|
Ya know it does make a lot of sense that there would be pro-gadaffi supporters undercover as waiters to keep an eye on these supporters.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 17:58 |
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 21:43 |
|
Pedrophile posted:Ya know it does make a lot of sense that there would be pro-gadaffi supporters undercover as waiters to keep an eye on these supporters. They are probably members of the security forces keeping tabs on everyone.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 17:59 |
|
God it feels good to see regular people identify something wrong happening and actually attempting to intervene This could have been anything bystander effect incident and probably not received the same kind of coverage
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:00 |
|
Canadian Surf Club posted:God it feels good to see regular people identify something wrong happening and actually attempting to intervene Well, from the point of view of the Daffy supporters, they were acting after identifying something "wrong". It is amazing to see how different people have different moral compasses.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:42 |
|
Cartouche posted:Well, from the point of view of the Daffy supporters, they were acting after identifying something "wrong". It is amazing to see how different people have different moral compasses. Did one of the waitress actually pull out a knife on the victim? I didn't catch that, but then I didn't fully watch it all, too sad.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:51 |
|
Misarataquote:AJE Pro-democracy activist Ahmed Al Misrati in Misurata tells al Jazeera: quote:LibyanDictator CONFIRMED: Aggressive shelling on #Misrata port and red cross camps continues. #Libya #Feb17 quote:LibyanDictator Red cross camps include workers from Bangladesh and African countries, but most are from #Egypt. quote:Liberty4Libya #Misurata, huge explosions heard in the area surrounding #Misurata. quote:Liberty4Libya#Tripoli #Gadafi Militias R reported to have left city to joing assault on #Misurata, heavy bombardment of the city takes place now #Libya quote:Tripolitanian Reports that refugee camp in #Misrata is being hit with BM-21 Grad missile launcher - confirmation to come soon quote:Tripolitanian CONFIRMED: #Gaddafi has sent busloads of mercenaries+tanks+grad missile launchers to #Misrata, if they don't receive help, city will fall! quote:Tripolitanian CONFIRMED: Mercenaries arrived in plain clothes in city buses! Ajdabiya, Brega and beyond quote:ChangeInLibya Revolutionaries are combing through every house in Ajdabiya and Brega and fortifying positions to avoid any Gaddafi counter-attacks. quote:LibyanDictator Libyan #NTC announce that revolution fighters are on their way to Ras Lanuf. Allahu akbar. quote:bungdan also met 3 captured #libya "mercenaries." One shoeless, one aged, the other just terrified. 2 from chad -- shanghaied laborers, not fighters Zintan quote:Tripolitanian Coalition forces flying recon over #Zintan - guess they got the tweets
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:55 |
|
My guess is the push on Misurata is going to end in a fireball of NATO munitions, especially if they are shelling near Red Cross positions.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:57 |
|
It really sounds like Gaddafi is throwing everything at Misarata, either to destroy it or take if over. He must know that Sirte can be easily bypassed, and once the rebels reach Misarata he's done for. They really need coalition help there, it's a really desperate situation. I'm hoping those reports of loud explosions outside of Misarata are bombs being dropped on Gaddafi forces.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 18:58 |
|
AJE report bombs are falling out side of Misarata, hitting Pro-gov fighters.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:04 |
|
RunningOnEmpty posted:AJE report bombs are falling out side of Misarata, hitting Pro-gov fighters. Thank gently caress.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:05 |
|
After yesterday's Day of Dignity, Syria is protests and violence in Syria are continuing to rise. The escalation here is fairly clear, it seems inevitable that the Army will step in, although Bashar is supposedly going to address the nation sometime tonight. So far we've seen several signs the regime would like to avoid violence, including releasing political prisoners, however as violence continues it becomes questionable if that is really the policy, or if they can't control the local security organizations. There are several fault lines here to watch. 1. If Bashar pushes reform, will the military leadership, much of it minority Alawite, back him 2. If the military is ordered to support the security forces, will the Sunni majority rank and file obey the Alwaite leadership? Currently it looks like the security apparatus is failing to contain the protests, which is usually a sign for military intervention. While it is not certain sectarian divisions will rule the day, it is something to look out for. quote:AJE: 6:53pm
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:08 |
|
Things are coming to an end very soon in Yemen.http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/03/26/yemen.president.interview/?hpt=T2 posted:(CNN) -- Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh told an Arab television network that he is "ready to step down with respect and dignity, even within a two hours notice." edit: "The respect and dignity" bit means he wants amnesty I think.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:10 |
|
