Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«134 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


Any opinion on FreeFalcon?

Looks decent, plenty of flyable planes etc...

Seems buggy though. Seems to crash more often than not, especially if you try to fly anything not an F16.

Is it worth muddling through to get it going?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dogmaan
Sep 13, 2007


Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Any opinion on FreeFalcon?

Looks decent, plenty of flyable planes etc...

Seems buggy though. Seems to crash more often than not, especially if you try to fly anything not an F16.

Is it worth muddling through to get it going?

FreeFalcon is too unstable, Falcon BMS is the newest, and probably the most stable Falcon.

Although BMS doesn't have as many different cockpits as FreeFalcon, the graphics are much better due to them updating the engine to use shaders.

http://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/

The Ferret King
Nov 23, 2003

cluck cluck

I debated the relevance of sharing this here, but I think it's a really well done document regarding VFR ATC services in the U.S. For those newer guys who are just starting to fly with us on VATSIM, it covers a lot of pertinent information and it's just really well put together. It provides a lot of good information for even more experienced pilots as well.

Download here: http://db.tt/xPGsFpFd

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


dogmaan posted:

FreeFalcon is too unstable, Falcon BMS is the newest, and probably the most stable Falcon.

Although BMS doesn't have as many different cockpits as FreeFalcon, the graphics are much better due to them updating the engine to use shaders.

http://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/

Was the Falcon 4.0 engine released as open source or something? Or did FreeFalcon actually like, just recreate it from scratch? Or did they just rip the engine without asking? BMS says it needs the original F4.0 (like actual original, not even that Allied Force re-release will work) which makes sense, but FF needs nothing...

Kilonum
Sep 30, 2002

After that, it's all a bit...........fuzzy...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsopafTipDA

Fredrik1
Jan 22, 2005

Gopherslayer


Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Was the Falcon 4.0 engine released as open source or something? Or did FreeFalcon actually like, just recreate it from scratch? Or did they just rip the engine without asking? BMS says it needs the original F4.0 (like actual original, not even that Allied Force re-release will work) which makes sense, but FF needs nothing...

From what I have understood the Falcon 4.0 code was leaked and various modding groups began to make their own versions of it.

The Free falcon guys claim they've at some point got some kind of permission to use the source code making them the only "legal" version. Myself I'd think they are in just as much trouble as the BMS guys if Atari decides to act on it but I really have no idea.

holocaust bloopers
Dec 30, 2010

How yah like me now?!!?

All the A2A P-51 video did was make me buy the DCS Mustang instead.

Edit: Bought the A2A one. Oh god so good.

holocaust bloopers fucked around with this message at Jun 3, 2012 around 07:05

Fredrik1
Jan 22, 2005

Gopherslayer


I made this back in a day when someone in the dcs boards asked how to complete one of the devils cross missions in dcs a10.

Then I never finished it, but at least I'll post the video I took so here is some a10s shooting at stuff which is always fun.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thrg_oW9H2Y

Komoxdos
May 29, 2012


FreeFalcon is so unstable it doesn't work half the time I open it, giving me a weird blue screen and crashing. The other half of the time, it waits till I try starting to play to do that!

Aero737
Apr 30, 2006


I want to have a China flight on VATSIM tonight.

00:30z

ZUUU CZH B213 LXA ZULS

Charts: http://db.tt/uiJlY6oC

ZULS is Lhasa Tibet and is at almost 12000 feet in a valley surrounded by 16000 foot mountain peaks.

Megadyptes
Oct 7, 2009

Yeah... If you hit them hard their heads bleed all over the ice and their legs convulse.


I finally sunk the bastard myself a couple of nights ago in the North Atlantic campaign. That mission was pretty awesome, there must've been at least 50 planes in the air heading towards the Sowjet carrier group. Hit it with a couple of Shrikes and then finished it off with a few bombs whilst dodging SAMs. Felt pretty awesome. I still managed to lose the loving campaign, however.

Colonial Air Force
May 22, 2002

Bombing Redcoats since 1775.


Aero737 posted:

I want to have a China flight on VATSIM tonight.

00:30z

ZUUU CZH B213 LXA ZULS

Charts: http://db.tt/uiJlY6oC

ZULS is Lhasa Tibet and is at almost 12000 feet in a valley surrounded by 16000 foot mountain peaks.

Jets?

Police Automaton
Mar 17, 2009


I grabbed an SSD drive and am planning to get back into this. Is FSX still the go-to simulator for everything? How's XPlane coming along? I'm not really up-to-date on most developments, is REX still the go-to replacement? Also has anyone experience with getting some useful AA with the SMAA or FXAA injector? I remember any form of traditional AA cutting the performance basically in half back in the day, no matter what video card was used. Time to dust off the ol' x52 pro and hope it's still working.

