Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«149 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Loving Africa Chaps
Dec 3, 2007

We had not left it yet, but when I would wake in the night, I would lie, listening, homesick for it already.


Jose posted:

Portsmouth's debt is now up to £138m. Its funny that its nearly double what they initially predicted.

jesus that is rapidly approaching arsenals debt size and the players are getting FA cup bonuses.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Scott Bakula
Jul 24, 2007



They players all agreed to forgo the FA cup bonuses from what I remember.

Loving Africa Chaps
Dec 3, 2007

We had not left it yet, but when I would wake in the night, I would lie, listening, homesick for it already.


Jose posted:

They players all agreed to forgo the FA cup bonuses from what I remember.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/...cup-final-bonus

maybe but they are still getting them

Butterfly Valley
Apr 19, 2007

Not in it for the money


how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Your dribbling is a treat,
you nicked a toilet seat




Transatlantic Gulp posted:

how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million
The list of people they owe money to is hilarious, if it's true.

partipo
Sep 24, 2005
participaction?

irlZaphod posted:

The list of people they owe money to is hilarious, if it's true.

Just who do they owe what to?

Loving Africa Chaps
Dec 3, 2007

We had not left it yet, but when I would wake in the night, I would lie, listening, homesick for it already.


partipo posted:

Just who do they owe what to?

everyone including the st.johns ambulance which pissed off the supporters so much they raised the money themselves (to cover any lost income, pompey still have to pay it as well).

TyChan
Dec 21, 2004

Chicks dig me because
I rarely wear underwear.
And when I do, it's usually
something unusual.


They also owe money to some local pasta caterer.

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Your dribbling is a treat,
you nicked a toilet seat




partipo posted:

Just who do they owe what to?
This is what what sent around work, I don't know how much truth there is to it, but if it's genuine then it's hilarious.

quote:

108 Medical Ltd: £1
AON: £154,934.27
British Gas: £473.62
BT: £1,335.68
Canterbury Europe: £1,398,486.86
Carlsberg: £1,039.33
Concorde Club Hotel: £7,558.70 (That's a lot of pay-per-view porn)
Faith and Football: £1,998 (Linvoy Primus had something to do with this)
Fareham Shopping Centre: £310.50
Hampshire Flag Company: £917.81
House of Weddings: £270
Johnston Newspapers South: £20,062.59 (That's The Portsmouth News, so it's no surprise if there are a few sniffy stories about them in the paper)
King Edward VI School: £41,714.01
Kitbag: £129,407.75
Land Ladies Rent Account: £12,066.50 (Interestingly, the address given for this one is 'Portsmouth Football Club')
Ministry Of Defence (financial management): £626.92
nPower: £2,677.16
Pasta King: £1,296.35
Performing Rights Society: £19,438.83
Portsmouth FC Supporters Club: £300
Pukka Pies: £40
Priory Community Sports Centre: £11,000
Qatar Airways: £0.20
Richard Auger: £340,000 (The amount piqued our interest, so we did a quick Google search, and the first result that came up was for a massage therapist)
Ryde School: £318
Scout Association: £697
Southampton FC: £35,000
St John's Ambulance: £2,701.91
St John's College: £6,660

I really hope they do owe Qatar Airways 20p.

Butterfly Valley
Apr 19, 2007

Not in it for the money


irlZaphod posted:

This is what what sent around work, I don't know how much truth there is to it, but if it's genuine then it's hilarious.


I really hope they do owe Qatar Airways 20p.

The administrator's list of creditors is available online somewhere, it was linked here, so I've no doubt those are all true

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Your dribbling is a treat,
you nicked a toilet seat




Transatlantic Gulp posted:

The administrator's list of creditors is available online somewhere, it was linked here, so I've no doubt those are all true
Yeah I'm pretty sure that's where it was pasted from originally and sent around.

Mickolution
Oct 1, 2005

I missed the 14-18 war
But not the sorrow afterwards

Transatlantic Gulp posted:

how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million

Harry Redknapp.

Butterfly Valley
Apr 19, 2007

Not in it for the money


Mickolution posted:

Harry Redknapp.

Yeah I was waiting for someone to say that

Bit disappointed the first reply wasn't a giant picture of his face tbh

partipo
Sep 24, 2005
participaction?

irlZaphod posted:

British Gas: £473.62
BT: £1,335.68
nPower: £2,677.16

Have Pompey seriously not been paying their gas and phone bill?

I also like that they somehow owe £40 in pies.

edit: they're like a uni student with their first credit card. an inexplicable amount of stupid little charges that add up.

Bea Nanner
Oct 20, 2003

Zut alors!


HinderedUseless posted:

PDF for Pompey's Administration findings:

http://www.uhy-uk.com/media/news/PF...20Adobe%207.pdf

Supposedly it goes so far as to show that Pompey owes £40 to Pukka Pies and 20p to Qatar Airways, but I only thumbed through it.

w00bi
Dec 11, 2004

E-...ehhh!?

There's no way... something like that is a bit..!

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...england&cc=5901

quote:

Bick told Soccernet: "I fear that, looking at the figures, Liverpool are in grave danger of not being able to continue to pay their interest bill for very much longer. Based on the existing figures, the interest repayments on the loans are £36 million a year.

"It's not clear when the cash from this season's Champions League comes in, but it is clear there is going to be a big hole for not being in it next season. The starting point is £20 million, maybe as much as £40 million, maybe even more.

"The city is aware that Liverpool will be posting a £35 million operating profit to July 31, but from what I can see the club will be running out of cash by the end of the year.
...
Bick argues that Liverpool's real value is £300 million rather than the £800 million Tom Hicks and George Gillett have been asking. Bick added: "I would say the true value of Liverpool is £300 million, no more than £350 million, and to suggest £800 million is ludicrous.

"But even if there is a buyer willing to pay £300 million, it would be pointless unless they had the funds for a new stadium, otherwise it just won't work."

I guess it's becoming even more clear why Rafa is so hesitant at staying.

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007


Winner, Best Scale Model Painter on SA, 2013


Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club.

TyChan
Dec 21, 2004

Chicks dig me because
I rarely wear underwear.
And when I do, it's usually
something unusual.


w00bi posted:

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...england&cc=5901


I guess it's becoming even more clear why Rafa is so hesitant at staying.

Thanks for digging that up, w00bi. I lost track of that article after initially reading it.

It's rather distressing that no one is in a position of strength right now to force Hicks & Gillett out. The debts are so large and the effort of taking over a club is so enormous and specialized that it will take forever for any lender to call the a halt to the extensions and demand full-on payment in a way that will force those two guys out. Everytime it looks like they could not keep the proverbial house of cards from collapsing, the practical difficulties of collecting on the debt and the magnitude of it gives them a lifeline.

I can sort of see where they're coming from in that they probably believe that the economy will eventually pick back up and that they will be able to sell the club for a high price, but everything they have done to contribute to enhancing the club is effectively going out the window the longer they stay on. Unless they can get more investment, the value of the club is going to go down and not up.

Bhyo posted:

Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club.

Well, it's apparently going to take quite a humongous financial catastrophe to force them to change their valuation.

TyChan fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 20:18

randomdumbnick
Mar 1, 2005
i registered to lurk. you shouldn't be seeing this.

Daniel Taylor/Guardian posted:

Glazer family reject secret £1.5bn offer for control of Manchester United

Glazers planning to stay in control for another 10 years

A secretive Middle East consortium has bid £1.5bn for Manchester United only to be firmly rejected by the club's owners, the Glazer family, it emerged last night.

According to information passed to the Guardian this was one of several covert offers which have been made for the club, all valuing United at more than £1bn and all of them rebuffed.

The offer from the Middle East that valued the club at £1.5bn was made towards the end of last year. It was flatly turned down and the bidders were discouraged from returning with a second offer, despite being willing to pay significantly more than United's £1.19bn valuation in the Forbes football rich-list.

