|
I want to know what the thought process is behind ipad knockoffs because right now it seems like "hmm if we make a lovely device that superficially resembles an ipad, but $100 less, maybe we can trick people into buying it" tried out a Samsung tablet at fry's the other day, it was running some lovely two-year-old version of android with a bunch of "value-added" skins. it looked like they'd just grabbed a chinese knockoff case, shoved their shitware onto it, and shipped
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 22:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 05:31 |
|
Don Lapre posted:Galaxy tab runs 2.2. Two year old version of android would be 1.1. whatever, it's still a piece of poo poo I'm waiting for the toshiba tablet, which seems to be designed by not-morons, but they still have a few months to make it awful/expensive like their idiotic folio 100
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 22:47 |
|
what is this posted:There's really no compelling narrative behind these android tablets at all. The iPad is thinner than many of them, has a bigger and/or better screen, gets better battery life, has apps and a UI designed for the tablet form factor, and doesn't cost more. the clonemakers are getting swept up in apple's own hype, then getting all confused when nobody cares about a $500 angry birds screen upgrade
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:05 |
|
what is this posted:Yes on the second part, but you're an idiot on the first part. iPad is awesome and is selling really well. People love them. Also you can use a bluetooth keyboard just fine with an iPad, though once you're writing a lot of stuff it makes more sense to use a laptop or desktop. Despite this, when I asked what advantages his $850 iPad has over a Kindle + legal pad, he just kind of looked at me, then did the slide-animation on the home screen a few times. Face it: iPad is the new Blackberry. Remember when everyone wanted one of those? Every businessman worth his BMW needed one. Now, blackberries are passe, and the ipad is now hip. Give it three years, and everyone will have moved on to something else.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:17 |
|
got dat wmd posted:Can someone please explain why android devices ship with old versions of the software? I've never heard of this anywhere
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:24 |
|
what is this posted:http://ipod.about.com/od/ipadmodelsandterms/f/ipad-sales-to-date.htm Name one thing a tablet form factor gets you? Especially considering its numerous negatives: 1. no keyboard = no typing more than a paragraph 2. compact and small = very hot 3. fragile, exposed screen = have to buy a separate protective case, bag, etc 4. hideously expensive
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:27 |
|
got dat wmd posted:so android is basically so poo poo that even oems need to hack the roms when left alone, android is pretty decent. all of the best android devices run pure android, with few/no modifications. but lots of vendors want to add their own "special sauce", so they spend lots of money on skins and less-useful versions of built-in apps. not to mention adding restrictions, like preventing customers from loading their own ringtones. all that breaking costs money. eventually you end up with a device running android as a kernel, with a horrid in-house UI that has no graphical acceleration, half the features of the equivalent ipad/pod/phone, and a lot of bundled adware it's analogous to buying windows computers a decade ago, where you could walk into a store and pay $50 for a system with bonzai buddy, aol, weatherbug, etc pre-installed.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:31 |
|
Glumwheels posted:What was google thinking getting into a partnership with device manufacturers that had zero experience supporting devices once they shipped. They cant even manufacturer devices that dont become obsolete with new versions of android hahaha.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:33 |
|
talk show ghost posted:this happens literally every time apple makes a successful product. the ipod was popular because it was far and away better than the competition, which was largely CD players. nobody who cares about fm radio even owns a computer likewise, the iphone completely trounced the competition because it wasn't some horrid featurephone with a few half-hearted arcade games you're trying to imply that the tablet form factor is some sort of revolutionary advance over laptops, when actually all it does better is look like a prop from Star Trek. e: Amethyst posted:get a macbook air
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2011 23:51 |
|
HIERARCHY OF WEEDZ posted:if you can't come up with a use for the ipad then shut the gently caress up and don't buy one, the rest of us are perfectly content to leave people behind in the mobile revolution, and better those people be unimaginative luddites
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 00:06 |
|
Bad rear end Boutique posted:EIGHT HUNDRED loving DOLLARS it's like they think being $50 less than an ipad will excuse a poor user experience seriously, look at the official xoom site; it's got a dual-core processor but only 1GiB of ram, as if there's this giant underserved market of people just itching to encode video over 3g my guess: this is verizon's way of getting back at apple for not releasing a cdma ipad yet
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 02:32 |
|
either that, orhaveblue posted:tTo activate Wifi functionality on this device, a minimum of 1 month data subscription is required.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 02:33 |
|
The Evan posted:cdma ipad was announced a month ago dude then I don't know what verizon's thinking
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 02:39 |
|
Unexpected EOF posted:tl;dr: Galaxy Tab is a sluggish piece of poo poo even fresh out of the box. if their handling of the gps problem[1] is any indication, they will spend a year denying that accelerated graphics are useful, another year fixing it, and then two years trying to charge carriers for the fix. [1] samsung galaxies shipped with gps hardware but no software support; the recommended "resolution" is to enable nearby-wifi location
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 18:03 |
|
Kirk posted:yeah if there's one thing that annoys me about android above all else is that it's never, ever, ever a smooth experience, you will experience tons of hitches and annoying pauses no matter how many cores your phone has apple understands this, so all of their devices accelerate UI rendering. result: scrolling, paging, and animations are butter smooth vendors trying to push out a cheap knockoff don't care about the user experience, so they don't bother writing proper graphics drivers. result: cpu is used for rendering, causing pauses and lag whenever it can't keep up supposedly android 3.0 will require acceleration, but I'll believe it when I see it
