|
Her baby does not have any sort of personal identity, and its continued existence relies on delusions otherwise. Reminds me of how the person called "Terri Schiavo" information-theoretically died BEFORE I WAS BORN.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2009 19:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 14:02 |
|
JohnnyChimpo posted:so where's the Rule 34 on this poo poo? Interestingly enough, since the "baby" lacks any sort of consciousness and external awareness, I would consider this not unethical, albeit quite bizarre.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2009 20:04 |
|
Rutibex posted:This disorder could be very useful to SCIENCE! Just imagine, you could clone yourself and induce a genetic mutation to not grow a brain. Free unrejectable donor organs! Read this.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2009 20:10 |
|
Peven Stan posted:Wow imagine living without having a conscious personal identity. This stuff fucks with my head. You wouldn't.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2009 20:48 |
|
Tweek posted:A doctor was delivering a young woman's baby. After the delivery, he said "Congratulations, it's a girl!", then he threw it across the room. He picked it up again, and began to stab it with a scalpel. When the baby was bloodied up enough, he elbow slammed it onto the floor before stomping on the infant until it was a mass of blood and innards. He looked up to the mother, who stared at him, terrified. Laughing, the doctor said "Just kidding! It had a cephalic disorder in which the cephalic end of the neural tube failed to close. It has no possibility whatsoever of ever gaining consciousness." I only consider this unethical for following two reasons: 1. It seems quite unsanitary in a hospital. 2. He didn't get the owner's permission.
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2009 10:00 |