Which means the "Red Knights" will fail, as was always likely, if this is the case. They won't come anywhere close to £1.5bn.

randomdumbnick fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 21:57

TyChan
Dec 21, 2004

Chicks dig me because
I rarely wear underwear.
And when I do, it's usually
something unusual.


randomdumbnick posted:

Which means the "Red Knights" will fail, as was always likely, if this is the case.

Would they like to buy a club that also wears red, but is on Merseyside?

w00bi
Dec 11, 2004

E-...ehhh!?

There's no way... something like that is a bit..!

So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?

Loving Africa Chaps
Dec 3, 2007

We had not left it yet, but when I would wake in the night, I would lie, listening, homesick for it already.


w00bi posted:

So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?

Dear Sergio
Sep 7, 2008

We are a couple, not a duo


w00bi posted:

So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?

more money

e: well beaten.

w00bi
Dec 11, 2004

E-...ehhh!?

There's no way... something like that is a bit..!

I guess you can never have enough when it comes to American business owners.

Rhgr
Sep 10, 2008

Ever present.


w00bi posted:

So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?

They like the prestiege and they can skim as much money as they need off the top.

ef;b

randomdumbnick
Mar 1, 2005
i registered to lurk. you shouldn't be seeing this.

w00bi posted:

So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?

To sit around in country clubs and tell other people they own a football club?

article posted:

They are described as enjoying the prestige of being associated with a winning team.

"It's like having the most beautiful house," according to one top-level source. "They could sell that house but why would they want to sell it if it were the most beautiful house around?"

They also hope to be at Old Trafford more next season. Avi Glazer has been a regular visitor but his brother Bryan has found it harder because his children are younger.

efb

Edit: Looks like Telegraph's Mark Ogden is also running with this. Both stories maybe most likely came from a tactical leak from the Glazers. Articles were posted at the same time and use the same quotes.

randomdumbnick fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 22:08

aellisr
Oct 11, 2007

Alveolar fibrosis don't give a damn.

Bhyo posted:

Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club.

Hicks and Gillett will push for the liquidation of the squad and then they will scramble off. Sure, the franchise will remain, but the team will be in absolute shreds. Those two never gave two shits about the club or the legacy, they saw it as a business venture and never anticipated the logistics of finishing as poorly as we have this year.

I will miss you Nando

EC10
Jan 16, 2005

We like E-boue-boue
We like E-boue-boue
We like E-boue-boue
We like E---BOUE!

w00bi posted:

I guess you can never have enough when it comes to American business owners.

their newly restructured debt situation (the 500m bond from a couple months ago) basically made it perfectly alright for them to siphon tens of millions a year out of the club and into their personal accounts. basically, they now own the most valued sports team in the world AND they and their grandchildren can use it as a piggy bank for as long as it continues to exist. why would they ever sell? it's a truly hosed situation, and if Utd hadn't won the title and made the final of the CL the last couple years, their fans would feel exactly the same way Liverpool fans do. or worse, since H+G would actually gently caress off for a billion.

EC10 fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 23:00

Nothus
Feb 22, 2001
Charmingly half-ass.

EC10 posted:

their newly restructured debt situation (the 500m bond from a couple months ago) basically made it perfectly alright for them to siphon tens of millions a year out of the club and into their personal accounts. basically, they now own the most valued sports team in the world AND they and their grandchildren can use it as a piggy bank for as long as it continues to exist. why would they ever sell? it's a truly hosed situation, and if Utd hadn't won the title and made the final of the CL the last couple years, their fans would feel exactly the same way Liverpool fans do. or worse, since H+G would actually gently caress off for a billion.

Congratulations. Liverpool are now run like a lovely American baseball team.

MoPZiG
Jun 6, 2006



partipo
Sep 24, 2005
participaction?

Bhyo posted:

Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club.

It's true. They've got too much worldwide prestige and history, and are so big a name that there will always be a crazy Saudi prince or a Russian oligarch willing to spend money to buy a Premiership team.

I mean, gently caress, somebody bought Fulham.

