|
Interrupting Moss posted:If you're really into digital B&W, Nik Software's Silver Efex Pro is excellent.
|
| # ¿ Oct 3, 2009 12:16 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2013 18:07 |
|
![]() Taken about an hour before landing in Beijing.
|
| # ¿ Dec 12, 2009 03:53 |
|
|
| # ¿ Dec 29, 2009 23:03 |
|
|
| # ¿ Jan 8, 2010 11:15 |
|
![]() Chinese haze: ruining contrast since the dawn of photography.
|
| # ¿ Mar 23, 2010 13:19 |
|
I think you did something right here. It isn't a particularly compelling subject, but you had good timing and placement of the sun. The whole thing looks rather hazy though, and I don't think that adds anything to the photo.northward posted:
|
| # ¿ Apr 13, 2010 10:38 |
|
Col. Mustard posted:I feel really lucky to have such great landscapes virtually in my backyard.
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2010 01:17 |
|
![]() ![]()
|
| # ¿ Jun 5, 2010 01:06 |
|
scottch posted:spf3million was using one in China for the shots above my post. I don't believe he uses it regularly for this thread, but I was impressed with those shots.
|
| # ¿ Jul 6, 2010 22:22 |
|
Both wide and long lenses can be used successfully for landscapes. I'd say the majority of people prefer wider angles. Using the smallest aperture (highest f/#) will give you the greatest depth of field, so both the foreground and background will be in focus, generally a desired characteristic of a landscape photo. The problem is that most lenses are sharpest around f/8 or f/11. Most lenses are significantly less sharp at their narrowest aperture so I wouldn't recommend always going to f/22+. This is another reason why people like wide angle lenses: due to the nature of the wide field of view, the depth of field (the distance in front of you that is in focus) is much bigger on wider angle lenses than on telephotos. This allows you to use an aperture closer to the lens' sweet spot (f/11 for example) and still have the foreground and background be in focus. I'm not sure what you mean by not being able to zoom to infinity. Do you mean can't focus to infinity? If so, are you focusing manually or using autofocus? If focusing manually, usually turning the focus ring all the way in one direction will actually allow you to focus just past infinity meaning nothing will be in focus. Usually infinity focus is just a smidge short of the farthest the ring will go. I don't remember exactly why they do this but someone here knows.
|
| # ¿ Aug 22, 2010 06:34 |
|
thefreshmaker posted:Dumb question directed at the community in general: In a lot of your guys' photos, the sky and atmosphere look incredibly clear. Are you reducing haze in post? Or is that just from the conditions when you took the shot? If you're doing it in post, how? If it's the conditions at the time, any advice on how to predict haze-free atmosphere? Is it just humidity?
|
| # ¿ Sep 7, 2010 13:55 |
|
This is one of my favorites you've posted in a while. Nice job. e: ![]() Glad I lugged my slr up the mountain Saint Fu fucked around with this message at Oct 16, 2010 around 10:40 |
| # ¿ Oct 16, 2010 10:00 |
|
octane2 posted:Click image(s) to view on black background, avoid burning your retinas, and appreciate shadow detail.
|
| # ¿ Nov 16, 2010 19:55 |
|
Awesome.
|
| # ¿ Feb 15, 2011 20:19 |
|
WB looks off on these, your water is waay blue. I like the eddy in the second one though.
|
| # ¿ Feb 20, 2011 20:20 |
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:
|
| # ¿ Mar 7, 2011 12:07 |
|
RazalasSol posted:
|
| # ¿ Mar 28, 2011 06:56 |
|
Nice reflection. I love that the water isn't still.
|
| # ¿ Apr 14, 2011 11:50 |
|
Falco posted:Col. Mustard
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2011 01:56 |
|
slothmeister posted:2.
|
| # ¿ May 25, 2011 12:06 |
|
brandino posted:Sup doggy dogs, here's a Hasselblad shot from Yosemite this last weekend:
|
| # ¿ Oct 1, 2011 16:35 |
|
![]() _MG_1707 by spf3million, on Flickr
|
| # ¿ Apr 22, 2012 18:39 |
|
Revolucion posted:
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2012 09:08 |
|
MMD3 posted:What would you guys say is the single most useful lens in your camera bag for landscapes?
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2012 04:01 |
|
InternetJunky posted:The farmers ploughing their fields make for some scenic pictures:
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2012 16:02 |
|
![]() Startrails-166 by spf3million, on Flickr
|
| # ¿ Jun 2, 2012 16:03 |
|
Kujaroth posted:
|
| # ¿ Jun 16, 2012 09:27 |
|
Work great as triptychs.
|
| # ¿ Jun 24, 2012 18:05 |
|
MrBlandAverage posted:
|
| # ¿ Jun 25, 2012 17:32 |
|
MrBlandAverage posted:
neckbeard posted:Saint Fu - thanks for the Mount Hua recommendation, I really liked Xi'an, that city is going to be insane in 5-10 years at the rate it/the area is going ![]() _MG_3635 by spf3million, on Flickr Saint Fu fucked around with this message at Jun 26, 2012 around 16:36 |
| # ¿ Jun 26, 2012 16:31 |
|
Holistic Detective posted:
|
| # ¿ Jun 28, 2012 12:41 |
|
xzzy posted:Anyone got advice or links to a crash course on ND/graduated filters? I just got my first set in yesterday and I leave on a road trip in two weeks so that gives me some time to get used to how they function.
|
| # ¿ Jul 18, 2012 14:56 |
|
LargeHadron posted:
|
| # ¿ Aug 4, 2012 09:53 |
|
Kujaroth posted:My first attempt at star trails.
|
| # ¿ Aug 22, 2012 15:03 |
|
Looks familiar. I was wondering how long that piano would last.
|
| # ¿ Aug 30, 2012 04:09 |
|
![]() #4 by spf3million, on Flickr
|
| # ¿ Sep 14, 2012 08:31 |
|
wizard sticks posted:Can ya'll make some Macbook friendly wallpapers for these pleeeeeaasssee (1440x900) ?!?!?
|
| # ¿ Sep 15, 2012 04:10 |
|
Mathturbator posted:quite the opposite really, would havd been more interesting if you could fill the frame with colory mountain goodness
|
| # ¿ Sep 19, 2012 08:55 |
|
Very very nice, but clean your drat sensor!
|
| # ¿ Sep 20, 2012 10:42 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2013 18:07 |
|
Reprocessing a photo from last year![]() _MG_0181-164 by spf3million, on Flickr
|
| # ¿ Oct 14, 2012 05:06 |











































