|
Jose posted:Portsmouth's debt is now up to £138m. Its funny that its nearly double what they initially predicted. jesus that is rapidly approaching arsenals debt size and the players are getting FA cup bonuses.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 12:13 |
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 10:23 |
|
They players all agreed to forgo the FA cup bonuses from what I remember.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 12:14 |
|
Jose posted:They players all agreed to forgo the FA cup bonuses from what I remember. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/...cup-final-bonus maybe but they are still getting them
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 12:17 |
|
how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 13:19 |
|
Transatlantic Gulp posted:how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 13:28 |
|
irlZaphod posted:The list of people they owe money to is hilarious, if it's true. Just who do they owe what to?
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:04 |
|
partipo posted:Just who do they owe what to? everyone including the st.johns ambulance which pissed off the supporters so much they raised the money themselves (to cover any lost income, pompey still have to pay it as well).
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:13 |
|
They also owe money to some local pasta caterer.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:14 |
|
partipo posted:Just who do they owe what to? quote:108 Medical Ltd: £1 I really hope they do owe Qatar Airways 20p.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:23 |
|
irlZaphod posted:This is what what sent around work, I don't know how much truth there is to it, but if it's genuine then it's hilarious. The administrator's list of creditors is available online somewhere, it was linked here, so I've no doubt those are all true
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:26 |
|
Transatlantic Gulp posted:The administrator's list of creditors is available online somewhere, it was linked here, so I've no doubt those are all true
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:27 |
|
Transatlantic Gulp posted:how the gently caress did they manage to spend £138million Harry Redknapp.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:33 |
|
Mickolution posted:Harry Redknapp. Yeah I was waiting for someone to say that Bit disappointed the first reply wasn't a giant picture of his face tbh
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:35 |
|
irlZaphod posted:British Gas: £473.62 Have Pompey seriously not been paying their gas and phone bill? I also like that they somehow owe £40 in pies. edit: they're like a uni student with their first credit card. an inexplicable amount of stupid little charges that add up.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 14:37 |
|
HinderedUseless posted:PDF for Pompey's Administration findings:
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 19:32 |
|
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...england&cc=5901quote:Bick told Soccernet: "I fear that, looking at the figures, Liverpool are in grave danger of not being able to continue to pay their interest bill for very much longer. Based on the existing figures, the interest repayments on the loans are £36 million a year. I guess it's becoming even more clear why Rafa is so hesitant at staying.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 20:00 |
|
Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 20:12 |
|
w00bi posted:http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...england&cc=5901 Thanks for digging that up, w00bi. I lost track of that article after initially reading it. It's rather distressing that no one is in a position of strength right now to force Hicks & Gillett out. The debts are so large and the effort of taking over a club is so enormous and specialized that it will take forever for any lender to call the a halt to the extensions and demand full-on payment in a way that will force those two guys out. Everytime it looks like they could not keep the proverbial house of cards from collapsing, the practical difficulties of collecting on the debt and the magnitude of it gives them a lifeline. I can sort of see where they're coming from in that they probably believe that the economy will eventually pick back up and that they will be able to sell the club for a high price, but everything they have done to contribute to enhancing the club is effectively going out the window the longer they stay on. Unless they can get more investment, the value of the club is going to go down and not up. Bhyo posted:Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club. Well, it's apparently going to take quite a humongous financial catastrophe to force them to change their valuation. TyChan fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 20:18 |
| # ? May 6, 2010 20:13 |
|
Daniel Taylor/Guardian posted:Glazer family reject secret £1.5bn offer for control of Manchester United Which means the "Red Knights" will fail, as was always likely, if this is the case. They won't come anywhere close to £1.5bn. randomdumbnick fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 21:57 |
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:53 |
|
randomdumbnick posted:Which means the "Red Knights" will fail, as was always likely, if this is the case. Would they like to buy a club that also wears red, but is on Merseyside?
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:55 |
|
So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:55 |
|
w00bi posted:So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal?
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:58 |
|
w00bi posted:So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal? more money e: well beaten.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:58 |
|
I guess you can never have enough when it comes to American business owners.
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:59 |
|
w00bi posted:So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal? They like the prestiege and they can skim as much money as they need off the top. ef;b
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 21:59 |
|
w00bi posted:So Glazers had a chance to get out with money and they didn't take it? What exactly is their end goal? To sit around in country clubs and tell other people they own a football club? article posted:They are described as enjoying the prestige of being associated with a winning team. efb Edit: Looks like Telegraph's Mark Ogden is also running with this. Both stories randomdumbnick fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 22:08 |
| # ? May 6, 2010 22:00 |
|
Bhyo posted:Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club. Hicks and Gillett will push for the liquidation of the squad and then they will scramble off. Sure, the franchise will remain, but the team will be in absolute shreds. Those two never gave two shits about the club or the legacy, they saw it as a business venture and never anticipated the logistics of finishing as poorly as we have this year. I will miss you Nando ![]()
|
| # ? May 6, 2010 22:05 |
|
w00bi posted:I guess you can never have enough when it comes to American business owners. their newly restructured debt situation (the 500m bond from a couple months ago) basically made it perfectly alright for them to siphon tens of millions a year out of the club and into their personal accounts. basically, they now own the most valued sports team in the world AND they and their grandchildren can use it as a piggy bank for as long as it continues to exist. why would they ever sell? it's a truly hosed situation, and if Utd hadn't won the title and made the final of the CL the last couple years, their fans would feel exactly the same way Liverpool fans do. or worse, since H+G would actually gently caress off for a billion. EC10 fucked around with this message at May 6, 2010 around 23:00 |
| # ? May 6, 2010 22:57 |
|
EC10 posted:their newly restructured debt situation (the 500m bond from a couple months ago) basically made it perfectly alright for them to siphon tens of millions a year out of the club and into their personal accounts. basically, they now own the most valued sports team in the world AND they and their grandchildren can use it as a piggy bank for as long as it continues to exist. why would they ever sell? it's a truly hosed situation, and if Utd hadn't won the title and made the final of the CL the last couple years, their fans would feel exactly the same way Liverpool fans do. or worse, since H+G would actually gently caress off for a billion. Congratulations. Liverpool are now run like a lovely American baseball team.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 00:56 |
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 02:38 |
|
Bhyo posted:Liverpool will never go the way of portsmouth. I hate to use the phrase 'too big' but they are. There would be a list of buyers as long as my arm if Hicks and Gillete wanted a more reasonable amount for the club. It's true. They've got too much worldwide prestige and history, and are so big a name that there will always be a crazy Saudi prince or a Russian oligarch willing to spend money to buy a Premiership team. I mean, gently caress, somebody bought Fulham.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 03:34 |
|
partipo posted:It's true. They've got too much worldwide prestige and history, and are so big a name that there will always be a crazy Saudi prince or a Russian oligarch willing to spend money to buy a Premiership team. Al Fayed bought Fulham because he could get that team for a relative pittance (£30 million) and had a vision of bringing it to the Premiership with his wealth. That's a lot different from buying a club where the owner is looking to make up to £800 million. MoPZiG posted:YES! TyChan fucked around with this message at May 7, 2010 around 03:40 |
| # ? May 7, 2010 03:34 |
|
I'm sure there's plenty who'll say it's about time someone else had a go at success in the PL but I'm pretty disgusted at the Glazers, Man U just won't be able to compete at the top level until the debt is gone, we're papering over cracks already and it's going to get worse as long as those interest payments remain. They had the chance to double their money and get out and turned it down, they really are the most odious of cunts if they don't give a poo poo about the club or it's fans and aren't even there for the money (not that that's particularly desirable as a motive) but are simply in it for bragging rights. They're going to gently caress us up worse than Liverpool if they hang around long enough and it's going to be horrible to watch, I'm seriously worried they start flogging our best players to cover interest payments so they can carry on taking tens of millions in dividends out of the club.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 09:19 |
|
irlZaphod posted:This is what what sent around work, I don't know how much truth there is to it, but if it's genuine then it's hilarious. They do, Qatar's replay was superb, along the lines of "We're still trying to work out how that even happens but it's fair to say the airline won't go out of business"
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 09:23 |
|
I'd like to know what loving alternate universe Hicks is living in where Liverpool FC is worth 3 times as much as it was when he and Gillet invested in it.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 10:46 |
|
irlZaphod posted:I'd like to know what loving alternate universe Hicks is living in where Liverpool FC is worth 3 times as much as it was when he and Gillet invested in it. The joys of being a rich morphine addict
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 10:47 |
|
duggimon posted:I'm seriously worried they start flogging our best players to cover interest payments so they can carry on taking tens of millions in dividends out of the club. i don't know how to break this to you but..... seriously though, you're right and it's just terrible. the problem with the "they're too big to fail" argument in this case is that someone has already offered them over a billion and they still don't want it. it's ugly because it means they are fine with the club being in an unsustainable financial situation as long as they can keep making money off it. and as you said, having the best manager in history among other factors is just papering over the cracks. if they went a couple seasons in a row without CL football who knows how crippling the interest payments would be. if Liverpool fail to make the CL again next year I think Utd fans are going to get a very, very clear picture of how this situation could ruin a club. EC10 fucked around with this message at May 7, 2010 around 17:32 |
| # ? May 7, 2010 17:28 |
|
Thing is, Man Utd ARE too big to fail, there will always be someone who'll buy them for market value because of who they are. Problem is, the owners won't sell for market value and when they finally consider it, it may end up being a painful road back.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 22:23 |
|
Dudley posted:Thing is, Man Utd ARE too big to fail, there will always be someone who'll buy them for market value because of who they are. Well, what's market value? At some point, the actual value of Man-U to a potential purchaser is going to be less than any inevitably owner-ordered appraisal. The debt will become too big of a liability, especially if results on the pitch suffer.
|
| # ? May 7, 2010 22:57 |
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 10:23 |
|
you never know when our idea of "always" turns out to be a bit optimistic
|
| # ? May 8, 2010 00:20 |





















