|
This game here is some pretty ridiculous grognardism. I'm not even certain what they were trying to prove with it, but the amount of is overwhelming.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 00:17 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 16:08 |
|
This guy is crazy for all kinds of reasons, but when he talks about gaming...quote:To me, when I walk into a geek shop and there are a bunch of 30 year old guys sitting at a table playing D&D, I can't help but feel a vague contempt. It's probably a character flaw; who am I to be judgmental? I roleplay too. But to me, D&D is the roleplaying equivalent of Chutes & Ladders, while my game system and campaign setting are, I don't know, Civilization, or at the very least, Risk. You walk into a public place and see a bunch of obvious adults spinning the little arrow and getting all excited because they hit a ladder, or screeching in rage because they landed on a slide... to me, that's pretty much the same thing as watching a bunch of adults rolling d20s so their 17th level Paladin can do 12 hit points of damage to a beholder, while the thief is picking the lock on a door down the hall, and the cleric is standing by to throw a Cure Light Wounds when necessary. It's just childish. It ain't real roleplaying. And the people I know who get into their late 20s and early 30s and D&D is still the only RPG they want to play? It may be tactless to say it, but anybody that looks at these guys knows there is something badly wrong with them.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:26 |
|
NorgLyle posted:This guy is crazy for all kinds of reasons, but when he talks about gaming... oh god I'm grognard.txting myself here: don't get me wrong, I love me some RPG games, but if you were to take that quote and replace D&D specific stuff with RPGs in general, he kind of has a loving point.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:34 |
|
Error 404 posted:oh god I'm grognard.txting myself here: Why do you hate yourself?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:38 |
|
Error 404 posted:oh god I'm grognard.txting myself here: quote:Where it was basically the HeroClix thing all over again. I posted a few notices saying I was looking for players. A few people responded that my game sounded cool, and what version of D&D was I running? To which I would spit venomously and say "I don't use D&D, D&D isn't a roleplaying system, I use my own system". (No, really. I'd type back something like ::spitting contemptuously:: I don't use DnD, I have my own system. I want to actually ROLEPLAY, not move a cardboard stand up around through a dungeon packed with monsters and treasure and moronic magic items.) EDIT: Or a bit more recent: quote:Now. I've written 7 novels and a memoir of my time in Basic Training, call it 100 hours for each, with seems fair. That's 800 hours. ... NorgLyle fucked around with this message at 02:46 on Sep 11, 2009 |
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:43 |
|
lol he thinks Risk is a good game, that's cute. he might as well praise monopoly.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:44 |
|
Error 404 posted:oh god I'm grognard.txting myself here: You'd have a point if you also included things like sports, video games, and most everything people enjoy. What makes this grognardy is that he has no trouble with RPGs, just D&D. Other stuff is fine, but D&D is plebeian
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:45 |
|
I can't stop with this guy:quote:Now, every once in a while I happen across a site where the management has a wonderfully enlightened attitude towards free expression and they've taken a vow to never, ever, under any circumstances ban any user no matter how provocative, controversial or confrontational that user may be.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:47 |
|
NorgLyle posted:I can't stop with this guy: someone should buy him an account here, and try to get a mod to give him posting immunity. P.S. yeah I'm reading through his site and posted too soon. looks like the first quote is the most reasonable(ish) thing there.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 02:53 |
|
The 'I'm a master writer' bit is so awesome. I'd love to read his 'novels'
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 03:14 |
|
Traditional Games > TG Discussion: ::spitting contemptuously:: I don't use DnD, I have my own system.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 03:38 |
|
I know this question kind of answers itself, but how can anyone so full of themselves get others to sit down and play a game with them for an extended amount of time?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 03:46 |
