Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
  • Post
  • Reply
ufarn
May 30, 2009


I think they are all stupid, sorry to say. Your rhetorics are just what you describe in the first comic.

We don't know enough about this to write anything profound except to take a chill pill, and it shows.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:

On the mental health angle, it occurs to me that it might be a good place for bringing up UHC, and how if everybody had access to free mental help in the US, this sort of thing might be more easily curtailed. Just a thought... not sure how to connect the two topics succinctly, though.

In the meantime, how about this:



?
I like that one. It doesn't pass any judgment or champion a specific argument, but it seems very on point.

Maybe I'm just partial because I just finished Batman: The Animated Series.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


I've seen what I think is the best comic take on the whole Arizona brouhaha:

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:

Really? Bennett had a cartoon making the same basic point that I felt was much better.

Though the message is good, the above isn't a particularly elegant or clever visual, IMO.
His use of labels is awful, and he should do something more clever than that, but I like the general gist of it.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Delta-Wye posted:

Nobody understood Vincent van Gogh while he was alive, does that make his paintings of lesser quality or the fact he was doing them kind of silly? This is a legitimately good cartoon, and you always run the risk of being misinterpreted anytime you publish something.
That's a really bad analogy. Deep Hurting has some point he wants to make with a cartoon, whereas art can just exist without any particular interpretation in mind.

(Even though a lot of high school teachers have ruined people's appreciation for art by subscribing to some Cliff's Notes TRUE ANSWERS list.)

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Pope Guilty posted:

Deep Hurting also wants to be paid for it.
Well, in terms of recognition for his talent, DH also seems to have settled for something posthumous.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


foobardog posted:

While showing Freud here is probably the best for recognition of the idea of psychology, considering his general lack of modern respect beyond starting the whole thing might give a little bit of a mixed message.
The guy gave some of his patients cocaine (or a similar opium) as treatment. A lot of people would sympathize with Reagan in that comic.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:

Please name another psychiatrist who's immediately recognizable by the general public as such, on his appearance alone.

That Nick Anderson cartoon posted upthread has a caricature of Freud in it, albeit not a particularly good one.

Edit: I mean, really. Just do a GIS for "Psychiatrist" and look at how many results are patterned after Freud.

I like that people notice and appreciate the extra research and careful attention to detail I try to put in these things, but let's not get pedantic. I doubt anything ever suggested by Freud was worse than "gun down people you don't agree with."
The question is, as always, "Will the comic make the point it tries to?", and the answer to that is "No". The aforementioned comments are some of the many arguments for this.

Kaal's suggestions sounds better. Failing that, something inspired by Anger Management.

ufarn fucked around with this message at Jan 20, 2011 around 03:50

ufarn
May 30, 2009


There's also the redefinition of surprise sex going on by the GOP or this

ufarn
May 30, 2009


I like this one:

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Uh-oh, looks like someone did an amazing comic on Egypt before DH:



It's sooo bad.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Perestroika posted:

Yeah, it appears that it is pretty difficult to find a working visual metaphor for the situation in egypt. Let's see how Michael Ramirez did it, the man who already won the Pulitzer for editorial cartoons twice:


Click here for the full 640x445 image.


It is beyond me how DH still doesn't get hired.
Is that supposed to make sense?

I also noticed that The Economist has the consistently worst comic.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


A comic I liked - it even had speech bubbles that worked in its favour:

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:



I'm trying to comment with this idea on the thought that, if we tax corporations and relax regulations preventing them from harming consumers, the environment, and their employees, they'll leave the state/country for a different one where they won't be subject to those taxes/regulations.

Is the idea in too poor of taste for that comment to make up for it?
Can't you replace the "corporations" by giving the guy a suit and some dollar sign cuff links instead?

Or give him a tattoo with a metaphorical motive?

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Enjoy posted:

I admire your refined sensibilities
I don't share the "poor taste" sentiment, but it's not exactly new territory for TAHT.

It's up to DH to decide if it's worth going over again, but it's obviously been done before on the same site.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Nessus posted:

It's probably because domestic violence seems to be an apt metaphor for the relationship between the Union at large and multinational corporations. If the shoe fits, wear it.
The problem is that if the metaphor is apt enough, it becomes inane. Basically a dead metaphor.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


How do these people have jobs?!

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Is DH's site down because of the reddit traffic?

I'd imagine that it's a run-of-the-mill Wordpress blog with no caching. Sigh.

If DH or anyone else has access to the dashboard, follow this guide to set up the necessary caching, so the site can - finally - get some attention that won't ironically kill it.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


You could also scrap "Joker" and just write a "J".

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Slickdrac posted:

Depending on how serious he is, he'll bankrupt himself to stay in vogue
... again.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


I completely forgot about that cartoon. Great job and amazing drawing. Their expressions are so dead-on.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:

How about this:



Does anyone know what these urban obstacle courses/shooting ranges used in police cadet training are called? I couldn't come up with a query string for GIS that turned up any useful photoreference ("police firing range" just returns normal target ranges rather than the ones where you have to avoid shooting civilian dummies).
I like the concept, but using a police officer is all kinds of wrong. I know it's in the sense of "world policing", but I think it's obvious why American police officers shouldn't be used here.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Kloaked00 posted:

The question though is, who would fit best as the shooter? I don't think a soldier would be a good choice because it's not their fault they're over int he middle east fighting. Uncle Sam, maybe, but I don't feel he would fit e scene very well.

I think the cop works. Maybe make him a more stylized cop, with a the USA name badge a little exaggerated, and the precinct badge a American flag background with "#1" as the precinct number.
A world police could work if DH uses a particular person in the suit. But to use a general police officer is stupid.

An eagle *might* work, but it takes some good drawing not to make it cheesy.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:



I think this might be a good idea, provided the irony isn't lost on too many people.


It's a cop because police cadets are the kind of people popularly associated with that type of shooting range.


I agree with this sentiment. Not being able to outdo myself is what makes this difficult sometimes.
Make the Statue look beside herself with joy, and you'll also address people's somewhat extreme reaction to the news.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Nothing unintelligible about that comic.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Grundulum posted:

How so?
Munroe doesn't adhere to the usual method of timing and punchline.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


I don't get the point and merit of the comic on any level.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


superjew posted:

Smoking a cigar to celebrate a baby is an old tradition, the cigar (baby) blew up in his face.
Thanks for clarifying that part, but I (still) just don't see why it's relevant to the comic.

It's personal, not political.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Dominion posted:

People make political cartoons about politician's sex scandals all the time.
I know how the American culture often is, but "everyone does it" was not a valid excuse, when people used Napster, and it's not a valid excuse now.

Jon Stewart and Colbert also cracked jokes about it, but I don't see the fun in making a public mockery of someone who's a woman's ex-husband and his children's father.

I'm sure the American school system works well enough to prevent his children from being bullied in school, though.

ufarn
May 30, 2009


Deep Hurting posted:

It's not a comic. It's just a caricature that didn't turn out,

I have a real cartoon I'm working on which I'll probably have done in a day or two.
Fair enough.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ufarn
May 30, 2009


AwkwardKnob posted:

DH, I really really hate corporations and I really, really love this cartoon. Thanks a million, ba-zing!

fake edit: thanks a trillion?
This should almost result in a Social Network spoof with The Koch Brothers or someone else sitting at a table with Scott Walker or someone similar, and either party says

quote:

A billion dollars isn’t cool. You know what’s cool? A TRILLION dollars.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply