|
roadhead posted:I'm pretty sure the average person can count on one hand the number of times they've completely pegged their CPU in the last week. Yes its the thing everyone thinks they need, but raw CPU performance is "good enough" on any modern processor in my opinion.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2012 21:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 18, 2024 23:41 |
|
^^ Wanted to post this.lil sartre posted:Yea, I'm gonna see a difference between 190 and 230 fps. My eyes are augmented. That's because they are average FPS numbers over a longer benchmark period of time, most the time of which the numbers are GPU-limited in the first place. It's when there's really stuff happening on screen, new models and actors created and uploaded to GPU, new bits of map loaded, that's when weaker CPU will lag and stutter while a fast CPU will blaze through with a constant framerate. You can stare at a wall in any game on any system and get great FPS, but that's not a great indicator of the smoothness of actual gameplay.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2013 16:02 |
|
[wrong thread]
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2016 19:01 |
|
FuturePastNow posted:Getting slightly faster RAM is the weakest performance upgrade ever. Why even worry about it? Can confirm a noticeable performance gain in that game when overclocking my DDR3 sticks from 1333 to 1866 MHz
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2017 14:19 |