Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«66 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Captain Cantaloupe
May 7, 2007
Heidegger mah nigga!

Sagebrush posted:

That's about where the needle jets start to open, so I would make sure those are operating properly. Holes in the diaphragms, damage to the needle or the jet body itself, gunk on the slides that would keep them from opening smoothly, etc.

Also, kick starting is wonderful. It's so much more visceral than pressing a little button.

Hmm when I took apart the carbs this weekend the needle jets, diaphragms, etc all looked fine.

Now I haven't had a chance to try tamir lenk's suggestion of recreating the stutter, but I did check my intake manifolds: they both leak air pretty bad, so I've ordered a couple new ones. I'm not sure if this will fix this problem but itll surely make the bike run better, right? I've just gotta wait till the drat things get here.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tamir Lenk
Nov 25, 2009



Captain Cantaloupe posted:

Hmm when I took apart the carbs this weekend the needle jets, diaphragms, etc all looked fine.

Now I haven't had a chance to try tamir lenk's suggestion of recreating the stutter, but I did check my intake manifolds: they both leak air pretty bad, so I've ordered a couple new ones. I'm not sure if this will fix this problem but itll surely make the bike run better, right? I've just gotta wait till the drat things get here.

Anything that limits airflow to the correct channels will improve engine operation and save it from ~very bad things~ (e.g., burnt valves, etc.).

New intake boots best boots.

BlackLaser
Dec 2, 2005



ShaneB posted:

Got the bike back together tonight, and it starts right up. Feels smoother than before, even. I'm so happy. No more loving starter fluid bullshit.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002




And it started with a pull of the choke and a press of a button, after sitting all night.

iwentdoodie
Apr 29, 2005

Witten sucks ass. SHOCKEY FOREVER BABY

Yerok posted:

Haha sorry man, too many beers and working on the RD400 distracted me. I guess I clicked submit without attaching the link.

https://www.mikesxs.net/product/08-6008.html

Holy poo poo, that's like $100 less than anywhere else. That's like used on eBay price. Thanks man.

I may pick that up, plus one of their master cylinders if one of those will fit.

https://www.mikesxs.net/product/08-6009.html This LOOKS right, but I believe the bore is too large.

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

Z3n posted:

Idle it higher until it's warm.

Did this this morning before my commute. Any reason I shouldn't use the idle adjustment screw to do this for me while I gear up, besides having to adjust my idle at the first few stoplights?

n8r posted:

Piston slap?

I think that might actually be the issue. It definitely fits.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



Viper_3000 posted:

Did this this morning before my commute. Any reason I shouldn't use the idle adjustment screw to do this for me while I gear up, besides having to adjust my idle at the first few stoplights?

Since we both have a CB550 I feel this should be accurate: Your bike should automatically be idling higher with the choke pulled, as there is a little protrusion on the choke rocker mechanism that, when the choke is pulled fully, presses against an arm that is attached to the throttle rocker mechanism. This bumps the throttle a bit to open the slides a tiny amount.

ShaneB fucked around with this message at Jun 8, 2012 around 19:54

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

ShaneB posted:

Since we both have a CB550 I feel this should be accurate: Your bike should automatically be idling higher with the choke pulled, as there is a little protrusion on the choke rocker mechanism that, when the choke is pulled fully, presses against an arm that is attached to the throttle rocker mechanism. This bumps the throttle a bit to open the slides a tiny amount.

Hmmmm, I didn't notice it idling higher with the choke pulled halfway. I'll check into that when I redo the carbs.

Z3n
Jul 21, 2007

Don't you wish all '07s were this cool?

Viper_3000 posted:

Did this this morning before my commute. Any reason I shouldn't use the idle adjustment screw to do this for me while I gear up, besides having to adjust my idle at the first few stoplights?


I think that might actually be the issue. It definitely fits.

No, not a problem. The choke can be hit or miss on the older bikes with allowing it to idle higher.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



Viper_3000 posted:

Hmmmm, I didn't notice it idling higher with the choke pulled halfway. I'll check into that when I redo the carbs.

Yeah it's something that can be adjusted, so it can not function correctly if it's adjusted wrong or come out of adjustment over time. It's also only really doing something at full, or near-full, choke.

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

Z3n posted:

No, not a problem. The choke can be hit or miss on the older bikes with allowing it to idle higher.

Cool. Part of the new routine then.

ShaneB posted:

Yeah it's something that can be adjusted, so it can not function correctly if it's adjusted wrong or come out of adjustment over time. It's also only really doing something at full, or near-full, choke.