Brown Moses posted:It really sounds like Gaddafi is throwing everything at Misarata, either to destroy it or take if over. He must know that Sirte can be easily bypassed, and once the rebels reach Misarata he's done for. They really need coalition help there, it's a really desperate situation. I'm hoping those reports of loud explosions outside of Misarata are bombs being dropped on Gaddafi forces. With all the reports of Gaddafi forces shelling red cross camps in Misarata I doubt NATO forces will hesitate to gently caress up the entrenched forces there. Shelling red cross camps is a pretty blatant war crime and is one that I don't think any country that was maybe hesitant as part of enforcing the no fly zone will be hesitant about being there for much longer.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:12 |
|
Lareous posted:My guess is the push on Misurata is going to end in a fireball of NATO munitions, especially if they are shelling near Red Cross positions. Yup. There's absolutely no justification Gaddafi can use for shelling a Red Cross camp, no matter how hard he tries to make one up. Unless they're only slightly smarter than a bag of rocks, there is no on, no matter how opposed they are to military intervention, who would protest launching a few tomahawks at these guys.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:15 |
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:The Agence France-Presse? Or do you mean Chad's president? Chad's president. Derby was probably trained by Gaddafi's men, and his current position is owed to the colonel. Also sounding the AQIM missile alarm theory are anonymous members of Mali's security forces -- an even closer Gaddafi ally. It will be interesting to see how regimes financed and supported by Gaddafi will fare in the absence of his support. The Eritreans I work with, for instance, are hoping for destabilization of the Asmara government, but we'll see.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:16 |
|
This is fantasy, but it would be nice for Egypt to use the attacks on their citizens as pretext to send a heavily armed contingent and blow the gently caress out of Gaddafi's forces outside of Misrata. Egyptian army has both the know-how and the muscle to beat back pro-Government forces more effectively than NATO.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:19 |
|
cioxx posted:This is fantasy, but it would be nice for Egypt to use the attacks on their citizens as pretext to send a heavily armed contingent and blow the gently caress out of Gaddafi's forces outside of Misrata. Egyptian army has both the know-how and the muscle to beat back pro-Government forces more effectively than NATO. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't really get there in time. There's miles and miles of desert. One of the best parts of this to me is the slowly growing list of countries the remaining dictatorships are not. "We're not Tunisia" "We're not Egypt or Tunisia" "We're not Bahrain, Egypt, or Tunisia" "We're not Yemen, Bahrain, Egypt, or Tunisia" "We're not Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, Egypt, or Tunisia" "We're not Syr.. ahh gently caress it."
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:22 |
|
Brown Moses posted:It really sounds like Gaddafi is throwing everything at Misarata, either to destroy it or take if over. He must know that Sirte can be easily bypassed, and once the rebels reach Misarata he's done for. They really need coalition help there, it's a really desperate situation. I'm hoping those reports of loud explosions outside of Misarata are bombs being dropped on Gaddafi forces. That's how I've been looking at it. If Qaddafi kept the rebel advance out of Ras Lanuf, he could sue for peace at any time and keep the oil-producing regions while letting the rebels have Benghazi and the intentionally-undeveloped east. Even keeping a hold of Sirte, he can use that later to keep the east down. Now, if the rebels link up with Misurata, he can't declare a ceasefire and sue for peace with the rebels in his backyard. Also, it gives him some difficulties toward claims in the southern part of the country, especially with places like Zintan openly rebelling. Also, once Misurata is liberated, the rebels can easily move toward Zintan and other towns just south of Tripoli. From there, the rebels can then move north Zwara and Zawirya, encircling Tripoli and cutting off any chance of Qaddafi continuing to get a pay off from the wells and refineries in south Libya.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:26 |
|
I do wonder, why did Gaddafi risk sending his forces to hit Misarata? Such a large force, moved even in civilian vehicles like buses, would garner some attention, none of it polite. It's not like all those tanks and technicals would be hard to spot from above. To have any chance of taking the city, especially if you consider that the time-window for the attack and the time needed to allow the subjugation of an entire city - to the extent where men and materials could be safely hidden - was very, very low. It just seems pointless. A waste of anything he might have used to protect the capital. Desperation, perhaps? edit: pretty much answered above. edit edit: AJE just said rebels in Misarata report the shelling of the city has stopped. CQ fall down, go boom. RunningOnEmpty fucked around with this message at Mar 26, 2011 around 19:32 |
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:27 |
|
RunningOnEmpty posted:I do wonder, why did Gaddafi risk sending his forces to hit Misarata? Such a large force, moved even in civilian vehicles like buses, would garner some attention, none of it polite. It's not like all those tanks and technicals would be hard to spot from above. At this point there is no making out how he is controlling his men, it is just sheer insanity brimming out of those tinted sunglasses.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:40 |
|
farraday posted:"We're not Tunisia" Mohamed Bouazizi, Time Man of the Year, 2011. http://www.time.com/time/world/arti...2043557,00.html
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:43 |
|
