|
What kind of pleading is this anyway? False Claims? Civil RICO? Yeah, don't submit that. The major redactions necessary would make it useless as a writing sample and you risk sanctions or pissing off the judge that sealed it. You don't have a brief or an opinion letter you can use?
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:51 |
|
|
nm posted:is it 2002? I do do carpentry in rugby shorts and a tank top, so maybe
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:5 rep 300# back squat today, 'sup
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Elotana posted:Like every fat guy who has ever started living can do this within a week or two FYI followed by 60 95# bulgarian split squats, 60 115# romanian deadlifts, 60 30kg kb swings, 800m run
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:followed by 60 95# bulgarian split squats, 60 115# romanian deadlifts, 60 30kg kb swings, 800m run yeah bruh then I slept like 30 minutes in my bar admission because I'm smart AND strong!! #flex #healthy #strong #fast #smart #cringe #liftweights #crossfit #dickinassandmouth #whocares #humblebrag #patheticachievements
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 22:23
|
|
|
kb swings jesus christ. do you have special yoga pants for that
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:followed by 60 95# bulgarian split squats, 60 115# romanian deadlifts, 60 30kg kb swings, 800m run
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
I never pictured eastern Europe as a hotbed of crossfit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
Look Sir Droids posted:What kind of pleading is this anyway? False Claims? Civil RICO? Yeah, don't submit that. The major redactions necessary would make it useless as a writing sample and you risk sanctions or pissing off the judge that sealed it. PI. And no, not really. The other suits I've filed have been produced with other, more senior, attorneys. The rest of my writing tends to be really short/simple stuff.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
sov cit getting arrested. <3 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=add_1438121829
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
nm posted:You got dong issues bro? I wish
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
I can't stop myself from reading "sov cit" as an abbreviation for "Soviet citizen."
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
I love how she talks about how she doesn't have to follow the laws, but as soon as he throws the cuffs on her she's going to sue him
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:followed by 60 95# bulgarian split squats, 60 115# romanian deadlifts, 60 30kg kb swings, 800m run jesus christ I can smell the axe body spray from here.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:jesus christ I can smell the axe body spray from here. hahaha i work from home so I go to the gym at 9 and sometimes don't shower until like 5 because I've Gotta Post
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:sov cit getting arrested. <3 Thats wonderful. I love how Act 3 culminates in her being dragged off, and the camera left recording the ground, undisturbed, like a found-footage movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:sov cit getting arrested. <3 i bet her shirt had a gold fringe
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
I'm reading cited cases from OC's proposed jury charges right now. At 9:00pm on a Saturday night. Go to law school.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:sov cit getting arrested. <3 "Cop illegally arrests girl and cuts her purse off of her." Hahahaha. The comments are equally tragic. They are all sure she is a liberal. Oh people, so amusing from a distance.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
Deceptive Thinker posted:I love how she talks about how she doesn't have to follow the laws, but as soon as he throws the cuffs on her she's going to sue him She's going to use the real, legitimate court on her militia compound, presumably.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:sov cit getting arrested. <3 It is kinda interesting because there are a whole bunch of sov cits who believe the sheriff is the only real legitimate law enforcement. CHP and police they'll run their mouths on and on. Sheriff shows up and "yes sir!" I think they watched too much old english poo poo with the sheriff of whatever the gently caress shire. Also he created joiner of her face and the ground.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 08:38
|
|
|
I think my favorite part is when he is going to take the purse off and she says he can handcuff her with it on. So he does and then he cuts the purse off.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
I love the fact that people record this stuff, it's so great. And I really love it when the cops engage with them, though it's just as funny as when they don't engage and just bust out the taser.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I love the fact that people record this stuff, it's so great. And I really love it when the cops engage with them, though it's just as funny as when they don't engage and just bust out the taser. P. Barnes had been putting up with that guys bullshit all morning from the loving metal detector on. They had to clear out the courtroom because this jackass in bluejeans and vibrams refused to turn off his camera and to stop filming other people's traffic court poo poo. P. Barnes had an incredible amount of patience.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
P. Barnes is truly my hero
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I love the fact that people record this stuff, it's so great. And I really love it when the cops engage with them, though it's just as funny as when they don't engage and just bust out the taser. I am opposed to police excessive force, except against sov cits (though this wasn't excessive force).
