|
Alternatively you could invest in an incident meter and not care about reflective metering
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2012 23:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:29 |
|
McMadCow posted:I use an incident meter for my model work, but don't you as a landscape/architecture shooter primarily work with a spot meter...? I can't afford a spot meter (too much film), so I psuedo-spot - I run around and take incident readings under different light and try to fudge the zone system that way
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2012 19:47 |
|
m4mbo posted:I hope I don't sound contrary, because someone responding to constructive criticism with nothing but rebuttals is very annoying, and I value your opinion. Take his advice, your original shots are pretty boring. On the second she's just standing in front of a wall, listlessly holding an instrument. That doesn't say anything about being a musician - it just looks like she's holding a prop.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2012 19:36 |
|
If your lens has vignetting wide-open (most do) you'll assuredly make it more obvious if you're tweaking your curves right.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 21:42 |
|
LargeHadron posted:Do you mind posting pictures of your own that have the same intent but actually do it well? Here's a little picture I took of an environmental portrait. As you can see the image is about the landscape but I have added a person in it for a better feel
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 20:05 |
|
LargeHadron posted:Were you really not comprehending the discussion or are you just being funny? If the latter, then yes that is pretty funny. If you're sincerely trying to denounce an entire aesthetic, you're going to have to put more effort into it than that. Huh. LargeHadron posted:It's nice that you took the time to write all that. Excepting the awkward one of her on the stairs, I was consciously trying to achieve a very minimal type of portrait in which the subject is there just a part of the composition (and something more interesting to look at than a log or whatever else it could have been). 016_a by Large Hadron, on Flickr There's no "minimal" look to this at all. You have a person directly framed in the center of your composition and you're trying to say the subject is just part of it - no. The subject *is* your composition. If you want to create something where the subject is merely a component of the entire composition, you can't just cut out a portrait, place it on a background, and call it a day.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 20:30 |
|
It also looks like you're standing on a step stool looking down
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2012 20:10 |
|
Paragon8 posted:Out of curiosity why did you choose to frame this horizontally? sw1gger posted:Probably because most of the visual mediums we as an audience are exposed to today are closer to this framing than a vertical one. desktop backgrounds
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2013 21:33 |
|
QPZIL posted:Those are just two shots we did outside. The rest are in front of a plainer background or in front of a backdrop indoors. Best clown portrait I've seen in a while.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2013 17:40 |
|
David Pratt posted:
You might want to check your monitor because it looks like I'm seeing this image through a clear pane of urine.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2013 23:47 |
|
Mannequin posted:Not quite vintage enough for you? Sorry, my bad. Just a typical New York bitch.
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2013 22:52 |
|
I think those would all benefit from some curves for contrast.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2013 20:42 |
|
Your boner is showing.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2013 18:40 |
|
Your boner is showing.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2013 19:59 |
|
Is there any reason to stuff them all in the right side of the frame?
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2013 21:46 |
|
Wario In Real Life posted:Presumably so text can be added as necessary to the left side. The reasonable assumption isn't always the right one.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2013 22:53 |
|
Floating head portraits are very en vogue
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 23:27 |
|
notlodar posted:While a rim light would help, there IS separation. Zone 0, Zone 1, who's keeping track?
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2013 00:20 |
|
Photos are serious. Old houses are serious. Pleasure is a myth.
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2013 22:49 |
|
It's like a photo taken by someone who hasn't been exposed to any photography that wasn't inside of a Maxim issue.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2014 22:22 |
|
Heroin's a killer.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2014 22:28 |
|
iSheep posted:Awesome. I am insanely jealous of how many gorgeous subjects you have shot. That has got to make for a solid portfolio. Are you friends with these girls or are they clients? Or is he the client?
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2014 18:11 |
|
triplexpac posted:Vicky by kschruder, on Flickr This one feels really weird, it's oddly unbalanced on the left.
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2014 18:30 |
|
What bothers you about "dat" border?
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2014 20:23 |
|
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 05:24 |
|
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2014 03:59 |
|
8x10 street at night with Musket
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2014 05:54 |
|
Cross-posting from the "street" thread. 8x10 at night.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2014 18:59 |
|
SB800 at full power about 4 feet away at 45 degrees with a diffuser, I think. Nothing special.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 05:32 |
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:If that's the look you want, why not just use equipment that can only achieve that instead of dumbing down your equipment to make some kind of statement? Yeah anyone with camera access can get that shot, so why use a several thousand dollar setup to get it? Because obviously what matters is how much the equipment you're using cost, not what you want to do.\ somnambulist posted:But ultimately you need to ask yourself: What is this photo for? If anything, MAYBE it could be used for an editorial piece, but otherwise I dont believe many clients would want portraits taken in a light that doesnt flatter their face that well. She is a very pretty girl, and I believe better light and better hand placement (and the form of the hand) would make this a thousand times stronger. Ask yourself: does everything need a marketable niche?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 16:07 |
|
Musket posted:Maybe tell her to look at the camera next time? Nah.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 22:35 |
|
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2014 03:16 |
|
-- nevermind i just won't shitpost --
bellows lugosi fucked around with this message at 18:47 on Oct 25, 2014 |
# ¿ Oct 25, 2014 18:42 |
|
That's a nice watch strap, where did he get it?
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2014 22:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2014 17:25 |
|
What do you think of your work?
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2015 18:46 |
|
Can't see past the purple. Have you considered turning your image into an 18% grey solid?
|
# ¿ Feb 17, 2015 20:08 |
|
Dude you need to stop loving posting.
|
# ¿ Feb 17, 2015 23:05 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:17 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:29 |
|
It's a limited edition print by MrBlandAverage of a photo I took of Mido. It's really layers of art to appreciate here
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 23:32 |