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 18:53 |
|
qirex posted:No it's caused by a lack of good OS graphics architecture.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 19:26 |
|
qirex posted:so why are the iPhone and iPhone 3g [with no GPU] more responsive than 2011 Android handsets? you have to be more specific than "2011 android handset". there's a lot out there, ranging from awful freebie phones with vendor-written UI, to a real phone like the nexus s. the cheap ones have jerky UI because they don't have accelerated graphics and the vendor UI devs don't care about speed. I know the nexus s UI is equivalent to an iphone 4 in terms of performance; supposedly the htc ones are also, though I haven't personally tested them
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 19:37 |
|
Kirk posted:its no secret how you fake a responsive UI on poo poo hardware, it's just that android devs are either stupid or lazy - pick the most likely one but vendors would rather suck a cock on live tv than ship stock apps, so they all rewrite the UI to be "special" and in the process make it annoyingly slow
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 19:40 |
|
JumpinJackFlash posted:Android runs on a lovely virtual machine which has only recently gotten JIT compilation. the main benefit of adding jit to android is simple video games can be played longer between charges (real games are written in C)
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 19:47 |
|
Kirk posted:lol
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 20:26 |
|
Lilac posted:My human being friend tells me that this is all caused by the default internet browser, and downloading a new one will make the device fly and make ipad owners cry tears of envy
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 20:39 |
|
johndis posted:isnt the screen change lag actually just how it works on android? it like goes half way, pauses for a tiny bit, then snaps to the next screen I'm more willing to believe it's just samsung developer incompetence
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 21:47 |
|
johndis posted:
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 21:50 |
|
what is this posted:after rooting my android tablet, compiling a new kernel from a nightly build posted on an internet forum, and loading a different skin, it seemed more responsive
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 21:54 |
|
Lilac posted:I like stuff that is terrible out of the box and continues to be terrible forever
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 21:56 |
|
Don Lapre posted:its coming, but i dunno why youd want it, its a poo poo phone.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 21:59 |
|
Glumwheels posted:I love buying a product that I have to deconstruct and install new software in order to make it work halfway decent. you can buy an iphone-quality device for $200, or a cheap knockoff with bad drivers and weird UI for $50 stop acting so surprised that the aria you got for free for renewing your contract isn't as good as an iphone/nexus
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 22:14 |
|
Unexpected EOF posted:Most Android tablets cost just as much if not more than the iPad.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 22:21 |
|
KNEELB4ZOll posted:lolol yea the nexus is equivalent to an iphone
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 22:23 |
|
Unexpected EOF posted:For the sake of argument, let's not include poo poo you buy at a pharmacy or from CHINAEXPORTS on eBay.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 22:25 |
|
Ryouga Inverse posted:you know, as long as you don't care about things like "battery life" probably the #1 thing the iphone still has over android phones is that it's made out of metal and glass, not cheap plastic.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 23:33 |
|
johndis posted:so the galaxy is more money than an ipad, does pretty much what an ipad does (minus a shitload of good ios apps), and is made out of cheap plastic galaxy s is the phone; it's decent enough, equivalent to an iphone 4 galaxy tab is the tablet; it's awful Don Lapre posted:Every mainstream android phone at this point has a glass display, and plenty of them are made of metal.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 23:41 |
|
johndis posted:oh good god i thought you were saying you had the tab this whole time
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 23:43 |
|
Godzilla07 posted:nook color is the only good android tablet right now and that's because it's decent and cheap
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2011 23:56 |
|
Don Lapre posted:Nook color is easy as balls to root and get market on, and there is a aosp froyo build now thats being worked on and is usable. You write some files to a microSd card and turn the nook on with the card plugged in. Glumwheels posted:I love buying a product that I have to deconstruct and install new software in order to make it work halfway decent.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2011 00:01 |
|
Ryouga Inverse posted:and in either case it doesnt compete with the ipad/galaxy tab because both of those devices actually work for the purpose you buy them for when you pull them out of the box
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2011 00:29 |
|
Ryouga Inverse posted:i mean they arent even trying. its like all these companies read all the nerd blog responses to the ipad announcement/release and wrote down all the things that nerds complained that the ipad didnt have, then tried to add them to their own devices how many people do you know who are willing/able to replace the battery in an electronic device, but are too dumb to use a torx driver
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2011 00:51 |
|
Ryouga Inverse posted:well you see, we could have spent a lot of money trying to make our tablet's battery life come within striking distance of the ipad's which, when you think about it, is an even sillier complaint
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2011 01:01 |
|
Ryouga Inverse posted:look it's still a killer feature even if you only use it like once the entire time you have the device!!
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2011 02:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 05:31 |
|
echinopsis posted:but seroiusly normally not a problem, since who's ever more than 4 days away from a power outlet / battery-backed charger?
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2011 19:01 |