TyChan
Dec 21, 2004

Chicks dig me because
I rarely wear underwear.
And when I do, it's usually
something unusual.


partipo posted:

It's true. They've got too much worldwide prestige and history, and are so big a name that there will always be a crazy Saudi prince or a Russian oligarch willing to spend money to buy a Premiership team.

I mean, gently caress, somebody bought Fulham.

Al Fayed bought Fulham because he could get that team for a relative pittance (£30 million) and had a vision of bringing it to the Premiership with his wealth. That's a lot different from buying a club where the owner is looking to make up to £800 million.

MoPZiG posted:



YES!

TyChan fucked around with this message at May 7, 2010 around 03:40

duggimon
Oct 19, 2007

If I had a horse I'd buy it oats and fuck it


I'm sure there's plenty who'll say it's about time someone else had a go at success in the PL but I'm pretty disgusted at the Glazers, Man U just won't be able to compete at the top level until the debt is gone, we're papering over cracks already and it's going to get worse as long as those interest payments remain. They had the chance to double their money and get out and turned it down, they really are the most odious of cunts if they don't give a poo poo about the club or it's fans and aren't even there for the money (not that that's particularly desirable as a motive) but are simply in it for bragging rights.

They're going to gently caress us up worse than Liverpool if they hang around long enough and it's going to be horrible to watch, I'm seriously worried they start flogging our best players to cover interest payments so they can carry on taking tens of millions in dividends out of the club.

Dudley
Feb 24, 2003

Tasty

irlZaphod posted:

This is what what sent around work, I don't know how much truth there is to it, but if it's genuine then it's hilarious.


I really hope they do owe Qatar Airways 20p.

They do, Qatar's replay was superb, along the lines of "We're still trying to work out how that even happens but it's fair to say the airline won't go out of business"

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Your dribbling is a treat,
you nicked a toilet seat




I'd like to know what loving alternate universe Hicks is living in where Liverpool FC is worth 3 times as much as it was when he and Gillet invested in it.

Scott Bakula
Jul 24, 2007



irlZaphod posted:

I'd like to know what loving alternate universe Hicks is living in where Liverpool FC is worth 3 times as much as it was when he and Gillet invested in it.

The joys of being a rich morphine addict

EC10
Jan 16, 2005

We like E-boue-boue
We like E-boue-boue
We like E-boue-boue
We like E---BOUE!

duggimon posted:

I'm seriously worried they start flogging our best players to cover interest payments so they can carry on taking tens of millions in dividends out of the club.

i don't know how to break this to you but.....



seriously though, you're right and it's just terrible. the problem with the "they're too big to fail" argument in this case is that someone has already offered them over a billion and they still don't want it. it's ugly because it means they are fine with the club being in an unsustainable financial situation as long as they can keep making money off it. and as you said, having the best manager in history among other factors is just papering over the cracks. if they went a couple seasons in a row without CL football who knows how crippling the interest payments would be. if Liverpool fail to make the CL again next year I think Utd fans are going to get a very, very clear picture of how this situation could ruin a club.

EC10 fucked around with this message at May 7, 2010 around 17:32

Dudley
Feb 24, 2003

Tasty

Thing is, Man Utd ARE too big to fail, there will always be someone who'll buy them for market value because of who they are.

Problem is, the owners won't sell for market value and when they finally consider it, it may end up being a painful road back.

TyChan
Dec 21, 2004

Chicks dig me because
I rarely wear underwear.
And when I do, it's usually
something unusual.


Dudley posted:

Thing is, Man Utd ARE too big to fail, there will always be someone who'll buy them for market value because of who they are.

Problem is, the owners won't sell for market value and when they finally consider it, it may end up being a painful road back.

Well, what's market value?

At some point, the actual value of Man-U to a potential purchaser is going to be less than any inevitably owner-ordered appraisal. The debt will become too big of a liability, especially if results on the pitch suffer.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fiskiggy
Feb 15, 2005
It's swedish.

you never know when our idea of "always" turns out to be a bit optimistic

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
«149 »