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
The secret that most people in favour of body cameras don't realize - in like 95%+ of cases, they'll show both: a) that the cops haven't done anything wrong b) that the accused is guilty as gently caress and an rear end in a top hat too
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
A world in which all cops wear body cameras is a world where resist arrest / assault peace officer trials are literally just the prosecutor turning on the video and sitting back while an hour of "ARE YOU DETAINING ME? AM I DETAINED? I'M NOT loving DRUNK I'M GOING TO loving KILL YOU WHEN I GET OUT WHY AM I ARRESTED WHY ARE YOU PEPPER SPRAYING ME gently caress YOU I'VE ONLY HAD TWO YOU CAN'T ARREST ME I HAVE RIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTS" plays
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:The secret that most people in favour of body cameras don't realize - in like 95%+ of cases, they'll show both: Yes but the good cops aren't the ones who need protecting you see.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:The secret that most cops against body cameras don't realize - in like 95%+ of cases, they'll show both: As a PD, I would have loving loved everyone to have a camera. When there was video, guilty or innocent, we generally knew. Show a bad video to a client, plea. Show a good video to the DA, dismiss. Especially on the bullshit misdemeanor and light felony calendars, the case loads would loving plummet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:The secret that most people in favour of body cameras don't realize - in like 95%+ of cases, they'll show both: Might be useful in those other 5% of the time, especially if the police bring down the blue curtain on finding out what actually happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
My only concern with body cams is the chilling effect it would have on witnesses. I do mostly gang related and we have a hard enough time getting statements from people we promise not to identify by name in the report and because snitches get stitches is actually a thing here if you don't get the statement at the scene you aren't getting it. But I think that's easily solved by "patrol and first responders use cams, detectives don't."
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 14:11
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:A world in which all cops wear body cameras is a world where resist arrest / assault peace officer trials are literally just the prosecutor turning on the video and sitting back while an hour of "ARE YOU DETAINING ME? AM I DETAINED? I'M NOT loving DRUNK I'M GOING TO loving KILL YOU WHEN I GET OUT WHY AM I ARRESTED WHY ARE YOU PEPPER SPRAYING ME gently caress YOU I'VE ONLY HAD TWO YOU CAN'T ARREST ME I HAVE RIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTS" plays I had an impaired driving trial where the RCMP cruiser dashcam captured the entire interaction (including the audio) between the officer and the accused. It was extremely simple, going from: traffic stop > reasonable suspicion from odour of alcohol on his breath (captured on camera when the officer makes the initial remark about smelling it) > ASD demand > ASD fail > breathalyser > over 0.08 result Instead of starting off by putting the video in through the officer on the voir dire to establish reasonable suspicion the Crown had the officer testify without it. After the officer screwed up his testimony they tried to play the video. Trial Judge found there was no reasonable suspicion and excluded the evidence 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 14:46
|
|
|
Stories like this are why in the cop thread I was always willing to believe a prosecutor was inept rather than corrupt. There are some really dumb prosecutors out there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 15:00
|
|
|
Man I wish the Daley center had working air conditioning. It's only 73 in Chicago but gently caress this is sweltering
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
Impaireds are clowny
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 15:33
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:Stories like this are why in the cop thread I was always willing to believe a prosecutor was inept rather than corrupt. There are some really dumb prosecutors out there. I had another case where the client was charged with breaching multiple conditions of his recognizance (contact & curfew breach). Prior to the trial the Crown asked if I would agree to an officer's notes/narrative going in because the officer wasn't available to testify on the date set for the trial. The officer's evidence was that they took a statement from the complainant (who was also under subpoena), and received a report from another unit who did a curfew check. I suspected that the Crown didn't realize it was a different set of officers who did the curfew check, so rather than fighting about an adjournment I agreed to the notes/narrative going in minus the hearsay. Day of trial and the complainant doesn't show up (as was expected since she didn't show up for the earlier assault trials). The Crown didn't subpoena the officers that actually did the curfew check and proceeded by tendering the absent officer's evidence despite my gentle suggestion that they stay the charge. Needless to say I was ok with billing Legal Aid for a 10 minute "trial" instead of a stay of proceedings. terrorist ambulance posted:Impaireds are clowny
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 15:40
|
|
|
Zarkov Cortez posted:I'd agree that screw ups are more likely due to the prosecutor being inept/lazy vs corrupt. That's just a complete comedy of errors. If you, as a Crown, can't successfully prosecute _curfew_ breaches I think the problem is not with the system. Impaireds however are finicky as hell. It is a very sensible and valid defence strategy to take them all to trial just to see what falls apart.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
More like the Crown had 6 trials scheduled that day and didn't bother looking at the curfew breach that hard because there's a 99% chance it'll get plead out on the day of anyways
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:51 |
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Jul 11, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2015 19:16
|
|