farraday posted:Even if they wanted to, they couldn't really get there in time. There's miles and miles of desert. To be a selfish American for a second, I really do hope everything works out for the best in those countries so I can travel to them with my wife in the next 5-10 years. Europe, most of Asia, hell even most of South America we have places already picked out to go to, but outside of gong to Egypt we both have no interest to go anywhere else in the ME or Africa. Hopefully with all the dictators being overthrown there it will open up the countries for people that want to visit places that are not only awesome, but also not corrupt or potentially dangerous.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:51 |
|
Warcabbit posted:Mohamed Bouazizi, Time Man of the Year, 2011. Knowing TIME it'll probably go to Twitter founder or Charlie Sheen. The Person of the Year thing has lost whatever credibility it had.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:52 |
|
Warcabbit posted:Mohamed Bouazizi, Time Man of the Year, 2011. Silly warcabbit, Mohammed Bouazizi wasn't an American! Clearly it should go to Jack Dorsey for inventing twitter which created these revolutions and demonstrates the continuing theme of American technological might helping oppressed people achieve fre... We're less than three months in 10 2011, but you're right that it's fairly hard to imagine a better candidate could come around.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:54 |
|
Do we have any confirmation about Gaddafi's postions outside of Misrata getting bombed to poo poo? The response seems a bit too quick for the NATO Coalition.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:56 |
|
Nonsense posted:Did one of the waitress actually pull out a knife on the victim? I didn't catch that, but then I didn't fully watch it all, too sad. IIRC one of the waitress staff was the one who put the bag over her head.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 19:58 |
|
Ace Oliveira posted:Do we have any confirmation about Gaddafi's postions outside of Misrata getting bombed to poo poo? The response seems a bit too quick for the NATO Coalition. News is slow in a warzone, there's a good chance they already knew about it.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:10 |
|
Ace Oliveira posted:Do we have any confirmation about Gaddafi's postions outside of Misrata getting bombed to poo poo? The response seems a bit too quick for the NATO Coalition. The siege of Misrata has been going on for some time.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:11 |
|
farraday posted:Silly warcabbit, Mohammed Bouazizi wasn't an American! The position has gone to groups of people before though, so it would be nice if it went to guys like Ghoneim and Bouazizi. Alternatively, they can go in the complete other direction and give the position to Gaddafi (both Hitler and Stalin have been awarded the position) since it still fits in the whole "influential person" category. In any case, they already hit the bottom of the barrel when they put a mirror on the cover and named "you" the person of the year.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:14 |
|
Warcabbit posted:Mohamed Bouazizi, Time Man of the Year, 2011. Dude is going to have so many elementary schools and streets named after him.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:17 |
|
Narmi posted:The position has gone to groups of people before though, so it would be nice if it went to guys like Ghoneim and Bouazizi. Alternatively, they can go in the complete other direction and give the position to Gaddafi (both Hitler and Stalin have been awarded the position) since it still fits in the whole "influential person" category. Or they could just declare "Arab protesters Protester being interviewed on AJE saying that the police are firing on protesters in Latakia, with 20 people killed so far. Casualty figures are, of course, unconfirmable. Looking ahead, now that it appears protests are kicking off in a major way in Syria, and regardless of what else happens, what other countries in the region are susceptible?
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:24 |
|
farraday posted:Looking ahead, now that it appears protests are kicking off in a major way in Syria, and regardless of what else happens, what other countries in the region are susceptible? Considering said protests have already happened in countries where they were previously thought to have been impossible or next to impossible, it almost seems like they could happen in any Middle Eastern country. Saudi Arabia seems least likely, but I even there I wouldn't put money on them not happening.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:27 |
|
evilweasel posted:The siege of Misrata has been going on for some time. I don't mean the Gaddafi troops in general. I mean the ones that have just been sent to the area, the ones who are bombing the Red Cross camps. Hell, the siege has been lifted a few times already, mostly when Gaddafi's forces outside the city have been bombed. It's just that Gadddafi keeps sending more troops to replace them afterwards. By now, he's just sending more of his men into certain death.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:30 |
|
Narmi posted:The position has gone to groups of people before though, so it would be nice if it went to guys like Ghoneim and Bouazizi. Alternatively, they can go in the complete other direction and give the position to Gadaffi (both Hitler and Stalin have been awarded the position) since it still fits in the whole "influential person" category. Uh, I wouldn't really call that going in the 'other' direction. Hitler was POTY well before the start of WW2 when his goal to unite German-speakers through small territorial acquisitions was very much sympathized with in the West, while Stalin was probably put in the second time for the only good thing (the defence of the Soviet Union) he ever did in his life. I'm not saying that Time never puts monsters on it's cover, but they don't intentionally put universally reviled individuals on their covers, only people who are universally controversial and polarizing. Either way, I'm quite happy to