|
MY GAME SYSTEM
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 03:49 |
|
semicolonsrock posted:Jut switching in from 3.5 I am frustrated at not being able to effortlessly whip up a min maxed character, and kind of annoyed that the fighter seems to have turned into a solely melee class (This kind of forced specialization is awful). Longbow wielding human fighters were pretty much my favorite character.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 04:24 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:The 'I'm a master writer' bit is so awesome. I'd love to read his 'novels' What kind of masterpiece does skipping the editorial process allow you to self-publish on Amazon? The Fear Masters, that's what. EDIT: Also not to be missed: ZAP FORCE! quote:Welcome to Sparta City, circa 1995, where seven super-powered teenagers fight for their lives and their freedom against covert cabals of ancient, evil immortals who yearn to outfit them all with high tech alien mind control slave collars – or low tech earthly bodybags, whichever works. Poe fucked around with this message at 04:54 on Sep 11, 2009 |
# ? Sep 11, 2009 04:48 |
|
ManMythLegend posted:
Why don't people ever get this is meta gaming to the extreme? To the world in-game you are not a "Bow using fighter" you're "a guy who uses a bow". A ranger and fighter using a bow are, in-universe, no different in profession.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 05:00 |
|
Poe posted:What kind of masterpiece does skipping the editorial process allow you to self-publish on Amazon? The Fear Masters, that's what. lol the black guy jumps high and is strong
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 05:06 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Why don't people ever get this is meta gaming to the extreme? To the world in-game you are not a "Bow using fighter" you're "a guy who uses a bow". A ranger and fighter using a bow are, in-universe, no different in profession. If people understood that then this thread would not nearly be so big.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 05:06 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Why don't people ever get this is meta gaming to the extreme? To the world in-game you are not a "Bow using fighter" you're "a guy who uses a bow". A ranger and fighter using a bow are, in-universe, no different in profession. look at you so dumb, of course there's a difference! They're named two different things in the book. now stop trying to ruin my IMMERSION and let me roll a ranged fighter
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 05:45 |
|
Phuzzy posted:look at you so dumb, of course there's a difference! They're named two different things in the book. now stop trying to ruin my IMMERSION and let me roll a ranged fighter maybe we should bump up the obviousness a notch and go from (melee) fighter and ranger to MELEEr and RANGEr
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 05:49 |
|
Phuzzy posted:look at you so dumb, of course there's a difference! They're named two different things in the book. now stop trying to ruin my IMMERSION and let me roll a ranged fighter You know, I do think there is something legit to the complaint, if tangential. With PHB2, the developers have shown a willingness to build melee classes that key off a single non-strength attribute (avengers, virtuous bards, beast-form druids, etc)...which then allows those classes to use their magical ranged/area/close attacks off the same bonus. However, the martial classes (and, to be fair, barbarians and wardens also fall in here) are stuck with ranged weapon proficiencies that they can't really take advantage of because they need to dedicate their attributes to strength. Basically- if they're willing to let Prescient Bards use charisma as a stat for their ranged weapon attacks, I don't see why they can't let strength do the same thing. Maybe this is better off here than in the 4e thread, but I think it's an issue that I'm starting to notice more and more. edit- although I think wardens and barbarians don't get the ranged proficiencies in their class package, so...
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 06:14 |
|
Poe posted:What kind of masterpiece does skipping the editorial process allow you to self-publish on Amazon? The Fear Masters, that's what. Why would you want super-powered slaves? I'm sure people like Flash and the Green Lantern would just quietly follow orders and never, ever try to escape EDIT: downloaded samples to my Kindle
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 06:41 |
|
NorgLyle posted:This guy is crazy for all kinds of reasons, but when he talks about gaming...