Police Automaton fucked around with this message at Jun 5, 2012 around 20:22

SwimNurd
Oct 28, 2007

mememememe


Police Automaton posted:

I grabbed an SSD drive and am planning to get back into this. Is FSX still the go-to simulator for everything? How's XPlane coming along? I'm not really up-to-date on most developments, is REX still the go-to replacement? Also has anyone experience with getting some useful AA with the SMAA or FXAA injector? I remember any form of traditional AA cutting the performance basically in half back in the day, no matter what video card was used. Time to dust off the ol' x52 pro and hope it's still working.

OK, FSX is still the way to go. XPlane 10 has a lot of issues to be resolved. If you are going to buy any non aircraft addons just pick up active sky 2012, as it for the most part has replaced rex for cloud images (and weather). There is a new version of REX that just came out, but as always the weather engine sucks.

If you have an nvidia card you can use inspector to force your graphics card to handle it. I urge you to join us on irc we can help you get all set up.

holocaust bloopers
Dec 30, 2010

How yah like me now?!!?

Picked up X-plane 10 for 50 bucks. Is it perfectly competent at simulating insane landings in all sorts of heinous conditions at the very least or that broken?

Jazzahn
Jul 3, 2007

Did you just say awesome?

No its not that great at weather. For good weather sim, get FSX and Active Sky 2012.

SybilVimes
Oct 29, 2011


Jazzahn posted:

No its not that great at weather. For good weather sim, get FSX and Active Sky 2012.

And if you want a reason to buy AS2012 over REX, remember REX doesn't (afaik) simulate wake turbulence at all.

I was just flying a IF & FSCaptain mission flight, and saw a CRJ700 drop into the glide slope a couple of nm in front of me, figured since I was in a prop that I'd be slower than him and be ok on seperation by the time I got to the runway. But no, he managed to slow down faster than me, and as I reached my minimums he was turning off the runway to taxi. So I figured I'd go in anyway.

Boy that level 4 wake turbulence hit hard just as I was touching down! Coupled with the 20kt winds that northern france is having atm, it ended up with an -11fpm touchdown vertical speed.

All in all, !fun! provided by accurate weather and wind effects.

The Ferret King
Nov 23, 2003

cluck cluck

Funny thing, I actually disabled the wake turbulence entirely. I was getting sick of being nearly flipped over when following a light twin in my SF260, or being 5 miles in trail of a 737 when I was in a Citation.

Hadlock
Nov 9, 2004

Welcome to the Jungle


Colonial Air Force posted:

PMDG's NGX for FSX. Hands down.

So uh, will this run on an i5/4GB ram with HD4000 at all? PMDG's website lists an 8800GT as the bare minimum, which is very roughly equivilent. Also any comments on FSX on an HD4000 (or, I guess HD3000 since those are much more common right now). Resolution is a measly 1377x768 because laptops ship with poo poo resolution these days.

I have a lot of down time at work and I want to try out DFW->Houston->San Antonio->Austin->DFW in a Southwest Airlines livery 737, but I dunno if my "bleeding edge" laptop is going to be able to handle it even at low settings.

SwimNurd
Oct 28, 2007

mememememe


The NGX will run fine. FSX is more bound by your single core cpu clock speed and if you have an i5 you are fine.

sellouts
Apr 23, 2003



If someone joined #flightsim just a minute ago and asked about addons, we usually aren't that snippy. It was an isolated person. Come back and we'll get ya set up!!!

Hadlock posted:

I have a lot of down time at work and I want to try out DFW->Houston->San Antonio->Austin->DFW in a Southwest Airlines livery 737, but I dunno if my "bleeding edge" laptop is going to be able to handle it even at low settings.

It will vary on your setup, but my NGX HATES multiple/quick turns without a restart of FSX. It is really annoying. I would give it a try but just so you don't get on leg 2 and wonder what's going on if it crashes.

Handsome Ralph
Sep 3, 2004

Johnny Pussy?


I took the plunge and bought myself a HOTAS joystick setup.

What's a good flight sim, preferably combat oriented, for a beginner to get into?

El Hefe
Oct 31, 2006

my boys


Boondock Saint posted:

I took the plunge and bought myself a HOTAS joystick setup.

What's a good flight sim, preferably combat oriented, for a beginner to get into?

IL-1946 Sturmovik is both easy to learn and lots of fun, and it will make use of all your buttons and axis on your HOTAS.

Al!
Apr 2, 2010



El Hefe posted:

IL-1946 Sturmovik is both easy to learn and lots of fun, and it will make use of all your buttons and axis on your HOTAS.

If you do be sure to download the Straight from the Farm mission pack. It's what taught me, a casual player, the basic principles of flight that I use to blunder through most games.

Hadlock
Nov 9, 2004

Welcome to the Jungle


sellouts posted:

It will vary on your setup, but my NGX HATES multiple/quick turns without a restart of FSX. It is really annoying. I would give it a try but just so you don't get on leg 2 and wonder what's going on if it crashes.