I'll look at fixing that when I eventually order one of those carbtunes and tear down the carbs, that sounds useful. My bike doesn't really like being at full choke though, it tends to want to stall out where as on 3/4 to 1/2 choke it'll idle nicely.

About to go spend the rest of my afternoon replacing the regulator/rectifier so I don't have to keep using a battery tender. Hopefully it's as simple as it looks.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



Viper_3000 posted:

About to go spend the rest of my afternoon replacing the regulator/rectifier so I don't have to keep using a battery tender. Hopefully it's as simple as it looks.

Yeah, I'm ordering one of those Oregon cycle things ASAP. The stock regulator/rectifier is terrible...

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

ShaneB posted:

Yeah, I'm ordering one of those Oregon cycle things ASAP. The stock regulator/rectifier is terrible...

Speaking of that:

New Parts!!!



Jesus H Christ look at that old thing. Complete with dead/dried spiders and nest.



Yeahhhh....That looks better I think.



Was losing daylight so I didn't take many pictures, here's the regulator installed:



Overall, my feelings on the stock parts.




I'm pretty happy with the Oregon Cycles parts. They do in fact bolt right up, however the rectifier got pretty hot when I was setting the voltage, not sure if that's intended or not. I also can't get the regulator to put out more than 13.8v at 2k rpm, but I'm fine with that.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof


Viper_3000 posted:

Speaking of that:

New Parts!!!



Jesus H Christ look at that old thing. Complete with dead/dried spiders and nest.



Yeahhhh....That looks better I think.



Was losing daylight so I didn't take many pictures, here's the regulator installed:



Overall, my feelings on the stock parts.




I'm pretty happy with the Oregon Cycles parts. They do in fact bolt right up, however the rectifier got pretty hot when I was setting the voltage, not sure if that's intended or not. I also can't get the regulator to put out more than 13.8v at 2k rpm, but I'm fine with that.

shouldn't it be a 12v regulator?

also, it's not your reg that's putting out the power. it's your rotor/magneto-alternator. You can't expect to fully charge your system at idle. That's why you have a battery.

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

GnarlyCharlie4u posted:

shouldn't it be a 12v regulator?

also, it's not your reg that's putting out the power. it's your rotor/magneto-alternator. You can't expect to fully charge your system at idle. That's why you have a battery.

According to everything I've read 14v is the correct regulator. Anything from 13v-14v at idle indicates charging, and you don't want to exceed 14.5v. (Again, from what I've read online)

I'm fine with 13.8 at idle, I was just going by his instructions which were to set it to 14v at 2k. (Bright side, it definitely won't peak at over 14.5 and risk frying my battery from my testing at different RPMs)

Here's his site, his stuff comes highly recommended from most of the CB forums around.

Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester
Oct 3, 2000


Viper_3000 posted:

According to everything I've read 14v is the correct regulator. Anything from 13v-14v at idle indicates charging, and you don't want to exceed 14.5v. (Again, from what I've read online)
These numbers are about right for all modern autos/bikes. 12v systems don't actually operate at 12v, it's more like 13-14 ideally. Old bikes will often not charge at idle, but modern ones should.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof


Viper_3000 posted:

According to everything I've read 14v is the correct regulator. Anything from 13v-14v at idle indicates charging, and you don't want to exceed 14.5v. (Again, from what I've read online)

I'm fine with 13.8 at idle, I was just going by his instructions which were to set it to 14v at 2k. (Bright side, it definitely won't peak at over 14.5 and risk frying my battery from my testing at different RPMs)

Here's his site, his stuff comes highly recommended from most of the CB forums around.

Just checking
All the ones on my CB's top out at 14.4 which is just perfect.

Viper_3000 posted:

n8r" post="404400969 posted:

Piston slap?
I think that might actually be the issue. It definitely fits.

TIME TO BORE IT OUT AND GO BIGGER

Sir Cornelius
Oct 30, 2011


Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:

These numbers are about right for all modern autos/bikes. 12v systems don't actually operate at 12v, it's more like 13-14 ideally. Old bikes will often not charge at idle, but modern ones should.

Those numbers are correct for ALL, modern or vintage, automotive poo poo that use a generator/stator-rotor design, a voltage regulator/rectifier and depends on a 12V acid battery to operate.

Some bikes will charge at idle, some won't. It depends of design, not of vintage.

Almost all 1970-1980's mopeds will be able to run even without a battery. Same with most off-road vehicles. There's no difference between "old" and "new" bikes. My 1977 GT750B will charge at idle and can, hardly pressed, run without a battery. (kickstarting a 3 cylinder 750 2-stroke is what separates women from men) My 1982 and '84 RD350s or my RD500 will require too much power for the CDI and YPVS-self-test to charge at idle. My CBX1000 could barely charge at idle if the headlights were turned off. My brothers Giiiiixxxxxer can't charge for poo poo below 3K rpm.

Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester
Oct 3, 2000


Sir Cornelius posted:

Same with most off-road vehicles. There's no difference between "old" and "new" bikes.
On average, yes there is. Older mopeds are generally of a different design, with a/c lighting, magneto ignition, etc., so they don't really fit in with street motorcycles.

Sir Cornelius
Oct 30, 2011


Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:

On average, yes there is. Older mopeds are generally of a different design, with a/c lighting, magneto ignition, etc., so they don't really fit in with street motorcycles.

I provided you examples of street motorcycles that doesn't follow your rule.

Actually I think your rule turned upside-down is correct. Older bikes will typically charge at idle, while most modern bikes with fuel pumps, EFI and CDI won't charge below a few K RPMs.

We still agree on correct regulator/rectifier voltage though

Viper_3000
Apr 26, 2005

I could give a shit about all that.

Is thins vintage enough?





Apparently the American Pickers dudes opened up a shop here in Nashville. It's really just a glorified T-Shirt shop but I need to go back when it's not super crowded and take pictures of the Indian they have and the BSA there that set the record at Bonneville.

Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester
Oct 3, 2000


Sir Cornelius posted:

I provided you examples of street motorcycles that doesn't follow your rule.
And I said "on average." The point is a 30 year old bike that doesn't charge at idle is not unusual and generally not something that needs fixing as long as it makes proper voltage at 3-4k.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



600+ mile round trip done over 30 hours on a windscreen-less CB550.... I'm kind of exhausted but so happy with the bike right now. Started and ran like a dream. Took it to 100 on the speedo a few times just to say I did it.

iwentdoodie
Apr 29, 2005

Witten sucks ass. SHOCKEY FOREVER BABY

ShaneB posted:

600+ mile round trip done over 30 hours on a windscreen-less CB550.... I'm kind of exhausted but so happy with the bike right now. Started and ran like a dream. Took it to 100 on the speedo a few times just to say I did it.

Awesome!

I felt like hot poo poo for doing 220 today on my RD. I guarantee you were more comfortable.

Nidhg00670000
Mar 26, 2010

We're in the pipe, five by five.

iwentdoodie posted:

Awesome!

ShaneB posted:

600+ mile round trip done over 30 hours on a windscreen-less CB550.... I'm kind of exhausted but so happy with the bike right now. Started and ran like a dream. Took it to 100 on the speedo a few times just to say I did it.

I felt like hot poo poo for doing 220 today on my RD. I guarantee you were more comfortable.

I read this as you doing 220 mph on a RD.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



Oh yeah I should probably post some kind of queer instagram shot of my bike for good measure. Note, the sun was actually making things these colors:

BlackLaser
Dec 2, 2005



ShaneB posted:

Oh yeah I should probably post some kind of queer instagram shot of my bike for good measure. Note, the sun was actually making things these colors:



What exhaust is that?

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



BlackLaser posted:

What exhaust is that?

I honestly don't know, as it came on the bike from the PO. The stock quad pipes were rusted out. It LOOKS sort of like a Mac 4-1 but I'm not 100% sure. It's not loud and has a good tone, especially at about 5000 rpm on where it smooths out nicely.

BlackLaser
Dec 2, 2005



ShaneB posted:

I honestly don't know, as it came on the bike from the PO. The stock quad pipes were rusted out. It LOOKS sort of like a Mac 4-1 but I'm not 100% sure. It's not loud and has a good tone, especially at about 5000 rpm on where it smooths out nicely.

I think it is a MAC. Looks good. For some reason the muffler always looks to big or too much like a megaphone in pictures.

ShaneB
Oct 21, 2002



BlackLaser posted:

I think it is a MAC. Looks good. For some reason the muffler always looks to big or too much like a megaphone in pictures.

Yeah, it's almost certainly a MAC based on the photos I am finding. It's definitely not too big, IMO.

CloFan
Nov 5, 2004

In case you haven't noticed, I'm a pilot.

I learned today that I have two different model carb bodies in my bike. One is a 3D and the other is a 722. The only difference I can tell is the idle mixture screw is different, which means I can't use the new one included in the rebuild kit I got.

Couple questions: the primary main jet (#70) doesn't sit firmly in its tube.. The O ring prohibits it. The float clip thing hold it in place, though. is that normal or a problem?

The new float needle spring is strong enough that when holding the carb upside down the floats don't compress the nipple. Searching around the internet, that is a good thing, the reason I mention it is both previous pins compressed in that circumstance.

