|
q != e
Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 04:17 on Jul 22, 2009 |
# ¿ Jul 22, 2009 03:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:33 |
|
That's what I'm reading about the focal lengths. 70-100mm ish. Thing to remember about going wide with a DSLR is that the crop factor is just a crop out of the middle, it doesn't fix lens distortion if it's severe enough, and getting close with a wide lens could make it worse. But if it worked, it worked. I'm in a class where we will have to shoot some portraits with film, and I'm wondering if my SMC-Takumar 135mm would be good at it. If it's too tight, I think the depth of field might be too narrow, but otherwise it might be an interesting portrait lens. Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 04:17 on Jul 22, 2009 |
# ¿ Jul 22, 2009 03:08 |
|
Fragrag posted:Not sure if you guys can see this, it's set to private on Flickr to avoid ire from my clients. I agree about the shadow in the top right. The vignetting is obnoxious, although I have a strong dislike for anything more than tiny, incidental vignetting. I'm not sure how I feel about the shadow in front, the only thing I get about it is that it adds to the linearity of the picture but just their bodies might be enough. I might have tried to fillflash that out.
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2009 06:52 |