Sorry, can you explain this in greater detail please? I was hoping to land at each of the airports, taxi, take off, etc. What do you mean it hates quick turns? Crashes?

holocaust bloopers
Dec 30, 2010

How yah like me now?!!?

sellouts posted:

If someone joined #flightsim just a minute ago and asked about addons, we usually aren't that snippy. It was an isolated person. Come back and we'll get ya set up!!!


It will vary on your setup, but my NGX HATES multiple/quick turns without a restart of FSX. It is really annoying. I would give it a try but just so you don't get on leg 2 and wonder what's going on if it crashes.

Are you accessing the menu bar while in-game? If so, it's probably the uiautomation.dll problem causing the crashes.

Handsome Ralph
Sep 3, 2004

Johnny Pussy?


Anyone know where I can find some control profiles for Il-2 sturmovik for a Thrustmaster T-Flight Hotas X Flight Stick? Google isn't helping much.

SwimNurd
Oct 28, 2007

mememememe


Hadlock posted:

Sorry, can you explain this in greater detail please? I was hoping to land at each of the airports, taxi, take off, etc. What do you mean it hates quick turns? Crashes?

I do not have the issue he describes I turn all the time without reloading.

sellouts
Apr 23, 2003



Hadlock posted:

Sorry, can you explain this in greater detail please? I was hoping to land at each of the airports, taxi, take off, etc. What do you mean it hates quick turns? Crashes?

It hates doing that, exactly. I don't think I mess with the menubar but maybe I did. I thought Swim said he had similar problems but GUESS NOT

SwimNurd
Oct 28, 2007

mememememe


sellouts posted:

It hates doing that, exactly. I don't think I mess with the menubar but maybe I did. I thought Swim said he had similar problems but GUESS NOT

Not if I follow the shutdown checklist.

holocaust bloopers
Dec 30, 2010

How yah like me now?!!?

The PMDG 737 is really tough to fly with dual engine fires. Also, taking off with a door open *does* drop O2 masks in the back after passing 10K.

ariagloris
Jan 9, 2010


Okay... I need this in my life..

http://youtu.be/AHlZYeFxKok

Holy poo poo, completely amazing.

LP97S
Apr 25, 2008


ariagloris posted:

Okay... I need this in my life..

http://youtu.be/AHlZYeFxKok

Holy poo poo, completely amazing.

It's pretty sad that the J35 sim flies more than the real F-35, but that does seem pretty cool.

Captain Scandinaiva
Mar 29, 2010

Insektsfarfar Fan Club
Ride hard, ride free


ariagloris posted:

Okay... I need this in my life..

http://youtu.be/AHlZYeFxKok

Holy poo poo, completely amazing.

Wow. I wonder whether the mirrors are separate screens or if they're actual mirrors and the large screen is 360*?

There's a J37 Viggen simulator not far from where I live, been meaning to check it out. Now I want to even more!

two_beer_bishes
Jun 27, 2004


sellouts posted:

It will vary on your setup, but my NGX HATES multiple/quick turns without a restart of FSX. It is really annoying. I would give it a try but just so you don't get on leg 2 and wonder what's going on if it crashes.

I had this problem too! It was to the point that I would restart FSX after every other leg, didn't matter if I touched the menubar or not. I had similar problems with the PMDG 747 and MD11 though. Even after a nice hardware upgrade the problem persisted. Restarting every two legs was an easy enough fix for me, wasn't worth putting the time into figuring out exactly what the problem was.

ariagloris
Jan 9, 2010


Captain Scandinaiva posted:

Wow. I wonder whether the mirrors are separate screens or if they're actual mirrors and the large screen is 360*?

There's a J37 Viggen simulator not far from where I live, been meaning to check it out. Now I want to even more!

I believe it's 360 - at some points you can see the rear of the cockpit. Gawd, the immersion factor must be immense.

JerikTelorian
Jan 18, 2007

That's right. I'm DOCTOR Light. P-H-D


I'm working on a bit of an electronics project, and I'd like to gather your opinions on this question:
  • Would you prefer to have trim wheels/axes with or without a center detent?
I've been thinking a lot about this and I'm not sure which I'd like. Having a center detent is certainly convenient but it does make it impossible to hit those small adjustments just adjacent to center. Lacking a center detent makes it slightly less convenient to center your axis.

simble
May 11, 2004

The $18 millon man.

Voting without because your trim changes with a lot of variables (such as airspeed) and is almost always different. The plane you're in will have a specific take off trim setting which probably won't be at the center position either.

SwimNurd
Oct 28, 2007

mememememe


simble posted:

Voting without because your trim changes with a lot of variables (such as airspeed) and is almost always different. The plane you're in will have a specific take off trim setting which probably won't be at the center position either.

No detents. But a stiff wheel is good, think like a cessna trim wheel.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Colonial Air Force
May 22, 2002

Bombing Redcoats since 1775.


No detents, although I like the one on my CH yoke that has a button press. I have that set for trim reset.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
«134 »