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:39 |
|
Contraction mapping posted:I'm not saying that Time never puts monsters on it's cover, but they don't intentionally put universally reviled individuals on their covers, only people who are universally controversial and polarizing. The big problem is that Time stopped doing this following the readers' reaction to Khomeini in 1979, because most people at the time and now believed that Time's Person of the Year is an endorsement instead of the most newsworthy person. For instance, Time was going to name Osama bin Laden as POTY in 2001, but defaulted to the safe choice of Giuliani because of the same reason, even though bin Laden was more newsworthy and Giuliani wouldn't be in the position of "America's Mayor" without bin Laden's hand in 9/11.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 20:47 |
|
King Dopplepopolos posted:Considering said protests have already happened in countries where they were previously thought to have been impossible or next to impossible, it almost seems like they could happen in any Middle Eastern country. Saudi Arabia seems least likely, but I even there I wouldn't put money on them not happening. Look at it a different way. The list of countries with major convulsions is also mostly a list of single party dictatorships, while the various shades of absolute monarchy around the region have been holding on. What single party dictatorships remain? Interesting blog post on The Arabist about the context for US military intervention. http://www.arabist.net/blog/2011/3/...-went-with.html farraday fucked around with this message at Mar 26, 2011 around 21:09 |
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 21:01 |
|
farraday posted:Or they could just declare "Arab protesters I considered that, but I hope they go with someone instead of a group of people. I mean, the Arab protesters are really brave and influential in their own way, but it's just so generic when the award is called "Person of the Year" (e:though a small group is also okay when it's given to people like whistleblowers or astronauts or scientists since you can actually put their names on the award). Contraction mapping posted:Uh, I wouldn't really call that going in the 'other' direction. Hitler was POTY well before the start of WW2 when his goal to unite German-speakers through small territorial acquisitions was very much sympathized with in the West, while Stalin was probably put in the second time for the only good thing (the defence of the Soviet Union) he ever did in his life. I'm not saying that Time never puts monsters on it's cover, but they don't intentionally put universally reviled individuals on their covers, only people who are universally controversial and polarizing. Not exactly how long you mean by "well before the start of WW2" exactly, but Hitler was chosen in 1938, less than a year before WWII started, and after he began his antagonistic policies towards the west (unless you mean the US specifically, but even then I dončt think they were too keen on his power grabs) and his desire to start a war of conquest became apparent. I mean, it's possible they chose him for different reasons before they knew all that, but by the time he was put on the cover they had to have known what kind of guy he was. And everybody hated Stalin, who was chosen the year after, in 1939 (the same year that the Soviets invaded Poland with the Germans AND signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler). The invasion of the USSR didn't begin till 1941, so you can't say that he was chosen two years in advance for that while he made peace with the Nazis. With WWII breaking out he became a major player, in addition to being extremely influential beforehand, which is probably why he was chosen. Narmi fucked around with this message at Mar 26, 2011 around 21:40 |
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 21:27 |
|
Some recent Tweets: East quote:iyad_elbaghdadi Reports that revolutionaries have progressed till Bishr and Ugailah. quote:iyad_elbaghdadi To give an idea how hastily Gaddafi troops retreated: Several Grad launchers taken by revolutionaries in Ajdabia & Brega. quote:FreeLibyan87 Freedom Fighters Colonel through AJA saying that the are arranging their actions with the coalition forces Misarata quote:iyad_elbaghdadi Night time air strikes have resumed. Confirmed hits on Gaddafi forces in Misurata. quote:WefaqLibya Gaddafi forces attack parts of Misurata, some Egyptionis are dead among other Foreign citizens. quote:feb17libya Reuters: French warplanes destroy 5 Libyan planes & 2 helicopters on ground in Misrata airport http://t.co/Zi2J1V5 quote:LibyanDictator Contact confirms that an Aljazeera team reached #Misrata and were there for 3 days. Nothing's been aired yet..
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 21:32 |
|
farraday posted:
That is in my opinion, a great and logical analysis of the West's intervention. But once again, reading the comments to it will kill many brain cells.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 21:36 |
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 21:43 |
|
Ballz posted:That is in my opinion, a great and logical analysis of the West's intervention. But once again, reading the comments to it will kill many brain cells. You ain't lyin': comments posted:What a bunch of wanking to justify sure killing by the U.S. because of hypothetical killing by Gaddafi. Some of the pro-Ghadaffi stuff reminds me of that one Spanish guy who's a tremendous fan of North Korea and always trying to organise Westerners to support the Juche ideal, disprove all the vicious rumors about how terrible North Korea is, etc.
|
| # ? Mar 26, 2011 21:44 |























