_top.JPG
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 16:35 |
|
|
The buffer detent isn't necessary for the rifle to function, and the safety detent hole would be really easy to drill (it's also not necessary for the rifle to fire).
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 16:38 |
|
|
MazeOfTzeentch posted:Also, I did notice that that "lower" is missing a few holes that are fairly important, namely the buffer detent and spring hole;
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 16:39 |
|
|
Groda posted:Probably to avoid going insane. Is 4/32" easier than 1/8"? Or 8/32 instead of 1/4" or 16/32 instead of 1/2"? Is there some sort of fetish with 32nds in with the firearms community I'm unaware of? Edit: That is an honest question, not trying to be a jerk. I measure poo poo daily and the rule of thumb is to break the fraction down to make it easier to understand. slidebite fucked around with this message at Jun 17, 2010 around 17:19 |
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 16:39 |
|
|
I'm ordering some stuff from a machine shop in the US right now, and non-reduced fractions of inches pop up all the time in their documentation, so I assume it's not unusual. If you're not dealing with nominal measurements like drill bits and threading (and using fractions instead of decimal inches/mils/whatever), there's really nothing to be gained by reducing your figures every time you present them.
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 17:33 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2013 19:09 |
|
|
Groda posted:there's really nothing to be gained by reducing your figures every time you present them. How about mental acumen? 
|
| # ? Jun 17, 2010 17:59 |
|