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 07:06 |
|
DeclaredYuppie posted:You know, I do think there is something legit to the complaint, if tangential. With PHB2, the developers have shown a willingness to build melee classes that key off a single non-strength attribute (avengers, virtuous bards, beast-form druids, etc)...which then allows those classes to use their magical ranged/area/close attacks off the same bonus. However, the martial classes (and, to be fair, barbarians and wardens also fall in here) are stuck with ranged weapon proficiencies that they can't really take advantage of because they need to dedicate their attributes to strength. That's what they added Heavy Thrown weapons for, isn't it? It makes more sense for the dedicated melee fighters to use stuff like javelins instead of whipping out a bow (that's right, it's got more realism, grognards ). Hell, Heavy Thrown weapons are fantastic for fighters, like Drox pointed out in the 4e thread where the delightfully poorly-written complaint came from.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 07:52 |
|
ManMythLegend posted:If people understood that then this thread would not nearly be so big. If you people realized how shallow and lovely 4.fail is, there wouldn't be a need for this thread You idiots need to grow up and use MY SYSYEM! loving manchildren itt
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 08:06 |
|
i don't use any system. i embody the concept of roleplay; by merely existing i have played and am currently playing every fantasy troupe ever devised
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 08:07 |
|
Countblanc posted:i don't use any system. i embody the concept of roleplay; by merely existing i have played and am currently playing every fantasy troupe ever devised I'm a Wizard irl.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 08:56 |
|
Countblanc posted:i don't use any system. i embody the concept of roleplay; by merely existing i have played and am currently playing every fantasy troupe ever devised Freeform is lower than LARP. Get out.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 09:19 |
|
Error 404 posted:I'm a Wizard irl. Psions über alles.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 11:11 |
|
Etherwind posted:Psyker über alles. fixed. now roll for warp
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 11:17 |
|
quote:<Etherwind> !r d10#3
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 11:21 |
|
Pieces of Peace posted:That's what they added Heavy Thrown weapons for, isn't it? It makes more sense for the dedicated melee fighters to use stuff like javelins instead of whipping out a bow (that's right, it's got more realism, grognards ). Hell, Heavy Thrown weapons are fantastic for fighters, like Drox pointed out in the 4e thread where the delightfully poorly-written complaint came from. Well, it looks more like they added the heavy thrown property because they couldn't convince themselves that basic ranged attacks could function off anything other than dexterity unless they made a particular exception...just as they couldn't convince themselves at first not to force melee basic attacks to key off strength. However in the second case they decided that wasn't necessary and added in the melee training feats. And I really don't know why you think javelins make more sense than a bow? Bows have greater range, do more damage, and (at least until you get a magical thrown weapon...which honestly isn't one of the first things a warrior is going to want) you don't lose your ranged attack after you throw your weapon away. And if you honestly want to pretend that's somehow more realistic, it'd probably be even more realistic for the fighters/warlords to carry around daggers or shurikens to throw since they're small and wouldn't be a nuisance to carry around...but those are light thrown. I mean at least for the warlord, they went out of their way to add some ranged powers for them in Martial Power- but they gave all of them a "you must use a heavy thrown weapon" requirement. All fine and good I guess, but then I don't know why they bothered giving them training in simple ranged weapons they'd never want to use. Looking at the prescient bard, though, they don't have any sort of limitation on the weapon type. They can key their attacks off charisma regardless of whether it's a heavy thrown, light thrown, or ranged weapon. They're in trouble too if they have to use a basic ranged as well, but that seems the exception that proves the rule for them. And I don't even know why "it makes sense" is a good argument here. With a couple of feats you can give your caster melee training, a superior weapon, and have them doing respectable basic attacks. It may be a bad idea, but you can do it. I can't see any reason why you shouldn't let fighters/warlords/TWF rangers get decent "bow attacks" aside from some "durr little quick guys use a bow not big slow guys" reasoning that they no longer seem to really subscribe to.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 13:00 |
|
DeclaredYuppie posted:Well, it looks more like they added the heavy thrown property because they couldn't convince themselves that basic ranged attacks could function off anything other than dexterity unless they made a particular exception...just as they couldn't convince themselves at first not to force melee basic attacks to key off strength. However in the second case they decided that wasn't necessary and added in the melee training feats.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 13:00 |
|
Error 404 posted:I'm a Wizard irl. I ropeplay as him.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 13:25 |
|
Pieces of Peace posted:That's what they added Heavy Thrown weapons for, isn't it? It makes more sense for the dedicated melee fighters to use stuff like javelins instead of whipping out a bow (that's right, it's got more realism, grognards ). Hell, Heavy Thrown weapons are fantastic for fighters, like Drox pointed out in the 4e thread where the delightfully poorly-written complaint came from. If you want a ranged fighter, pick up Deft Hurler Style, Quick Draw, and a ranger multiclass. I want to play this character now.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 16:03 |
|
You phlebs still you dice in your role playing adventures? Might as well pull out a laptop and play WoW together. Real role players use dice-less systems
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 17:15 |
|
HKR posted:You phlebs still you dice in your role playing adventures? Might as well pull out a laptop and play WoW together. Real role players use dice-less systems You guys actually 'role play'? I'm so good at roleplaying, I don't even exist
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 17:18 |
|
I do not play at a role. I do not play. I am the game. I am the roll and the role. I am Natural Twenty.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 17:19 |
|
Have we discussed this yet? Click here for the full 2000x1560 image.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 17:26 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 16:08 |
|
Yeah that looks fun and simple
|
# ? Sep 11, 2009 17:29 |