Should the emulsion tube (the tube secondary jet #105 sits on) be locked in place? Both old tubes were, and both new tubes will slide out with no jet installed. Since this tube is manipulated by the slide needle, I figured it would need to be stationery. I didn't want to pound it in for fear of breaking anything.

Finally, loving floats. The distance from the float touching the top of the carb body is 25mm. So, setting the carb to 26mm without having the pin compressed seems wrong, since there is barely any difference between that and the floats all the way up. I'm thinking the metal where the actual float is connected to the rod may be bent. If I'm being retarded and this is normal, please inform me. If this is clear as mud and I need to draw out what I'm saying, I will, but I'm posting from my phone right now so hopefully that description will do.

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012


CloFan posted:

Couple questions: the primary main jet (#70) doesn't sit firmly in its tube.. The O ring prohibits it. The float clip thing hold it in place, though. is that normal or a problem?

The float clip thing is supposed to push on the jet and hold it in place, so that's not a problem. What do you mean by "the O-ring prohibits it", though? Is it too tight, or too loose?

CloFan posted:

The new float needle spring is strong enough that when holding the carb upside down the floats don't compress the nipple. Searching around the internet, that is a good thing, the reason I mention it is both previous pins compressed in that circumstance.

Actually, the stock pins compress if you lean the float on them and tilt the carburetor more than maybe 10 degrees. I don't know if having a somewhat stronger spring here makes any difference to the performance, though. Watch for fuel leaks.

CloFan posted:

Should the emulsion tube (the tube secondary jet #105 sits on) be locked in place? Both old tubes were, and both new tubes will slide out with no jet installed. Since this tube is manipulated by the slide needle, I figured it would need to be stationery. I didn't want to pound it in for fear of breaking anything.

No, because as above, the little clip thingy pushes up on the whole jet and emulsion tube assembly and holds it in place. Normally the tubes just press-fit into place and you should be able to pop them back out with your finger by reaching into the venturi. If the whole assembly literally falls out just from turning the carburetor upright, probably your O-rings are shot.

CloFan posted:

Finally, loving floats. The distance from the float touching the top of the carb body is 25mm. So, setting the carb to 26mm without having the pin compressed seems wrong, since there is barely any difference between that and the floats all the way up. I'm thinking the metal where the actual float is connected to the rod may be bent. If I'm being retarded and this is normal, please inform me. If this is clear as mud and I need to draw out what I'm saying, I will, but I'm posting from my phone right now so hopefully that description will do.

This is what it should look like when you set the float height, assuming you have the old-style brass floats:



The angle shown there is the maximum angle that you can tilt the carb without compressing the pins at all.

CloFan
Nov 5, 2004

In case you haven't noticed, I'm a pilot.

Sagebrush posted:

The float clip thing is supposed to push on the jet and hold it in place, so that's not a problem. What do you mean by "the O-ring prohibits it", though? Is it too tight, or too loose?

The O-ring is too big and will always eject the jet instead of sitting firmly.

quote:

No, because as above, the little clip thingy pushes up on the whole jet and emulsion tube assembly and holds it in place. Normally the tubes just press-fit into place and you should be able to pop them back out with your finger by reaching into the venturi. If the whole assembly literally falls out just from turning the carburetor upright, probably your O-rings are shot.

The emulsion tube is loose, but with the jet in place it does not fall out. I'm not sure how much play it has with the jet in, or if it should have any.

quote:

This is what it should look like when you set the float height, assuming you have the old-style brass floats:



The angle shown there is the maximum angle that you can tilt the carb without compressing the pins at all.

I know how I'm supposed to set the floats, but that's where the problem is. Pretend in your picture that the floats are pushed all the away against the carb body. At that point, the pink line is 25mm, meaning I'd need to set the flange way up in order to not compress the pin at all for my 26mm. It just doesn't seem right but I can't figure out why that is, hence my speculating on other bent parts.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof


CloFan posted:

I know how I'm supposed to set the floats, but that's where the problem is. Pretend in your picture that the floats are pushed all the away against the carb body. At that point, the pink line is 25mm, meaning I'd need to set the flange way up in order to not compress the pin at all for my 26mm. It just doesn't seem right but I can't figure out why that is, hence my speculating on other bent parts.

You sure they're in the right way?

CloFan
Nov 5, 2004

In case you haven't noticed, I'm a pilot.

GnarlyCharlie4u posted:

You sure they're in the right way?

Yep, the way the float arm is set up on this carb you can't really get it wrong or they won't be able to float very high at all.

