|
Philippine boxer Manny Pacquiao made $32M for two fights in 2010.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2011 19:15 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 16:31 |
|
Scikar posted:City pay the council £2m/year for the naming rights that they sell for £35m/year to Etihad quote:for an estimated £35m per year, which includes naming rights to the stadium, the proposed 80-acre training "campus" alongside it, and City's shirts.
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2011 16:20 |
|
ibroxmassive posted:Isn't Tevez the only Kia product left at City? I doubt he'll be invited back De jong too I believe.
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2011 11:48 |
|
Jose posted:What is it about Portsmouth that gets all of these terrible owners. Why do they never try some other club? Venkys
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2012 14:57 |
|
Mickolution posted:According to this site (not sure how accurate it is, but should be in the right area), it's £607.5m with £160m coming in. Chelsea paid £21m for SWP alone though. They essentially paid £12m to loan him for 3 years and also paid all his salary.
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2012 14:57 |
|
Loving Africa Chaps posted:free agents can join any time What's that got to do with selling players?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 16:46 |
|
Pissflops posted:But like I said earlier, that gives specific benefits to the clubs buying the players that other clubs do not have. It's not like only a few clubs are given permission to buy the players in question. Maybe they should gain an advantage if they're willing to put forward the best offer?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 17:17 |
|
Pissflops posted:There's only a limited number of players for sale - it would be impossible for every club to benefit equally even if they all could and wanted to. Well either they get released on free's and whichever team can offer them the highest wages gets them, or they get sold and whichever team can offer the highest transfer fee/wages gets them. What's the difference, or what other alternative is there if the players have to go because they wont agree to lower wages?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 17:24 |
|
Pissflops posted:What's the difference between doing this and not you mean? If their contract is terminated doesn't that mean that other clubs can sign them on a free transfer?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 17:34 |
|
Why not? What's the difference (in terms of signing for other clubs) between being released on a free and having your contract terminated? Rangers surely can't keep their registrations?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 17:38 |
|
Quanta posted:Haha, so in which century do we reckon Man City will break even after the biggest financial loss in the history of football? I don't know if you heard but they won the title, have an excellent squad, so they're done with spending money. Except for Hazard. And van Persie. And then Wilshere next season when he plays 30+ games and carries Arsenal to another top 4 trophy.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2012 16:30 |
|
Pissflaps posted:This seems like a pretty major development for Rangers. I hope that they stay in the SPL just to see everyone cry about the injustice
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2012 12:24 |
|
Akileese posted:Aren't Plymouth Argyle in very big trouble financially or has that since passed? If you had a choice between liquidation or Ken Bates what do you choose (I'm pretty sure I know the answer)? Combine the two and liquefy Ken Bates
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2013 04:37 |
|
Manchester City's owners have bought Melbourne Heart.BBC posted:Melbourne Heart taken over by Manchester City-led consortium Source
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2014 02:04 |
|
Hashtag Banterzone posted:It's funny because Chelsea are in "trouble" with FFP because the first 2 years they were good and then the 3rd year they had a loss. If they just would've spent a ton of money those first two years they could get a pass like City since the losses would be decreasing. Maybe they should have thought of that two years ago
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2014 17:55 |
|
oh em gee bee ess posted:Ugh. The worst possible pizza. Maybe it's different over there but Papa Johns is better than Pizza Hut and Dominoes by far. Not to say it's great, just... it's far from the worst possible.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2014 17:46 |
|
oh em gee bee ess posted:Pizza Hut is some good poo poo imo, Papa Johns is poo poo. Dominoes is take it or leave it though I pity the fool who thinks that Little Caesar's is good pizza. I guess it is just different over there (or we just have different tastes) but Papa Johns is better than any of the other three no matter what for me.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2014 17:53 |
|
Ninpo posted:People 2009-2013: Lol United are poo poo why don't they buy midfielders lol jeez This is like if a City supporter pointed out that City are 2nd and therefor would you please STOP referring to them as "Manchester lovely" and also stop with the "Joe Fart" thing too that's very mean. He probably doesn't even have a gastrointestinal problem.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2014 00:35 |
|
Mods change the topic from Portsmouth to QPR pleaseBBC posted:QPR 'challenge legality' of Football League FFP regulations http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/32699118
|
# ¿ May 11, 2015 22:03 |
|
julian assflange posted:One of the many great minor disappointments in life is getting hype for a Saturday of football then realising your team doesn't play until Sunday Or Monday
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2015 01:12 |
|
Blue Star Error posted:Everyone's favourite plucky little breath of fresh air Bournemouth have been fined £7.6m for breaking football league FFP rules. They had a £30m wage bill with £13m income lol I love it, "You don't have enough money to pay your players their wages based on your income, so we're taking more money away from you"
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 21:19 |
|
Blue Star Error posted:Well they have enough money now, because they got promoted by cheating while morally upstanding law abiding clubs such as Leeds languish in the championship Oh well in that case I don't see the problem.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 21:24 |
|
Shrapnig posted:That's like being the smartest kid at the Special Olympics. Well, you wouldn't.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 00:49 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 16:31 |
|
trem_two posted:Wengy's finally going to get a real war chest But first they need to make a small transfer of a £13 million profit?
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2016 03:22 |