|
klauth posted:
I can HEAR this picture.
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2009 18:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 18, 2024 18:05 |
|
|
Stickbug posted:gently caress! I can hear this one too!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2009 21:55
|
|
|
Ottermotive Insanity posted:Wonder no more! I AM NOT OKAY WITH THIS 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2009 21:45
|
|
|
Mister Kingdom posted:I got through with no errors. Reread the error message.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2009 01:35
|
|
|
It's a bit extreme I think to prevent mothers from having children with major problems like Downs but it's probably a good idea to discourage it and at the very least try not to encourage it. It's important for women who are pregnant with children who are going to need major help for their entire life to really understand what their future will be like if they go ahead with the pregnancy.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2009 06:28
|
|
|
Sup Bro posted:Keep in mind that people with Down Syndrome are almost always sterile, and we can assume no one's jumping up to be impregnated by the mentally challenged anyway. http://www.ds-health.com/issues.htm I'm not saying that we should start killing off the kids with Downs, but it's important that realize that raising a child with Downs is going to be a huge challenge. I'm pro-choice but I think that in a lot of cases women really ought to consider having the child and giving it up for adoption. There are a lot of people out there who would really like to adopt an infant and raise it as their own. However, in the case of Downs and other comparable birth problems, there really isn't as much of a demand. I have a terrible feeling that Trig is going to be some huge poster child for Downs syndrome for the next 20 years, Trig is going to get all the medical and educational care that he needs to become a sorta functional member of society. People are going to see this and be inspired to try to repeat that success story when they barely have the resources to raise a perfectly healthy child.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2009 17:13
|
|
|
Pimpsolo posted:Darwin has proved it, as much as gravitational theory is proved. You need to understand the concept of a "scientific theory." It isn't the same thing as the colloquial use of the term "theory." A scientific theory needs mounds and mounds of evidence, and Darwin's theories have withstood scientific prodding time and time again. It is proven. If you don't want accept evolution as true, we have nothing to discuss really. Based on the fact that Children with Down's are able to stay alive in the United States they are definitely sufficiently adapted. Darwin really isn't the right direction to go at all in defending your views, people who have a much better handle on the subject are going to run circles around you if you keep pushing the Evolution angle.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2009 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 18, 2024 18:05 |
|
|
skander posted:And bring home the bacon, so that no one knows. Even his friends would be unaware. I'm pretty sure that no one would even care.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2009 00:56
|
|