\/\/ I'm about to go get a picture because it's hard to describe, but no, that's not what I meant.

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012


CloFan posted:

The O-ring is too big and will always eject the jet instead of sitting firmly.


The emulsion tube is loose, but with the jet in place it does not fall out. I'm not sure how much play it has with the jet in, or if it should have any.


I know how I'm supposed to set the floats, but that's where the problem is. Pretend in your picture that the floats are pushed all the away against the carb body. At that point, the pink line is 25mm, meaning I'd need to set the flange way up in order to not compress the pin at all for my 26mm. It just doesn't seem right but I can't figure out why that is, hence my speculating on other bent parts.

You should put a smaller o-ring on if you can find one. Failing that, I guess just give it a good shove? If you can get it to stay, at least you'll have a good seal.

The emulsion tube should have zero lateral play when it's inserted to the proper depth (it should stick out of the venturi surface maybe 1/8"). It's okay if it slides in and out freely, as long as it's not rattling around inside the bore. That's where leaks would occur.

I understand what you're saying about the floats -- so you mean that when you measure the distance as shown, just resting against the valve, it reads like 35mm or something? Are you sure you didn't put the float on upside down?

[e]

CloFan posted:

Yep, the way the float arm is set up on this carb you can't really get it wrong or they won't be able to float very high at all.

Well, if it's not upside down, I'm stumped. Can you post a picture of the float, both on its own and mounted in the carb?

CloFan
Nov 5, 2004

In case you haven't noticed, I'm a pilot.

I should note, the right carb seems normal-- besides the difference between the setting and the carb body being only 1mm apart, it does not seem off. Also, the primary jet doesn't have the issue I mentioned on this carb.


This is the current setting-- I know I don't have it at the right angle, but only because I couldn't measure and get a pic at the same time while holding it. However, because of the increased spring tension on the float needle, the setting is the same at 10 degrees or straight up and down. The new float needle actually makes it easier to adjust.


This is with the floats touching the very bottom (top) of the carb body-- note there is only 1mm difference between the two. This may not even be an issue, it just seemed strange to me.


This is how compressed the pin is when I'm holding the floats against the bottom (again, top) of the carb body. It's not completely compressed, but it is compressed enough to stop fuel flow.

Now onto the left side.


As you can see, the little flange is bent severely upward in order to get the right float setting. I didn't take many pictures of this side because they ended up looking the same, but this one shows the differences off.

They're both currently set at 26mm, albeit the differences in appearance, so I'll give them a try and not question it if it works.

This is what I'm talking about with the primary yet:


I was able to get it to seat in there properly once, but by the time I was ready to put the bowl back on it had backed itself out, or got jostled enough to come out. It sits like this:


Edit: Just noticed the difference in the doohickey that holds the float needle chamber in place-- on one carb it is bent upward, and on the other, downward. This could be my problem, so I'll look into it.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof


Don't worry about how much the pin compresses. the needle is going to move up and down before the pin compresses anyway, the pin does nothing but absorb some of the shock from floats bouncing around to reduce float seat wear.

Tilt the carb body @ 45º (so the float tang is just barely resting on the needle), and set the float height to 26mm by adjusting that middle tang on the floats.

Tamir Lenk
Nov 25, 2009



GnarlyCharlie4u posted:

Don't worry about how much the pin compresses. the needle is going to move up and down before the pin compresses anyway, the pin does nothing but absorb some of the shock from floats bouncing around to reduce float seat wear.

Tilt the carb body @ 45º (so the float tang is just barely resting on the needle), and set the float height to 26mm by adjusting that middle tang on the floats.

This.

The needle spring is just a shock absorber for the float. The spring does not really add pressure to the needle to close it. So don't try to account for spring pressure when setting float heights.

You can tilt the carb to remove the spring from the equation, as Gnarly suggests. I just set the floats with the carbs upside down, regardless of possible variation across the needle springs. Gnarly's way is probably the most accurate, but my clumsy rear end would need 4 hands and 2 sets of eyes to maintain the tilt and take the measurement.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof


Tamir Lenk posted:

This.

The needle spring is just a shock absorber for the float. The spring does not really add pressure to the needle to close it. So don't try to account for spring pressure when setting float heights.

You can tilt the carb to remove the spring from the equation, as Gnarly suggests. I just set the floats with the carbs upside down, regardless of possible variation across the needle springs. Gnarly's way is probably the most accurate, but my clumsy rear end would need 4 hands and 2 sets of eyes to maintain the tilt and take the measurement.

I just lean them against a 2x4.

Actually... I have yet to find a set of helping hands I can't replace with a block of wood.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
«66 »